Obama’s ISIS plan: Outsourcing U.S. national security in a chaotic world
by LTC ALLEN WEST (US ARMY RET) September 11, 2014
I just finished listening to President Obama delivering his strategy for dealing with ISIS and my summation of what Obama stated is simply: "Outsourcing US National Security in a Chaotic World."
Lots of you here aren't career military combat warriors, so let me explain why this speech made no sense. Obama said that we are committed to a counter-terrorism strategy and a systematic campaign - but then Obama stated there will be no U.S. combat mission on the ground - although he is deploying another 475 on top of the almost 1,000 troops there now. Folks, you cannot win a counter-terrorism operation without a combat force - it certainly cannot be won from the air.
And what Obama didn't explain was who will coordinate close air support for these "coalition" partners on the ground - and of course Obama just recently derided the Free Syrian Army as being "doctors, farmers, and pharmacists." Our air strikes - and you must understand 150 strikes over a one month period is not a dedicated air campaign - have to be targeted and that means SOFLAM (Special Operations Forces Laser Acquired Munitions) but if there are no American combat troops, none on the ground, then who is doing this critical mission? You cannot destroy a force from 30,000 feet with air power only.
Obama just had to state that this is not going to be another Iraq or Afghanistan. Well, let's look at that. In Afghanistan a small American force of 600 Special Operators and CIA operatives along with the Northern Alliance routed a Taliban Army of 70,000 along with another 5,000 Al-Qaida enemy forces. That was a successful model which could be used here, but Obama told us again what he was not willing to do.
Now we are going to put our national security trust in surrogate forces? And we're supposed to send in more trainers for the Iraq Army? Heck, if Obama had supported the generals on the ground and fought to leave a residual force in Iraq, we would have had the trainers there and wouldn't be in this position! So now we have to go back in because of his ideological intransigence and "redo" it all over again and try to rebuild the relationships, which have now been broken - as many Sunni tribesmen have enjoined ISIS.
And to state that ISIS is not Islamic? You have to be kidding me. ISIS stands for, first word, "Islamic." Obama continues to deny and refuse to define the enemy, and that folks is not helpful.
President Obama stated that America is safer - but not according to recent American polling - and certainly not reflected by the beheadings of two Americans, Foley and Sotloff.
Obama borrowed the "no safe haven" phrase from George W. Bush. And in a comparative analysis of coalition building ability, George W. Bush had 37 countries in 2003, but so far Obama only has 9 - and as we reported, one of them is Turkey and they're already waffling about not joining unless we restrain support to the Kurdish Peshmerga Army - a core element of this strategy.
I was glad to hear Obama state that he would cut off funding - I hope he goes after Qatar with a strategy we have offered here. As well, since the Saudi King Abdullah is so worried, then have him foot the bill for this operation. But, there was no reference to our domestic jihadist recruitment problem and a porous southern border that must be sealed.
Another key point Obama failed to address, as he talked about his highest priority being our security - will Obama stop the decimation of our military force, which finds itself at horribly low levels? That is why I believe Obama's strategy is about "outsourcing" our national security as he degrades and destroys our military capability and capacity, which we have addressed here.
This is not American leadership at its best, it is American acquiescence and incompetence. You cannot destroy an enemy or conduct a counter-terrorism strategy by hoping someone else will execute it, or by air - and how are we going to increase air strikes? Will we have a dedicated air campaign with countless sorties a day?
The finish to this speech was utterly weak; full of empty rhetoric and pabulum which means nothing to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi - and it was Russia who sealed the deal to secure Syria's declared chemical weapons.
Obama asked for our support - he certainly doesn't secure mine, and he shouldn't get yours either. Tonight President Barack Hussein Obama proved that polling drives his strategy, because this was supposed to be done midday.
He probably should have, since this was an utter embarrassment and a waste of time. Obama is expanding a combat operation and yet refuses to go to Congress, as George W. Bush did to make a case and secure - by vote - approval. He asked for a blank check for an ambiguous endeavor supporting surrogate forces to handle American business of destroying an enemy who he did not define, which has declared enemy against us.
I fear for my country. We are indeed rudderless amidst a maelstrom.
Lt. Col (Retired) Allen West served 22 years in the US Army and represented Florida's 22nd Congressional District in the US House of Representatives from 2011-2013. To hear more from Col. West, visit www.allenbwest.com.
Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/obamas-isis-plan-outsourcing-us-national-security-in-a-chaotic-world?f=must_reads#ixzz3D54U5SZT
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Replies