Did Ted Cruz enter the U.S. illegally in 1974? by COL Sellin

Family Security Matters

Did Ted Cruz enter the U.S. illegally in 1974?

by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD February 11, 2016



This article is a statement of the facts, and is not meant to, or intended to, be interpreted as a political endorsement, or lack thereof, of any political candidate. Family Security Matters takes no political point of view whatsoever. 

Exactly how and when did Ted Cruz obtain U.S. citizenship?

The fact that it is still an open question at this stage of the Presidential campaign is a testament either to the galactic ignorance of our political-media elite or their willingness to place political expediency ahead of the Constitution and the law.

There is no third alternative.

Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada on December 22, 1970 and remained a Canadian citizen until he officially renounced it on May 14, 2014, eighteen months after taking the oath of office as a U.S. Senator. At the time of his birth, Cruz's father was a citizen of Canada and his mother was a U.S. citizen.

Legally, Cruz could have obtained US citizenship through his mother consistent with Public Law 414, June 27, 1952, An Act: To revise the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality and for other purposes [H.R. 5678], Title III Nationality and Naturalization, Chapter 1 - Nationality at Birth and by Collective naturalization; Nationals and citizens of the United States at birth; the relevant section being 301 (a) (7):

"a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph."

In that case, Cruz's mother should have filed a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) with the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate after the birth to document that the child was a U.S. citizen.

According to Cruz spokeswoman Catherine Frazier, Cruz's mother did register his birth with the U.S. consulate and Cruz received a U.S. passport in 1986 ahead of a high school trip to England.

There are two apparent contradictions regarding how and when Ted Cruz obtained US citizenship.

First, according to the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946, also referred to as the "Act of 1947," Canada did not allow dual citizenship in 1970. The parents would have had to choose at that time between U.S. and Canadian citizenship. Ted Cruz did not renounce his Canadian citizenship until 2014. Was that the choice originally made?

Second, no CRBA has been released that would verify that Ted Cruz was registered as a U.S. citizen at birth.

It has been reported that the then nearly four-year-old Ted Cruz flew to the U.S. from Calgary, Alberta, Canada in 1974.

Ted Cruz could not have entered the U.S. legally without a CRBA or a U.S. passport, the latter of which was not obtained until 1986.

If Ted Cruz was registered as a U.S. citizen at birth, as his spokeswoman claims, then the CRBA must be released. Otherwise, one could conclude that Cruz came to the U.S. as a Canadian citizen, perhaps on a tourist visa or, possibly, remained in the U.S. as an illegal immigrant.

It is the responsibility of the candidate for the Presidency, not ordinary citizens, to prove that he or she is eligible for the highest office in the land. Voters deserve clarification.

Even assuming a CRBA was filed, the weight of the legal evidence indicates that Ted Cruz is a naturalized U.S. citizen because he was born outside of the jurisdiction of the U.S. and obtained U.S. citizenship by an Act of Congress (Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution). As a naturalized citizen, he is not eligible for the Presidency (Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution).

It is disturbing to this writer that, Ted Cruz, a man who claims to be a "principled conservative" and a staunch supporter of the Constitution, should be so opaque about his personal history and unwilling to release his records.

Does that sound familiar?

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ". He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Views: 646

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

I believe as you do on that matter, and there seems to be a few that should leave this discussion, ASAP.

Anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence can read the Constitution and diligently study the history of our nation, and the thoughts of the founders can only conclude that a Natural Born Citizen of this day to be the off-spring off two American citizens and born in the U.S. or a U.S. Territory.

The self proclaimed "Scholars" and "Experts" that claim other wise are mere idiots or traitors, in my opinion.

Ray Hause........I'm afraid you miss what most are about on PFA.  It's not about Trump, Cruz, Rubio, et al in the sense of who is the best candidate at this point....we know any republican candidate is better than Clinton or Sanders.

What it's about at this point is still that "U.S. Constitution Matters".   Every indication, fact, and history supports Cruz and Rubio as being ineligible to serve as president or vice president.  They simply do not meet Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution, the requirement for eligibility to serve as president or vice president.

I and others have posted facts which support our position.  Now, it's time for you to provide facts that support your position that they do meet Constitutional qualification.  Not just your opinion.

If you fail offer a documented plan/data we will consider what your motives reflect.

Come on Mr. Riley, those of us who accepts the current standing to Cruz and Rubio being eligible does not fit your candidate preference, be honest about it. Just how many would be honest about it?  I've sat and read all of this documentation you offer as nothing more than substantiation to your political preference and I will ask you to provide credible scholars, judges or whomever to substantiate your reasoning. 

You are acting and sounding like a troll more and more with your comments.

Teresa I believe your correct. What's amazing to me is how the minority in this country be it a racial minority or a religious minority has beat down the majority and has userped the majoritys freedoms and rights and established their own. This is what happens when the majority is silent and dosent fight back with the same tenacity as the minority. They have used "guilt" in all their arguments including white guilt to get the majority to vote for a black president. I have long said that the black community is more racist than the white and that they donot want equality they want superiority. I say that as one who was born and raised in the black community and attended black schools I've seen it first hand so I'm not being raciest I'm calling a spade a spade. They have become successful because they have sold us a bill of goods in making the past sins of others our sins and we have sat silent.

Oh Dianne, that is elementary. Obama was never vet. He was just signed off (Band of crooks like Pelosi etc.) by DEMOCRATS.

Cruz is REPUBLICAN. If he was a demo, you would not hear a peep.And of course there is Rubio as well, in my opinion not elegible.

And from a Floridian leaving out the uneligible part about Rubio, he is far too wet behind the ears, has done NOTHING of substance since being in the Senate and above all is Bush trained - he was Jeb's lap dog until he decided to run against Jeb - not sure the ties are really broken.


Reason, their Trump lovers.

How to spot a Cruz supporter:

1) Claims to be a Constitutionalist but doesn’t care that Cruz is Constitutionally ineligible.

2) Claims to be religiously pious but doesn’t mind if Cruz and his minions lie to steal votes from Ben Carson (in addition to other dirty tricks).

3) Claims to be concerned about illegal immigration and the muslim influx but supports a candidate who doesn’t have the cajones to put stop to it and may himself have come here illegally.

4) Claims to want a president who isn’t in the pocket of special interests but supports someone who takes sweetheart loans from his wife’s employer, Goldman Sachs. (One can only wonder what they’ll expect in return for that)

5) Claims to want a President who puts Americans first but supports someone whose wife is a member of the CFR (an organization whose deliberations support the globalist anti-American, feudalist agenda).

6) Believes that someone like Cruz who is hated on both sides of the aisle can actually advance an agenda.

There are quite a few others, but 1) and 2) will help you spot most of them.

Absolutely amazing. 

This is a time in America to return to McCarthyism. 

Demand for the indictment on government officials on charges in violation of 1940 Smith Act, that is currently a national law on the books today. It was a law that was to prevent and purge U.S. government from being infiltrated by foreign nation loyalists and sympathizers who could take government over for their own political agenda.

Also, 1954 Anti-Communist Act by Executive Order from President Dwight Eisenhower was established to prevent Communist political supporters from campaigning and taking office in US government because they would cause havoc and dysfunction in the US political system to get you to support them in their agendas. 

1948 Taft and Hartley Act was established to prevent Communist dictator from taking control over U.S. Labor unions because they would create hardship and discourage earners that capitalism is no longer working for the labor and try to convince the society that Socialism is the way to fix and help support the working class.

The Commie tactics are working as Americans are loosing ability to fully possess private property ownership which is necessary for a free society





I wanted to share this,"We the People" petition, with you: http://wh.gov/iwNBc

Individual citizens, get the Court to indict and press charges. If they will not, then do so according to US Constitutional Law by the Court of Common Law. Under this court system, the citizens form a trial jury of 25 members who have a right to indict, investigate and judge over the Admiralty Court systems established by the Corporate courts currently (illegally) practiced by the judicial systems today!!!

When an elected judge goes against the taken oath of office to practice law according to the Constitution and does not keep to that oath, according to Blacks Law, they are guilty of perjury and can be imprisoned for such violation.

Punish by Capital punishment to set a good example and send a clear message that there will be harsh consequence put upon wrongdoers. Capitalist society must enforce capital punishment!!!

American Citizens, take back you Nation, you are the Governing Republic.

There is a Right Wing anti- Communist Socialism, like president FDR administration and early union leaders whom controlled the unions before 1976, whom still believed in a free society that the citizens have liberty and right to own affordable private property such as a home, business or land ownership. Were all people have political voice and strong governance policy making power by right to vote, all people of society were improving in social equality.

Then we headed more towards Left Wing Socialism when all people have social equality, Political policy is decided on by a ruling counsel or congress. The majority of people begin to loose policy making decisions. The further to the political left, the citizens loose more of their freedom, liberty and individual rights.

Even further left, they loose oppertunity to become able to afford to purchase private property and gun ownership to protect and defend this property and self. That becomes only possible by a smaller elite class, which are the Capitalists whom become an elite privileged class in society, whom become large investers thru hedge, private equity, corporate and union fund investments that eventually take over the governing role that will benefits their own interest.

Extreme left Socialism of Fascism, when all private property is owned by a select few Elite in the ruling class and introduces a Dictatorship and militarized polIce force.

Then Totalitarian Communism is Property Owned by the governing state under a high authority leader whom is the sole ruler over the whole Society under martial law.

Where is American on this political measure and where is each other nation in the world? How far to the left will we have to progress before people will rise up and prevent further political progression to the left?

Obama ruled by Executive Order bypassing the legislative branch while Americans saw a militarized police force present itself at the Ferguson protests. Individual home owners loose their homes in bankruptcy and small business owners become tenants in their business facilities.

Private property has become hard to purchase by common citizens and commercial properties are becoming only owned by banks, Corporations and high profile investers investwd in Private investment and hedge funds. Corporations are taking over farmlands and government is hoarding on federal owned lands.

What Socialism does Sanders support, Right or Left Wing? Does he live a lifestyle of the rich and famous or is it simular to that of a common middle class man?
If his home is a mansion and he preaches socialism then he is a Communist in disguise. BEWARE!!!

Where is it that Trump wants to take us? He smears his opponents well but what is his plan to make America Great again? Does his plan resemble that of the brutal Bolshevik Mafia jewish leader Joseph Stalin of Russia during the 1930's?

The people are in need to reestablish the Court of Commin Law trials that induct and judge by the citizens through a 25 member trial jury, established by the law of the land under Common Court System that already exists and is identified in the US Constitution!!!

Leave your Constitution alone, indict government officials on violation of the 1940 Smith Act, which was to prevent supporters of foreign government from taking US Political System over for their own political agenda.

Indict government officials on violating the 1954 Anti Communist Act established by Executive Order from President Dwight Eisenhower!!!



Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts

How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......


© 2020   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service