Watch how fast agendas will get pushed here too!
Penned by Lex Greene
Patriotic Americans deeply concerned about the condition of our beleaguered Constitution and Republic have been challenging Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the highest office in our land ever since he tossed his hat in the ring in 2008.
A variety of definitions for the Natural Born Citizen constitutional requirement have been batted around by numerous people with varied agendas, leaving the debate largely stuck right where it started in 2008. What does the term really mean?
Every Supreme Court Justice knows what the term means, which is why the Supreme Court prefers to never hear the case. The term Natural Born Citizen refers to a citizen by Natural Law (aka the Laws of Nature), the natural offspring of a Father who was at the time of the child’s birth, a legal Citizen of the United States. The nation of the Father is thereby the nation of the child, via Natural Law.
They would have to remove Barack Obama from office in handcuffs, and few other co-conspirators along with him. Obama supporters would not take kindly to such a move against America’s first multi-racial resident of the people’s White House.
The term is not based upon English Common Law or 14th Amendment cases often wrongly referred to as “precedent.” The term is based in Natural Law recorded by Vattel in his treaties called The Law of Nations
, a book about the Laws of Nature, Americas founding principles.
Most of the “birthers
” cherry-picked one sentence out of Vattel’s entire book and hang their hat on that one sentence – claiming wrongly as a result, that Natural Born Citizens “are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” Note how they posted the entire paragraph, but highlight only the one line.
Why did they cherry-pick this one sentence? Vattel’s book The Law of Nations
is a vital read for every patriotic American seeking to fully understand this term and the true foundation for all things American, Natural Law. Read it cover to cover, without cherry-picking…only then will you understand Natural Born Citizen.
Why didn’t the “birthers” cherry-pick this sentence from the same paragraph in Vattel’s book on Natural Law and Natural Born?
-”As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”
- or this sentence –“The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”
- or this one –“I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
Why did “birthers” single in on one sentence and completely ignore the rest of the paragraph, in fact, the balance of the entire book? Is it possible that they just didn’t do their homework? Or is it more likely that they chose that sentence because it suits their agenda, rather than the obvious truth? You decide!
What hidden agenda?
The same people who use their cherry-picked sentence from the Law of Nations also use 14th Amendment cases, regarding immigration and naturalization, to support their use of that sentence. They use British Common Law to make their case, which our Founders had just left behind for the New World free of British rule.
The same people who use this sentence to disqualify Obama from office also use their cherry-picked definition in attempts to disqualify John McCain, Mitt Romney and other Republicans. Yet, both McCain and Romney were both the natural born children of Fathers who were legal U.S. Citizens at the time of their respective births.
We know the vital importance of Vattel’s Law of Nations as it appears in our Constitution in Article I
, as an enumerated power of congress, under enforcement powers. Three times in the same paragraph on Natural Born, Vattel stated unequivocally that Natural Born Citizenship passes via the bloodline of the Father, just like all birth rights and a family surname.
How could “birthers” have missed this accidentally, in their research to understand Natural Born and prove that Obama is ineligible for the office he currently holds?
Frankly, I just don’t believe that they missed this blatant truth accidentally. Nobody has worked harder to destroy every sentence in our Constitution than lawyers, judges and law professors. How hard is it to read the entire paragraph instead of the one sentence that suits their agenda?
It is inconceivable that people researched Natural Born Citizen enough to find Vattel’s explanation of the term, but did not notice that Vattel went out of his way not once, but three times in that paragraph, to identify Natural Law and the bloodline of the Father as the source of Natural Born Citizenship. Why did they cherry-pick the one sentence and ignore all else on the subject?
You will have to ask them, because I don’t know why they choose to ignore the true definition of Natural Born, I just know that they do. Vattel could not have made it any plainer…
“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
On January 26th, only days from now, a Georgia Judge is being asked to keep Barack Hussein Obama off the 2012 Georgia ballot
in three separate cases, because he is blatantly ineligible for the office of president, according to the U.S. Constitution.
If “birthers” make it impossible for this or any other judge to get the definition of Natural Born Citizen right, they will make it possible for Obama and every other non-Natural Born Citizen to hold the highest office in our land. Is that their agenda? You decide!
What I can tell you is that as long as Barack Hussein Obama II remains in office in direct violation of Article II
, there is no U.S. Constitution. If he is allowed to appear on the ballot again in 2012, the Natural Born Citizen requirement is gone forever and the greatest political fraud in U.S. history is forever swept under the carpet.
America is officially a third world banana republic at that point, no more a Constitutional Republic.
The people must protect the Georgia Judge willing to brave those dangerous waters. He is likely to get a nasty visit from D.C. any moment now. God bless the Constitutional Republic at this most dangerous hour.
Well. The judge in Georgia has ruled that Obama can be on the Democratic Primary ballot, since he was born in Hawaii!
folks, i hate to burst any ones bubble.
but our Constitution was declared DOA MARCH 9TH 1933 under president Roosevelt when he had congress pass the NATIONAL EMERGENCY ACT and confiscated all the Gold.
i used to hear my folks talk about this and they went through the depression.
what most people THINK is at the ending of WW11 they thought everything went back to NORMAL, it didn't because that NATIONAL EMERGENCY ACT WAS NEVER UNDONE BY CONGRESS.
how do you think those TRAITORS keep passing all their UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws and placing a USURPER into our white house?
because their NOT operating under CONSTITUTIONAL LAW..
Legal precedent HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED! It simply a matter of "Honestly" enforcing the Law. Yes it causes problems, but is Law Enforcement a matter of convenience? The consequences and ramifications are extreme and wide spread, but why is that?
Because the Law was ignored in the first place!
Who's fault is that?
The longer we wait, the worse it's going to be!
The invalidation of Obama's "Presidency" also invalidates and nullifies EVERY PIECE OF LEGISLATION he has signed into Law!