Wanted to take the liberty of sharing the following letter that I recently forwarded to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall regarding the recent release of five key Taliban Guantanamo detainees in exchange for US Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/profiles/blogs/letter-to-our-nm-u-s-sen...
Letter To Senator Udall:
“June 6, 2014
The Honorable Tom Udall
United States Senate
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3101
Dear Senator Udall:
As previously mentioned in a recent letter to your office, on or about March 23, 2014, I sent the following letter to you regarding a “Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles”:
“March 23, 2014
Dear Senator Udall,
OPERATION AMERICAN SPRING
Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles
As a patriotic citizen, with unwavering faith in our Creator, Whose divine hand guided our founding fathers in composing the United States Constitution, I acknowledge that many in current leadership are willfully violating their Constitutional obligations or are complicit in the actions of others infringing the Rights of the People, including, but not limited to, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to bear arms, free and fair elections, right to counsel and due process of law.
Under the rights implicit in our People, as stipulated in the First Amendment, I hereby demand immediate Restoration of our Government under its intended Constitutional Principles, rule of law, freedom and personal liberty, and a return to government "of the people, for the people, by the people", free of despotic and tyrannical federal leadership.
To begin the recovery of our Rightful Government, we demand immediate, lawful, and orderly replacement of the following office holders: Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Nancy Pelosi, and Eric Holder according to the process allowed and stipulated in our Constitution.
Mr. Jake Martinez”
Due to the recent unlawful actions taken by President Obama when he once again flouted the law by skirting the requirement of giving Congress a 30 days notice of his intent to free five key Taliban Guantanamo detainees in exchange for US Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, as documented below, I again am hereby respectfully demanding immediate Restoration of our Government under its intended Constitutional Principles, rule of law, freedom and personal liberty, along with a return to government "of the people, for the people, by the people", free of despotic and tyrannical federal leadership.
For your information, I will also be requesting that the U.S. House of Representatives draft articles of impeachment and commence impeachment proceedings for the numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that President Obama has allegedly committed by continually ignoring federal laws, as documented below, while in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s), which I believe they have the power to do in accordance Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution.
The following article and/or blog, which also contains a video, reveal that retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin recently stated that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is clearly a deserter who should never draw a free breath and that President Obama is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors for once again ignoring federal law in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s), which I totally agree with.
What follows is an overview of the general’s comments contained in said article and/or blog regarding President Obama’s unlawful actions, along with what action should be taken against Sgt. Bergdahl:
Regarding President Obama’s actions:
The general stated that President Obama’s actions in this episode demonstrate why he is unfit for office. He categorically dismissed President Obama’s contention that the exchange had to happen to honor America’s commitment to leave no Americans behind. General Boykin said that clearly wasn’t true in Benghazi and that the administration seems to have little regard for a U.S. Marine currently jailed in Mexico, an American pastor imprisoned in Iran or the Sudanese Christian in custody for her faith, along with her two American children.
The general is also taking President Obama to task for once again flouting the law, this time skirting a requirement to give Congress a 30 days notice of his intent to free any Guantanamo detainees. General Boykin states that he understands why President Obama would feel constrained by the law and admits that it might not be constitutional. However, as long as it is the law, he said President Obama is required to abide by it instead of ignoring statutes he doesn’t like, whether on this issue or several others.
Regarding Sgt. Bergdahl’s actions:
General Boykin stated that: 1) They should do an Article 32 investigation surrounding his actions immediately, which is a prelude to a court-martial, and that there can be no other option. 2) They must take him to court-martial and hold him accountable for his actions; 3) If he didn’t desert, then the truth will come out. He goes on to explain that Sgt. Bergdahl’s actions are even more severe than desertion because there were other soldiers that were endangered and that we are now positive that some soldiers were killed in the efforts to find him, which exacerbates his crime from being a simple desertion to being one that resulted in the deaths of his comrades; and 4) If found guilty, Sgt. Bergdahl needs to spend the rest of his life in prison at a minimum.
What follows is said article and/or blog in its entirety:
GENERAL: DESERTER SHOULD NEVER DRAW A FREE BREATH: ‘’He needs to spend the rest of his life in prison at a minimum’!-Posted on WND.com-By GREG COROMBOS-On June 4, 2014:
Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin says Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl is clearly a deserter who should never draw a free breath, and President Obama is guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors for once again ignoring federal law in pursuit of an administration goal.
Boykin is also ripping the president for releasing five key Taliban figures in exchange for Bergdahl and slamming the Obama administration for attacking the character of Afghanistan veterans who publicly denounce Bergdahl’s actions in Afghanistan.
The general said Obama’s actions in this episode demonstrate why he is unfit for office. He categorically dismissed Obama’s contention that the exchange had to happen to honor America’s commitment to leave no Americans behind. Boykin said that clearly wasn’t true in Benghazi and that the administration seems to have little regard for a U.S. Marine jailed in Mexico, an American pastor imprisoned in Iran or the Sudanese Christian in custody for her faith along with her two American children.
“This was about emptying out Guantanamo,” he said. “This was a backdoor deal. The reasons for it, the details of it will probably never come out in its entirety, but this is an ugly story.”
The general is also taking the commander in chief to task for once again flouting the law, this time skirting a requirement to give Congress 30 days notice of his intent to free any Guantanamo detainees. Boykin said he understands why Obama would feel constrained by the law and admits that it might not be constitutional. However, as long as it is the law, he said Obama is required to abide by it instead of ignoring statutes he doesn’t like, whether on this issue or several others.
“It was really bad form for him not to at least call in the chair and ranking member of the intel or armed services committee and tell them what he was about to do with regard to the release of these prisoners,” he said.
“It’s an example of how this president only obeys the laws and follows the policies that he wants to. In our Constitution, it falls under the category of high crimes and misdemeanors, where you just selectively obey certain laws and ignore others.”
Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin:
As for Bergdahl, Boykin said he has no doubt the soldier ended up in Taliban custody because he deliberately deserted his unit.
“We know for sure that he is a deserter,” Boykin said. “In fact, the 15-6 investigation that was conducted immediately after his departure from his base concluded that he had deserted, and I think all the evidence supports that conclusion, particularly given the fact that he had asked a series of bizarre questions of his teammates. He also left a very revealing message explaining how he was ashamed of being an American and wanted to help the people of Afghanistan. This guy’s a deserter.”
Boykin added, “The fact that (National Security Adviser) Susan Rice went on television and said that served honorably is just another example of why she needs to be removed and replaced, because this is the second time, Benghazi being the first, where she has gone on television and openly lied to the American public. This administration knows he deserted. They knew how people felt about him, and she went out there and called his service honorable. If that’s the case, then you tell me what the concept of honorable service is for this administration.”
The term “desertion” has been used far and wide in media reports this week. While no one applauds a soldier abandoning his unit, considerable debate has ensued about how significant of an issue this ought to be.
Boykin said it’s an extremely serious issue.
“Desertion in combat – and I emphasize in combat, which means you are in a combat zone and routinely engaged with the enemy – is punishable by death,” he said. “That should give you some indication as to how serious this is taken. When a man walks off and leaves his post in combat, he jeopardizes everybody else.”
Boykin said, in addition to leaving his men shorthanded against the enemy, Bergdahl compromised military intelligence, whether he willingly went along with the Taliban or was interrogated.
“You have a tremendous amount of information, which would be very useful to the enemy,” Boykin said. “Whether he was a collaborator or not is yet to be determined. My guess is that he was. Even if he was not a deliberate collaborator, the interrogation techniques of these people is such that he probably provided an awful lot of very useful, valuable information to the enemy.”
So what should happen to Bergdahl as a result of his desertion?
“They should do an Article 32 investigation immediately. It should be ongoing right now. That is a prelude to a court-martial. There can be no other option. They must take him to court-martial, and they must hold him accountable for his actions. If he didn’t desert, then the truth will come out,” said Boykin, who explained that Bergdahl’s actions are even more severe than desertion.
“There are other soldiers that were endangered and even some we are positive now that were killed in the efforts to find him,” he said. “As far as I’m concerned, that exacerbates his crime from being a simple desertion to being one that resulted in the deaths of his comrades. I think that has to be considered as we talk about what to do with him. From my perspective, he needs to spend the rest of his life in prison at a minimum.”
At least one of the other soldiers who served alongside Bergdahl in Afghanistan believes this is a case of desertion at best and treason at worst.
Is Boykin willing to go that far?
“Absolutely. What else could you call it?” he asked
At least a half-dozen soldiers who served with Bergdahl are speaking publicly. They all consider him a deserter and not the hero portrayed by the administration. In response, the State Department accuses those veterans of not telling the truth, and White House aides tell reporters that their criticism amounts to a swift-boating of Bergdahl, a reference to the criticism Vietnam veterans leveled at John Kerry in the 2004 presidential campaign.
“Do you think if Bergdahl had served honorably that those guys wouldn’t be coming out now rejoicing in the fact he had been returned?” Boykin asked. “Use a little common sense and just ask yourself: Would they have had this reaction had he not deserted his unit?”
Boykin is appalled that Bergdahl’s return also came at the cost of five high-level Taliban leaders being held at Guantanamo Bay. The general said he would not even have paid such a price for an honorable soldier being held by the enemy, but he would have quickly gathered intelligence by which to launch a rescue mission. He believes the military knew exactly where Bergdahl was but didn’t have any motivation to go get him.
“That’s what should have happened if this was a man with honorable service. He wasn’t,” Boykin said. “So you have to ask the question, ‘Why didn’t the military go and try to rescue him?’ I’m going to speculate that it’s because they were not willing to risk another life for a guy they knew was a traitor.”
What follows is an article and/or blog, which also contains a video, that revealed Senator Jeff Session’s reaction to this past Wednesday night’s closed-door briefing that the White House gave to members of the U.S. Senate regarding the deal that resulted in the release of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in exchange for five Taliban detainees that had been held at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which I believe relate to and/or further support General Boykin’s comments contained in the above article and/or blog:
SESSIONS ON WH BERGDAHL BRIEFING: ‘THE MOST TROUBLING BRIEFING I’VE EVER BEEN!-Posted on Big Peace-By BREITBART TV-On June 5, 2014:
In an appearance on 1070 WAPI’s “Matt Murphy Show” in Birmingham, AL on Thursday, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) reacted to Wednesday night’s closed-door briefing the White House gave to members of the U.S. Senate about the deal that resulted in the release of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in exchange for five Taliban detainees that had been held at the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Sessions, a 17-year veteran of the Senate, told host Matt Murphy it was the most troubling briefing to which he had been privy and was devoid of credibility.
“Look, we had a briefing with a number of officials last night,” Sessions said. “It was one of the most troubling briefing I’ve ever been in. It no credibility with me. The arguments and the reasons they gave for what they did just did not ring true. They didn’t meet the common sense test. We’ve got people at war right now in Afghanistan. They’re on patrol. They’re working with the Afghan allies and some of the things they’ve said about this just seems oblivious to the reality of that.”
“He did it anyway,” Sessions continued. “He didn’t tell them in advance and it’s a colossal error – in my opinion, it’s a colossal error. It hurts our country. It weakens the United States in a whole host of way and I am very worried about it. I just think it doesn’t reflect an understanding of what it means to commit men and women to combat and what we owe them. Are we going to release five of the worst terrorists? And one of these terrorists in Afghanistan – his statement has been interpreted and he basically said it’s the equivalent of adding 10,000 jihadists to our cause, this release. This is a huge victory for the Taliban and al Qaeda and I am just baffled by it. I can’t comprehend it.”
On the question of impeachment, which had been raised by Sessions’ colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Sessions didn’t outright suggest impeachment as a measure. But he did admit he was troubled by the “lawlessness” of President Barack Obama.
“I’ll just say it this way – the commander-in-chief has to be responsible to law and people are getting very concerned about the lawlessness that we’re seeing here,” Sessions replied. “It goes beyond anything I’ve ever seen. It reflects an ignorance of a great American system where people pass laws. Even if they don’t like them, they abide with them. So if our top leaders are just ignoring laws, this has a corrosive effect on the entire integrity of the democratic republic that we’re so proud of. I mean the rule of law is at the bottom of our prosperity and our liberty. And I don’t think the president has a sufficient grasp of that.”
What follows is a link to a video that revealed Senator Ted Cruz’s comments regarding the number of Americans that may have lost their lives while in the process of capturing the five key Taliban figures that were released by President Obama, which I totally agree with:
Video: TED CRUZ: ‘HOW MANY SOLDIERS LOST THEIR LIVES TO CAPTURE THESE FIVE TALIBAN TERRORISTS?’-Posted on BREITBART TV-On June 3, 2014:
What follows is a link to an article and/or blog that revealed that following the announcement of former Army Sgt. Bergdahl’s recovery from a Taliban-related terror group in Afghanistan, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee issued a press release which stated that Obama had violated federal law in transferring five Guantanamo Bay prisoners to Qatari custody in exchange for Bergdahl.
The author asks the question: “if President Obama broke the law, what will Congress do about it” and rightfully so because Congress (both Democrat and Republican) has stood by without taking any action while the President continually commits high crimes and misdemeanors by violating federal laws and basically shredding the Constitution, which so many Americans in uniform have fought and died for.
If Obama Broke the Law, What Will Congress Do About It?-Posted on The Post & Email-By Sharon Rondeau-On June 4, 2014:
My following blog relates to and/or further supports some of the information contained in the above article and/or blog:
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
What follows is an article and/or blog that revealed that President Obama recently announced an effort to re-establish a law-enforcement group that will basically be used to prevent homegrown terrorism by having this group focus on cases that involve Americans who may be spurred to violence for political or prejudicial reasons, which I found extremely concerning because it seems to virtually give government unlimited authority, along with further restricting our Constitutional First Amendment Rights:
NOW OBAMA ZEROES IN ON DOMESTIC TERROR: ‘Focusing on ‘Americans who may be spurred to violence’ by prejudice’!-Posted on WND.com-By BOB UNRUH-On June 3, 2014:
President Obama, fresh off of a deal with international terrorists, is announcing an effort to re-establish a law-enforcement group to prevent homegrown terrorism, according to a report.
Reuters said the new panel, to be announced Tuesday, will focus on cases “that involve Americans who may be spurred to violence for political or prejudicial reasons.”
The panel apparently will include representatives from the National Security Division of the Justice Department, the attorney general’s office and the FBI. The announcement follows Obama’s decision to free five top terror commanders from the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in exchange for an American soldier held by al-Qaida-linked terrorists in the Middle East.
The new campaign continues efforts by the Obama administration to address domestic terror, which began in the first weeks of its White House tenure, when the president put conservatives in the bull’s-eye of his campaign.
At that time a newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warned of the possibility of violence by unnamed “right-wing extremists,” including opponents of abortion.
The DHS report was followed days later by a report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center that warned law enforcement officials to watch out for individuals with “radical” ideologies based on Christianity.
The Family Research Council, which was targeted by a confessed domestic terrorist more than a year ago, said it will be important to make sure politics are kept out of the debate.
“We must not allow the important work of national security to become diluted by political concerns or motivations secondary to seeking the truth about those who act in violence toward American interests,” said Ken Blackwell, a senior fellow for family empowerment at FRC.
Blackwell said that as the target of a domestic terrorist, Family Research Council “expresses gratitude and appreciation toward all law enforcement involved in the apprehension and prosecution of Floyd Corkins II.”
“Terrorism is terrorism, regardless of the motivation behind the acts,” he said. “What is important is that the United States’ approach to terrorism, whether domestic or international terrorism, results in an evenhanded and objective application of policy and legal frameworks.”
Blackwell said laws and policies “designed to deal with the real and serious danger of violence done in the name of ideas must not be misused to target individuals and groups merely based on differences in viewpoint or ideology.”
In the FRC case, one man was injured when the convicted assailant, Corkins, entered the lobby and started shooting.
Corkins said he chose to attack FRC because the organization was listed as an “anti-gay” hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center on its website.
FRC promotes traditional Judeo-Christian beliefs about the family and homosexuality, but SPLC claims the organization’s “real specialty is defaming gays and lesbians.”
Corkins, a former volunteer at an LGBT community center, pleaded guilty to domestic terrorism.
It was on Aug. 15, 2012, when the heavily armed Corkins walked into FRC headquarters and began shooting with the intent of killing “as many people as I could.” He managed to shoot and injure just one person, facilities manager Leo Johnson, who is credited with heroically stopping the attack.
In a speech at recent the Values Voter Summit 2013, Alveda King, a niece of Martin Luther King Jr., condemned the practice of labeling Christian organizations “hate” groups.
She said Corkins “came to FRC as a gunman, fueled by hate mongering from the Southern Poverty Law Center.”
“The shooter admitted he was directed to FRC’s location by the Southern Poverty Law Center’s website. While SPLC claims to fight against hate, they have been saying hateful things about the Family Research Council and perhaps other groups who are represented her today,” King said.
“Today the shooter is behind bars as the result of being convicted for domestic terrorism. But the SPLC and many others, who couch hate and anger in false claims of civil rights activism, still roam free to confuse the masses with their deceptions,” said King.
Constitutional expert Herb Titus of William J. Olson, P.C. told WND that Americans should be wary by attempts by the Obama administration to crack down on “terrorism.”
“What do they mean by domestic terrorism?” he asked. “The problem, whether it’s called international or domestic terrorism, is the word terrorism. There’s no legal or historic meaning.”
Titus said the definition will provide a foundation for government attempts at “electronic eavesdropping and all kinds of activities uncontrolled by any Constitution.”
The worry, then, is the “highly discretionary power that’s given to the government [and] the notion of preventing terrorism.”
“In order to prevent a particular activity that you consider to be terrorism, it requires you to go to extraordinary measures to keep track of people’s movements, thoughts and relationships and so forth,” he said.
The reality, Titus said, is that civil government is set up to punish wrongdoers but not “prevent something from happening.”
“That’s beyond the capacity” of civil government, he said, emphasizing that only church and community work can change behavior.
The Reuters report said the April 2013 Boston Marathon bombing would not be considered “domestic terrorism,” because it was thought to have been influenced by forces outside the U.S.
The Olson law firm previously raised concerns about the issue of virtually unlimited g...
In a dispute over a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act that allows the government to gather private details about people without cause, the firm warned the door is open to “detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker.”
The comment came as the Supreme Court refused to review an appeals court decision that said the president and U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals.
The firm of William J. Olson, P.C., which filed a friend-of-the court brief asking the court to step in, noted that not a single justice dissented from the denial of the request for review.
“The court ducked, having no appetite to confront both political parties in order to protect the citizens from military detention,” the legal team said in a statement to WND. “The government has won, creating a tragic moment for the people – and what will someday be viewed as an embarrassment for the court.”
WND has reported since the case developed over the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act.
The controversial provision authorizes the military, under presidential authority, to arrest, kidnap, detain without trial and hold indefinitely American citizens thought to “represent an enduring security threat to the United States.”
John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, said that once again, the U.S. Supreme Court “has shown itself to be an advocate for the government, no matter how illegal its action, rather than a champion of the Constitution and, by extension, the American people.”
“No matter what the Obama administration may say to the contrary, actions speak louder than words, and history shows that the U.S. government is not averse to locking up its own citizens for its own purposes,” he said. “What the NDAA does is open the door for the government to detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker.”
Whitehead said that “according to government guidelines for identifying domestic extremists – a word used interchangeably with terrorists, that technically applies to anyone exercising their First Amendment rights in order to criticize the government.”
There already is precedent for the mass detainment of citizens.
In 1944, while the U.S. was defending itself in a war launched by Japan, the government rounded up thousands of Japanese Americans and placed them in camps under the approval of the high court in its Korematsu v. United States decision.
The new law authorizes the president to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to jail those “suspected” of helping terrorists.
The issue of linking conservatives and Christians to the possibility of terror is a recurring theme in the Obama administration.
Just weeks ago, the chief of the U.S. Army ordered that training for the military on “extremists” be halted until the program can be corrected and standardized to eliminate reported Christian-bashing.
During one such “training” course the material was reported to have labeled the pro-family American Family Association as a hate group.
According to Fox News Radio’s Todd Starnes, Army Secretary John McHugh has given military leaders a memo with the orders.
“On several occasions over the past few months, media accounts have highlighted instances of Army instructors supplementing programs of instruction and including information or material that is inaccurate, objectionable and otherwise inconsistent with current Army policy,” the memo said.
Starnes reported an Army spokesman, David Patterson Jr., said McHugh “directed that Army leaders cease all briefings, command presentations or training on the subject of extremist organizations or activities until that program of instruction and training has been created and disseminated.”
It was a soldier at a Camp Shelby in Mississippi who presented evid... that an Army presenter at a briefing identified AFA as a “hate group” because of its stance on homosexuality and marriage.
Previously, a study at the West Point Military Academy asserted people who are part of the ideological right wing of American society constitute a danger to the nation.
It was just the latest in a steady drumbeat of statements from the administration that even prompted members of both parties in Congress to blast the reports.
For example The Department of Defense was caught teaching that those who oppose abortion are “low-level terrorists.”
And DHS was caught monitoring a blog posted by a Christian who was forced to flee Brazil because of the conflict between that nation’s pro-homosexual “hate crimes” agenda and his advocacy for traditional marriage.
The Obama administration declined comment on its decision to monitor Julio Severo’s unabashedly Christian Last Days Watchman blog.
Then, too, there was a West Point study from the U.S. Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center that linked opposition to abortion and other “fundamental” positions to terrorism.
As previously mentioned in a recent letter to your office, the following video reveals who President Obama’s real enemies are: the military, veterans, the National Guard, and those who eschew his brand of democratic socialism. It also reveals a shocking 160-page Top Secret document that clearly describes drills that are currently going on dubbed “Capstone Exercise 2014: Scenario Ground Truth,” whereby a fictitious anti-government group, whose stated ideology happens to match exactly with that of the Tea Party, wages a cyber attack against the U.S. government after martial law has been declared in the wake of a massive earthquake and tsunami. I believe that this video relates to and/or further supports the information contained in the above article and/or blog:
Video: SHOCKING Leaked DHS Drill: Military, Veterans, Capitalists Are The Enemy!-Posted on Western Journalism-By KRIS ZANE-On March 26, 2014:
Finally, what follows are other articles and/or blogs and videos that I believe further document the numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that President Obama has allegedly committed by continually violating federal laws and basically shredding our Constitution, which again so many Americans in uniform have fought and died for, while in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s).
I also believe that these articles and/or blogs and videos do a meticulous job of laying out numerous articles of impeachment, along with the framework required for the U.S. House of Representatives to commence impeachment proceedings, which again I believe they have the power to do in accordance Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution:
BREITBART SENIOR EDITOR BEN SHAPIRO’S STUNNING NEW BOOK: PROSECUTE OBAMA—NOW!-Posted on Big Government-By STEPHEN K. BANNON-On June 3, 2014:
THE GROWING CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT OF OBAMA: ‘What constitutional experts say about high crimes, misdemeanors’!-Posted on WND.com-By CHELSEA SCHILLING-On October 2, 2013:
1ST DRAFT OF ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT ARRIVES: Obamacare ‘illegally bypasses Congress, unauthorized IRS power-grab’!-Posted on WND.com-On August 26, 2013:
FBI Complaint Letter!-Posted on Scannedretina.WordPress.com-By arnierosner-On August 23, 2010:
As mentioned above, I again am hereby respectfully demanding immediate Restoration of our Government under its intended Constitutional Principles, rule of law, freedom and personal liberty, along with a return to government “of the people, for the people, by the people”, free of despotic and tyrannical federal leadership.
I will also be requesting that the U.S. House of Representatives draft articles of impeachment and commence impeachment proceedings for the numerous high crimes and misdemeanors that President Obama has allegedly committed by continually ignoring federal laws, as documented in the above articles and/or blogs and videos, while in pursuit of his administration’s goal(s), which again I believe they have the power to do in accordance Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution.
For your information, I will also be sending similar letters to NM U.S. Senator Heinrich and NM U.S. Representative Lujan-Grisham.
Please feel free to contact me at my email and/or home address.
I look forward to hearing from you regarding these extremely disturbing and time sensitive issues.
Thank you for your continued service to our state and our country.
Response received from Senator Udall’s Office regarding my above letter:
“Thank you for your message!
I look forward to reviewing your comments and questions.
Before you leave, I hope you’ll explore my website. On this page, you can learn more about the work that I’ve been doing on Environment & Conservation as your U.S. Senator.
End of Letter To Senator Udall
For your information, I will inform you should I happen to get a response from Senator Udall, which I really don’t expect, but again miracles do happen.
Note: My following blogs relate to this disturbing and gut-wrenching issue-You Decide:
Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!
The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 1):
‘CIVILIZATION JIHAD’ AND OBAMA’S CONNECTIONS!
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!
Who ran cover for Obama’s Islamic background? ‘Tracing The Politics And The Money Behind Obama’s 2008 Campaign’!
Communists and Muslims: The Hidden Hand of the KGB!
Obama is the Manifestation of a Multi-Generational Soviet Plot to Destroy America!
The Islamic Infiltration: Inside Our Government, Armed With Our Secrets!
Veterans and members of our Armed Forces under attack!
The Military Pays the Price for Obama’s Agenda!
Rules of Engagement Killing Marines and U.S. Soldiers!
It’s Getting Very Serious Now!
Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away (Part 23)!
Brainwashing in America: ‘WHY FEW DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY”! (Part 1)
Obamanites Get Violent in Support of the Agenda!
Nearly 80 percent don’t trust the government!
Where Is America Today?
The Russian View of What Has Been Happening In America!
Is History Repeating Itself?
GENERAL CEMENTS PLAN TO END OBAMA’S REIGN: ‘Working in Washington now to implement radical solution’!
America...................Rise Up Or Surrender! (Part 1)
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Tom Udall (re: Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 17, 2014:
Letter to our NM Governor Martinez regarding a “Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On April 19, 2014:
Letter to our NM U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich (re: Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles)!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 29, 2014:
Letter to our NM Governor Martinez regarding a “Petition for Return of Government to Our Constitutional Principles”!-Posted on Tea Party Command Center-By Jake Martinez-On March 29, 2014:
Is it time to call for Obama’s resignation!
Washington Times Calls for Obama’s Impeachment!
Note: The following videos are extremely appropriate today:
A Republic, If You Can Keep It!
The Fightin Side of Me!
When Injustice Becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty!
Note: If you have a problem viewing any of the listed blog posts, please copy website and paste it on your browser. Sure seems like any subject matter that may be considered controversial by this administration is being censored-What happened to free speech?-You Decide:
“Food For Thought”
Hello: When Are Americans Going To Wake Up?-God Bless America!