by Doug Hagmann
Presently flying under the radar of the American people is the much misunderstood, deliberately mischaracterized and under-reported United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty. Considering the persistent multi-level attacks against U.S. gun owners and American’s rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the “Final U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty” that convened yesterday and is scheduled to last through March 28, 2013 should be front page news all across America. But it’s not, and for good reason.
Most people, including conservative Americans thought the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was a dead issue, or at least not a threat to U.S. gun owners based on a number of assumptions relating to international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. Like everything else with the Obama regime, however, things are never what they appear, nor are they as simple as we are led to believe.
But first, let it be made clear that Barack Hussein Obama is on record as being against the private ownership of firearms by American citizens. This might surprise anyone who listens to the hysterically-pitched assertions by such Obama lapdogs as Chris Mathews and Lawrence O’Donnell, for example, who contend that Obama has posed no threat to private gun ownership as President. Such assertions are only convincing to those who have not done any research into this matter.
Barack Hussein Obama has a long and well documented history on gun control, going back as far as his law school days. There, he was mentored by Laurence Tribe, a staunch opponent to gun rights of American citizens. In 1994, Obama was a member of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago based charitable organization that in part, is a proponent of various anti-gun groups and related agendas.
In 2003, Obama voted in support of legislation that would have banned privately owned hunting shotguns, target rifles and black powder rifles in Illinois. While running for political office in 2004, Obama called for national legislation to prevent anyone but law enforcers from carrying concealed firearms. As reported in the February 20, 2004 edition of The Chicago Tribune, Obama was quoted as “back[ing] federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”
In the April 2, 2008 edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama was quoted stating “I am not in favor of concealed weapons… I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” As an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted twice against SB 2165, more commonly known as the “Castle Doctrine,” which would permit household occupants to defend themselves through the use of firearms.
Perhaps most nefarious and telling of all is what Obama whispered to Sarah Brady during a meeting on 30 March 2011 concerning gun control: “I just want you to know that we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”
By far and despite the intent of Obama-supported organizations such as Fact Check and Media Matters, it is clear that he is the most anti-Second Amendment (putative) President ever to hold office.
Perhaps most disconcerting about the present actions of the United Nations is the cavalier attitude held by most, including many conservatives, that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be completely impotent against the U.S. Constitution and American’s rights under the Second Amendment. After all, it is argued that to be effective, such a treaty would require Senate ratification and at present, such ratification would have a “zero possibility” of passage. Such thinking is consistent with a normal political atmosphere and an administration that has a genuine respect for the U.S. Constitution. Considering what we’ve seen over the last decade, does the recent track record of our elected leaders alleviate your concerns?
Consider that within 24 hours of his re-election, Obama pushed for a new round of international negotiations to revive the very U.N. treaty he visibly backed off of in the months leading to the 2012 elections. Isn’t this act alone enough to trip some alarm bells, even among the most skeptic?
It should also be noted that on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.” A review of this four-page document reveals certain questionable assumptions on which that conclusion is based.
This is a warning to all Americans that the Obama support of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty can lead to some “UN-intended” consequences to American’s right to own and bear arms. Americans looking at this issue are failing to look at the larger picture, which is the ultimate subjugation of the United States to a global governance. This can most effectively be accomplished through the disarmament of its citizens, especially in the face of violent outbreaks as the U.S. and the world economic systems begin to unravel.
The machinations of the Obama regime within the inner workings of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty must not be underestimated. We must look at the bigger picture and the end-game objectives of the globalists pulling the puppet strings. All is not what it appears.
Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network, and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: email@example.com
"...on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.”
Fortunately for us, they conclude incorrectly. The ABA is not the law of the land in this country, even though they would like to think so. This ABA Center for Human Rights is a bunch of Marxist pricks wanting you and I to just hand over our property, namely our firearms. However, they hold no real power of anything.
Bottom line..... Keep an eye on this, just don't lose sleep over it. Yet.
Here are a few suggestions I made on another site-
Don't forget the county sheriffs- I am reading a book called "They Fired the First Shot" - the 1st half explains in stunning detail how Obama has written the Executive Orders and what they mean, the collusion of the media, comparing our situation to Rwanda (how the government there organized the Hutus to kill Tutsis, etc. The second half explains the power of the sheriff and an interview with sheriff Mack . I believe it is well worth the read even if you know a lot about what Obama has done- It also ties in God and "Our Lady" appearing to various people to warn them. Though it is from a Catholic point of view, it does not matter if you are not a Catholic or if you are Jewish. If you can afford it, buy a few copies to pass out to people you know who would be willing to read it- if you know anyone with even a lowly position in your town, they can help spread the word among the Republican Party- tI believe there are some good ones still out there, but they don't realize exactly what is going on - this book will explain it in great detail. If you know anyone in law enforcement you trust- show them the book too- it is easy reading and keeps the reader interested. It is suggested that you start reading without looking ahead so the impact is effective. Check it out on Amazon.
I also recommend a newsletter "Independent Living" which gives survival advice, how to protect your privacy etc.
People on this site have a lot of good ideas. As far as the American Revolution is concerned, it was fought by brave Patriots who had enough of the oppression - but there were a lot of people who did not want to be involved- some wanted to be loyal to the king- I think I heard only 3% did the fighting. One thing to remember- in the end the Patriots had the help of the French, so they were not entirely alone. We have the help of Trevor Louden of New Zealand- check out newzeal blog. I believe his is doing another speaking tour. Jim Garrow of Canada also was helpful passing on information of our military asked if they would fire on Americans. Nigel Farage of England is well aware of Communists in the EU and has spoken out. Show people the FULL LENGTH version of the Yuri Bezmenov interview you can find on you tube- I forwarded it to a liberal cousin of mine and he was fascinated and passed it on- it can open someone's eyes to the danger of Communism because it comes from a KGB defector. Full length is best because then they see he is the "real deal"- they can't say he is some crazy right winger. These tools and people can help us.