Constitutional Emergency

The following email message was sent to the Department of Justice; Criminal Complaints division:
Correspondences by e-mail may be sent to Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov (link sends e-mail)
Anyone who wishes to copy and send this again is welcome too do so.

Someone please tell me how can American citizens place and file complaints of real and factual criminal charges when the complaints are against people within our own damned Federal Government;
Please - Do NOT stop reading right here and simply dismiss this as just another kook with a burnt hot-dog to bitch about.
I am talking about people being killed, Yes - murdered,,,,, Land being taken from them by agents of the Federal Government,, Federal courts, Judges, and Prosecutors being used to imprison people and whole families destroyed. All because three very powerful people within our own Government decided to cash-in on mulit-national land and minerals transactions.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions says he approves of the job and actions of the Federal Prosecutor. But AG Session NEVER EVEN READ THE COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS. Mister Sessions apparently spoke briefly with the prosecutor, but NEVER bothered to actually look or learn of the actual charges against these people.

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions yesterday praised the lead attorney in the government's prosecution of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy but also said he would not be "taking sides" in the trials related to the 2014 armed standoff between ranchers and federal agents near Bunkerville, Nev.

In an appearance in Nevada, Sessions briefly raised the Bunkerville trials to laud Nevada acting U.S. Attorney Steven Myhre, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported. The government has divided its prosecution into three cases, one of which began a retrial this week after a jury deadlocked on charges against four of six defendants in April.

"I've got to tell you, it's impressive when you have a tough case, a controversial case, and you've got the top guy leading the battle, going to court, standing up and defending the office and the principles of the law," Sessions said.

But he added: "I'm not taking sides or commenting on the case. Just want to say that leadership requires, a lot of times, our people to step up and be accountable."

Sessions' refusal to take a position on the Bunkerville trials is notable because the Bundys and their supporters hoped the Trump administration would offer them some relief in their battle with the federal government."

Yes - It WOULD be nice to see somebody actually stand up and defend the rule of law, stand up and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. But you will NOT find any justice within the court room of Judge Gloria Navarro. Judge Navarro has catagorically and absolutely forbidden the defendants and their attorneys from even mentioning the Constitution, or any mention of the 1st, 2nd or any other Amendments.
The defense has essentially, and literally, been barred from presenting any actual defense. The are NOT allowed to present testimony about WHY they even went to Bunkerville in 2014. These men are NOT allowed to testify that they went there to protect and defend the Bundy family.
they have been forbidden to even say that.
Defend the Bundy family from WHAT? THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PRESENT TESTIMONY CONCERNING WHAT THEY FELT WAS A THREAT TO THE BUNDYS.

But Attorney General Sessions says "I'm not taking sides on this"
It might be helpful if he asked what the hell this Bundy / Bunkerville case is all about in the first place.
WHY did these men reportedly point guns at federal agents? What could possibly move people to do such a thing?
You can NOT ask the defendants in Gloria Navarro's court room,,,,,, she has forbidden them the answer that kind of question.

How do American citizens seek justice when the criminals are part of our own Federal Government?
Do we always have to resort to the use of guns and force?

Charges and law suit;

Plaintiff: The United States of America, We-The-People.
Defendants: Included but not limited; Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator Harry Reid, Agents and employees of the Bureau of Land Management states of Oregon, Nevada. Agents and employees of the Federal Wild Life service, States of Oregon and Nevada,

Oregon Judge Hammond case, Oregon prosecutors Hammond cases,
Nevada Judge Gloria Navarro, (Bundy cases) Nevada prosecutors, (Bundy cases),

Claims of criminal charges, complaints and charges:
Conspiracy to defraud, theft, Racketeering, collusion, Conspiring against the American people, Treason, Murder, Abuse of Office, Abuse of Power, Violations against the Constitution, Various offenses and violations of denying and abusing civil rights of citizen's currently incarcerated in State and Federal prison, (Nevada Bundy cases, and Hammonds in Oregon). (Additional charges and complaints to be added).

Law suit $145 Million dollars, Estimated proceeds received by Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton for her part in the Russian Uranium transactions, $38 Million dollars as the estimated proceeds received by Senator Harry Reid as payment for his part in the transactions of the Nevada land and reported subsequent sale to China and/or other foreign entities, $38 million dollars in damages to the Bundy, Finnicum, and the Hammond families. Total $221 Million. The people also seek restitution and restoration back to the States, Counties, and the ranchers and farmers, of all federal lands, minerals,and water rights, taken by the BLM, EPA, and any other federal agencies.

Charges: Listed but not limited to the following:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Acting as Secretary of State of the United States of America, Colluded with and sold or otherwise transferred rights and control of Uranium supplies to a foreign entity, (Uranium One A Canadian corporation later owned by The Russian Government). Said Uranium deposits located in land withing the borders of the Continental United States of America, More specifically located within the borders and boundaries of the States of Oregon, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, Others may be included as may be discovered.)

US Senator Harry Reid, Senator of the State of Nevada: Colluded and conspired to defraud the State of Nevada, and County of Clark County Nevada to seize and/or otherwise secure ownership of lands and mineral rights held either by the State of Nevada or by various private land deeds of trust held by various Ranchers and farmers, Including Mister Cliven Bundy and other members of the Bundy family, as well as other Farmers and Ranchers within the State of Nevada.

Summary of complaints and charges:
The United States of America is estimated to be in debt to various foreign entities and foreign Governments in excess of 19-TRILLION Dollars, , In an effort to secure collateral against such foreign debt the United States of America has set up various treaties and agreements withing the United Nations. Some of these treaties and agreements may or may not have been set in place by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Irregardless of whether of not Secretary Clinton was instrumental is setting those treaties and policies, or agreements, Secretary Clinton and US Senator Harry Reid decided to take advantage of the circumstances to personally benefit financially by seizing ownership and control over certain assets, Land and mineral rights within the boundaries of the United States.
In her activities and in the process of selling or otherwise granting ownership and/or control of Uranium Ore deposits to the Canadian company, later transferred to Uranium One corporation owned by Russia, Secretary Clinton discovered that in order to complete said transactions they would first have to remove the current occupants and owners of the land and properties. They (Clinton and others) Conspired with the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and the Wild Life Service, Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA) (others my be included as discovered), to remove the current land owners. The Hammond Family Ranchers in Harney County specifically were targeted to be removed by the BLM and Wild Life Service. Searching for any way possible the BLM charged the Hammonds with”Domestic Terrorism” because they started and set a Back-fire to extinguish wild range fires and that Back-fire inadvertently crossed the land boundaries of the Hammond Ranch. The fire subsequently burned an estimated 120 acres of open range land which the BLM claimed was Federal land. The Hammonds were arrested and charged as Domestic Terrorists for setting range fires in an effort to extinguish wild fires. A practice which the BLM engages in on a regular basis. Once convicted in a Federal court the Hammonds were sentenced to one year(??? Check sentences) For the elder Dwight Hammond and 6 Months for Steven Hammond. The men did serve those sentences and were subsequently released from Prison. A situation which apparently did not satisfy the requirements and demands of Secretary Hillary Clinton to have the Ranchers completely removed from the land. Again acting as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered or otherwise conveyed instructions to a Judge and Prosecutors office in Oregon to return the Hammonds to prison. The two men were subsequently returned to Prison to fulfill the terms of the earlier mandatory 5 years sentences which had been reduced by the previous judge. The Hammond Family was then forced to sign documents which would guarantee sale and transfer of ownership of the land to the BLM, and the Hammonds were fined a reported $250,000 in addition to being returned to prison. Arrangements and documents were completed for the transfer of ownership and control of the Hammon Properties was complete. Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton was paid an estimated $145 Million dollars for her part in securing and transfer of the Uranium to the Russian corporation and the Russian Government.

2014, The Bundy Ranch standoff; During much of the same time period and extending back a few years before the activities of Secretary Clinton, Senator Harry Reid and his Son were already engaged in a similar efforts to secure and obtain land and mineral rights in Nevada. It has been estimated that 57 ranchers had already been removed from the land mass known as the Gold Butte area of south eastern Nevada. When it was discovered that the last standing Rancher and land owner, Mr. Cliven Bundy, had been in a long time dispute with the BLM over range grazing fees, those efforts to remove the Bundy's from the land was again amplified and the BLM was ordered to remove the Bundy cattle from the open range in Nevada. A situation which was anticipated to attract opposition by the Bundy family and other local Ranchers. The efforts to remove the Bundy cattle resulted in what is now referred to as the Stand Off at the Bundy Ranch. The Bundy's and several other men have been incarcerate in Nevada prison without the benefit of indictment by a grand jury or due process of law under the Constitution by Nevada Federal Magistrate Judge Gloria Navarro for more than 8 months. (Violations of defendants rights under the US Constitution).

During the re-sentencing of Dwight and Steven Hammon in Oregon, (2016), several of the Bundy family Sons and several other men and women went to Burns Oregon to protest the re-sentencing of Dwight and Steven Hammond and to protest against the BLM and federal Government take over of Oregon land. This has become known as the Oregon Stand off at the Malheur Wild Like Reserve. The Bundys and several others were subsequently arrested and stood trial. One man Lavoy Finnicum was shot and killed by FBI and Oregon State police. Ammon, and Ryan Bundy and the other men arrested for the Standoff were later acquitted of all charges. But Mr. Cliven Bundy, Ammon and Ryan Bundy were once again arrested in Oregon and transferred to Nevada prison where they remain awaiting trial for the 2013 Stand Off at the Bundy Ranch.

Nevada Judge Gloria Navarro:
Federal judicial service:
On September 11, 2009, Sen. Harry Reid contacted Navarro to inquire about her interest in serving on the federal bench. After a video conference interview with Reid, the senator told Navarro on September 22, 2009 that he would be recommending her to President Obama for consideration to serve as a judge on the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On December 24, 2009, Obama formally nominated Navarro to the vacancy, which was created by the resignation of Judge Brian Sandoval.[1][3] On March 4, 2010, the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary voted to send Navarro's nomination to the full Senate for consideration.[4] On May 5, 2010, the United States Senate voted 98-0 to confirm Navarro to her judgeship.[5] She received her commission on May 6, 2010. On January 1, 2014 Navarro succeeded Robert Clive Jones as Chief Judge.[6][2]

Bunkerville standoff trials

See also: Bundy Standoff

In the first Bunkerville standoff case in 2017, Navarro declared a mistrial after a jury convicted two men of some of the counts in the indictment and reported that they were "hopelessly deadlocked" on the remaining counts.[7] She scheduled retrials of the defendants in that trial and trials of the remaining 11 defendants for June 26, 2017.[8]

Shortly after the Stand off at the Bundy ranch in 2013 Senator Harry Reid said of the event “This is not over yet”. Judge Gloria Navarro appears to be fulfilling her role and duties in guaranteeing Senator Harry Reid that none of the Bundy family will ever return to their Nevada ranch.


Two men who were found guilty in the first set of trials have been sentenced to inordinate long prison sentences by Judge Navarro. One of the men believing he would receive a reduced sentence of 8 months plead guilty but was instead sentenced to 8 ½ years for traveling from New Hampshire to Nevada to help defend the Bundys. Another faces a maximum sentence of 57 years in Federal prison.


“A jury found two men guilty of federal charges Monday in an armed standoff that stopped federal agents from rounding up cattle near Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch in 2014.

Jurors said they were deadlocked on charges against four other men, and the judge told them to keep deliberating.

Gregory Burleson, 53, of Phoenix, was found guilty of eight charges, including threatening and assaulting a federal officer. Todd Engel, 49, of Boundary County, Idaho, was found guilty of obstruction and traveling across state lines in aid of extortion.”
https://www.agweb.com/article/2-found-guilty-in-1st-trial-over-bund...

Update, July 2017; Gregory Burleson, now 53, blind and in a wheel chair, was sentenced to 68 years in the federal penitentiary for his participation in the 2014 stand off at the Bundy Ranch.

Violations of defendant's civil rights:

Judge Gloria Navarro has refused to allow the Bundy defendants to use the 1st, 2nd, or any part of the US Constitution as part of their defense. According to reports from people in attendance during juror selections and while motions are being filed by both the prosecutor and the defendant's attorneys, Judge Navarro refused the motion by the defense attorney to submit the Constitution of the United States of America, and more specifically the 1st and 2nd amendments as a portion of their defense. Judge Navarro denied that motion and stated that the Defendant's had NO Constitutional rights in her court room.

This raises the question of precisely what is this judges title and from what authority does she preside over this trial?
Answer = Judge Gloria Navarro is a United States District Judge. She is a FEDERAL Judge. Appointed By Barrack Hussein Obama and Senator Harry Reid. She was confirmed by the Senate of the United States of America. Therefore SHE operates ONLY under the auspices and authority and sanctioning of that very same US Constitution that SHE denies these defendants to even mention. She is denying these defendants their legal Constitutional rights.

Judge Navarro can NOT have it both ways. She is operating solely under the power and authority of the Constitution but simultaneously denies the defendants their rights under that same Constitution. If she denies the defendant's right to use the Constitution then SHE herself must also be denied the power and authority to operate under that Constitution. She can NOT use the Constitution to prosecute these defendants, (Which she does simply by sitting on that bench), while simultaneously denying them any rights to use it in their defense. In which case then Judge Gloria Navarro HAS NO AUTHORITY TO PRESIDE OVER THIS TRIAL.


There are three fundamental issues at stake in the Bundy and Hammond cases:
#1) Whether of not the people have the rights to own private property;

#2) Whether of not the people have the right to stand up in self defence against a tyrannical government whether it be a State or Federal government.

#3) Last but not least and perhaps the most important issue is whether our Constitution remains relevant, Is the Constitution still the fundamental primary laws of these United States of America? IS the federal Government still bound to the basic principals and fundamental premises of that Constitution? Without that Constitution there can no longer be such a thing as The United States of America.

The real issues behind these Bundy and Hammond cases is not about the Bundy or Hammonds themselves, but about the fundamental questions of land ownership in America and about the American people's rights to stand up against a rouge government agency gone tyrannical and out of control. The actions of the agents of Bureau of Land Management and all actions of these federal prosecutors and judges is all aimed at “teaching” the people a lesson, a lesson in obedience to the State. Including the state and local governments such as the Oregon State Police and the agents of the FBI. The message is loud and clear, The Government will take what they want, when ever they want too, and anyone who stands in their way will either be killed or will spend the rest of their lives in Federal prison. Our Constitutional rights no longer protect the people nor is any government agency or bureaucracy limited or restrained by any such Constitution.
The over riding question in both of these cases (and also including several others) is the Constitution; Whether the Federal Government, various agencies of that Government, any State or local Government officials, or any Law enforcement or court officials are bound under the restraints and limitations of the US Constitution. Many federal and state law enforcement, as well as federal judicial system officials appear now to believe there is no Constitution and that they no longer have any such restraints or limitations. They apparently believe there is no reason for any defendants to be granted any such thing as Constitutional rights.
The Oregon State Police, acting under the orders of Oregon Governor Kate Brown, shot and murdered Lavoy Finnicum. Governor Brown's orders were for them to end the Oregon stand off by what ever means necessary. Finnicum was killed after the stand off had effectively ended and all occupiers were leaving the Wild Life refuge. The message sent loud and clear to make sure no one every does that again.

The message in the Bundy cases is the same, do NOT attempt to stand up against or resist the Federal Government or you will be shot and killed, at the very least you will spend the rest of your lives in Federal prison. Judge Gloria Navarro has made it abundantly clear that anyone appearing in her court room does NOT have any constitutional rights. And that she nor any of her court or prison officials have any obligation to adhere to any old Constitution. The Constitution be damned, it does NOT exist in her Nevada Court room.

The Declaration of Independence:

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”--

Views: 69

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Posted on Facebook by Doug Knowles;

The Retrial of Defendants Eric Parker, Steven Stewart, Scott Drexler, and Ricky Lovelein took a decided twist today in a Las Vegas Federal courtroom.

The defense had already been shot down by Judge Gloria Navarro. Yesterday, the day was spent previewing the defense witness testimony and Navarro refused to allow their witnesses to take the stand. She called the testimony “Not Relevant”.

She has made it clear that there is no such thing as self defense against the government, or that of defending anyone else against the government. Law enforcement cannot be considered to use “excessive” force in this case. She believes that if any of this is brought to the jury, they may acquit for “jury nullification”. Navarro seems to have a pathological fear of jury nullification.

It was left to Parker to take the stand in his own defense.

Within 10 minutes of taking the stand, AUSA Myhre began his objections. Between Parker mentioning the “First Amendment Zone” that was set up several miles away from the wash and his saying that he “looked up to the right” (where the BLM snipers were located), Myhre nearly went into conniptions.

After long side bars, Navarro finally removed Eric Parker from the witness stand. She came back to the bench and, without explanation, told him to step down. He will not be allowed to continue defending himself, there will be no cross examination and no jury questions.

Parker was so stunned that it took him a minute to get back to the defense table where he became very emotional at the thought of not being allowed to fight for his very life.”The jury was also stunned and shocked. When Judge Navarro released them so abruptly, they all sat there for several moments, with at least a few jurors having their mouths hanging open.

Judge Gloria Navarro made several points earlier, outside of the jury’s hearing. Self Defense is not allowed. Defense of another is equally not a valid defense. Provocation by the government is not a defense. All of these are irrelevant and only go to jury nullification.

Navarro has said that a group of protesters that advance on the government are aggressors and the law is clear that the government agents and law enforcement can defend themselves using deadly force.

Based on the statements, rulings and opinions of Judge Navarro, Martin Luther King, during his march from Selma to Montgomery, could have legally been shot by the government, and his crowd of supporters, as well.

RSS

About

Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11



HOW TO JOIN YOUR STATE GROUP

1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts


How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......

Events

© 2017   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service