Devastating: Michael Behenna's Conviction Upheld

by: Diana West Friday, July 06, 2012 from joseffy

By a 3-2 majority, the highest military appeals court has upheld Army Ranger 1st Lt. Michael Behenna's conviction for the unpremediated murder of a detainee and al-Qaeda-operative in Iraq named Ali Mansur. While Michael still could receive clemency, his legal appeals are now officially exhausted. Barring clemency, Michael will remain at Leavenworth military prison until 2024.

What a blow. What a disgrace.

I just finished reading the majority opinion. It is a chilling document. It contains analysis of whether Michael had "the right to act in self-defense" when the detainee he was questioning about IED attacks that had recently killed two men in his platoon, suddenly lunged for Michael's gun, and Michael shot and killed him.

This was one of several issues before the court. As the "initial aggressor" for engaging in an unauthorized interrogation of a naked detainee, Michael, the court upheld,had lost his right to self-defense. Under consideration was whether at any point in the split seconds during which the detainee hurled a piece of concrete at Michael and rushed for his gun, and Michael fired in return at the detainee, Michael ever regained it. 

Three judges in the calm of their chambers in Washington, D.C., determined that he did not.

Or, as they wrote: "Even assuming for a moment that Mansur could have escalated the level of force, we conclude that a naked and unarmed individual in the desert does not escalate the level of force when he throws a piece of concrete at the initial aggressor in full battle attire, armed with a loaded pistol, and lunges for his pistol."

Oh yeah? Maybe it's simplistic of me, but I'd like to see them step into Michael's combat boots and see how it felt out there in the night, after a hard day's "catch-and-release," after military intelligence shockingly set Mansur free and ordered Michael to drive him home -- the very man Michael suspected of knowing all about the attacks that had recently killed two of his men. Michael thought he could get the necessary evidence in one more interrogation, just him and Mansur. But it didn't work out as Michael hoped.

The majority:

Ultimately, even if we assume that Mansur lunged for Appellant's pistol and Appellant feared that Mansur would use the pistol if he was able to seize it, because Appellant was the initial aggressor, and because there was no evidence to support a finding of escalation or withdrawal, a rational member [juror] could have come to no other conclusion than that Appellant lost the right to act in self-defense and did not regain it.

I'm afraid that this court's idea of a "rational member" also could have come to no other conclusion than that Michael, "initial aggressor," bereft of the "right" to self-defense, should have permitted Mansur to snatch his gun from him and then shoot him dead.

Maybe then the three judges would have sighed with a satisfied kind of regret over the poor lieutenant who had given his all for their, frankly, demonic reading of the law. Instead, for having defended himself, for not having sacrificed himself to a charging terrorist, Michael and his family pay the price of Michael's freedom.

America: Is that justice?

Views: 636

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Here's what you get for putting your life on the line.....Rules of Engagement (ROE) that send you to prison.  Outrage is beyond measure........

You know as well as I do, JAG has been infiltrated by Muslim and pro-Muslim lawyers.  The chances of prevailing in a case involving [any] Muslim are slim to none ... closer to none.

These folks need to be rooted out and fired.  The sitting Judge in this case needs to be fired.


Only we have (ROE) Is this because we are a civil society or are we being defeated from within?

Make me Commander in Chief and I would have the three genius judges, who have probably never even held a weapon, outfitted in battle gear and sent to the front lines in Afghanistan.  Let them dodge bullets and IEDs for about a year and then they can reconsider their opinion.  If they still found as they recently did, I would send them back, because that is the type of U.S. warrior that the Taliban needs.  Ones that will not shoot back, but be a bullet catcher. 

That is what happens when you allow a group to establish a method to circumvent Common Sense, with this Politically Correct mentality.  Since the 1960s people have ben taught to excuse all kinds of infractions to avoid exhibiting behavior unacceptable in any mans Army.  Maybe someone should have given that crew an exhibit of what happens when ypu ar struck with a piece of concrete, and what happens when the nude jerk now has your weapon.   Ignorance is curable, the stupidity exhibited is terminal.



This is a travesty in justice.  I am glad that I no longer am in the military after serving 29 years and 10 months.  I could not recommended going into the military for anyone today.  I highly recommend that anyone in the U.S. Military get out when your enlistment is up.

IMO, badd move!!!  We need people in place, Enlisted and Commissioned, ready to step in when it's time to take over.

My kid's been in for 24 years now, and I find myself praying he'll get out when this commission is up. Right now it looks like there's a goal to take all officers and charge them with something to make them forfeit their retirement account and any other benefits they have earned.

My question, if God is merciful, and we get our country back, how will we do away with all the subversives and anti-Americans they seem to be planting within the Military, Pentagon and Justice Department? It almost looks like we'll need to dissolve everything and recall retired veterans to once again serve their country. (We may have to get a lot of them out of prison first!)

Boykin, Vallely, Lakin, Behenna, Fitzpatrick, Riley I'm sure few more names of honor will come to others here. 

sickening, and disgusting of the court.

This is absolutely disgusting.  However, to expect better of the politically correct cowards serving the usurper in chief would be unreal.  If Romney is elected in November we need to put pressure on him and every member of congress to correct this miscarriage of justice.  And, let's not forget all of the other military personnel who are victims of political correctness run amok.

This is the same decision process by a bunch of lawyers appointed to judgeships that ignore our basic rights in law under the Constitution.  This decision is the same as the one issued in the many cases against Obama, ignore the facts and damn the defendant the judges are omnipotent but certainly not wise and good Americans suffer.  Justice is NOT blind.



Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts

How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live" shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......


© 2020   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service