"BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY" - The Threat To America Is Real

[Harry Riley]

MILITARY INSIDER: President Obama – “By Any Means Necessary”

 

 

by Ulsterman on July 19, 2012 with 42 Comments in News

For the first time in over two years of ongoing interviews, a powerful and highly influential Wall Street insider allows for direct interview participation of a figure we will simply call “Military Insider”.  What follows is the first of a two part interview with both of these individuals who are warning of an impending manufactured crisis within the United States by powers desperate to secure a second term for “the man calling himself Obama”.  For those who have followed  these insider interviews from the beginning – you know just how accurate they have proven to be.  Please remind yourself of that as you read this latest discussion.

PART ONE:

 

UM:  Can we begin?

WSI:  (Broad smile)  Yes – and might I just say this before we do…it is so very nice to see you again in person.

UM:  I’m just as glad to see you looking so much better.  Out of the woods?

WSI:  No-no…at my age one is always “in the woods” if you will.  But at this point, I’m not helping to fertilize the trees just yet!  (laughs)

Read more in News

« “Food Poisoning”

UM:  Why did you decide to invite him here?  I’m glad – honored, to have them here, but can you explain…briefly explain why you’ve done this?

WSI:  Certainly.  I invited…I guess that term is sufficient…I invited them here for no other reason than to have what they know and what their experience tells them – I wanted that perspective to now be included in this from the first person.  I…we…-name deleted- and I decided it would be best, when possible, to have this information come to you without the filter of our own interpretations.

UM:  How long have you known each other?

WSI:  (Looks over at MI)  That would be…nearly twenty years?  Perhaps a bit more?

MI:  Twenty three years.

WSI:  That long?  Really?

MI:  Just over twenty-three years.  That’s correct.

UM:  Have you known –name deleted- that long as well?

MI:  No.

WSI:  I introduced them…it wasn’t more than a few years ago.  Shortly after the election…in 2008.  Shortly after –name deleted- told me there had been a terrible mistake made.  That Obama being elected had been a terrible mistake.  Then I began hearing similar things from him…the concern that was…mounting within the military and intelligence community regarding the new president.

UM:  Can you expand on that?  Those concerns.  What were they?

WSI:  You’ve already – we’ve already been down that path.  A number of times.

UM:  I’d like to hear it from him.  If that’s ok.  Their perspective.  Unfiltered.  Like you just said you wanted.

(Military Insider looks at WSI)

WSI:  If they wish to share that with you…that is certainly fine.  But I would caution there is a great deal of information that this interview is to…coordinate with your own efforts…you may not want to spend too much time rehashing what was.  I would rather concentrate on what I now know that is going to be…or what some hope is to be.

UM:  We’ve got time – I really want to hear them describe these concerns. It’s those concerns that pushed us to this point, right?  So if you’re comfortable with that – please…you can be brief if you want…but tell us a bit about those concerns back then.  After 2008.  Or before 2008 if there were concerns before then.

MI:  There were.

UM:  Concerns?  Before 2008?  About Obama?

MI:  Yes.

UM:  What were they?

MI:  The first real warning was Mr. Obama’s carpet bombing villages comment against the military.  That…I apologize for the term…that pissed all of us off – or most of us.   At least those of us not put in place by the communists.  The pro-union…the pro-Big Labor faction.

UM:  Did you just say communists?  In the U.S. military?

MI:  Yes.

UM:  Please – can you please explain that.

MI:  Communists.  Communist supporters.  Sympathizers.  Or socialists.  Or globalists might be the right…a more accurate term.  Big government…One World…that whole concept.  It’s real.  As real these chairs.  That wall.  The air in your lungs.

UM:  Agenda 21?  That conspiracy theory?  And the United States military?

MI:  Yes – not a conspiracy.  It’s real.  It exists.  And it’s happening right now.

UM:  Agenda 21 is non-binding.

MI:  That is…not accurate.

UM:  No – it’s a non-binding agreement.  It’s…it was more a show than anything of substance.

MI:  No sir.  You are wrong.  Your dismissal…that was the outcome…that was the intended outcome of calling it that.

UM:  What?

MI: Non-binding.  Voluntary.

UM:  But that’s what it is – it was a non-binding bullsh-t agreement for the environmentalists.

MI:  It’s only as non-binding as the executives who will use the authority granted within that document choose to act on that authority.

UM:  What?

MI:  That document was a blueprint.  Have you actually read it?

UM:  Not…not all of it.  No.

MI:  Then why are you presuming to know what it is – or isn’t?

UM:  I wasn’t presuming – or…I was trying to get around the idea of communists running the United States military.

MI:  That’s not what I said.

UM:  You just did – that’s…yes, that’s what you just said.

MI: No.

UM:  Ok…you explain to me what you just said.  About the communists, the globalists…all of that.  What did you say?

MI:  You posed a question about warnings regarding Mr. Obama?  Before the 2008 election.

UM:  Yeah – and you said that pissed off the military – at least those not put in place by the communists.  That’s what you said.  Right?

MI:  Yes.

UM:  So – what’s the problem?

MI:  What I did not say was that communists were running the United States military.  You said that.  Not me.

UM:  What’s the difference?

MI:  Communists, Big Labor, globalists…those factions have infiltrated the U.S. military.  They are not running the U.S. military.  That is a distinction of epic proportions.  You may not fully appreciated the difference but in my world – all due respect…in my world…BIG DIFFERENCE.

WSI:  And this plan…the globalization of the American military…it’s been planned, slowly implemented…for a long time.  It’s been happening right under our noses.

UM:  It began with Agenda 21 – during the Clinton era?

MI:  Incorrect.

UM:  What?

MI:  Agenda 21 did not begin during the Clinton era.  It was developed long before that.  In fact, it culminated under President Bush.  HW.

WSI:  But it goes back much farther than that.  I only learned of this more recently myself.

MI: Yes sir – much farther.  Decades of planning.  A multiple series of five year plans.

UM:  Five year plans?

WSI:  Just like Stalin.  A slow progression…a creeping monster that comes in five year increments.  Cutting away at freedom and liberty and individuality.

MI:  Yes sir.  Just like that.

UM:  So how far back does this Agenda 21 go?

MI:  You are admitting you don’t know – but you were just attempting to explain to ME, what Agenda 21 was really about.

UM:  Fair enough – I apologize for that.

MI:  Accepted.

WSI:  He’s like me – getting up to speed as it were.  Please – continue.

MI:  Yes sir.

(Pause)

Decades ago.  The first official mark goes back to the early 1970’s.  The birth of the modern environmental movement.  Are you aware that the protection of the environment was placed as the most important issue – more than freedom, sovereignty of nations…environmentalism became the fixture of a full on assault against any nation’s own self determination.

Those who have spoken out against Agenda 21 – and there have been members of the military and intelligence communities who have…they understood the implications.  These people are not conspiracy nuts.  These people are patriots who understand the threat.  The country – the United  States, is under siege.  It has been going on for a long time.  Decades of planning.  And now the planning stage is being transitioned into the implementation stage.  Right now.  It’s happening now.

WSI:  And you are absolutely convinced of that?  It’s happening now – the election of Barack Obama was the signal?  Implementation of this globalization plan commenced at that time?  Fully commenced?  Right?

MI:  Yes sir.

UM:  How?  (Pause)  The…implementation?  How does that work.  By force?  Using our own military against us?

MI:  No.  That would be too much of a risk…most of our military personnel are good men and women.  They signed up.  They took an oath.  And they are doing their job.  Remember, I indicated some inside the military were part of this globalization movement.  Not all.  Not most.  But some.

UM:  But some of these inside the military – they have influence?

MI:  Yes.  Appointed to positions of authority.  By this administration.

UM:  The Secretary of State?  Panetta?  I thought he was the real hero of the Bin Laden raid?

MI:  He acted outside his direct authority.  That action had little to nothing to do with the best interests of the United  States.

UM:  What do you mean?

MI: (Looks toward WSI)

UM:  (Repeats question) What do you mean?

WSI:  What they mean to say…if I may interject…is that Mr. Panetta’s motivations were…perhaps, a bit more… uncertain than many of us are comfortable admitting to.  The fact he is a Clintonite means a great deal to –name deleted-.  It means nothing to me.  Nothing.

UM:  So you don’t trust him?

WSI:  No – I do not.  I’ve never trusted any of them.

UM:  Who?

WSI:  Politicians.  That’s much of my reason for never voting in an election.  I find them all distasteful to some degree.  Even the best of them.

UM:  But you’re voting this time – in 2012.

WSI:  That’s correct.  While I find most politicians distasteful…I find the man calling himself Obama to be something else entirely.

UM:  And what’s that?

WSI:  Dangerous.

UM:  So you’ve said – but getting back to the Agenda 21 thing…this whole globalization concept…it’s difficult to wrap my head around all of it without coming off…without sounding…

WSI:  Crazy?

UM:  Yeah – crazy.

WSI: That’s how it’s intended.  Do that which you intend, and if any oppose that which you intend…mock them into submission while continuing on with your work.  Call it outlandish, crazy, ridiculous, preposterous, all the while – continue doing the very thing they accuse of.

These Obama people are quite good at that.

UM:  So the globalization thing…the plan…Agenda 21…it’s not just a Democrat thing?

MI:  Correct.

UM:  Republicans have gone along with it too?

MI:  Correct.  Let me clarify that a bit.  If that’s ok?

UM:  Please do.

MI:  The architects are embedded within the various liberal sub groups, all of which are under the umbrella of today’s Democratic Party.  They have been the ones to push this agenda  – THE AGENDA…for the past several decades.  There are Republicans…there have been Republicans, sympathetic to the superficial aspects of the plan.

 

(Long pause)

UM:  You lost me.  I get the liberal groups…I will assume the unions, the environmental groups…they are all in on the globalization plan. I get that.  What do you mean by the superficial aspects of the plan?  The…that part of it that attracts some Republicans?

WSI:  If I may?

MI:  Yes sir.

WSI:  This is where the big money comes into play.  Take for example, General Electric.  A huge corporation with multiple subsidiaries…it is itself, a working, breathing, functioning, ever-evolving manifestation of this globalization movement.  Massive amounts of dollars are spent developing public relations campaigns that infest the very fabric of the public conscience. Movies, television, music, fashion, consumable goods…it all becomes part of the implementation plan.  Global cooling becomes global warming becomes climate change becomes sustainable resources…each of those are reading from the very same script.

And so as these concepts grow in popularity among the public…politicians bend their own vision to those concepts.  They may do so not knowing of course the true motivations of those who have invented said concepts, but nevertheless, they become tools of the plan.  They become that all-important “bi-partisan” support of those plans.

UM:  So what’s the purpose of all of it?  The plan?  Globalization?  Why?  What’s the end goal?

WSI:  First, and for us at this very moment, most important – is the total and irreversible transformation of the United States.  If that is achieved – as the man calling himself Obama and all those who support him and have placed him in the White House…if that is achieved, then we are looking at a true one-world government ruled by a small group of elite who will control all aspects of production, dissemination of resources, how you are born, how you live, and how and when you are to die.  There is a group who believes they will have a seat at that table of power – Big Labor, particular globalized financial institutions, certain business entities, they all share in a belief that the individual is simply too dumb, too un-evolved, to have to suffer through life on their own.  They want to be told what to do.  What to think.  How to live.

UM:  (turning to MI)  Do you agree with that – it’s really that far-reaching?  That’s where President Obama wants to take America?  Take the world?

MI:  Yes.  I know it.

UM:  How?

MI:  (Looks to WSI)

WSI:  Go ahead.

MI:  Approximately two years ago…not quite two years ago…I received information pertaining to an election contingency plan.  For 2012.  After the 2010 elections there were particular operatives…specific to the Obama administration and Democratic Party leadership…indicating an overwhelming need to secure a second term for President Obama.  That document’s title was…(pauses)

WSI:  He can be trusted – I give you my word.  Please proceed.

MI:  That document’s title was “By Any Means Necessary”.  It was unofficial – but we know it came directly from channels specific to the administration.  We confirmed that.

UM:  What channels?  Who are you talking about?

MI:  We believe it to have been authored by Mr. Sunstein.  Reviewed and approved by Valerie Jarrett.  Preparations for implementation are being done in part by Mr. Leo Gerard coordinating with…with high ranking officials within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security…and…the U.S. military.

UM:  Leo Gerard?  The union leader?  How would he play a part in this?

WSI:  Mr. Gerard has direct experience in toppling a government working directly with similar forces that would be in play here in the United States.  You did some work on that…perhaps look more closely at what exactly happened in Brazil.  It was a coup.  An overthrow of government.  A joint effort between Big Labor and certain business groups in which law enforcement helped facilitate the final push.

Brazil was a regime change orchestrated by Leo Gerard and soon after personally and financially congratulated by the President of the United States.

What is now being planned for the United States is not regime change – but the final implementation… and to use the words of the man calling himself Obama, the fundamental transformation of the United States of America that can only be assured by a second presidential term.

That plan to ensure a second Obama term as it has been titled,  is to take place “By Any Means Necessary”.

 

PART TWO OF THIS INTERVIEW COMING SOON.

 

Connecting the dots on Leo Gerard…

Who Is Leo Gerard?

[Marvin Green]

My point was that you have to let them know what you think of their reply. 

[Ronald King]

Norma,  You  graduated   with  honors  on  this..House  and  Senate  is  the  laughing-stock  of  our  nation, the  Leader  has  come  under-fire  for  his  lies..!! Justice  system  will  run  and  hide..!!  NO  bubbles  pooped  here..

[Ricky A Childers]

Damn,  we sure could use a George Patton or a Chesty Puller right about now.

[2qb7gp0aqb22z]

Ricky , We some of those but will not support them because they've been around since everyone started saying the very thing you state .

[2qb7gp0aqb22z]

All of you seem to know what's going on but we're had and most know it . For the last years everyone knows we need to do something but nothing is done .

The most powerful entity in our country is the County and know that few can realize it . Sounds too simplistic but it is this power that can have a meaningful impact . I've written many articles and posts about it but mostly it is other countries that take it to heart . Your county can have a standing army (posse) and some are over a thousand and one 3000 strong .

Imagine counties sticking together in proximity . The power is incredible . However it is not going to happen because of preconceived ideas and most will not believe it . It is getting people out of their comfort zones .

Militias only work when like minded people understand what is expected of them and some who are pacifists can supply those who are fighters , staging areas if you will and communications . As a Vet I understand the various parts of the whole . It's the three musketeer thing - one for all and all for one mentality that can win . By yourself you lose !

But like these pages we will only talk about it like we've done for these last three years . Personally I think all is lost because I know who the enemy is and while Ocrap is certainly in the mix he isn't the one I'm afraid of .

[Edward S Davison Jr]

What do you call a politician[ OBAMA ] who gives one half Billion dollars in taxpayer money to a money losing company owned by someone who collected five hundred thousand dollars for your campaign war chest?

Americans tend to have short memories. But wasn’t it Presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama who claimed that he would cut the deficit in half, end corruption and cut waste? Wasn’t that his “Hope and Change?” How his sycophants choose to forget.

Let’s take Solyndra, the Obama poster child for his “greening of America.” During the very alternate energy friendly Bush Administration, it was refused a taxpayer guaranteed loan as being a company destined to fail.

But in Obama’s “Jobs Stimulus Program,” much of the almost one Trillion dollars was stolen from the American taxpayer and distributed to his friends and financial supporters.Responsibility always seems to take second place to political payoffs in this administration.

One week before Solyndra was approved for more than one-half Billion in taxpayer guaranteed loans, their CEO visited the White House four times. Those spoken to included Obama’s top policy advisor and closest confident Valerie Jarett. People warned the White House about Obama’s Enron, but money is money when it comes to political payoffs.

It’s normal policy that if a company with federal funding fails, the taxpayer gets first dibs on the remaining assets, but not with Solynra. In this case, Obama’s supporters who own stock in the company get paid off first, leaving the taxpayer to fondle their empty pockets.

But that’s not all. Billions of dollars are currently being given out to similar “green” companies with Obama political connections. Isn’t this what Obama condemns as “crony capitalism?”

But wait. There’s more and it involves national security. Eli Lake reported in the liberal Daily Beast that GEN William Shelton who heads Air Force Space Command informed a classified oversight committee hearing that Obama attempted to alter his testimony on the broadband company LightSquared.

This is another company with deep pockets for Obama. It’s building a wireless 4G satellite network that the Pentagon feels will interfere with high precision GPS signals that could disrupt military operations from strategic and tactical mapping to missiles.

But LightSquare majority stock owner Philip Falcone donated some $60,000 to the Democrat Party in 2009. CEO Sanjiv Ahuja made a $30,400 contribution to the Democrats, the very day representatives from LightSquared went to the White House for a payoff, uhhhh,“ meeting.”

Is a political campaign payoff more important than national security to Obama and those close to him? It seems so. 

Is Barack Obama a “Crook?” Legally, he’s probably not. In my opinion, “Traitor” would be a more appropriate term. What do you think? Probably BOTH!

 

[Richard Charles Wagener]

I don't know anything about all this, but I do know something is wrong about Obama.  He is a professional liar, it is quite obvious the truth is not in him.  It is also obvious that he has no use or respect for this country.  He has no credentials, he has not been vetted.  Something is seriously awry in this administration.  "They consider themselves bound by no law, but sincerely believe they are the law unto themselves.  I don't know if what is hidden will be revealed in near future, because evil is dependent on darkness.  I know one thing, our founders were ingenious in writing our laws and they gave us one final gift to be used in the last extreme and that is our second amendment.  The Dems have been fighting and trying to get rid of this for years.  One only has to look at how determined to rid us of those rights for years.  We need only look to Hitler's Germany to know what will happen if they are successful in their goal.  A nation is without defense if the ruling junta or whatever you want to call them succeeds in ridding the country of arms, except for they themselves who cannot accomplish their goals with and armed populace to contend with.  So since we all know what has happened to nations where firearms were outlawed,  we would be the greatest of fools to surrender these rights for any reason what so ever. So under no circumstances can we be urged, ordered, coerced to cede them to the government or be bullied into giving them up for any reason or in spite of any threat.  Never, ever ever surrender our second amendment rights, but rather in the words of the great leader and actor, "Charleton Heston, "From my cold dead hands".  The results are certain if we ever permit it to happen for any reason.  If they are surrendered or  confiscated America will cease to exist.  Never give your guns and ammo up for any reason, tis better to die free than have a long life as a slave!

[2qb7gp0aqb22z]

RichardCW , PLEASE----- don't think it is just the Dems . There are plenty of RINO'S that will go against us also .

We all know about Hitler and those like him but Australia and the UK have given up their guns and crime is through the roof especially Australia .

"IF" Congress was doing their job Ocrap would be out and that's Republicans hiding the truth . I was a Democrat once and voted for Carter and that changed me forever . I'm not a Republican either but a Conservative and don't equate one with the other .

Show me a Republican and I'll show you a crook , show me a Democrat and I'll show you a bigger crook !

[Norma Ellen (Auge) Dowling]

I have a question.  These insiders, do they have any information on a possible Military intervention on behalf of "We the People" and the Constitution?  I realize the people appointed by Obama are bound and determined to destroy freedom loving American's, especially Christians.  But is anyone with any power on our side??? Obviously our legislators, even the good ones are doing too little too late.  Is there any hope for us in the U.S. Military leaders who stil stand for  the Constitution?

So far this just sounds like old men talking, sorry, I'm no spring chick either, but most of us know Obama is dangerous.  Most of us with reasonable I.Q's. figured a lot of this stuff out a long time ago.  No one had to tell us.  Obama showed us by his actions and agendas, and  by the laws and presidential orders he has signed.  It doesn't take a world renowned economist to know that what Obama is doing to the economy will kill the dollar. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that he is doing it on purpose, since he wrote about how to do so in college, and his "father?" was an economist so he teethed on how to build up and how to destroy an economy.    What I want to know is, do these insiders have any clout?  Hey insiders.....if you have any clout, use it.  I am sick of words, I want to see somebody do something.  We have known since before Obama was elected that something was really wrong with him.  It was the first election in my memory that no one said much negative about him.  In fact you heard a lot of propaganda, but not much else.  That is when I knew he had control of ABC, NBC, CBS, and MSN.  Fox was the one hold out, but they have soft peddled it lately since Glen Beck left.  You sure don't hear much of a peep out of anyone except on the internet about Obama's birth issue, except to hear them make snide comments about birthers.  So I ask you Mr. Military insider, who if anyone is coming to the rescue?  Frankly, I just hope someone is.  I realize if someone is, their plans must remain secret till they move, but if they exist, I sure hope they hurry.  Obama intends to declare Marshall Law and when he does, he will begin his roundup of political opponents as if they/we were no different than cattle.  I find it appalling that Obama has gotten this far with no one standing up to him....Oh there are a scant number of individuals within states who are gutsy enough to take Obama to court, but not a peep from our political leaders, or our FBI, or our Military. Our chanpion is Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona.  Hey you guys, he could use a little help, please.  You know the saddest day of my life was when I realized that if we had to be taken over by someone, we would be better off with Putin than with Obama.  Why you ask?, because Putin has decided to take a soft line as he calls it.  Putin will not kill us all unless we make trouble.  Obama will kill us all simply because we are Christian, or white, or politically against Obama, or just because he wants what we have....Putin wants the former glory of Russia restored, Obama want to bask in his own glory. God help us if no one else will!     

[Harry Riley]

"BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY" 

I can't help but wonder if the Aurora, CO murderer won't eventually be traced back to an Obama operative......meaning Holmes was tied to the Obama apparatus in some deep covert cover.  It creates the 'chaos" and meets the "by any means necessary" to support an objective of the Obama/Clinton team.........the private/personal gun grab.

[Norma Ellen (Auge) Dowling]

Hi Harry, I think  a whole lot of these situations originate deep in the Obama do whatever is necessary file.  It's possible connection could probably even be easily traced.  Just like the black group  assaults on individual white people can be traced back to the pardoned New Black Panthers..

[Harry Riley]

Check this one Norma........credibility is unknown.  http://www.eutimes.net/2012/07/us-military-reveals-coup-plan-to-top...