Constitutional Emergency

JW Asks Federal Court to Order Release of bin Laden Funeral and Burial Documents

JW Asks Federal Court to Order Release of bin Laden Funeral and Burial Documents

"The necessity of conducting the global war on terror should not render the U.S. government so afraid of its own shadow that it refuses to release truthful information to the American people when required by FOIA."


This was an argument JW made in a key motion filed on July 11, 2013 with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as we continue our pursuit of records related to the burial of terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden.

Specifically, Judicial Watch's expert legal team filed the motion (specifically, a "
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment") against the Department of the Navy challenging the withholding of information relating to "descriptions of the actual funeral and burial of bin Laden."

This latest legal filing is all part of our ongoing
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the Department of Defense (DOD) and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) seeking "all photographs and/or video recordings of Osama (Usama) bin Laden taken during and/or after the U.S. military operation in Pakistan on or about May 1, 2011"

As you recall, the Obama administration is hiding behind the bogus claim of national security in keeping these records secret.

The DOD claims that releasing the information could harm national security by (1) providing the nation's adversaries with "information they could use to thwart future sensitive military operation, and (2) inciting al-Qaida members to attack United States citizens."

And, as you might expect, we find that explanation unacceptable and without legal basis.

In the first place, as we argued in our court filing, JW "seeks only descriptions of the burial and funeral, and not any sensitive military information which could be used to thwart possible future military operation." 

And with respect to this "don't offend the terrorists" provision the administration created out of thin air to keep JW from accessing images of the deceased terrorist, Judicial Watch argues that the burial descriptions "cannot be withheld under the D.C. Circuit Court's recently announced 'inciting violence' test in Judicial Watch v. DoD."

That test, which arose in our case disputing the withholding of images of the deceased bin Laden, required the government to present evidence of a "reasonably analogous" situation in which release of information incited violence in the past. In this particular lawsuit, we're not after images, we're after mere descriptions of the funeral and the Obama administration has no such analogous situation to draw upon in keeping this information under lock and key. (Although when has the law ever been a guiding force for this administration?)

While I don't know if the terrorists would be offended by this information (and, as I say, it's irrelevant), I suspect the American people might be.

As you may recall, we previously uncovered 31 pages of
heavily redacted emails concerning the burial, including a paragraph with previously unknown details of the bin Laden internment at sea: "Traditional procedures for Islamic burial was [sic] followed. The deceased body was washed (ablution) then placed in a white sheet. The body was placed in a weighted bag. A military officer read prepared religious remarks, which were translated into Arabic by a native speaker. After words were complete, the body was placed on a prepared flatboard, tipped up, whereupon the deceased's body slid into the sea."

Now, those records did not include the "prepared religious remarks" read at bin Laden's burial as specified in the Judicial Watch FOIA request. However, if Navy regulations were followed, the remarks likely included the exculpatory Muslim prayer, "O Allah, forgive him, have mercy on him, pardon him, grant him security, provide him a nice place and spacious lodging, wash him (off from his sins) with water, snow, and ice, purify him ... make him enter paradise and save him from the trials of grave and the punishment of hell."

A ceremony where the American government prayed for the soul of one of the world's most despicable and hateful terrorists might help explain why we've had to fight so hard for these records, which remain secret courtesy of a couple of court rulings.

JW filed its original FOIA lawsuit against the DOD and CIA on May 13, 2011.  On April 26, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia blocked access to the materials requested in a decision that was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on May 21, 2013.

The Obama administration's unprecedented stonewalling on basic information about the bin Laden operation makes a mockery of President Obama's promises of transparency. And the courts should not rubberstamp this continuing denial of the American people's right to access government information.

As I say, there is no provision of the Freedom of Information Act that allows documents to be kept secret because their release might offend our terrorist enemies (or the American people back home, for that matter).

BREAKING NEWS! IRS Scandal Blockbuster

As I write this week's update, news is breaking in the Obama IRS scandal as the House Oversight Committee held hearings on Thursday. This investigation involves a concerted effort by the tax-collecting agency to target and retaliate against groups that opposed the Obama presidential campaign. (Details
here.  And check out the panel we hosted on the scandal here.) 

I will have more from you next week, however, I wanted to give you some critical breaking news. Evidently, according to congressional investigators, instructions to target Tea Party organizations emanated out of Washington, DC, and not low level IRS officials in the Cincinnati office, as previously claimed.

Per The Washington Times.

IRS employees have told congressional investigators that they were ordered by the agency's Washington office to give extra scrutiny to tea party groups' applications for tax-exempt status, according to excerpts from interviews with the employees that were released by House committee chairmen Wednesday.


Carter Hull, a tax law specialist with 48 years of experience at the IRS, told investigators that Lois Lerner, the former head of the Exempt Organizations division, demanded he send some of the reviews of tea party groups to the IRS chief counsel's office in Washington. The chief counsel is one of two political appointees in the IRS.


You will recall, Lois Lerner issued a statement before Congress professing her innocence and then plead the 5th, refusing to testify.  This new revelation further explodes the lie that the IRS attack on conservatives was the result of rogue agent activity in IRS's Cincinnati office.  The DC establishment is trying to bury the IRS scandal.  Don't let them.  Begin getting the word out!  As I say, more on this next week.

Until then...

Tom Fitton
President

Views: 225

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I would love to see those documents.

Make  that   2  or  200  million  more  American  people

who cares he is dead keep his burial site undisclosed so they can not make it into a shrine or the site of a mosques like they are doing for the 9/11 site.

Is he really dead, where is SEAL TEAM 6?

Are any of them around to support the actual burial?

RSS

About

Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11



HOW TO JOIN YOUR STATE GROUP

1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts


How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......

Events

© 2020   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service