WND

Penned jackmino_avatar.jpg by Jack MinorEmail | Archive Jack Minor is a former Marine who served under President Reagan. He has written hundreds of articles and has been interviewed about his work on multiple television and radio outlets. He is also a former pastor and has been acknowledged for his research ability in several books.

 

 

 

Over 100 members of Congress appear to share the concerns of a former Army general who has sounded the alarm over efforts by the Obama Administration to push through the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, or ATT.

As WND reported, retired Lt. Gen. William Boykin earlier this year, in a video in which he claimed Obama was leading America down the path of a quiet, Marxist revolution, blasted the ATT, also known as the small arms treaty, saying it would regulate private gun ownership.

“There has been a decree by the administration by the president and the secretary of state saying that our president will sign the United Nations small arms treaty, which is about how we will buy sell and control individual private weapons,” Boykin warned. “That means the United Nations, an international body will decide how you and I as Americans can buy and sell our weapons, how we control those weapons, who is authorized to have those weapons and where they are. This is a dangerous trend.”

Now some 130 lawmakers, consisting of mostly Republicans, but also including Democrats such as Reps. Jason Altmire, Sanford Bishop, Jerry Costello, Danny Davis and Peter DeFazio sent off a letter to the Obama administration opposing the treaty.

The letter states that Congress is concerned the treaty could “pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

The letter goes on to declare that the Second Amendment guarantees the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms” and the U.S. has no business supporting a treaty that infringes on the Bill of Rights.

The ATT would specifically require signatories to identify and trace, in “a timely and reliable manner,” illicit small arms and light weapons. The information would be required to be submitted to the United Nations.

The treaty was opposed by the Bush administration, but President Obama’s administration reversed direction on the treaty. U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, said the United States would support talks towards ratifying the treaty.

While the treaty is still in a draft stage, the United Nations is beginning a month-long process beginning this week to craft the final details of the treaty.

Supporters say the treaty is necessary to prevent rogue countries from being able to purchase guns from arms dealers. Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said concerns about the treaty restricting individual rights are “misplaced” and that he supported its goals.

Critics of the treaty have long maintained that the treaty would lead to mandatory registration of all firearms and every sale; even those between individuals.

The congressional letter also takes issue with the “moral equivalence” of comparing America to totalitarian regimes and calls upon the administration to break consensus and reject the treaty. It goes on to remind the president and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that “the Constitution gives the power to regulate international commerce to Congress alone.”

This is not the first time Congress has sent letters to the administration opposing the small arms treaty. Last year, Congress sent off a similar letter addressing many of the same concerns. This letter was signed by 12 Democrats who joined 45 Republicans in opposing the treaty.

The letter stated, “The Arms Trade Treaty must not in any way regulate the domestic manufacture, possession or sale of firearms or ammunition.”

It went on to state, “The establishment of any sort of international gun registry that could impede upon the privacy rights of law-abiding gun owners is a non-starter.”

While that letter was been touted in the mainstream media as an indication that Democrats are now opposing gun control, some pointed out that the letter actually proved the opposite. The Senators stated they support the general concept of the treaty but believe countries such as the U.S. should have “exclusive authority to regulate arms within their own borders.”

Critics point out that this statement indicates that the senators believe firearms registration is acceptable provided it is initiated by individual governments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!

Join The Patriots For America

Replies

  • Now you know why the oil rig blew up..Hillary was at the UN working on the bill to take all the peoples guns from them. With the oil rig burnning all the news when south, just like Fort Hood when the tea party was going thru the halls of the senate and congress, and all the news media was at Fort Hood. nothing was reported on the tea party....

  • Obama, Hillary, and Holder tried to paint a picture of guns killing our border patrol officers.....it didn't work, they got caught selling the guns to drug dealers and criminals in Mexico and God only knows where else.  They were hoping "guns" would be blamed, the truth is that Obama, Hillary, and Holder are the criminals and the biggest threat to law and order...they are part of the death spiral.

    All three of these people are despicable betrayers of America...they all should be tried, convicted, and hung.

    • Agreed!  This treaty must not pass! 

    • right on Harry, God help us!!  Their all LIARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • I will say one thing to this. If Hillary Clinton, Barack H. Obama, Joe Biden, and /or anyone else in the government of these United States of America either sign, vote for, or vote to ratify these United Nations treaties, then I will go to my grave trying to make damn sure they are charged with, convicted, and hung for treason. Impeachment will not be sufficient.

      • My sentiments exactly, Ronald!

    • BUT KNOW ONE WILL DARE DO ANYTHING...THATS THE PROBLEM?   HOW DO YOU CHARGE THEM WITH TREASON?   NO ONE WILL TOUCH IT, LIKE SO MANY OTHER THINGS THATS BEEN GOING ON, NOTHING IS EVER DONE........THATS OUR PROBLEM...........

  • The Constitution prohibits treatys being valid even if signed when they contradict or attempt to supercede the Constitution... not that the people in Washington have read or understood it!

  • This is a call to arms! 

  • The Republicans and some Democrats need to gett off of their buttocks and enforce their letter, and tell traitor Obama to back off in a big hurry.

This reply was deleted.