Constitutional Emergency


Will you please find any and all 2012 voter fraud news reports, police reports, court cases and post full information and links for references here in comment section.


This is very important for actions going forward from another organization prior to the electoral college vote.


Thank you all so very much!



Views: 794

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

They are barking up the wrong tree.  The issue is less the vote count, than whether many of the ballots are even valid to be counted. Such high turnouts in precinct after precinct going almost unanimously for the Marxist usurper are statistically impossible and completely in conflict with history.  If Romney/Republicans/voters don't contest this, then they have not only given away the election, but set precedents which will be difficult to overcome later. I see little difference remaining between us and Venezuela.

It is obvious as hell that we had a fraudulent election and an illegitimate would-be dictator. I do not accept this imposter thug as our President. How about you?

In addition to ballot fraud, we have court fraud, overturning/blocking/impeding laws designed to prevent fraud, media/reporting fraud/campaign finance fraud and more.

Romney is not the first weak sister to easily concede a fraudulent election.  I can still remember the Nixon-Kennedy contest, decided by fraud in Cook County, Ill. History repeats itself, but on a far larger scale in 2012.

If patriots lack the will to fight this, should I even bother anymore?  Do we even have enough patriots remaining?

Chapel Hill Killer Registered At and Voted From Mental Hospital
Dozens of mentally disabled registered in stepped-up efforts by state

By Don Carrington,
Nov. 2nd, 2012

The Murdoch Developmental Center in Butner is one of several state-run residential facilities for the developmentally disabled or mentally ill where voter registration efforts targeting patients have been conducted.

BUTNER ­ Recent stepped-up voter registration efforts at state mental hospitals and facilities for the developmentally disabled resulted in the registration of Wendell Justin Williamson, who in 1995 killed two people in Chapel Hill and was judged not guilty by reason of insanity.

Election records show Williamson, a patient at Central Regional Hospital in Butner, was registered on Sept. 13 as an unaffiliated voter. He cast an absentee ballot that was accepted Oct. 15 by the Granville County Board of Elections.

In a street shootout in January 1995 near the UNC-Chapel Hill campus, Williamson, a law student, used an M-1 rifle to kill two strangers. The not-guilty verdict caused a national furor. He attracted additional headlines this week when a judge granted Williamson unsupervised off-campus privileges.

Efforts to register mental patients and residents of centers for the developmentally disabled have taken place in recent months in several locations around the state.

Employees of the Murdoch Developmental Center, a state-run facility in Butner for the mentally retarded and developmentally disabled, recently registered 36 of the more than 500 residents to vote in what appears to have been a voter registration drive at the facility. In addition, some residents were checked out of the facility and transported to early voting centers to cast votes.

As of Oct. 30, eight of the center’s residents had voted in person at one of the two early voting sites in Granville County, Carolina Journal has learned. One of the sites is at the Creedmoor City Hall, four miles from the Murdoch Center. The residents voted at the early voting locations on five different days.

Registration activities also appear to have taken place at two other centers serving those with extreme developmental disabilities ­ the Riddle Developmental Center in Morganton and the Caswell Developmental Center in Kinston.

By law, facility employees are prohibited from assisting the residents with voting, but each resident could have asked an election site official for help in completing a ballot. The developmentally disabled also may receive help from a close relative or legal guardian, but CJ has been unable to determine if these rules were followed in any of the instances in Granville County.

A source who wished to remain anonymous told CJ that Murdoch Center employees recently asked all residents if they wanted to vote, and that they then helped register those who indicated they did. All the patients living at Murdoch Center have been diagnosed with “profound, severe, or moderate intellectual/developmental disabilities or a related disability.”

The registration drive was unusual because the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services currently requires each facility for the developmentally disabled to ask new residents, at the time they first receive services at the facility, if they wish to register to vote.

According to Granville County Elections Director Tonya Burnette, no one residing at 1600 East C Street in Butner, the address of the Murdoch Center, had registered to vote until a couple of months ago. Presumably, the 36 residents that recently have been registered had indicated they did not want to register to vote when they first were admitted to the facility.

CJ has had difficulty obtaining more detailed information on voting-related activities at Murdoch because facility directors are told not to talk with reporters. All media calls are referred to Julie Henry, acting director of public affairs for DHHS.

Advocates for the physically, mentally, and psychologically disabled have been pushing to increase the voter participation of disabled citizens, as a feature story in the October issue of The Atlantic reported. Some of the activities have been controversial, as advocates of the disabled historically have railed against the political exploitation of individuals who are severely incapacitated.

CJ reported last week that state workers offered assistance with voting activities to mentally ill patients at a Cherry Hospital, a state-run mental health facility in Goldsboro. That assistance, which has included registering voters, applying for absentee ballots, and assistance in filling out those ballots, appears to be a violation of state law.

Voter registration activities also appear to have taken place at the J. Iverson Riddle Development Center in Morganton. Burke County Elections Board records show that nine persons are registered to vote at the center’s address ­ 300 Enola Road, Morganton. Six of the nine were recent registrations. Residents of the state-owned facility have “profound or severe mental retardation, or a related developmental disability.”

Additional voter registration activities appear to have taken place at the Caswell Center in Kinston, another state facility for persons with intellectual disabilities. Lenoir County Board of Elections records show that 17 voters list their address as 2415 West Vernon Avenue ­ the address of the Caswell Center. Ten of the voters were recent registrations. Residents of the center have been diagnosed with “profound, severe, or moderate intellectual/developmental disabilities or a related disability.”

CJ asked if Gov. Bev Perdue was aware of the voter registration and absentee ballot activities that have taken place at the state’s psychiatric and developmentally disabled facilities. “DHHS is going to respond on behalf of the administration,” spokeswoman Christine Mackey said.

Spokeswoman Henry said the voter-related activities of DHHS employees followed federal law. “The department has no information that any law has been violated,” she told CJ. “Moreover, the information the Department does have is that its facilities are complying with the mandates of a federal law, the National Voter Registration Act.”

CJ asked Henry to provide all documents and correspondence related to the voting activities at all facilities. She is in the process of compiling that information.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993

A July 2009 guide to disability rights laws published by the U.S. Department of Justice includes a section on the NVRA, aka the Motor Voter Act. “One of the basic purposes of the act is to increase the historically low registration rates of minorities and persons with disabilities that have resulted from discrimination,” the guide says. “The Motor Voter Act requires all offices of state-funded programs that are primarily engaged in providing services to persons with disabilities to provide all program applicants with voter registration forms, to assist them in completing the forms, and to transmit completed forms to the appropriate State official.”

To assist agencies in complying with the Motor Voter Act, DHHS published the Agency Voter Registration Manual. According to the manual, each service provider “must offer the voter registration form at first contact or upon renewal of services. The purpose of the new law is to make the voter registration process more simple and accessible.”

If a client claims to be registered, “note the fact in the transaction record and move on,” the guide states. “If he/she is not registered and declines to register at that time, ask him/her to sign the declination portion of the voter registration form. If he/she refuses, you should print the customer’s name and date of birth, initial the declination, and print the transaction date.”

Cherry Hospital

Lisa Grafstein, a senior attorney with Disability Rights North Carolina, confirmed that her organization has conducted voter registration activities in conjunction with state employees at Cherry Hospital, a state psychiatric facility in Goldsboro. She would not say what other facilities, if any, her organization had visited to conduct voter registration activities. Disability Rights is a nonprofit advocacy organization headquartered in Raleigh. It receives 95 percent of its funding from federal government grants and is designated the state’s primary protection and advocacy organization for the disabled.

An Oct. 5 memo from Cherry Hospital clinical director Jim Mayo to hospital staff confirmed that Disability Rights helped patients with their absentee ballots. “I want to congratulate the [Health and Wellness Committee] along with Disability Rights of N.C. in conducting a very successful event today assisting patients complete ballots for the general election,” wrote Mayo. The Health and Wellness Committee is an organization of Cherry Hospital employees.

Of the 34 voters registered at Cherry, 21 were registered in September or October. Grafstein acknowledged to CJ that her organization had met with patients at Cherry Hospital this year, offering them the opportunity to register to vote in Wayne County.

North Carolina General Statute 163-226.3 makes it a Class I felony for anyone other than the legal guardian or close relative of a hospital or nursing home patient to apply for an absentee ballot or fill out that ballot on the patient’s behalf. The law was enacted in the 1980s to prevent the political exploitation of elderly and disabled residents of hospitals and nursing homes. The lone exception allowed is if the hospital or nursing home asks the county board of elections to bring in a multipartisan team of registrars, trained by the county, to assist the patients.

CJ could find no evidence that legal guardians, close relatives, or trained multipartisan teams were involved in the recent voting activities at state facilities.

Don Carrington is executive editor of Carolina Journal.

CBS DC   gov-biz1580_35h All News 99.1 WNEW 106.7 The Fan

Video Allegedly Shows Electronic Voting Machine Changing Vote


November 6, 2012 3:10 PM,

WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) ­ A video posted on YouTube at a Pennsylvania polling station allegedly shows an electronic voting machine changing a man’s vote from President Barack Obama to Mitt Romney.

The video, published by “centralpavote,” shows the man pushing the Obama tab on the Perry County machine, but highlighting Romney.

“From the top of Romney’s button down to the bottom of the black checkbox beside Obama’s name was all active for Romney. From the bottom of that same checkbox to the bottom of the Obama button (basically a small white sliver) is what let me choose Obama,” the description stated.

The self-proclaimed software engineer said he pressed the tab for Green Party candidate Jill Stein and that it worked fine. He then asked a volunteer to help about the problem and they reportedly said there was nothing to worry about.

“I asked the voters on either side of me if they had any problems and they reported they did not. I then called over a volunteer to have a look at it,” the engineer said. “She him hawed for a bit then calmly said, ‘It’s nothing to worry about, everything will be OK,’ and went back to what she was doing.”


Department of State spokesman Ron Ruman tells The Associated Press the voting machine has been recalibrated and is back into service after the “momentary glitch.”

Union Thugs Threaten Citizen Election Watchdogs

Posted By J. Christian Adams On March 16, 2012 @ 2:37 pm In Uncategorized | No Comments

The Communist (I do not use that term recklessly) publication People’s World has an article full of threats and libel from union thugs and Soros funded voter fraud deniers directed at law abiding Americans: “Labor raising an “army of 400,000 for the 2012 elections.”

Groups like True the Vote and Judicial Watch are working to cleanse the voter rolls of ineligible and dead voters, using federal laws Eric Holder’s Justice Department won’t enforce.

Here is Larry Cohen, President of the Communications Workers of America with an outright fairy tale:

We know their game,” he said, they even have tried to criminalize voter registration – something that was always considered an act of good citizenship. We will not be deterred. If necessary we will be arrested, if that’s what it takes, to register voters – if that’s what it takes to protect democracy.”

Criminalize voter registration?  Where? How?  Note carefully the threat of lawlessness.  Cohen can’t help it.  A union scorpion will remain a union scorpion.   Another union scorpion, Arlene Holt-Baker of the AFL-CIO adds her threats:

The tea party groups, like the so called “Election Integrity” group in Maryland match names on the voter rolls to all kinds of other databases, including property tax information, arrest records or anything else they can find. Similar groups are at work in at least 30 states.

“We will work with our allies and coalition partners to stop this form of vote suppression,” said Holt Baker.

Some bad news Arline. First, too late.  The work is already done or well along.  And though it might not matter to you, the work of these groups is perfectly legal and protected by Federal law which allows private actions to clean up the voter rolls.  But the law has never been much of a deterrent to the particular species of muscle your organization relies upon.

Now some lies funded by the convicted felon George Soros, courtesy of his voter fraud denying mouthpiece, the Advancement Project:

Judith Browne, co-director of one such partner, the Advancement Project, said her organization and many others will work with unions to watch the right wingers hanging around the polls. She described the so-called “watch groups” as “nothing more than voter suppression posses.”

This is libelous.  Judith Browne knows better, but the real aim is stoking up the ignorant mob that reads Communist affiliated publications.  The better question is why is anyone from the Advancement Project talking to someone from “People’s World.”  Of course we all know the answer.  And we also know why so many lawyers from the Advancement Project have been hired by Eric Holder’s Voting Section to oversee the 2012 Presidential Election.  Just last week, one Advancement Project veteran, Elizabeth Westfall was arguing in federal court against the voter ID law in Texas.

And how does the union muscle plan on countering this wave of law-abiding citizen watchdogs?  There is a uniquely union method – “intensive conversations.”

“We can’t write checks for ten and thirty million,” said Holt Baker but “what we can do is engage in intensive, deep, one-on-one conversations between the 400,000 unionists going out there and voters, in their workplaces and at their doors.  The labor leaders said the volunteers will carry out intensive conversations.

The good news is that this year, Patriots recognize the stakes, even Patriots who belong to unions.  They don’t want to live in a country where “intensive conversations” with thugs is normalized and are tired of slander of the law abiding.  This time, the thugs are going to lose.

Article printed from Rule of Law:

URL to article:

All of the articles from Gulag Bound tagged with Voter Fraud

NAACP Takes Over Polling Location

By GOPUSA Staff November 5, 2012 7:19 am,
Print   Tell a Friend    []  
Text Size: A A A

[]As early voting continued in Houston on Friday, an incident occurred that should serve as a shocking reminder that there are those who care nothing about voting rules and integrity. Members of the NAACP took over a polling location and broke multiple election laws. Despite repeated requested by a poll watcher, to halt their activities, the NAACP members continued with their pro-Obama rhetoric and moving certain people from the back of the line to the front. This is what Americans need to watch for in the closing days.

As report on, poll watcher Eve Rockford was absolutely stunned by what she saw going on at her polling location:

According to Eve Rockford, a poll watcher trained by voter integrity group True the Vote, three NAACP members showed up to the 139 precinct location with 50 cases of bottled water and began handing bottles out to people standing in line. While wearing NAACP labeled clothing, members were "stirring the crowd" and talking to voters about flying to Ohio to promote President Barack Obama.

After watching what was occurring, Rockford approached Polling Supervisor Rose Cochran about what she was seeing.

"I went to the polling supervisor and let her know that it was not appropriate that they were in the building handing out water. She ignored me. I repeated my statement. She told me that she would handle it. She did nothing. I then went to the assistant supervisor and he stood up, walked over to another table and then sat down. I then walked into the waiting room and they were reloading another dolly with more cases of water," Rockford said in a True the Vote incident report.

After handing out water and advocating for President Obama, the NAACP members started handpicking and moving people to the front of a long voting line inside the polling place according to the incident report. After multiple complaints from voters about the line cutting, Rockford received a phone call from downtown telling her to "stand down."

Rockford says she later received a phone call stating that it was ok for the NAACP to be doing what they were doing and that she should back off.

This is law and order in America? If election laws can be so blatantly violated, what happens next?

Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts

truther November 12, 2012 ,

Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day.  In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes.  So how in the world did this happen?  Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote.  Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County.  There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won.  But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory.  And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw- large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama.  However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre.  Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas?  In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less.  Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there.  Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?


Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them.

But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation.

Maybe there is some rational explanation for the numbers that you are about to see.  If there is, I would really love to hear it.

What makes all of this even more alarming is that there were reports of voting machine problems during early voting in Ohio.  It was being reported that some voters were claiming that they tried to vote for Romney but that the voting machines kept recording their votes as votes for Obama…

“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.

Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.

“I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney’s name,” Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.

She said that the first time she pushed “Romney,” the machine marked “Obama.”

So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.

“Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times,” she told Fox News.

The numbers that you are about to see are quite dramatic.  They come straight from the website of the Cuyahoga County board of elections.  Once again, I am not alleging that election fraud has actually taken place.  What I am saying is that these numbers look very, very strange and that somebody needs to start asking some questions.

Posted below are voting results from the presidential election from various precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.  If you wish to verify these numbers, you can do so right here.  In each case, the specific precinct is identified first, followed by the number of votes for Obama and then the number of votes for Romney.

In this first set of Cuyahoga County precincts, Mitt Romney received exactly zero votes in each instance…

0154 CLEVELAND -02-Q: 542 - 0  0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 - 0  0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 - 0  0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 - 0  0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 - 0  0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 - 0  0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 - 0  0232 CLEVELAND -06-L: 70 - 0  0233 CLEVELAND -06-M: 419 - 0  0241 CLEVELAND -06-U: 118 - 0  0248 CLEVELAND -07-F: 361 - 0  0273 CLEVELAND -08-J: 472 - 0  0280 CLEVELAND -08-Q: 49 - 0  0285 CLEVELAND -09-B: 414 - 0  0288 CLEVELAND -09-E: 478 - 0  0523 EAST CLEVELAND -04-C: 486 - 0  

Are we actually supposed to believe that not a single person wanted to vote for Mitt Romney in any of those precincts?

But wait, there’s more.

In this next set of results we get to see many of the precincts where Mitt Romney received exactly one vote…

0118 CLEVELAND -01-A: 438 - 1  0144 CLEVELAND -02-G: 532 - 1  0183 CLEVELAND -04-C: 548 - 1  0185 CLEVELAND -04-E: 522 - 1  0190 CLEVELAND -04-J: 434 - 1  0200 CLEVELAND -05-A: 364 - 1  0217 CLEVELAND -05-R: 357 - 1  0240 CLEVELAND -06-T: 148 - 1  0272 CLEVELAND -08-I: 473 - 1  0274 CLEVELAND -08-K: 382 - 1  0276 CLEVELAND -08-M: 492 - 1  0279 CLEVELAND -08-P: 378 - 1  0284 CLEVELAND -09-A: 320 - 1  0287 CLEVELAND -09-D: 394 - 1  0289 CLEVELAND -09-F: 468 - 1  0290 CLEVELAND -09-G: 400 - 1  0303 CLEVELAND -10-C: 471 - 1  0312 CLEVELAND -10-L: 363 - 1  0314 CLEVELAND -10-N: 340 - 1  0315 CLEVELAND -10-O: 473 - 1  0512 EAST CLEVELAND -02-D: 437 - 1  0513 EAST CLEVELAND -02-E: 359 - 1  1040 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-A: 523 - 1  1041 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-B: 514 - 1  

Do these numbers look believable to anyone out there?

Now let’s look at some of the Cuyahoga County precincts were Mitt Romney received exactly two votes…

0120 CLEVELAND -01-C: 531 - 2  0128 CLEVELAND -01-K: 470 - 2  0136 CLEVELAND -01-S: 635 - 2  0147 CLEVELAND -02-J: 541 - 2   0148 CLEVELAND -02-K: 632 - 2  0149 CLEVELAND -02-L: 531 - 2  0153 CLEVELAND -02-P: 564 - 2  0155 CLEVELAND -02-R: 509 - 2  0187 CLEVELAND -04-G: 491 - 2  0188 CLEVELAND -04-H: 508 - 2  0194 CLEVELAND -04-N: 520 - 2  0211 CLEVELAND -05-L: 461 - 2  0213 CLEVELAND -05-N: 324 - 2  0222 CLEVELAND -06-B: 637 - 2  0225 CLEVELAND -06-E: 505 - 2  0226 CLEVELAND -06-F: 342 - 2  0234 CLEVELAND -06-N: 244 - 2  0236 CLEVELAND -06-P: 438 - 2  0249 CLEVELAND -07-G: 446 - 2  0250 CLEVELAND -07-H: 358 - 2  0251 CLEVELAND -07-I: 445 - 2  0253 CLEVELAND -07-K: 429 - 2  0256 CLEVELAND -07-N: 433 - 2  0262 CLEVELAND -07-T: 363 - 2  0269 CLEVELAND -08-F: 463 - 2  0270 CLEVELAND -08-G: 516 - 2  0278 CLEVELAND -08-O: 405 - 2  0302 CLEVELAND -10-B: 452 - 2  0311 CLEVELAND -10-K: 476 - 2  0511 EAST CLEVELAND -02-C: 319 - 2  0515 EAST CLEVELAND -03-A: 359 - 2  0516 EAST CLEVELAND -03-B: 459 - 2  0519 EAST CLEVELAND -03-E: 293 - 2  0526 EAST CLEVELAND -04-F: 517 - 2  0625 HIGHLAND HILLS -00-A: 377 - 2   

These numbers look even more bizarre when you start comparing them with the overall results from the rest of Cuyahoga County that you can find right here.

The results from most of the precincts look very much like what you would expect from a competitive national election.

But there are more than 100 precincts where the results look incredibly suspicious.  Here are some more precincts where Barack Obama won more than 99% of the vote…

0119 CLEVELAND -01-B: 558 - 4  0121 CLEVELAND -01-D: 452 - 3  0122 CLEVELAND -01-E: 671 - 5  0123 CLEVELAND -01-F: 704 - 6  0124 CLEVELAND -01-G: 543 - 3  0126 CLEVELAND -01-I: 674 - 4  0127 CLEVELAND -01-J: 687 - 4  0130 CLEVELAND -01-M: 781 - 4  0132 CLEVELAND -01-O: 615 - 4  0133 CLEVELAND -01-P: 733 - 5  0134 CLEVELAND -01-Q: 753 - 6  0135 CLEVELAND -01-R: 697 - 5  0142 CLEVELAND -02-E: 434 - 3  0145 CLEVELAND -02-H: 571 - 3  0150 CLEVELAND -02-M: 503 - 4  0151 CLEVELAND -02-N: 601 - 3  0152 CLEVELAND -02-O: 621 - 3  0156 CLEVELAND -02-S: 471 - 4  0157 CLEVELAND -03-A: 489 - 3  0184 CLEVELAND -04-D: 576 - 3  0186 CLEVELAND -04-F: 572 - 3  0189 CLEVELAND -04-I: 503 - 3  0191 CLEVELAND -04-K: 508 - 4  0193 CLEVELAND -04-M: 497 - 4  0195 CLEVELAND -04-O: 599 - 3  0196 CLEVELAND -04-P: 443 - 3  0199 CLEVELAND -04-S: 686 - 5  0203 CLEVELAND -05-D: 569 - 4  0207 CLEVELAND -05-H: 341 - 3  0210 CLEVELAND -05-K: 427 - 3  0212 CLEVELAND -05-M: 340 - 3  0216 CLEVELAND -05-Q: 461 - 4  0218 CLEVELAND -05-S: 515 - 5  0221 CLEVELAND -06-A: 701 - 3  0223 CLEVELAND -06-C: 462 - 4  0227 CLEVELAND -06-G: 401 - 3  0230 CLEVELAND -06-J: 475 - 4  0254 CLEVELAND -07-L: 447 - 4  0261 CLEVELAND -07-S: 449 - 4  0271 CLEVELAND -08-H: 552 - 4  0275 CLEVELAND -08-L: 499 - 3  0282 CLEVELAND -08-S: 517 - 4  0292 CLEVELAND -09-I: 423 - 4  0294 CLEVELAND -09-K: 445 - 4  0307 CLEVELAND -10-G: 428 - 4  0317 CLEVELAND -10-Q: 446 - 3  0320 CLEVELAND -10-T: 654 - 5  0510 EAST CLEVELAND -02-B: 401 - 4  0518 EAST CLEVELAND -03-D: 374 - 3  0520 EAST CLEVELAND -03-F: 457 - 3  0521 EAST CLEVELAND -04-A: 453 - 4  1045 WARRENSVILLE HTS -04-B: 598 - 4  1049 WARRENSVILLE HTS -06-B: 480 - 4  

Once again, perhaps there is a rational explanation for all of this.

But I find it really hard to believe that one candidate would get more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in one of the most important counties in the most hotly contested swing state of the 2012 election.

Unfortunately, we may never know the truth about these election results.  We are just told that we can trust the voting machines and that we can trust whatever results they end up spitting out at us.

Look, I don’t know what the truth is, but where there is smoke there is usually fire.  Voters reported tens of thousands of voting problems on election day, and it will be an absolute disgrace if those complaints are brushed under the rug now that the election is over.

Setting aside who won or who lost, the legitimacy of our elections if of the utmost importance.  If we cannot even trust the ballot box, what do we have left?

I sincerely hope that authorities in Ohio and in the other swing states will investigate some of the voting “irregularities” that are being reported.

Millions of Americans are watching, and if all of this just gets swept under the rug there are going to be a whole lot more people that will lose faith in these voting machines.

I know that I already have.

Couldn't remember if this website has already been listed: 






It appears that your Republican Party, back in 1980, may have broken the 1965 Voter's Protection act and in an effort to keep from being fined or imprisoned, they signed away YOUR rights to fair and clean elections, apparently for all time.... 

so what your saying that now that gives the Dems all rights to cheat and nothing can be done they both cheat so how can they do it to one party then something has to be done if we knew this we would not have even bother to vote


Fox Sites
10:32 am ET November 7, 2012 ,

Voter Fraud Watch: Two Election Judges Replaced After Illegal Activity in Ohio

Fox News senior correspondent Eric Shawn appeared on America’s Newsroom to report on possible voting problems and voter fraud in the battleground state of Ohio.

Shawn detailed reports of broken voting machines and ballot scanners in addition to long lines and hours of waiting. He then explained that some voters arrived at their polling places only to be told they weren't on the voter rolls ­ or worse yet, that they had already voted when they hadn't.

In Hamilton County, the area that houses Cincinnati, two election judges ­ one Republican and one Democrat ­ were replaced after illegally allowing unregistered voters to cast their ballots.

Shawn also pointed out how there are 205,422 provisional ballots yet to be counted in Ohio, which is more than double the difference (100,763) between the confirmed popular vote. For those who cast those provisional votes, there are still 10 days to contact election officials and claim eligibility.


At the url below is a trilogy of articles that ran five years ago and since the elections seems to be making the rounds all over again. It provides a compelling case for the assertion that the real cause of vote fraud is "vote secrecy". It is titled: "Why You Can't Vote Them Out" - Wanna Know A Secret? - The Vote Hasn't Always Been "Secret"!




Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts

How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live" shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......


© 2020   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service