It's time to stand up to these federal interference judges. They have no constitutional authority to interfere in issues between states gov. and fed. gov. If the fed. gov. has an issue with any state, the only court that is constitutionally set up to mediate is the Supreme Court. All other fed. courts are nothing more than illegitimate thugs legislating from the bench.
In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.
I was unable to access this article on the Examiner site directly this morning. All I get is a blank page. I think it is being washed out.
It can be read on Canada Free Press. Arizona should line it's border to Mexico and stop the invasion there. I would think this would be under a "State of Emergency" which should allow the Gov. to call out the National Guard, If she needs more help (since the BHO admin will do nothing but sue her) she should call for Citizen Soldiers -- Patriots!! I'm sure there are plenty that will come from all over this Great Nation to help. The Mexicans have already fired the 1st shot long ago! We are at WAR with Mexico!! Course CA, N.M., and TX should do the same!!
This all boils down to them attempting to DO TOTALLY AWAY WITH OUR CONSTITUTION!!! I'm wondering if ANY attorneys are taught and learn what the Constitution is let alone learn what's in it!! How can ANYONE have an occupation or work in ANY job that has ANYTHING to do with the law -- from the local street cop all the way to to Supreme Court AND NOT KNOW THE CONSTITUTION ? IT'S A TRAVESTY!!! Justice can NEVER be done IF our CONSTITUTION isn't followed TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW!!! We all know this -- the Atorneys on BOTH SIDES SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS!!!
Juanita: Attorneys study "case law", not the Constitution. That's why we have the ridiculous concept of a "Living Constitution".
Stingray, you are more than likely right about Holder...This is nothing new.....One of the judges who headed the Nuremburg War Trials, I believe his name was Jackson, never completed Law school...From there, he was appointed to the supreme court and authored the Feres Doctrine, a doctrine that literally stripped Veterans of due process....Where are these people coming from????
get all the violators of the US Constitution and bring them up on charges...from the top down, and from the botom up!!!
Can someone please , Explain to me why an attorney or lawyer can site the constitution in a municipal court but the average joe cant , and can someone please explain how some muck lawyer or attorney gets the Idea that the laws perpetrated today via the constitution has any thing to do with the Private citizen , let me give you an example ,
The uniform family law support act which was NOT I repeat not created by The Congress ,it was created by National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, and who are these people They are Lawyers, judges
in other words why
do these pin heads insist that the constitution is a chain on the people!! via law created in the name of the constitution. and where is the word family law stated in the constitution! can any one please tell me !
The Constitution Is Dead They Dont read it , the courts interpret it see Marbury vs Madison.
scioPatriot1776 is absolutely correct. Attorney's study "case law", not the Constitution. They are legally bound to do that rather than go back to the original Constitution for authority. That's why we are drifting further and further into a liberal-progressive abomination called the "Living Constitution". The whole game is rigged to enfeeble and ultimately eliminate our Constitution as written and understood by the Founders.
Arizona, Texas and New Mexico needs to call up their National Guard and guard their borders.
I wrote about this when the actual Holder law suit was filed - and I submitted to the AZ Gov. and her lawyers that said Holder law suit should be ignored and that the case should be filed directly with the Supreme Court under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2.
I further provided them with prior examples of case law, but, to no avail. The AZ lawyers, like all lawyers, saw $$$$ signs and Brewer saw political gains, so the obvious constitutional avenue was ignored, overlooked and abandoned. That was intentional.
Now, after millions of donated dollars and tax payer funds have been wasted, with more legal fees on the way....the case has reached the Supreme Court. However, it could have been at the SCOTUS many, many months ago....already decided and a judicial life jacket for all of the states that have passed the same and/or similar legislation.
What needs to be done is for Alabama, Georgia, Utah and the several other states that have been, are and remain the targets of such Holder law suits is for them to use Articl III, Section 2, Clause 2 as their weapon of 1st choice and to file thier arguments directly with the Supreme Court, rather than to respond to any court claiming to have jurisdiction over this matter....when indeed they don't - even if you let them.
The point of writing this retort is to demonstrate just how ignorant, dumb and stupid lawyers are today, re the Constitution. Or are they? Is the lure of unlimited dollars the "judas" question that is tempting them all?
God save the Republic!!
Our Military take an oath to "defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic" We have military bases in EVERY state that borders Mexico. Good practice for them -- send them down to our border!!!! (They have the weapons and BIG guns to aim back!!) GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS