by Ulsterman on July 19, 2012 with 42 Comments in News
For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”. What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”. For those who have followed these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be. Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.

PART ONE:
UM: Can we begin?
WSI: (Broad smile) Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.
UM: I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better. Out of the woods?
WSI: No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will. But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet! (laughs)
UM: Why did you decide to invite him here? I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?
WSI: Certainly. I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person. I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.
UM: How long have you known each other?
WSI: (Looks over at MI) That would be…nearly twenty years? Perhaps a bit more?
MI: Twenty three years.
WSI: That long? Really?
MI: Just over twenty-three years. That’s correct.
UM: Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?
MI: No.
WSI: I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago. Shortly after the election…in 2008. Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made. That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake. Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.
UM: Can you expand on that? Those concerns. What were they?
WSI: You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path. A number of times.
UM: I’d like to hear it from him. If that’s ok. Their perspective. Unfiltered. Like you just said you wanted.
(Military Insider looks at WSI)
WSI: If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine. But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was. I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.
UM: We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right? So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then. After 2008. Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.
MI: There were.
UM: Concerns? Before 2008? About Obama?
MI: Yes.
UM: What were they?
MI: The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military. That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us. At least those of us not put in place by the communists. The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.
UM: Did you just say communists? In the U.S. military?
MI: Yes.
UM: Please – can you please explain that.
MI: Communists. Communist supporters. Sympathizers. Or socialists. Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term. Big government…One World…that whole concept. It’s real. As real these chairs. That wall. The air in your lungs.

UM: Agenda 21? That conspiracy theory? And the United States military?
MI: Yes – not a conspiracy. It’s real. It exists. And it’s happening right now.
UM: Agenda 21 is non-binding.
MI: That is…not accurate.
UM: No – it’s a non-binding agreement. It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.
MI: No sir. You are wrong. Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.
UM: What?
MI: Non-binding. Voluntary.
UM: But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.
MI: It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.
UM: What?
MI: That document was a blueprint. Have you actually read it?
UM: Not…not all of it. No.
MI: Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?
UM: I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.
MI: That’s not what I said.
UM: You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.
MI: No.
UM: Ok…you explain to me what you just said. About the communists, the globalists…all of that. What did you say?
MI: You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama? Before the 2008 election.
UM: Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists. That’s what you said. Right?
MI: Yes.
UM: So – what’s the problem?
MI: What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military. You said that. Not me.
UM: What’s the difference?
MI: Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military. They are not running the U.S. military. That is a distinction of epic proportions. You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.
WSI: And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time. It’s been happening right under our noses.
UM: It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?
MI: Incorrect.
UM: What?
MI: Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era. It was developed long before that. In fact, it culminated under President Bush. HW.
WSI: But it goes back much farther than that. I only learned of this more recently myself.
MI: Yes sir – much farther. Decades of planning. A multiple series of five year plans.
UM: Five year plans?
WSI: Just like Stalin. A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments. Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.
MI: Yes sir. Just like that.
UM: So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?
MI: You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.
UM: Fair enough – I apologize for that.
MI: Accepted.
WSI: He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were. Please – continue.
MI: Yes sir.
(Pause)
Decades ago. The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s. The birth of the modern environmental movement. Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.
Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications. These people are not conspiracy nuts. These people are patriots who understand the threat. The country – the United States, is under siege. It has been going on for a long time. Decades of planning. And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage. Right now. It’s happening now.
WSI: And you are absolutely convinced of that? It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal? Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time? Fully commenced? Right?
MI: Yes sir.
UM: How? (Pause) The…implementation? How does that work. By force? Using our own military against us?
MI: No. That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women. They signed up. They took an oath. And they are doing their job. Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement. Not all. Not most. But some.
UM: But some of these inside the military – they have influence?
MI: Yes. Appointed to positions of authority. By this administration.
UM: The Secretary of State? Panetta? I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?

MI: He acted outside his direct authority. That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United States.
UM: What do you mean?
MI: (Looks toward WSI)
UM: (Repeats question) What do you mean?
WSI: What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to. The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-. It means nothing to me. Nothing.
UM: So you don’t trust him?
WSI: No – I do not. I’ve never trusted any of them.
UM: Who?
WSI: Politicians. That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election. I find them all distasteful to some degree. Even the best of them.
UM: But you’re voting this time – in 2012.
WSI: That’s correct. While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.
UM: And what’s that?
WSI: Dangerous.
UM: So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…
WSI: Crazy?
UM: Yeah – crazy.
WSI: That’s how it’s intended. Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work. Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.
These Obama people are quite good at that.
UM: So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?
MI: Correct.
UM: Republicans have gone along with it too?
MI: Correct. Let me clarify that a bit. If that’s ok?
UM: Please do.
MI: The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party. They have been the ones to push this agenda – THE AGENDA…for the past several decades. There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic to the superficial aspects of the plan.
(Long pause)
UM: You lost me. I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that. What do you mean by the superficial aspects of the plan? The…that part of it that attracts some Republicans?
WSI: If I may?
MI: Yes sir.
WSI: This is where the big money comes into play. Take for example, General Electric. A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this globalization movement. Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes part of the implementation plan. Global cooling becomes global warming becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading from the very same script.
And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts. They may do so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan. They become that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.
UM: So what’s the purpose of all of it? The plan? Globalization? Why? What’s the end goal?
WSI: First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and irreversible transformation of the United States. If that is achieved – as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you live, and how and when you are to die. There is a group who believes they will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through life on their own. They want to be told what to do. What to think. How to live.
UM: (turning to MI) Do you agree with that – it’s really that far-reaching? That’s where President Obama wants to take America? Take the world?
MI: Yes. I know it.
UM: How?
MI: (Looks to WSI)
WSI: Go ahead.
MI: Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information pertaining to an election contingency plan. For 2012. After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama. That document’s title was…(pauses)
WSI: He can be trusted – I give you my word. Please proceed.
MI: That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”. It was unofficial – but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration. We confirmed that.
UM: What channels? Who are you talking about?
MI: We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein. Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett. Preparations for implementation are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.
UM: Leo Gerard? The union leader? How would he play a part in this?

WSI: Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with similar forces that would be in play here in the United States. You did some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in Brazil. It was a coup. An overthrow of government. A joint effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement helped facilitate the final push.
Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the United States.
What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.
That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled, is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.
PART TWO OF THIS INTERVIEW COMING SOON.
Permalink Reply by ARNOLD CARL TAPP on July 20, 2012 at 1:35am >>> THIS INFORMATION SCARES THE HELL OUT OF ME , ESPECIALLY FOR AMERICA .
THE MOVE FOR A ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT , AND ALL THAT ENTAILS IS PROPHESIED IN THE BIBLE ,
BUT IT WILL BE A SAD DAY WHEN IT HAPPENS .
Arnold , This should scare the hell out of everybody . A friend of mine wrote and has published a book on Agenda 21, Sustainable Development and recently put it on the book shelves . Her name is Rene' Halliday and is one of the few experts that know the U.N. and this agenda . She is dogged in her quest to let the folks know how it is our most dangerous issue today , and has been . This is just the tip of the iceberg and the way for World Governance to kill off every farm , every house and put us in 13 story buildings to be managed . We will have no rights , none !
She is a valuable asset to our County Assembly . One of the few ways to combat this is County , not state or states because of your County Sheriffs . This agenda can only work if the people want it and they make it sound very good but it is an NGO and it is only the Sheriff that can put an end to it . We have approximately 3000 Counties and that is a lot of power if only they (the People and Sheriffs) knew it .
Part 2 may be better because they don't reveal anywhere close to what this agenda is !
Permalink Reply by Johnny Smith on July 20, 2012 at 5:48am I am glad to say that at least some in Alabama have awakened to this threat. Our state legislature recently passed a law that forbids any city, county, municipal, or state agency to enact any law or regulation that would lead to compliance with AGENDA 21. It may turn out to be something to lull our citizens into a false sense of security, but at least it shows that the agenda is actually out there and it's real, as now it has been accepted to be so by our law makers. Sadly I must admit that I have not had the time to study the new law closely enough to find if it has any teeth or will actually accomplish anything to prevent agenda 21 from implementation, future project.
Permalink Reply by Norma Ellen (Auge) Dowling on July 20, 2012 at 5:59am
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on July 20, 2012 at 7:08am Norma, I hate to bust your bubble, but talking to our government as it now stands, gets us NO WHERE... I can't get my Congressmen and Women to respond and do the right thing. They keep on giving Lip Service in Political Correctness or as usual, NO SERVICE. I actually believe that this government (Both Houses of Congress) have decided they are not going to do "One DAMN THING for "We the People" who put their asses into the seats they occupy. I think they have decided n the their minds, they want the UN Agenda at all cost.
I personally believe, if we don't rise up, take the fight (Armed to Washington) en-mass and this is where the planning comes into play, there has to be some way to get "ARMED PATRIOTS" INTO WASHINGTON UNDER COVER, so when those bastards wake up one morning, they wake to 10 to 30 million pissed off, Patriots, then we will see the TRUE METTLE of our government. We have to get the jump on them (Our Government) and be prepared and resolute to fire the first shots, because I think this is the ONLY WAY left for "We the People".
I will Live free, until the day, I get killed or die, but never in Slavery....May God and his son, Jesus Christ make the suffering short.
Permalink Reply by Johnny Smith on July 20, 2012 at 8:30am Clois, I am of the opinion that we will accomplish little unless we start within our states to resolve these issues. There are few choices left us for true representatives that will stand up for us in DC and even fewer who will actually abide by the constitution. Where will we find the people to do that unless we bring them up through our state governments?
To address the subject of getting armed patriots into DC, it will never happen secretly, and if it did and was not completely successful, what we deem to be patriots would be successfully painted as domestic terrorist by the liberal left media. It would be pictured as a crowd of extremist that went completely crazy and attacked our beloved institution of government, hell bent on taking over and reverting the U.S. to slavery days and worse. Think about how every group that has acted in this way has ever been portrayed to the public and the public (sleeping public) have bought it without question. What were the real reasons behind these actions, who knows for sure? It may come to an armed revolution and I will join if it does, as long as there is a solid plan in place. I will not join in creating anarchy.
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on July 20, 2012 at 12:12pm Johnny, I don't like it either, I would rather not make the first shot, but we had better be making some kind of Battle Plan for the contingencies "Martial Law" and "No Election or Fraudulent election". I don't have the stomach for more of this Destruction of the United States, the Constitution and the Rule of Law. The progressives in this country have brainwashed all the politicians and future leaders into believing their vision (the liberals) is the only vision, the UN Vision. Frankly if we can't get 10 to 30 million into DC, then we mass at the county line and take it from there. The media, I could care less about, they are complicit along with the current Government. Texas Government is not in session, until 2013 and Governor Perry does not want to call the Legislature into Emergency Session, so there is NO BUSINESS going on in TEXAS. Local government at City and County is worthless, they have their own agendas going....So we are going "Nowhere" and FAST....
Permalink Reply by Johnny Smith on July 20, 2012 at 12:39pm You nailed it Clois. We need to be formulating, not only a battle plan, but an after action plan as well. Imagine if we undertook the battle as we describe and won, then we stood around and looked at each other and asked now what... We had better plan for all phases or we lose from the start. A void space will be filled quickly and we want to control who those people will be. Sure there will be unaccounted for contingencies and everything will not go according to any plan we may make, but that is no reason to go ahead with none in place.
My reference was not necessarily referring to your present state government. What I meant was that we need to elect good people at the city, county, and state levels. If there are none available then make them. Do the same as the other side and start training them NOW. Yes I know it will take years to get this done in some cases but remember how long we have ignored the problem and let it finally get to this. These problems did not arise over the last few years, it has taken them decades to get us to this point. Our process will not take nearly as long because we are in the right and as soon as the American public can be awakened enough we will have much more support than the socialist/communist side has ever had here,
As you, I could care less about what the media thinks and that is not the problem. Many in this country still listen to the MSM and believe what they say, whatever they say. If we were to begin a revolution and not win quickly the MSM would turn those people against us. If that happened there would be little trust from them for any new government we could establish afterward, ever. It would cause major fear, just a we are experiencing now, that the government was going to jail or kill them etc..
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on July 21, 2012 at 2:39am Here is just one example of the Political Correct Lip Service, I get from one of my congressmen:
Dear Clois Beckwith,
Thank you for contacting my offices. Your correspondence has been received, and we will respond to you as quickly as possible. A copy of your message is attached below for your records.
If you need immediate assistance regarding an urgent problem you are experiencing with the federal government, visit the "Help With Federal Agencies" section of the website for details on how to proceed so that your difficulties are brought to my attention as soon as possible.
If you are seeking information or services from my offices that are NOT related to my Legislative duties, please visit my "Services For Texans" section for more information.
Warmest Regards,
U.S. Senator John Cornyn
---------------------------------------------------
Name/Email:
Clois Beckwith (cherock1254@gmail.com)
Your Message:
Dear ___John Cornyn____: It has recently come to light that the SOE Corporation based in Tampa, FL was purchased by the Spanish online voting company SKYTL. SOE was the largest vote processing corporation in the United States; recording, counting and reporting the votes in 26 American States. This encompasses 900 total jurisdictions across the nation. SKYTL is based in Spain, which means the votes in the 2012 Presidential election will now be counted in a foreign country. Simply stated, our votes will now be routed to a centralized, privately held server in Barcelona, Spain where the opportunity exists to alter the outcome of the election in Barack Obama's favor. The CEO of SKYTL, Pere Valles, is a known Socialist who resided in Illinois during Barack Obama's tenure as a United States Senator and donated heavily to his 2008 election campaign. Our military overseas will again be disenfranchised as they will be voting online and SKYTL will control the method of voting. The stage has been set for unimaginable voter fraud as there will be no paper ballots and, thus, no way for the voting public to authenticate who actually cast the votes or the count. We, the citizens of Texas, demand that you as our United States elected official representing the State of TEXAS stand up and not only loudly denounce this fraud being perpetrated on the American people, but effectively stop it. Our future and the future of our Country hangs in the balance. Remember Obama's statement to Medvedev, "After my election". Apparently he is supremely confidant everything is firmly in place to make that a reality. Sincerely, Clois R. Beckwith, Jr. ______________________________
As you can see they don't care and why calling or emailing them is a waste of time we have been sold out by everyone in the government and we can't count on them to do anything we the people want.
Permalink Reply by Marvin Green on July 21, 2012 at 2:31pm Did you reply thanking him for his nonanswer? But they're all alike. They will never give you a straight answer. Having said that, I did receive an answer I sent to Senator Tester regarding the WWII vet who is being ripped off in Montana or Wyoming. His answer stated very diplomatically that the vet is being helped and they are keeping an eye on the dirt bags.
Permalink Reply by Clois Beckwith on July 21, 2012 at 7:09pm Marvin, why would I want to respond to a "NON-ANSWER" about issues that they have all the power to resolve? They could nip this in the bud, if they had any backbone at all, but they have none. IT IS A SHAME WE CAN'T SHUTOFF THEIR PAYCHECK FOR NOT DOING THE JOB WE HIRED THEM TO DO...Take all their pay for the last 3.5 years and then give them the "PINK SLIP" for not doing anything but sitting on their butts collecting my hard-earned TAX MONEY....Truely pathetic.....
This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.
A federal appeals court in Washington DC Tuesday affirmed that the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) acted properly in refusing to disclose 52 post-mortem images of al Qaeda Osama bin Laden as the images were properly classified as Top Secret.
The case was brought against the CIA and the US Department of Defense (DOD) by Judicial Watch, a non-partisan organization that aims to promote transparency, accountability, and integrity within the legal and political spheres, and which operates under the motto: “Because [...]
The US government released its latest report on religious freedom in Spain.
Prepared by the US State Department, the report is an annual survey of how religious tolerance and freedoms fare in different nations across the world.
“The [Spanish] Constitution and other laws and policies protect religious freedom. However, some local government policies restrict the religious freedom of minority religious groups, including Muslims,” states the document released in Washington on Monday.
It cites instances in some cities where Muslim groups charge that special [...]
A Saudi court sentenced two Asian housemaids to 10 years in jail and ordered their lashed 1,000 times each after they were found guilty of indulging in sorcery at their employers’ houses in the Gulf Kingdom, a newspaper reported on Monday.
Their Saudi employers reported the two maids to the Gulf country’s feared religious police, saying they had discovered that their families had been harmed because of sorcery practiced by the maids against them.
Members of the Commission for the Promotion of [...]

HOW TO JOIN YOUR STATE GROUP
1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.
Follow the Prompts
How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......
© 2013 Created by Twana Blevins.
Powered by