Anyone who tries to limit the Second Amendment by any slight of the pen is just as bad as the criminals in government seats who work tirelessly to remove your God given right to defend yourself and your family against a tyrannical government and thugs who wish to do you and those in your care harm!
Even Conceal Carry Permits and the such are very unconstitutional! There are many who've become desensitized to that fact and think CC is good. That shows how a tyrannical government and groups of folks who want to have full control over you gradually works and then - SOME citizens don't even realize they've been deceived and worse - those some citizens then defend tryanny without even realizing it!
Replies
I agree with the founders.
We are already half way to situation which is now in England (of course, Canada is almost there. In late sixties you did not hear about any shooting in Toronto. Since prohibition of the hand guns, there is no day without shooting over there). Gun laws of 1968 are word by word based on the Nazi laws signed by Hitler in 1938. That is what "we the People" allowed our elected politicians to do .Dictatorial government does not care about well being of the citizens any more. Read the Constitution what you are allowed to do, but be careful, you will be branded as terrorist, enemy of state, as you would be in any communist country. Over there is not very smart to say publicly what is in the Constitution, unless you do not care being prosecuted and rot in some place, forgotten by outside world.
The ONLY reason for the gun control is the control by the Government of the own population. With usurping more and more power (Nazi Germany, all former communist countries and any dictatorship) there is the danger for such governments, that population of the country will start to defend themselves and have means to overthrow such Government. Criminals are in minority and never any danger to the government. Gun control is the goal of any dictatorship to which EVERY government is turning with the time. Obama's administration is a good example of that. Gun control through history produces one result: Genocide.
Quote by Stan Mishin:
“Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.
"Buying from a federal licenced dealer or paying with a credit card is putting a star by your name for future night time visits from DHS".
True. And they will probably want to search your place. But, you can always say that you sold everything off due to needing the money in Ozero's economy. I don't think any state requires that you keep records of who you supposedly sold to....just like the flip side.......the guys you bought your toys from weren't required to keep your name and info.
You could have a junker gun to "let" them find it, and then complain/ask - "you're not going to take my only means of protection, are you?" Smoke screen.
With my husband having moderately severe dementia, all the guns are sold and out of the house. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
And so let it be - forever!!!
Obama is now instituting the same that happened to my country (Australia). You folks are now being attacked ( & obviously your constitution) by a deliberate Marxist plan that has been implimented over last 30 odd years.This is now bearing fruit, firstly they destory you beliefs and scared institutions then they go for Guns (same as has happened in Aus). Then they destory education and a few other tricks like slavery to Govt aka Welfare. Please take note and action now before it is too late.
God Bless.
Andrew
Howdy.
let me inform all here and in GOVERNMENT. those of us who TOOK OUR OATHS when we joined the MILITARY knew that OATH WAS FOR LIFE.
now those in government who took THAT SAME OATH then try and VIOLATE IT have become TRAITORS to the CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.
and our OATH was to DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION NOT GOVERNMENT OR SOME PRETEND PRESIDENT.
so ANYTHING those TRAITORS PASS AS LAW IS NO MORE LAW THAN A COMIC BOOK IS and should be TREATED AS SUCH.
Semper Fi.
Jim.
CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) - Protection Against Tyrannical Government
Dick Act of 1902 (aka Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654) of 28 June 1902
The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities. The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are: (1) the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, (2) the unorganized militia and (3) the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy. The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders. The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard. Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, "the Organized Militia (the National Guard) cannot be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States. The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached. During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country. The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold. Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: "The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States." In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, "that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it." "This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power." The Honorable William Gordon: Congressional Record, House, Page 640 - 1917 Re-Posted 03 Nov 2009
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next