MOST OFFENSIVE MOMENT IN GOP DEBATE HISTORY

MOST OFFENSIVE MOMENT IN GOP DEBATE HISTORY

 

By J.B. Williams
February 17, 2016
NewsWithViews.com

The simple fact is… these globalist media controlled circuses we shamelessly call “debates” are much more akin to a cat fight at the local tavern, after a couple liquored up street hookers get into a brawl over who gets the last $20 John of the night…

These commercial events we call “debates” are designed to make every person on the stage look like an idiot… and so it should surprise no one that every event ends with every candidate on the stage looking like a lying, back-stabbing, self-indulgent egomaniac that shouldn’t be entrusted with the job of local dog catcher…

The phrasing of every “media controlled” question is designed to make each candidate turn their guns on each other, circular firing squad fashion, for which, the media moderators will then gleefully basque in the afterglow with the full knowledge that they had achieved their lofty goal of making everyone seeking the Oval Office, look like a sandbox full of preschoolers.

What a ridiculous way for any intelligent society to choose a President, Commander-in-Chief and leader of the free world…

Having established this as the foundation for this discussion, despite the embarrassing media behavior and the even worse behavior of the “stacked audience” in the room at last Saturday evenings so-called debate, these were not the most offensive moments in GOP debate history. Even the repeated use of the word “liar” was to be outdone.

The most offensive moments in GOP debate history came from none other than the two U.S. Freshman Senators in the race… neither of whom has the constitutional right to even stand on that stage!

In a failed effort to honor the just deceased Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who had just been found dead in his resort hotel room earlier that morning, Senators Cruz and Rubio sought to “make political hay” on the death of the Constitutions best friend on the High Court, both acting as if they are themselves “constitutional originalists” like Scalia, as they stood on that GOP debate stage in direct violation of the Founders clear “original intent” of the “natural born Citizen” clause in Article II.

By “natural born Citizen,” the Founders certainly did NOT mean “anchor babies” via 14th Amendment naturalization, as is the case for Marco Rubio, native born on U.S. soil, but to two foreign Cuban citizens at the time, who eventually naturalized to the USA four years later… nor did they mean a person “born Canadian” who remained a legal citizen of Canada for 43 years, until he decided to seek the Oval Office with NO proof of legal U.S. citizenship of any kind, as is the case for Ted Cruz.

On the passing of one of the greatest Supreme Court Justices in U.S. history, two ineligible frauds seeking the Oval Office from the U.S. Senate tried desperately to ride the coat tails of Scalia’s death to the lofty status of “great constitutional originalist…” – a term certainly befitting Justice Scalia, but in no way suited for the two frauds illegally and unconstitutionally seeking the Oval Office today.

The mere fact that the Republican Party would even allow the two frauds to enter the race, much less stand on that stage and compare themselves to a true “constitutional originalist” like Scalia, on the day of his untimely passing, makes this event the most offensive moment in GOP debate history…

The Republican Party is now officially no better than the Democrat Party, which defrauded the American people in 2008 and 2012 with their support of “the first black president” who happens to be neither “black” nor “natural born American.”

Trump calling both Cruz and Rubio “liars” is the understatement of the century…

The truth is… Trump and Carson were very likely the only two in that room last Saturday night who were telling the truth… nearly everyone else in the room is a “liar…”

For the record, legal scholars are NOT “constitutional scholars.” Quite the contrary actually… they are experts at undermining and usurping constitutional law via their use of British Common Law tactics they learned in Law School.

History Scholars are Constitutional Scholars…. They are the people who have studied the historical foundations for everything our Founders created, everything that appears in our Founding documents, everything that is the foundation for American freedom and liberty.

99.9% of all modern day lawyers in the USA do not know and even more importantly, do not care about the foundations of freedom and liberty or anything in our Founding documents. They were taught in Law School that “they are the law of the land.” That they get to establish law by merely “setting a precedent.”

In the good old days, they did this via “case law,” court decisions. But now they think they can do it by mere opinion letter… Just like Obama thinks he makes law by Executive memo.

And, too many Americans are none the wiser today… finding themselves convinced that someone with no U.S. citizenship authentication at all (Cruz) would make a great president!

Caught in lie after lie after lie, Cruz supporters now demonstrate that their problem isn’t that they don’t know Cruz is a fraud, it’s that they do not care.

The RNC is worried about Democrats lining up behind Hillary and Bernie, two communist criminal idiots when in fact, they should be far more worried about the fact that they cannot line voters up behind any one GOP candidate, due to their massive effort to mislead and divide their voters over the two RNC insider ineligible candidates…

Now, are Beck, Levin, Hannity, Limbaugh, Kelly and O’Reilly as ignorant of the Constitution as they appear? Or, are they really nothing they appeared to be, before exposing themselves as mere RNC stooges in the 2016 election cycle, standing up for obvious frauds like Cruz and Rubio?

Our Founders were not extraordinary men… they were 56 ordinary men who somehow came together, set their differences aside, and stayed in the room long enough to somehow complete an extraordinary act that could never be accomplished today, or maybe ever again.

The American people will be foolish to ignore these foundations, as without them, including Article II eligibility, they will have no sovereign nation, no security, no freedom and no liberty. May God help those too foolish to help themselves!

© 2016 JB Williams - All Rights Reserved

Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.

You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!

Join The Patriots For America

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thanks.

  • Amen, JB.  Thank you for telling it like it is.

  • JB yet again cuts to the chase and is spot on.  Great article

  • Very good article. Fully agree.

  • Great post, Harry. J.B. Williams tells it like the truth it is without hesitation, as usual. However, I am still not understanding how it is that the two freshman senators are being allowed to continue their quest for the loft they are not legally endowed to perch upon. We all know that Obama was given permission by illegal means to do so but that in no way should be a substantiated reason for anyone else to even think they are legally enabled to follow suit. And the fact Rubio lacked the honor and decency  to acknowledge the passing of the greatest supporter of the Constitution, exposes the true color of the clown who would like nothing better that to follow in the footsteps of the Prince of Fools who is currently usurping the lofty perch he has no legal claim to rest upon. If it is the desire of the RNC to allow this charade to continue it will further divide the ranks and guarantee a Democratic victory. The truth needs to be told and enforced so there is not a single doubt in the minds of the voters as to the legitimacy of the two fraudsters in the fray. Again, thanks for the post, Harry.    

  • You said it yourself: They're setting a precedent---Obama did just that---Now, anyone can become POTUS. He set the example. In my humble opinion, a fixed election both times to allow Barry Soreto to ring in the New World Order that started with H.W.

    Anybody, prove to me I am wrong

    • Mary, You are clarifying precisely why We the People, with the help of Oath keepers, current and retired, need to take our country back, from those who are poised to hijack it from us.  All based on the nonsense idea that 'precedent' could ever trump 'original intent'.

      The only thing that trumps 'original intent' is a constitutional amendment.  Absent that, the erstwhile hijackers have no legitimate leg to stand on.  I suppose the best thing that we patriots can do, for now, is be sure to call anybody on this issue who is either intending to deceive the public on the matter, or is blind to the reality of it.  Either way, SET THEM RIGHT.  Over and over again.  Never give up.  Truth is Truth.  Period.  Rub their noses in it if you have to.  But do not ever deny Truth.  Or you jeopardize your own soul's spiritual progression as well as those do so who are choosing a downward path.

      •  I am in full agreement, Stan, that “we need to take our country back”. The million dollar question is, how? Seems to me the best thing any of us on this forum can do is to work toward getting as much enlightenment as possible into those who are our friends, relatives and neighbors in our local areas.

        Trying to take on the central government head-on, in one big chunk, is futile since they operate outside the bounds of natural law, have a virtually unlimited amount of funds available to buy the loyalty of followers and they also possess a virtual monopoly on the use of force. They can murder us almost at will (Lavoy Finicum) but if we so much as gesture toward them in a threatening way they will respond with overwhelming violent and deadly force.

        Continue to work toward establishing a County Congress or a Common Law Grand Jury, legally, within your own county then populate it with Patriots and use unrelenting reason to make your case. Sounds easier than it is but that looks like the best way for us to regain Liberty.

  • Mary, you're correct. They will declare a precedent set by Obama if challenged. If it is a leftist court they will win. Just how common is it for two junior senators to run for the highest office in America, like Obama did. Both of them are NWO choices.

  • Young people of the last 30 years have been taught the lessons by this government that turns them against the Constitution, deprives them of any knowledge of it or that government is who they should look up to. When I was in school many years ago we had Civics classes, American History classes and Geography classes. Young people today couldn't tell you what Civics is much less what it teaches. They know very little about American History as well as the geography of our Nation much less any other Nations. They also know little about elections, how they work or the voting of elected officials until the newspapers or TV tells them they should go vote. That information is left up to parents and grandparents to share. The problem is the parents don't know either because they are in this time frame as well.

      The ridiculous rants and shows we see on TV going on now I believe are being set up by Obama to make the candidates look foolish while their choice look more mature. Obviously that's Rubio. Trump is new to this and is trying to defend himself in the public eye as Cruz spins his lies and publicly ties to humiliate him. He will calm down in time and proceed to go after his goal to make America great again.

This reply was deleted.