OBAMA A TRAITOR AND WAR CRIMINAL – WHERE’S CONGRESS?

[Twana Blevins]

 

The Patriots News

 

By JB Williams

[e-mail]

 

On the eighth anniversary of the day President George W. Bush ordered US troops into Iraq in 2003, with the full support of the US Congress and majority support from the UN Security Council, Barack Obama launched a Tomahawk missile assault on the sovereign nation of Libya with no majority support in the UN and without even consulting congress.

Acting alone while congress was away on recess, solely at the command of the United Nations and without constitutional authority, Barack Obama dropped over $70 million worth of Tomahawk missiles on the sovereign nation of Libya in a dictatorial maneuver to force regime change of a foreign land.

He launched a military assault on Libya under what authority? To be certain, Gadhafi is no prize, but what Obama just did is far worse. Acting all alone in a truly imperialistic fashion, Obama violated his Oath of Office, Article I and II of the US Constitution and The War Powers Act all in one mindless kneejerk decision.

Article II – Section II of the US Constitution identifies the US President as the civilian oversight of the US Military and Commander-in-Chief. But it gives the US President no authority to use military might to enforce its political will upon foreign nations.

Article I – Section VIII of the US Constitution rests the power to declare war solely with the US Congress. It requires both the Commander-in-Chief and Congress to commit US troops to combat, without which the act is wholly unconstitutional.

Even the Washington Times managed to get this one right in its editorial – Obama’s Illegal War.

The 1973 War Powers Act was put in place to prevent a US President from doing exactly what Barack Obama just did.

SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

 

A US Commander-in-Chief can order use of military force in only three specific conditions…

(1)    a declaration of war,

(2)    specific statutory authorization, or

(3)    a national emergency created by  attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed  forces.

 

The US Congress has not declared war against a foreign nation since WWII. But when George W. Bush sent troops into Afghanistan and Iraq following the September 11, 2001 attacks on US soil, he not only consulted congress in advance, he sought and received specific statutory authorization from congress before ordering troops into combat. Bush complied with the constitution and War Powers Act under conditions (2) and (3). He also had a broad coalition of UN partners backed by years of Iraqi broken UN resolutions.

In the case of Obama and Libya, none of these conditions exist.

1)      Congress did not declare war.

2)      Congress was not consulted and did not give specific statutory authorization.

3)      The US was not attacked in any way by Libya which presented no threat to the US or US assets.

 

As a result, Barack Obama had NO constitutional authority to attack Libya with over $70 million worth of US taxpayer Tomahawks, placing American soldiers in harm’s way in yet another war which cannot even be justified by the pursuit of oil.

Obama touched down in Brazil as American soldiers launched a military assault on Libya at Obama’s command. Obama stands alone in this decision and order, without the support of the American people, without constitutional authority and in direct violation of his Oath of Office and the War Powers Act.

Obama is a war criminal and traitor as a result. He has acted alone, well beyond the scope and authority of his office and at odds with the national interests of the United States and the constitution which he took an oath to uphold and defend.

The Washington Times has it right. Even crook Democrat Charlie Rangel has it right - saying he was angry that Congress was not consulted before the military strikes.

He said he was undecided on whether the military action against Libya was justified but thought lawmakers and their constituents should have had time to weigh in. "Our presidents seem to believe that all we have to do is go to the U.N. and we go to war," Rangel said.

Rangel is right this time - a president must consult congress unless the US is under attack. Obama did not consult or even notify congress in advance. He acted alone on the command of the UN.

Although the UN clearly has command over Barack Obama, the UN has no command authority over the US Armed Forces. Obama used US soldiers illegally and unconstitutionally. These are the facts…

But where is congress?

Anti-war liberal and libertarian politicians like Ron Paul have attacked President Bush for years on Iraq and Afghanistan, even though Bush openly consulted, sought and received congressional authority for both military actions.

Here we have a clear cut violation and abuse of presidential powers and where are all the Code Pink, MoveOn.org, Ron Paul anti-war types?

Who in the US Congress, specifically the Republican controlled House, is going to launch a full scale investigation into Obama’s dictatorial use of military might and begin impeachment proceedings?

Americans are well aware of the fact that we have a lawless renegade regime running our federal government, which does not concern itself with the constitution or rule of law no matter the subject.

But now that anti-American renegade regime is illegally using military might to enforce its political will upon foreign sovereign nations, acting as though their oath is to the UN rather than the USA and as if they are free from any limitations or consequences.

Who in the US Congress is going to put a stop to the growing insanity? We have a runaway government acting against the interests of the United States and beyond its legal authority. Will anyone have the backbone to stop it and hold Obama accountable?

Will there be an international war crimes trial of Barack Obama?

 

JB Williams
Co-Founder
www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.ThePatriotsNews.com

 

[JB]

You win the most accurate response award Debrajoe.... BRAVO!

[Twana Blevins]

What do WE do about this act of Treason?

[Debrajoe Beatty]

We start by writing our Congressman or woman, pointing out what the Constitution says, Then asking the Congress to take action, if the Congress does not file charges, then we file charges of Violation of OATH of OFFICE  on the Congressman or woman. I bet this will happen only once, once the  elected ones understand we are serious about the USA.

[Twana Blevins]

In the Judicial System? The very same judicial system that declares we have no standing?

[Billy Bowlegs]

I will give all of you a break.  It is the damned COngress not assuming responsibility for their jobs.

 

We are in need of a complete overhaul of the United states Government starting with a Constitutional Congress.

 

But first, impeach all the Government Employees doing wrong.

[Debrajoe Beatty]

Billy, I am at the point of believing that the Congressmen/women do not know the Constitution nor that laws that govern the USA. They certaintly aren't doing anything.

[Jerry White]

I totally agree DJB. They have been stopped on the street many times and asked very simple questions about the US Const. None of them have even offered answers. They acted like the Constitution was new to them. Several have outright dissed the US constitution. Only to be voted in again. I just don't get it.

[JB]

Sadly, only a very small number of Americans have any clue what the constitution says or what it means, a VERY small number. Most of the people who wear the badge "patriot" or "constitutionalist" do not know what the constitution says or means. Politicians are no exception and most of them don't even care what it says or means.

Unfortunately, most "patriots" are still trying to save something that is already gone. What they need to focus on is how they will reinstate the constitution as the law of the land, because it is NOT the law of this land today.

[H. Gregory Badger]

This is by design.

[Billy Bowlegs]

Exactly, just how Communism works.

[Debrajoe Beatty]

Then we the citizens must be the ones to be the defenders, the keepers of our Constitutional rights.

[JB]

As it has always been and will always be.... we just stopped being forever vigilant for a few decades.