Constitutional Emergency

MAY TRUTH RULE - I THINK CRUZ IS AN EXCELLENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, BUT THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE OBEYED.....APUZZO IS CORRECT.

Wednesday, November 25, 2015

New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against Ted Cruz and Marco R...



New Hampshire Ballot Access Challenges Against Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio Fail for Want of
                                                           Jurisdiction

                                                    By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
                                                       November 25, 2015




Christopher Booth of Concord, New Hampshire, Cameron Elliott of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Robert Laity of Tonawanda, New York, filed ballot access challenges in New Hampshire against presidential contenders Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Marco Rubio, arguing that neither of them is an Article II natural born citizen.  The challengers are correct.

Still, the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission refused to rule on the question of whether the senators are natural born citizens because, chairman Brad Cook said, the issues were not under the panel’s purview.

“Our precedents say we don’t’ go there,” Cook said. “Personally, would I like the U.S. Supreme Court to decide these issues so we know what is, so it doesn’t keep coming up? Absolutely. Are we the vehicle to start that discussion? No, we’re not.”

http://www.wmur.com/politics/elections-panel-allows-cruz-rubio-to-a...

~~~~~

The Commission refused to rule, basically saying that it does not have jurisdiction over the question of whether Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio are Article II natural born citizens.  It also said that it would like the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on the issue.

On the merits, neither Ted Cruz nor Marco Rubio are natural born citizens.  Neither the original nor amended Constitution defines a natural born citizen.  The unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett (1875) informed that we have to look outside the Constitution for its meaning.  It explained that at common law the nomenclature with which the Framers were familiar when the Constitution was adopted, all children born in a country to parents who were its citizens were "natives, or natural-born citizens," and that under that same common law all the rest of the people were "aliens or foreigners," who could be naturalized if they met the requirements of naturalization Acts of Congress. Minor v. Happersett (1875).

Cruz was neither born in the country, nor was he born to two U.S. citizen parents.  He was born in Canada, presumably to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen father.  Unlike Senator John McCain, who was born in Panama to two U.S. citizen parents who were there to serve the military interest of the United States, neither of Cruz's parents were in Canada for purposes of serving in the U.S. military.  He therefore does not meet the definition of a natural born citizen.  Cruz is a citizen of the United States at birth only by virtue of a naturalization Act of Congress.  He is therefore not a "natural born citizen" of the United States by virtue of the common law.  A “naturalized born” citizen of the United States is not and cannot be a “natural born” citizen of the United States.

Rubio was born in the country.  But he was not born to two U.S. citizen parents.  He was born in the United States, but to two non-U.S. citizen parents.  Hence, he also does not meet the definition of a natural born citizen.  He is a citizen of the United States at birth only by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment and not by virtue of the common law that provides the only definition of the clause.  He needs the Fourteenth Amendment because, while born in the United States, he was not born to two U.S. citizen parents.  Rubio is a "born citizen" of the United States only by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment.  He is therefore not a "natural born citizen" of the United States by virtue of the common law. Simply being a born citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment does not make one a natural born citizen of the United States under the common law.
 
So, neither Cruz nor Rubio are natural born citizens.  It is treason upon the Constitution and the rule of law to see our political institutions kick the can down the road under the guise of want of jurisdiction.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
November 25, 2015
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
####
Copyright © 2015
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
All Rights Reserved

Views: 1050

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

To fill in your blank, the global elite, AKA NWO and they have infiltrated the Democrats first, then the Republicans shortly thereafter, possibly as far back as the 1860's.

Mike Travis, though you may not like this answer, but let us PRAY that anyone who wants to run for the Presidency can do so BECAUSE WE STILL HAVE THAT MUCH LEFT of our FREEDOMS!

i have shared my revelations of truth / fact on this site numerous time and in many other venues.

only two choices remain to save the republic and the first is not ours to make

1. divine intervention

2.  revoultion

GOD no longer blesses a Nation that refuses HIS word and as a result is filled with perversion and

the possibility of destruction.

Michael, Please move and repost this some place else. This thread was started and should remain on the Constitutionality issue of the candidates at question.
You are free to start a new thread on the issue of the TPP and then please remove it from this one. Is it important ? Yes, but not pertinent to this discussion.

But obama [sic] IS??????? When are the Damedolecrap "birthers" going to come out against both? After one or both become a nominee? I agree with the legal argument about both being unconstitutionally qualified and have been so concerned for some time. Just as I was concerned about the Kenya born, Malaysia raised, Communist indoctrinated, muslim [sic], illegal alien current resident of the White House!

If one of these two is nominated COUNT on Damedolecraps to sue! The only cogent response by the GOP would then be "precedent has been set" and then there goes the rest of our Constitution!

That is what the establishment GOP want to happen, they are as deep in bed with the global elite as the Democrats are

 Thank you Col.Riley !!! People got so angry at me when I bring up the point of eligibility on them. It greatly disappoints me that conservatives who say they want a Constitutional Gov.,but yet are willing to vote for a candidate who isn't eligible. Two wrong's do not constitute right!!! We either stick to the Constitution or finish shredding it.

As for the Supreme Court hearing the matter,we should avoid that totally !  It is stacked it against Constitutional Judges,America would surely lose on their ruling. The way hussein has sneaked in muslims for 7 years and is bringing in more all we need is a POTUS to invoking shariah law.

I hope everyone will consider backing an eligible candidate. Our nation is founder upon it and it is the most critical time in our history to get it right for our children and grandchildren.

Are Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio eligible to hold the office of President?

My opinion = NO.
As many others have stated here that question comes down to that same question about Obama.
According to the Constitution (Natural Born Citizen) None of them are eligible to hold that office.
And of course the Democrats will use it against both men, Cruz and Rubio, while ignoring the same about Obama.
So how are they getting away with it?
Go back and look at the original statements in this thread concerning the definitions of "Natural Born Citizen". It says "UNDER COMMON LAW". And as we all have made note here many many times the US Justice department re-wrote the rules of the US Justice system to explicitly and deliberately write-out all mentions, references, or knowledge of Common Law. (Ask Terry Trussell)
In other words we now live by the new Rules of the US Justice system but NOT under any rules or definitions of the Constitution. When they wrote OUT any mention or reference to US Common Law, they simultaneously, (and deliberately)  wrote-OUT the Constitution.

Under the "New Rules of the US Justice System" all three are eligible, (Until it violates the rules of the Democrats or those in power). (DNC OR RNC).

The Constitution doesn't apply, You don't HAVE a Constitution.......................
At least not as far as those people are concerned.

(Pick your battles wisely, Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer). And keep your powder dry.
(We all know the reference to this ) "Tell me Mister Jefferson, What kind of Government have you given us? - A REPUBLIC Madam, If you can keep it."

Well now ladies and gentlemen, NOW is the time to stand up and make sure we keep it. So Help us GOD.

Yes NOW is the time, but to keep it is going to take guns and guts at this point in time, which I am sorry to have to say as I wish there was a peaceful alternative.

Not only that! But, Mario claims the "Title of nobility Esquire. " we have had 8 years of a constitutionally repugnant potus.  New Hampshire is a bunch of wimps. One of the Several states needs no scotus seal of approval. Do your job read the Constitution and make the correct decision. It is written in English and completely clear. However, the same people do not understand "congress shall make no law" and "shall not infringe."

MAY TRUTH RULE - I THINK CRUZ IS AN EXCELLENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, This can never be true. Only a liar, a coward and a traitor would knowingly violate our Constitution.

You just named obozo, the rep and dem parties and the entire judiciary. Cruz is repugnant to the Constitution.

RSS

About

Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11



HOW TO JOIN YOUR STATE GROUP

1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts


How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......

Events

© 2019   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service