Constitutional Emergency



By Paul Skousen

At the close of the 111th Congress, America is deeply in the bog of Thomas Jefferson’s prophetic warning: “The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.” Unfortunately, the broken chains of the Constitution have failed to contain the federal government.

By way of review, let’s take a stroll through the junkyard of constitutional violations that have been painted fresh by President Obama and the 111th Congress. Here’s my top-ten list, highly abbreviated for length.

#10. — 9/11 Responders Relief Fund: We love and honor those who put themselves in harm’s way for our security. However, giving the 9/11 first responders money after the fact violates the Constitution. Article 1.8 gives Congress the right to expend funds for all the purposes itemized, provided it is done for the general welfare, NOT for individuals or preferred groups. The states may reward heroes if they so choose.

#9. — Checks and Balances Failure: The Chairmanship of the UN Security Council: Where was Congress when President Obama became the chairman of the powerful UN Security Council in 2009? The normal monthly rotation for that chair goes to the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. because Article 1.9 of the Constitution forbids the president (and all other office-holders) from accepting any present, foreign office or title from a foreign country or a foreign potentate unless it is specifically authorized by Congress. The Founders wanted to prevent deal-making, corruption, and foreign influence from affecting America’s internal affairs.

#8. — Net Neutrality: The government is trying to stop Internet providers from blocking or slowing some web traffic and prevent providers from showing favoritism. The FCC thinks it should be able to regulate the Internet like it regulates utility companies. This violates the property rights of Internet providers and interferes in the market’s free choice of which services receive funding. Article 1.8 makes it clear that the FCC is not constitutionally authorized to pass laws, especially those disguised as regulations.

#7. – Czars: The moniker for appointees who report to no one but the president has taken on a new and eerie resemblance to the dusty Russian tsars of old. Article 2.2 grants the president leeway to appoint managers, but those managers may not have any regulatory, legislative or law-making powers — such powers are reserved to the legislative branch. Today’s “czars” have the power of cabinet members without having to go through a vetting process or the confirmation process prescribed for cabinet members. Czars are unelected and untouchable political decision-makers — in violation of Article 1.1.

#6. — Cap and Trade: The Clean Energy and Security Act mandates greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, 42 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, and 84 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. By 2020, this tax will extract an estimated $160 billion from the economy, or an average $1,870 per family. Once again, had the chains of Article 1.8 not been broken, America would be spared such tomfoolery. Cap and trade masked in any disguise whatsoever cannot be justified as a general welfare activity.

#5. — Cash for Clunkers: The government offered $4,500 rebates to people turning in their clunkers for more fuel-efficient vehicles. When the first program quickly ran out of the $4 billion allotted to it, another $2 billion was added. Follow-up analysis showed the program did nothing to stimulate the economy and put many people into additional debt by encouraging them to purchase cars that they otherwise would not have bought during these hard economic times. The government has zero authority to selectively give individuals tax money for purchases of vehicles, according to Articles 1.2 and 1.8 — and common sense.

— TARP Funding: The original 2008 act authorized $700 billion to bail out banks and other institutions. The government has no business rescuing private financial institutions from bad judgment and risky ventures. Article 1.8 excludes permission for Congress to grant financial aid or loans to private companies. Any use of Treasury funds must go toward the general welfare, not to specific groups.

#3. — Illegal Immigration: Arizona is being invaded. When that state passed SB 1070 to stem the flow of violent illegals into its sovereign territory, a derelict federal government turned around and sued. At issue was the Feds’ failure to control the border, so Arizona took it upon itself to do just that — to uphold existing federal immigration laws. It didn’t add new laws; it simply gave local authorities the power to enforce federal responsibilities. The federal government claims the right to manage immigration, but when it refuses to carry out that obligation, thereby jeopardizing the security of border states, it is derelict in its duties. Arizona should haul the federal government before the Supreme Court for malfeasance. Article 4.4 clearly states that the U.S. shall protect states from invasion — more than 400,000 illegal aliens (est.) in Arizona is, by definition, an invasion.

#2. — Economic Stimulus Bill: The $814 billion stimulus is the most backward-thinking proposition to come along since human sacrifice. Dumping borrowed money into an over-fed, bloated and out-of-control ogre doesn’t solve anything, it simply temporarily props up with blocks of melting ice cream a failed and failing government of extravagance. Not only does it illegally take money out of the economy that could be used to provide jobs, but it’s using borrowed money — with interest due.

And the worst violation of the Constitution over the past two years is …

#1. — Health Care Reform: Health care reform was the last lever needed to lift the lid off the pot of American gold and empty it out for socialism. It required all Americans to have health insurance whether they wanted it or not. Earlier this month, Federal Judge Henry E. Hudson said that the government has no power “to compel an individual to involuntarily enter the stream of commerce by purchasing a commodity in the private market.”

The string of constitutional violations supporting the judge’s rejection is long and shocking:

For purposes of regulation, Congress invoked Article 1.8 and claimed insurance may be controlled because it falls under Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce. But insurance is not interstate commerce — you can’t buy insurance across state lines.

Language in the bill says the health care law may NOT be changed or amended by anyone once signed into law. This violates the role of Congress. Article 1.1 makes it clear that only Congress is authorized to make law, meaning it has every right to alter, amend and change the health care law. To restrict Congress is to change its constitutional duty. The 111th Congress must think it can change the Constitution without amending it — a violation of Article 5, which outlines the amendment process.

The health care bill also violates the 10th Amendment because it coerces states into complying with a new national program that reaches far into state jurisdiction.

So, what do you do when you’re navigating through a blizzard of political white-out where visibility is reduced to zero, the road is slick and slippery, and disaster is strewn about in all directions? You come to a complete stop — and put on the chains.

Paul B. Skousen is a former analyst for the CIA, an intelligence officer in the Reagan White House, and staffer for Senator Orrin Hatch. He has interviewed on Fox News and was featured by Paul Harvey’s The Rest of the Story about smuggling Oliver North’s shredded secrets from the White House. He is a journalist and published author, and the son of W. Cleon Skousen, author of The Five Thousand Year Leap. He is a national Constitution Coach and senior editor with PowerThink Publishing, LLC. Website: Email:

Views: 734

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


most of the knee jerks in office probably can't get it up anymore

NOT impeachment!  Impeachment is for LEGITIMATE officials, elected or appointed, Obama is NOT legitimate, but if impeachment is used it automatically lends an air of legitimacy to all his acts. We have to go after his lack of eligibility to have ever HELD the office, and get him out that way; then everything he's done, all appointees, EOs and bills signed automatically become null and void since he was NEVER eligible to sign or make them in the first place!

Like the graphic that is the faker to a tee right down to the red star.


Not only that, he has to be tried for treason. The best by that State, where they still have capital punishment.
The Supreme Court has ruled in the past that an Unconstitutional law is null and void and can not be enforced.The federal courts have ruled that any law enforcement officer who tries to falsly arrest you is commiting a feloney and you have the right to resist with what ever force is nessasary.Thomas Jefferson stated that when the Government gets out of control it is the DUTY of the people to remove it and reestablish an honest Government. I do not believe we can wait for 2012, obumer will have destroyed our freedom and our country by then. The people have to stand up now and SCREAM NO MORE, Tell them they are FIRED and we are apointing new people to run our Government within the confines of the Constitution.



You have made a very valuable statement to the US above.  Now, if everyone that feels that the US is being screwed over and denegrated to a third world country of Socialism, the first thing we need to do is to write a letter to our local County Sheriff and demand that his office protect us.  That is why we elected him.  Info the local district attorney and demand that we be protected. 

Start at the bottom level of law and go up the latter.  Make them all take notice and be accounted for.


One way to stir up the impeachment pot.


That  is a very true statement that you have made there, question is how many are going to get up and depose this fake president obumer and hie hoods from office. It will take a minimum of about 250,000 to do this job the right think we can come up with that many in a short amount of time.

All in all, doesn't it add up to enough to impeach someone(s)?  And, make it stick?
In the list of 10, I did not see the theft of General Motors from its legal owners and the giving of their ownership to the United Auto Workers Union.  I thought that "THEFT" was probably unconstitutional. It is certainly illegal under federal law. In any case, among its enumerated powers, the Federal Government does not have any Constitutional authority to do such an act.
We have enough from all this to have the entire Congress, Scumbama, Bite me Biden all arrested for TREASON. I know the laws and by all of them they wouldn't have but one thing to say at their arringment, that is "Guilty as charged" .  We have full documentation, written, audio and video to back the charges. Now where in the hell is a team of lawyers with Titanuim balls and a judge who would try the case?
There is NOT any judge or cop with balls enough the have them all arrested, Forget Obummers birth certificate, arrest him and his cronies who are in on his fraud, for treason, and a host of other charges. Hopefully (though doubtfully) none of the new congress members will have balls enough to either. It appears the cops and politicians are Teflon coated so far as obeying the laws. Laws only apply to others (us).  I am studying and intend to join the freeman's society, and live by common law, not the fraud perpetrated on native citizens
Related to the GM Theft is the destruction and theft of GM dealerships.

Obama, in an unconstitutional act, mentioned earlier in the list of 10, appointed Steve Rattner to be the White House's official "Car Czar"--literally his title. Rattner is the liaison between Obama, Chrysler, and GM.

Initially, the national media reported that Chrysler 'had made this list of dealerships'. Not true!

The Washington Examiner, Newsmax, Fox News and a host of other news agencies discovered that the list of dealerships was put together by the "Automotive Task Force" headed by no one other than Mr. Steve Rattner.


Why were certain dealerships closed and others left in business?


On May 27, 2009, the Washington Examiner and Newsmax exposed the connection.


Amazingly, of the 789 dealerships closed by the federal government, 788 had donated money exclusively to Republican political causes, while contributing nothing to Democratic political causes. The only "Democratic" dealership on the list was found to have donated $7,700 to Hillary's campaign, and a bit over $2,000 to John Edwards. This same dealership, reportedly, also gave only $200 to Obama's campaign.


Does that seem a little odd ? 


Steve Rattner the Auto Czar who had zero experience in the auto industry is the guy who put the list together. He happens to be married to Maureen White--the former national finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. As such, she has access to campaign donation records from everyone in the nation--Republican or Democrat. Of course, that is just a coincidence.

There is another coincidence.
On that list of dealerships being closed down, a weird thing happened in Arkansas, North Louisiana, and Southern Missouri. It seems that Bill Clinton's former White House Chief of Staff, Mack McClarty, owns a chain of dealerships in that region, partnered with a fellow by the name of Robert Johnson.


Johnson happens to be founder of Black Entertainment Television and was a huge Obama supporter and financier.


These guys own a half dozen Chrysler stores under the company title of RLJ-McClarty-Landers.  Interestingly, none of their dealerships were ordered closed -- not one!  While all of their competing Chrysler/Dodge and Jeep dealerships were ordered closed by the Obama Administration!


Eight dealerships located near the dealerships owned by McClarty and Johnson were ordered shut down. Thus by pure luck, these two major Obama supporters now have virtual monopoly on Chrysler sales in their zone.


Is the illegal closing of dealerships, causing upwards of 100,000 lost jobs, considered "unconstitutional?"  I should think it exceeds the "enumerated powers" clause.




Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11


1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts

How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live" shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......

© 2015   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service