December 2, 2015
By Larry Klayman
Twenty-two years ago, I conceived of and founded Judicial Watch, as I had labored in the legal system for 17 years and seen its gradual but steady ethical decline: my alma mater, the U.S. Department of Justice prosecuting those on the wrong side of the political fence and protecting those on the right side; judges failing to enforce the rule of law, or favoring those who could get them a higher appointment or an under the table favor or gratuity; and, lawyers whose ethics more closely resembled used car salesmen or insurance adjusters, rather than officers of the court in a formerly noble profession.
But the situation in 1994 – when I filed Judicial Watch's articles of incorporation and began my quest to take on judges, lawyers and President Bill and first lady Hillary Clinton and their 40-plus scandals over the next eight years and beyond (now with my new group, Freedom Watch) – pales in comparison to the rank dishonesty and corruption that permeates the legal system and its judiciary today.
Sure, if as a lawyer one has the opportunity to represent private interests of equal political, economic or social weight, there is a chance that a court or jury will rule correctly and in a just and righteous way. But if a legal revolutionary, such as myself, files suit against a politically, economically or socially connected person or entity, such as the president or other high official or corporate or labor union executive, the president who nominated the judge will usually dictate the ultimate result. Regrettably, I can predict with near exact certainty, after decades of toiling in the increasing ethical swamp of our judicial system, what the result will be depending on the judge's connections, extra-judicial biases, inclinations and likely professional aspirations. Let me give you four examples, just for starters.
First, there are the cases I (and others) brought challenging the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to run for and be elected president of the United States. Despite the strong election laws in Florida, my home state, where any taxpayer or voter can challenge a candidate on the basis of fraud or misconduct, the courts there, in three successive cases going all the way to the Florida Supreme Court, dismissed all challenges without nary writing a coherent word explaining why. A similar result occurred in Alabama, although the chief judge there, Roy Moore, had the integrity to write a dissenting opinion agreeing with me. The hard fact: No judge in this country, other than Moore, would make such a ruling against an African-American president like Obama, who has spent his career, a la Al Sharpton playing and using the race card to destroy anyone of a different color who gets in his way. While judges are supposed to adjudicate cases and controversies regardless of political, economic and social pressures, it is revolting at best that they have bent over to this despot and his black and white leftist racist allies and apologists in the media. The result: The country has been sold out to foreign and Muslim interests, including the terrorists Obama refuses to even call Islamic, lest he offend his own bloodline.
Now in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential elections, ironically, two white Republican candidates also do not technically qualify as natural-born citizens eligible to be president. It will be interesting to watch what mostly politically compromised and conflicted judges now "find in their legal hearts" to write should legitimate challenges be filed with regard to the candidacies of Sens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, who were not born in this country to two citizen parents at the time – the uncontroverted Supreme Court precedent that applies (Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875). The Founding Fathers clearly inserted this requirement into the Constitution to avoid a president being too close to foreign influences – a tragedy if not a disaster we have seen played out and foisted upon us by one President Barack Hussein Obama, our first and hopefully only "Muslim president," born to a Muslim father, educated in Islamic schools in Indonesia, and likely birthed in Kenya and not Hawaii. (While I personally really like and admire Ted Cruz as a true patriot and would be happy to see him as president, he sadly does not qualify.)
Second, there is the recent experience with my clients' and my cases against the National Security Agency. While one of the few courageous judges in the nation along with federal judge Royce C. Lamberth of the same D.C. federal court, the Honorable Richard J. Leon, enjoined this runaway and corrupted spy agency, now run by Obama and the Democrat and Republican establishments in Congress, from conducting mass surveillance on the entire citizenry without probable cause (which Leon found was an almost-Orwellian violation of the Fourth Amendment), politicized judges on the D.C. federal appeals court quickly stayed the injunction under obvious pressure from this establishment. These cases will continue to a jury trial, but the lesson for now is clear. Judges, such as the primarily Obama and Clinton appointees on the D.C. appeals court, will bend over to the establishment. This establishment, generally speaking, got them their appointments and can butter their bread in the future. We the People come a distant second to these judges' own interests.
Third, there is the myriad of federal judges, mostly Clinton and Obama appointees, now overseeing the various cases challenging Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's personal email obstruction of justice in Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. Despite a few cosmetic and inconsequential rulings by Judge Emmet Sullivan, a Clinton appointee, these cases are being delayed by these judges to get Mrs. Clinton past the 2016 primary and general elections. Her so-called personal email would undoubtedly show, if produced, that the "wicked witch of the left" sold influence – that is, took bribes – for her, her husband's and daughter's sham money-laundering foundation while she was secretary of state. But the Clinton cases will never see the light of day thanks to these politicized judges. And, in the one case that challenged Hillary's bribery scam directly, the one I filed in Palm Beach, Florida, federal court, the Clinton-appointed judge couldn't wait to dismiss it before even hearing any evidence. The case is now on appeal to the federal appeals court in Atlanta.
Fourth, there is my case against OPEC, the Arab oil producers who fix prices and divide markets to manipulate the price of gasoline in clear violation of our antitrust laws. The case, before a Republican appointee of former President George W. Bush, has languished in the court for now almost four years without the judge even permitting us to effect service of process of the complaint against this Saudi-dominated oil cartel. The likely reason: Both the Democrat and Republican establishments are in bed with OPEC and its major oil producer, Saudi Arabia, which finds clever ways to line the pockets of our politicians with favors and other perks. Just ask President George W. Bush who made it a point of immediately jetting members of the Saudi Royal family out of the United States to avoid them being questioned in the days after the Sept. 11 attacks. Seventeen of the 19 hijackers were Saudis. And, is it no coincidence that W's dad, President George H.W. Bush, was then a member of the Carlyle Group, which had invested and held more than a billion dollars for the bin Laden family?
In sum, these are just a few examples of how our judges have largely been bought and sold by the political, economic and social establishments. At some point, the roof is going to blow off of our legal system and We the People, just as we did in 1776, will find no recourse other than to take matters into our own hands. This Thanksgiving Day weekend, we can at least be thankful that the citizenry will not stay silent for long. The die is cast. It's only a matter of time.
© Larry Klayman
We need to get to the bottom of who B. Obama really is, and quickly. We need to know if he in fact went to school in the U.S as a foreign student. If he did, he can be removed immediately and everything he has signed is null and void. America it's time to speak up and do something before this despicable man does something very dangerous to this nation.
What banker would want their puppet exposed?
A really great and informative article.
Larry will be called one of the greats of our time.
Well for a short amount of time I had some hopes that the State of Texas might be the place to start forming and establishing a plan to fight back. But today I heard (read) that Texas has caved in and quit their Federal law suit trying to block the Obama invasion of Syrians into the state.
In the case of the Oregon ranchers who have been sentenced to five years in prison as "terrorists" for starting a back-fire that stopped a run-away range fire, It appears there will be no help or hope of preventing this. The BLM and the Wild life administration (and Senator Harry Reid) have found a new tactic to remove ranchers and farmers from their lands. Rest assured they will not stop with the Hammonds and the Bundy's. There are already a dozen more on the books of the BLM.
This article confirms what we have all been saying for at least six years.
It brings me back to one of my own experiences. The Town where we lived wanted our property, and they were hell-bent on getting it. The head of the board of select-men told me (to my face) that there was only three ways to fight them, Money - lawyers- and guns. He flinched a little when I told him I didn't have any money, the lawyer I had in that meeting room was the judge himself, and if he really wanted to push it further I already had my guns loaded and ready.
A week later he died from a brain aneurysm while standing at the podium. (true story BTW).
We won that case after that.
Does anyone really think that the impostor in the WH will step down when the time comes? If he can be appointed to the POTUS (notice I did not say elected), he can stay seated indefinitely. This country was taken in a quiet coup when an ex-CIA director TOOK office, and shortly after announced the New World Order. We haven't elected a president since. Don't get me started on the meaning and place, in this charade, of the World Trade Center bombing #1 and the eventual destruction of same on 9/11. Who better to serve the governments of the world than Islamic citizenry? They thrive on being submissive. They will kill any resistors, their government, religion, ideology, financial system, military, etc. are all one and the same. One world government, religion, etc. rolled into a neat little package. Think about it. George the 1st and 2nd are friends with the Bin Laden's....Muslim. The Clintons were buddy, buddy with Arafat....Muslim. Obama, well....need I say more? The world is in a religious war, make no mistake, and the world leaders seem to be in it to advance the Muslim agenda. Germany and Sweden are seeing some of the worse of it and STILL the government caters to Islam. We have been and will continue to do the same. It will escalate and if We the People do not revolt and take the country back from the criminal element running it, the great experiment of the United States of America will fall by the wayside of history.
Ya know it's not a political war it's a spiritual war at this point. In the bible, revelations, this is all predicted. Babylon and on an on.. The government is appointed by satan Allah. It's all about the new world order.. It's not about gun control, It's about total control.
I think that's what everyone wonders. I think every state should organize in their capitals. That way people would be closer to home, obligations, jobs, children. People could protest when they could while others couldn't and the other way around. Instead of traveling all the way to D.C. A lot of people can't go to D.C. so more would be able to join closer to home in their capitals. Remember the gun rights rallies at all the states capitals ? It was organized in short notice but many showed up.