Take a look at this video of a seventy-one year old with a permit to carry. Watch the upper right side of the video then watch the reaction of the robbers. This took place in Fl.
You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Replies
Vidio was very informative but i notice'd that this 71 year old was shooting while these guys were running away,
Poor judgement on his part!. You cant shoot people in the back while there running away according to the ways self defence laws are explained.
Being 68 years old and having carried for the last 20 years, i fully understand that old people are a target most of the time but the law reads it another way folks.Perhaps if he had dropped the guy while he still had a gun in his hand he would have comfortably "walked", shotting them in the back......Bad deal.
Looks like those robbers could have been black, so this must be a hate crime, where the hell is Al and Jessie...lol...
I am 68 and have carried a gun in and out of the US Military for about 47 years. I believe that if one wants to be a thug, let him die like a thug.
I agree.....Just wish the Law looked at it that way.When you really make a close examination of how the courts look at this issue, there seems to be a lot of difference from state to state. California is rather "cut & dryed" so to speak.
You have to be absolutly sure your life was in danger or it falls the other way right on top of you!! Looking at the vidio of this 71 year old, i doubt that he would have had a leg to stand on.
We have the 2nd admendment in the USA.
now this is what i call gun control.but the libs will give the robbers a slap on the wrist,saying they didnt know any better because of their upbringing,and they promise not to rob anymore.
If that was true gun control, those two wouldn't have had a chance to turn to, or have reached the door. Gotta give the defender credit though, straight forward pull, and addresses the problem head on; in true Marine Corps fashion too....."when in doubt, empty the magazine!".
I believe there are MANY MORE Americans that are tired of all of this Bull Excriment, I figure the next thing we'll see is someone addressing "Flashmobs" in a point and click fashion. It's going to get worse as this Country further degrades into a "Robin Hood" mentality.
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis
In the video, as soon as these two thugs walked into the cafe there was an immanent threat to the lives of the people there. The 71 year old hero was minding his own business, until he saw the threat of danger, so he took action, not to injure someone needlessly, but to minimize or eliminate the danger. So, conceal and carry with someone properly trained is a threat to the criminals and thugs.... one for good guys!
As Mr. Williams moved in with weapon raised, he didn’t fire until the thug pointed a weapon at him with deadly intent. Mr. Williams wasted no time in attempting to put an end to the threat. With a clear mind, Mr. Williams got off 3 or 4 shots and with each shot took careful aim, keeping the distance between him and the thugs as close as possible. The two tough guys ran like scared rabbits tripping over each other out the door. So these tough guys aren’t so tough when the odds are even.
Mr. Williams acted responsibly… CASE CLOSED! Send the two thugs to jail for as long as the law allows.
I would also add to this Len, that there are angle gaps in the video presented to the public. We don't know the full story of what happened in part of that encounter. It may further come out that once at the door they tried to retaliate further against Mr. Williams. The video is clips, and can be edited to show a side in one's favor or the others (E.g. his continued return of fire) was there someone else outside, that LEOs haven't caught? We don't know.
Seattle's Channel 7 is uber-liberal biased and last night was running gun story after gun story in attempts to sway the public "See......we don't need guns....all they do is lead to death"......oh, then after the 3 or 4 gun stories, a knife incident.
I am tired of liberals painting the canvas as it's the guns fault. The psychopath behind the gun who consciously makes the decision to needlessly end a life is WHO is at fault and WHO is responsible for their actions, just as much as the permit holder is who decides to be the intervention. The difference, the former is there to do whatever damage they can inflict; the latter is doing whatever it takes to protect life until reinforcements can take over.
Semper Vigilo, Fortis, Paratus et Fidelis
well said snowman8wa
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next