All off topic comments will be deleted!
As you get ready for the 4th of July, please take a moment to think of our brave men and women who are defending our rights far from home. Here at the MVP Project, we will be thinking of our heroes as we prepare more than 100 care packages for our troops.
If you know of any service members that are currently stationed in Iraq or Afghanistan, please reply to this email and send us their name, address, and email address. And, if you would like to include a special note, we will include that as well.
In case you missed it, we also were profiled in a recent article in the Dayton Daily News. The article discusses our efforts to make military voting a priority for our service members. You can read the article here.
Thank you again for your support and efforts to protect our military members. Have a safe and happy Fourth of July!
Founder & Executive Director
Military Voter Protection Project
By John Nolan, Staff Writer
Tens of thousands of military service members attempting to vote by absentee ballot in recent years haven’t had their votes counted because of various problems with the system, according to authorities that track voter participation.
The Military Voter Protection Project, an organization founded by a Navy Reserve member who previously was a Justice Department lawyer, is promoting efforts to ensure that the votes of all military members are counted.
“The problem has always existed, given the high degree of mobility of our fighting forces,” said Eric Eversole, founder and executive director of the Military Voter Protection Project.
The issue is a bigger concern during a presidential election year with a military force totaling more than 3 million, including active-duty and reserve forces.
In 2010, of the approximately 2 million military and overseas voters accounted for in data reported by the states to the Election Assistance Commission, only 4.6 percent of those voters were able to cast an absentee ballot that counted, according to the Military Voter Protection Project’s analysis of that data from the federal Election Assistance Commission, which tracks participation in voting. That compared with 5.5 percent in 2006, which was also a midterm election, concluded the nonprofit voter protection group based in Washington, D.C.
The overall national voter participation rate for the 2010 election was 41.6 percent, authorities said.
The frequent movement of some military members and the difficulty that state election authorities have in maintaining contact with them undermines the ability of deployed troops to vote, Eversole said.
Military voters who didn’t request absentee ballots, absentee ballots that were sent to the wrong addresses, ballots that were lost in the mail, or delivered too late to be counted contributed to the problem, authorities said.
Eversole’s organization has begun the Heroes Vote Initiative to form partnerships with local military and veterans groups, as well as state and local election officials, to make military voters a priority in this year’s elections.
The Help America Vote Act of 2002 required states to report to the Election Assistance Commission on participation in voting, including balloting by U.S. military and overseas voters.
In 2009, Congress enacted yhe Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act requiring states to transmit validly requested absentee ballots to those military voters no later than 45 days before a federal election, unless the state has been granted a “hardship waiver” by the Defense Department for that election. The 2009 law also requires states to use electronic delivery mechanisms for ballots, such as fax transmission, email or online delivery.
Ohio has adopted that 45-day advance transmission of absentee ballots for state elections as well, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said Monday. All 36 county boards of elections with local ballot issues in the Aug. 7 special election complied with the requirement to send those ballots by email on Saturday, 45 days prior to the August election, Husted and his spokesman Matt McClellan said.
Ohio, Florida, Texas and Virginia are among states that are using tracking numbers to allow military members to track whether their ballots were received by local election boards back home, Eversole said. The tracking numbers are similar in concept to those that consumers use to track movement of express delivery packages.
Since 2010, the Defense Department provides a special label, called “Label 11-DOD,” that provides uniformed service members with express-mail priority delivery of their ballots through the military and U.S. mail systems. That label also allows tracking of the mail’s movement, said Ken Warford, the Defense Department’s deputy director of voting assistance.
Ohio’s tracking number also allows the service member to confirm that his or her ballot has been counted, Husted said.
“You always wondered if your votes were being counted,” said Pam Strickler, director of military affairs for U.S. Rep. Steve Austria, R-Beavercreek.
Strickler said that was a concern for her husband, James “Jay” Strickler, a retired Air Force colonel who is a former vice commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, when he was stationed in England and Germany during the 1980s and ’90s.
Husted said he has made it a priority to properly handle and count military absentee ballots after having heard concerns from parents of military personnel during his 2009-10 campaign for office. Husted has told election boards that it would be considered grounds for removal of board members if their agencies should fail to electronically send out absentee ballots 45 days prior to an election.
The democRATS want the illegals to vote and all of his low life dems to vote many, many times, but they don't want the military personel to vote at all.
There is a bit more to this than meets the eye. Absentee votes are a hassle to count; the registrar knows how many there are, but they are not opened and counted unless the margin of victory, as determined by the "local" votes, is less than the number of absentee ballots.
For instance: Candidate "A" wins in the county by 60,000 votes and 12,000 absentee ballots were received; there is no point in counting the absentee ballots, because, even if they all went to the loser, the margin of victory would still be 48,000 votes. Naturally, this would have to hold true for the margin of victory for every candidate and proposition on the ballot, otherwise a count of the absentee ballots would be required.
In practice, absentee ballots are -- or should be -- counted because, in most cases, there are going to be at least a couple of offices or props which are closer than the number of absentee ballots. In most cases...but not all.
Just so you know.
Thanks for the information.