From Big Journalism:
In Harm’s Way: Obama’s Shell Game Puts Troops In Danger
This is the kind of story that might be expected to draw a journalist’s attention, for it has the kind of elements that should
outrage the average reader: a commander playing politics with the
military, troops called upon to execute a mission they had neither
expected nor been trained for, and subsequent accusations that heavy
casualties might have been avoided, but for politically-motivated shell
games.
The commander in question is the commander-in-chief, who has made it the policy of his administration to reduce troop deployments in the
“bad war” (Iraq) while increasing the number of boots on the ground to
fight the “good war” in Afghanistan. While the President has followed
through on the latter, the former has yet to happen in any substantive
way and our troops have paid the price for this political sleight of
hand.
On February 17, 2009, the Defense Department announced, to great fanfare, that it was deploying an additional 17,000 troops to Afghanistan, including the 5th Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division. The problem with that, which would soon become evident when the 5th Stryker entered combat, is that the Brigade was trained to fight one
kind of war and then, apparently for the sake of political expediency,
deployed to fight quite another.
One of the 5th Stryker’s units, the 1st Battalion, 17th Infantry Regiment (1-17) has been particularly hard hit since arriving
in Afghanistan last fall, suffering twenty-one combat deaths in one
battle in the Arghandab district alone. One of the battalion’s company
commanders, Capt. Joel Kassulke was replaced after that action, a move
that angered some of the Captain’s troops, according to this Army Times article. The problem, some soldiers said, was not their commander, but mismatched training:
The battalion had spent much of the previous two years training for combat, but preparing for the wrong theater — until
February, when it got orders for Afghanistan, 1-17 was scheduled to
deploy to Iraq.However, 1-17 soldiers said their training, which had been focused on highly “kinetic” urban warfare drills such as room clearing, did not
change much to accommodate the change in mission. “The COIN-intensive
fight here … isn’t so much what we trained on,” said 1st Lt. Kevin
Turnblom, Charlie Company’s fire support officer.“We trained [in] urban fighting in Iraq and then they give us Afghanistan,” said Staff Sgt. Jason Hughes, Weapons Squad leader in 1st
Platoon, Charlie Company. “The principles are the same but the details
are day-and-night different, and we’ve learned that the hard way over
the last almost five months.”
The story did not go unnoticed by military bloggers, many of whom expressed disgust over the transfer. Greyhawk, a popular military
blogger among veterans and those currently serving in uniform, seethed with contempt:
Those months of training and preparation were scrapped (one example: they don’t speak Arabic in Afghanistan) so the phrase
“Barack Obama diverts 17,000 soldiers from Iraq to Afghanistan” could
appear in newspapers.
Not only was moving the 5th Stryker ill-considered, it was also unnecessary, at least as far as military (rather than political) necessity was concerned. On March 2, 2009, the administration announced – much more quietly – that the 4th Brigade, 2nd Infantry division would be deployed to Iraq several months earlier than planned, replacing the 5th Stryker Brigade. This move, combined with extensions for other units
already on the ground in Iraq, meant that the much ballyhooed reduction
in forces in Iraq hadn’t occurred at all.
An officer currently serving in Iraq told me that the results of these shell games have had the predictable demoralizing effect on the
military, already distressed by the increased politicization of their
mission. Training for different theaters, he said, simply doesn’t
translate.
The major difference is the language training, Iraqis speak Arabic and the Afghans speak Pashto or Afghan Persian, but not
Arabic. Additionally if a unit was training to deploy to Baghdad or
another urban center in Iraq the tactics techniques and procedures
would differ considerably than those used in the mostly rural
Afghanistan. There are also things like culture classes and theater
specific training that wouldn’t be the same because obviously the
cultures and lifestyles are different.
“Bush lied – people died” was a popular leftist mantra for the better part of the last decade. Given the mismanagement of the current
commander-in-chief, perhaps it should be replaced in 2010 with an
equally pithy, and more honest, couplet: Obama shilled – soldiers were
killed.
Replies