(23) ACORN led by you Obama laid the foundation for the sub prime mortgage collapse. You sued City Bank and forced them (The rest of the banks) to lower their standards and through President Bill Clinton, Freddie Mae and Freddie Mack forced banks to lend money to un qualified people mainly minorities and the poor who could never pay back the loans. Thus the housing bubble was created and the collapse of our economy 2008.
(24) Bill Ayers directed you Obama to write a book to secure your political position. Obama did not write his book Dreams from my Father, Bill Ayers did. The book was full of lies and falsehoods and a hundred thirty pages were concentrated on Obama's trip to Africa to build credibility with his fake black heritage.
(25) Your friend David Axelrod whose mother was a member of the Communist Party USA helped you run for the US Senate. You were advised to have nose surgery (Rino-plasty) to hide your close facial resemblance to your father Frank Marshal Davis. In 2008 you had this surgery before you ran for the US Senate.
(26) You become closely aligned with Marxists and Muslims who both support the over throw of capitalism. After 5 months as a Senator you decided to run for President. David Axelrod said you must hide your Marxist ideology and he set up another trip to Africa for you to create an alignment once again with your fake African family. You met up with Odinga Odinga and his Marxist Kenyan Peoples Union who are aligned with Islam and also the Communist Party of Kenya.
(27) You returned back to the states and then set up your "Hope and Change" campaign for a Presidential run. Hope was derived from Jeremiah Wrights audacity of Hope Sermon and Change was from Saul Alinsky's Code word for Socialist Revolution. "Yes we can" originated from Communist activist Caesar Chavez SI, SE PUEDE! / YES, WE CAN! Your Hope and Change emblem was designed from the old Weather Underground domestic terrorist group emblem.
(28) You refuse to release all your college transcripts because you a "C" average student that just got by in school. You are not able to give a speech without a teleprompter. You are lost without it. You will stammer and stumble. You cannot let the world know you are actually dumber than a bag of marbles.
(29) Your wife Michelle used Communist propaganda by telling people in the black - Hispanic communities that success is always quite out of reach for them and that the capitalists keep moving the bar making it impossible for them to get ahead. Michelle Obama made the black community think America was "Hell" and only the government can help them. All Marxist indoctrination.
(30) Obama you then stated you needed a civilian security force more powerful than our military to secure America. You slipped up Comrade when you revealed your true Marxist intent for America with this statement. Stalin and Lenin would have been proud of you.
(31) Your friend Marxist Bill Ayers and your father "Communist" Frank Marshal Davis prepared you Obama to replace American capitalism with socialism and it all started by signing the stimulus bill in 2008. This was a way to funnel money to Marxist front groups and re distribute our wealth. This included the bail out of General Motors and Obama care are was rammed down our throats and implemented. You also centralized power and hired over 30 czars to bypass the Congress and the America people.
(32) You told Eric Holder to ignore laws and or go around laws you did not like. Like the Dream Act and Defense of Marriage Law. Pure Marxism and unconstitutional. You used the BP pipe line disaster to re distribute wealth and tried to nationalize oil companies using this crisis.
(33) You regard America as an imperial nation and that we owe the world an apology. So you went on your world apology tour. Marxism 101.
(34) Instead of asking where is the birth certificate we should be asking who is your real father. You also stated that the free market capitalism does not work. Using Marxist propaganda you polarized a nation with your speeches stating this is not fair and that is not fair. You programmed people in the minority voting blocks that we need to change America. You even created the group African Americans for Obama. You created an illusion that you were the son of an African goat herder when in fact you are the son of a former Communist leader and you have unleashed a dangerous Marxist agenda on the Middle Class trying to destroy them.
(35) You are purging the military senior leadership. Over 200 to date and replaced them with weak left leaning capitulators. Marxism 101. You sided with the Muslim brother hood in Egypt a terrorist organization and you inflicted massive casualties' on Libya by siding with pro Islamic forces that over threw Colonel Mumar Gaddafi. You fired your Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel because he had reached a point of no return and basically told you to go screw yourself after he finally figured you out and he manned up.
(35) Your goal is to tax and regulate the middle class out of business and collapse the economy and make this nation vanish, leaving behind a lower class and your political elites who will run the government and control the wealth. You will do this by controlling the school curriculum, the energy under cap and trade, the water under the EPA and America would become socialist and nobody would even realize it until its too late. Agenda 21 .... The United Nations are waiting to swoop in and finish the job.
I say to Barry Soetoro we will not allow you to destroy this nation. The November 4th election was just the beginning. We the American people demand that you step down and surrender your Marxist agenda and turn yourself over to the Congressional Master at Arms for prosecution for treason against the United States under Article 3 Section 3 of the US Constitution. The militia in this nation is stronger than your federal Communist storm troopers. Barry its time for you to step down and resign from the Presidency.
Senior Chief Geoff Ross
Surface Warfare - Air warfare - Airborne
United States Navy Retired
If you check the records -- Originally, when the Amendments were submitted for ratification they were not numbered. However, since the 13th was removed they have numbered the Amendments when they have submitted them. Thus, by numbering them they were able to send out a replacement for the 13th Amendment and then keep numbering them from there.
"If I check the records" ??? Please read all of my posts on both the 13th and 14th Amendments on this site.
I think then you will be able to assure yourself that is exactly what I have done and the results of that research isn't really pretty.
It appears that Lawyers have totally screwed up the legal system, and expecially to THEIR sole advantage.
Can you disagree?
I know you are very well versed in your studies. I was only talking about the fact that starting with the NEW 13th Congress started numbering the Amendments when they were sent out.
I really appreciate being able to talk with you about these things.
I research for ALL of my brothers who have served and who are true patriots of this nation.
FREEDOM WILL SURVIVE. Obama may not and he is too ignorant ("ignant") to grasp that concept that America is the Home of the Brave and the Land of the FREE. It shall not be taken down by him or anyone like him.
Only the people will need to remove him by the hand of the sargant-of-arms and tried for Treason and hung by the neck until dead and that goes for all his cohorts in DC and around the country that hid his fraudulent acts, amen.
Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the "missing" 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous.
Which is what I have been saying for a Long time, Why are Lawyers eligible for positions in Congress and the House? This is one of a few dozen reasons, why Statues and Regulations can't be understood by the masses, when they are written in Legalize and take ObamaCare, it is well over 2000+ pages long. No wonder, Nancy Pelosi said " You have to pass it to read what is in it ". It can't be read, with all of the Legalize in it. It takes at least a week to read through this monstrousity. How many other bills have been this complicated to read. Make congress put the 13th Amendment back into the writings and then get rid of all the Lawyers. They are the problem, not the solution...
I agree Clois. Then abolish the 14th Amendment and every Amendment after the 14th because none of them were ratified by a "lawful" government, along with the Federal Reserve, and the IRS. As long as these entities are in power, we will never be free.
"Give me control of a nations currency and I care not who makes it's laws".
Mayer Amschel Rothschild
In the process we need to restore the missing 13th Amendment.
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the united States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." - The true 13" Amendment to the Constitution for the united states of America
I hear a lot of legalize on this site. Does anyone know if we have a law firm that is trying to implement these ideas? If we don't....we should.
Unfortunately, the answer (to my knowledge) is NO.
The primary reason is that a "Law Firm" must make an attempt to restore the 13th Amendment which makes it illegal for LAWYERS to serve in the House or Senate and thus make law.
This nation was formed "for the people and by the people" and not for the monetary benefit of LAWYERS.
BTW ....... all of the legalize you see on this site is due to the research and diligence of patriotic contributers who are posting information that the public generally does NOT know and does not research.
Thanks to all for your excellent posts.
The lawyers are part of the establishment. They swear an oath to be loyal to the laws of the "United States". If lawyers dare to use the true facts they will be dis-barred, ie, the truth about the Fed and the IRS.
Our best hope is in "We the People". Every time we sit on a Jury, we have the right and the power to NULLIFY ANY LAW. This is why it is so important to educate the people as to the tyranny that has plagued America for so many years. Every time someone is charged with one of these ridiculous so-called laws, such as the seat belt law, the Jury has the right and the duty to find that person not guilty. Then it will be on the record and may be used by others.
The people themselves have it in their power effectually to resist usurpation, without being driven to an appeal in arms. An act of usurpation is not obligatory: It is not law; and any man may be justified in his resistance. Let him be considered as a criminal by the general government: yet only his fellow citizens can convict him. They are his jury, and if they pronounce him innocent, not all powers of congress can hurt him; and innocent they certainly will pronounce him, if the supposed law he resisted was an act of usurpation. See: 2 Elliot's Debates, 94; Bancroft, (1788) History of the Constitution, 267.
"If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize, as appellants urge, the undisputed power of the jury to acquit, even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon which they judge. If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused, is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic of passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision." (US v Moynihan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969)).
"The jury has an un-reviewable and irreversible power... to acquit in disregard of the instructions on the law given by the trial judge... The pages of history shine on instances of the jury's exercise of its prerogative to disregard un-contradicted evidence and instructions of the judge; for example, acquittals under the fugitive slave law. U.S. v. Dougherty, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, 1972, 473 F.2d at 1130 and 1132. (See also State of Georgia vs. Brailford, et al 3 Dall, 1, and U.S. vs. Moynihan, 417 F 2d 1002, 1006 (1969).
The jury's power to acquit out of justice or mercy is a constitutionally protected right. If not their right, it is at least the defendant's firmly settled right that he insist on a jury with such power, regardless of whether the proof of his technical legal guilt is literally overwhelming and un-contradicted. Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 277-82 (1993).
Our system of justice is unflinchingly committed to the liberty of criminal juries to "err upon the side of mercy," Jackson, 443 U.S. at 317, or to "refuse to convict even though the evidence supported the charge." Gregg, 428 US. at 199 n.50.
Telling a jury they "must" convict where guilt has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt is a serious misstatement of the law and "an error of the most egregious nature." Proceedings of the 53rd Jud. Conf. of the D.C Circuit, 145 F.R.D. 149, 175 (1992) (Remarks of R. Kenneth Mundy, Esq.).
Under our Constitution, by design, a defendant is entitled to have his fate decided by a jury even if the evidence of his guilt is undisputed and decisive. Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 277. This is because criminal jurors are entitled to "refuse to convict even though the evidence supported the charge," and any legal system which would strip jurors of that discretion would be "totally alien to our notions of criminal justice." Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 199 n.50 (1976).
"it is not only his right, but his duty - to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court." (John Adams- Yale Law Journal, 1964:173)