Keep in mind OAS mission against lawless, oath breaking politicians in positions of power"
There is new information out concerning emails and Benghazi and the White House is using their Carney (you know...the little paid liar who works at the circus?) to back pedal faster than a clown on two wheels. The newest claims are coming from individuals who worked both in and outside of Libya. One is a former Navy Rear Admiral and the other was a paid informant for both the FBI and the CIA. We know that recent emails state that it was imperative that the talking points concerning Benghazi remain focused on the bogus YouTube video claim. This was done to protect Obama in the upcoming 2012 election. But there is other information, too and it is damning to not only Obama and Hillary, but many other political clowns on both sides of the aisle, including John McCain, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell.
In the 18 months leading up to the Benghazi attack, the United States ignored a negotiated peace accord and assisted in attacking a sovereign nation and aligned with forces supporting a global jihad. The attack on Benghazi was about a failed foreign policy and a covert operation that saw the United States enable, support and arm al-Quaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
In a November 2008 State Department report, then US Ambassador to Libya, Gene Cretz stated;
The U.S. shares key strategic goals with the Government of Libya (GOL), particularly with combating al-Qaeda and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
Shortly after September 11, 2001, the CIA stopped in Libya on their way to Afghanistan and insider reports state that the Libyan government was very receptive to cooperating. Muammar Qaddafi made the transition from sworn enemy to an arms length US ally. He agreed to destroy his nuclear weapons program in 2003. He provided the US with intelligence against al-Qaeda and he worked with the US to resolve the Darfur conflict. Despite his support for the war on terror, Qaddafi was potentially becoming a major economic threat to the Europeon Union and the US.
In a February 2009 cable, made public by wikileaks, Ambassador Cretz wrote about Qaddafi's goals for a unified Africa, which would share a "common army, currency and passport". Cretz was particularly concerned with the unified currency since the entire country would be dependent on a currency that was backed by Libya's oil exports. This idea could have jeopardized relations between Libya and EU member states that imported significant amounts of Libya's oil. The currency Qaddafi wanted to implement was a single dinar made from gold. Qaddafi was starting to demand gold for oil and in that demand he was threatening the fiat currencies of both Europe and the United States. There was a fear that if Qaddafi's plan started to take hold, then there would be some very powerful people who would lose a lot of money.
Even though rioters were raging in nearby Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, Libya was still stable until anti-Qaddafi activists called for a Libyan day of rage on February 17, 2011 to mark the 5 year anniversary of a Benghazi demonstration that had turned deadly. When the rebel forces started gaining strength, the State Department began to look for another country that would take Qaddafi in order to avoid more violence. Emails were sent from a senior State Department official trying to find a place for him. Also, emails were sent asking for information as to who exactly the opposition leaders were in Libya. Specifically, if before February 17, 2011, did Opposition leaders receive any funding and/or communication with extremist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hizbollah, or AQIM (al-Qaeda in the Maghreb). And, were opposition and rebels plotting the "day of rage" with extremists?
On March 10, 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified before the House Appropriations Committee endorsing US support for the Libyan Opposition. But there were no factual reports of a humanitarian crisis in Libya. It was Al-Jazeera who was manufacturing the crisis in Libya and other news outlets jumped on their feed. Al-Jazeera even interviewed so called witnesses who were not even in Libya. The entire ordeal was fabricated. Over the next week, Clinton met with key anti-Qaddafi leaders and named US State Department Diplomat Chris Stevens as liaison to the Libyan Opposition. Obama and other top officials in Congress were calling for the arming of the rebels. Hillary was the most aggressive in this call, even though reports clearly showed that it would be terrorists who received the arms and the support.
On March 17, 2011, the United Nations passed a security resolution ordering Qaddafi to immediately cease fire while at the same time authorizing NATO forces to take all necessary military action against the Libyan government. People on the ground in Libya could not believe what was happening. Top military leaders called for a 72 hour cease fire and peace agreement under the laws of war. This was done in order to give everyone a chance to let the rising tensions die down and to give Qaddafi a chance to pull back his forces.
March 19, 2011 began the beginning of a 3 day cease fire negotiation period. The Department of Defense and Obama cancelled any discussion of a truce.
On March 23, 2011, NATO began assuming control of Libyan operations as dictated by the UN security resolution in place. On March 27, AFRICOM's General Hamm's control was transferred to Navy Admiral, James Stavridas.
On March 24, 2011, in an effort to stave off further military action against his regime, Qaddafi ordered the release of a detailed report to US intelligence officers. That report identified al-Qaeda and other extremist ties to the rebels. Obama had that report on his desk in the Oval Office within hours. Admiral Stavridis then went before a House Committee meeting and stated that although they had seen flickers of intelligence, there was no concrete evidence of terrorists within the ranks of the rebels. He quoted parts of the report that Qaddafi had released so it is certain that he had read it. This was a bald faced lie.
Even though Obama and Hillary remained non-committal to arming the rebels while in public, Reuters reported on March 30th that Obama had already signed a secret deal to do just that; arm the rebels. He authorized the CIA to get them the weapons. This operation was called Operation Zero Footprint. The US outsourced the transfer of these weapons to a foreign ally so that their involvement would not be so easily traced. Even though this was a covert operation, Obama still was required to sign off on it.
John McCain even answered a reporter about his feelings of those who were fighting for the Opposition. He called them his heroes. And let's not forget that McCain was very present in Libya. He visited there in the Spring of 2011. As a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain had access to privileged and confidential intelligence information. The information that the rebels were terrorists was cast aside. Obama was required to share this intelligence with what is known as the "Gang of Eight" which includes McCain, Feinstein, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi and Reid. They knew about Zero Footprint.
Operation Zero Footprint was concocted by the White House in order to arm the Libyan rebels while giving the appearance of having no dealings whatsoever in the transfer of said weapons. Qatar was used to handle the transfer into the hands of al-Qaeda who was posing as Opposition rebels. This is why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi. So that he could coordinate the transfer of the weapons. Stevens also has extensive experience in international arms transfers.
In October 2011, Qaddafi was captured and killed by the Opposition. This is when Hillary Clinton appeared incredibly happy when she said, "We came, we saw, he died." And then she cackled. (She doesn't laugh) This had been the plan all along because Qaddafi wanted to be paid in gold for his oil.
On July 9, 2012, Stevens filed a request with the State Department for additional security. He was denied that request. On August 16, 2012, Stevens described deteriorating conditions in Benghazi, specifically warning of 10 Islamist militia and al-Qaeda training camps.
On September 5, 2012, just one week before the attack on the consulate in Benghazi, an AFRICOM report showed that the rebels were taking advantage of the lax security in Benghazi, yet the State Department again refused to send additional security. Stevens was told to make do with the detail he had. Many people who were in Libya at the time of the attacks believe that Stevens was actually a CIA operative and that the entire Libyan ordeal became a CIA operation after the death of Qaddafi.
The murder of Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans was nothing more than a political agenda to save Obama's chance in the up-coming 2012 Presidential election. The weapons were transferred to the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda and Stevens became a liability. Qaddafi was removed from power, which saved the US the embarrassment of having to admit it has no gold. As a keeper of the worlds gold, this would not be acceptable and so Qaddafi had to go.
Make no mistake that the events that unfolded in Libya are only a tip of the iceberg, but information is coming out now and there is no where these murdering government assholes can hide. What goes on in the dark always comes to the light.
Portions of this were taken from For The Record with Laurie Dhue.
Replies are closed for this discussion.
I am certain that many of us have sufficient fire in our hearts to be motivated to act, the problem is that we haven't the attention, the concern, the support or the backing from most of mainstream Americans. Apathy and sloth and a silent media are the main causes, if any can be found.
Anne, I appreciate all the posts you have made. You are intelligent, informed and obviously deeply concerned.
Please stop saying how stupid the rest of America is. They are not. Our Brothers and Sisters who have not stood up for freedom yet have never seen anybody come forward to restore our Republic.
Nobody will join with a bunch of people that are always whining about how bad everything is.
All this name calling and naysaying will turn them away from us.
The people who are not moving yet, will.
It is our job to show them some positive direction and outcome.
Yes, the situation has been bad, is bad, and will continue to be bad as long as we keep saying "bad, bad, bad".
It is up to each one of us to focus on the good and promote it.
Find what you love and make it bigger. The bad will not have any room in such a world.
You say to stop telling people how bad everything is. Do you prefer fairy tales? What is happening is frightening, it is the destruction of everything America stood for. And the fact is that the majority of people are totally unaware of what is happening. I don't know how you put a happy face on that. If I have been negative it has been in response to those suggesting we just turn it over to God, read some scriptures and all will be well. With the public being unaware, we need to educate them and telling them not to worry that God will fix things is not educating them it is just another form of propaganda. WE NEED TO FIX THIS. Yes, my voice could be seen as negative here but that is because I see all of you abandoning the principles we started out with. I see people saying "write your congressman". I can't tell you how many times I have written and faxed and its all useless. WE THE PEOPLE need to act. We don't need to hold rallys to read scripture.
I don't know what else you can call people who, when presented with evidence of the destructive forces working not for us but against us in DC, refuse to even consider that we might be telling the truth.
My brother is an educated man yet he and I are currently estranged because he refuses to entertain even the remotest idea that Obama's policies are destructive. I don't know how he managed to earn two degrees when what I see currently is a man who refuses even to open the book much less learn.
I have gone to considerable effort. I have amassed a library of videos, articles, books, etc. that I use to try to convince people, to open their eyes.
If I am frustrated by their stupidity it is a byproduct of years of frustration trying to get people like my brother to open the proverbial book. You cannot teach people unwilling to explore. It defies logic how we can see what's happening and still follow in blind allegiance to Obama. They are perfectly willing to REMEMBER what Bush did or Reagan did but try to tell them about something happening to day and their minds are closed.
Simple things that are not hard to see. Such as American school children being sent home for wearing a tee-shirt bearing an image of the American flag because it offends mexicans who came here illegally. A decade or two ago, certainly when I was growing up, that kind of thinking would never have been tolerated but its not just tolerated today, its taught, drummed into our children's heads. The teachers tell our children that America is evil and bullies. Now THAT is negative thinking. And our children are our future, poison their minds and we are doomed.
I try to get people to THINK, not just accept blindly what they hear. If parents passively accept their children singing praise to Obama who has apologized to our enemies for our many many sins (according to him) then there is no line of defense.
This video offends me. Its one of many that I use to try to open people's eyes. I dont think any previous president is above reproach, that they were free from influence or corruption, but I want them to think when did you ever see children singing about Obama - our children are more precious than anything and their heads are being filled with lies just as happened with Youth for Hitler. These children are singing the praises of someone who has given funds and weapons to the Muslim Brotherhood, who preaches to us about the wonders of Islam while he stands idly by as his brothers murder, rape, and torture Christians. I want people to be offended by what he is doing - they should be.
Very well said, Patricia
Anne NEVER implied from what I can tell, that she was not a Christian, or that she does not believe in the Power of God.
Like you I will be very frank here, and if your feelings are hurt, unlike you, I will not apologize now, nor ever for this rebuttal.
In your own words, God Gave Us this LAND, to Nourish, Tend To, and to Prosper.
define TEND to? This LAND was not given freely, nor was it given with out Sacrifice and Blood. Nor was it given as Pulpit to oppress ONE individual, from ANY Religious Perception.
It was not given to build steeples and demand ONE Individual Must sit among your pews and comply to your Wisdom of denomination. This land is not for the Catholics, it is not for the Babtist, it is not for the Protestants, it is not for the Mormons, it is not for the Pentecostals, it is not for ANY form of definition of Christianity. Perhaps though, In God We Trust, we made our Nation of many Nations. From Many, One.
Among so many Men of so many community's, that in itself is absolute evidence God alone is also an Individual to which NO other man has the Authority to Dictate what one man's relationship will be with his creator.
You declarations of such is the very basis that this Nation was founded in Opposition from.
If your Only Grievance to this Nation is risen from a demand for a defined religious Proclamation that requires an affirmation to YOU own Beliefs, there are many other Countries in this world, that require a STATE Religion you may find more comforting than your own.
Although I do not deny, I am in fact Christian, I am also an Oath Keeper, sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America from ALL enemies, both Foreign and Domestic.
I also have Grievances, I also believe our Current Government has become corrupt and reaches beyond the limits and bounds of the Constitution, and ignores the principles of the Declaration Of Independence and the Cause of the People to form this Nation as intended.
I assure you, the original intent of our Founding Fathers was not for you to have ANY RIGHTS or AUTHORITY to Force Your own Religious Perception among any of those who may also have their own religious Perception, (Regardless of their Own Perception).
I believe adamantly, by restoring this Nation to its Cause, also preserves OUR GOD. Outside the Bible, which is subjective in its own rite, what other set of documents in this World we share are more perfect than the Documents that Found and Define this Great Nation we call The United States of America.
If it is You Cause, and the Cause of Col. Riley to oppress others with your Selective Perceptions, than as an Oath Keeper, and a "Christian", you, Riley, and those like You would also become my own enemy. You would be No Better an alternative than the Government we currently have that oppresses Individual Liberty, and the right to life and the pursuit of happiness. Your rights END where another's begins. If your favorite Color is Purple, must mine also be purple? If you demand this of me in exchange for association, I can NOT associate with your Individual or Common causes.
As with extreme Left ideologies, I will likewise commit to purging the oppressive extreme right from this Nation. Make no mistake, My own cause to restore America, does neither restrict religious perceptions, eject GOD from this Nation, but nor does my Mission demand any Individual declare their favorite Color be Red as it is mine. (The Color of the Blood of those who have and would fight beside me, and I beside them, in death if necessary, for true Liberty in this LAND).
I did not Serve in this Nations Navy so that You can Prejudge and demand my fellow Americans COMPLY to your Belief Systems. If you demand this of me as association fees for your America, be WARNED, you ALSO are an Enemy of the United States of America to which I pledge my Allegiance, to the Flag, and for which it stands. One Nation, Under GOD, Indivisible with LIBERTY, and JUSTICE for ALL!!!
I will come with the Fury of My God, I will prevail, I will defeat my enemy, So Help Me God.
I support the restoration of America, as it was founded. I suggest YOU ALSO Should Support that Restoration.
READ the Declaration of Independence, READ the Constitution of the United States of America as Amended to Include the Bill of Rights.
This is WHAT I STAND FOR, and MANY PATRIOTS LIKE ME. AND In Doing SO, I also STAND WITH GOD. But DO NOT LABEL ME. DO NOT DEFINE FOR ME, THAT WHICH I MUST BELIEVE WITH YOU LESS YOU ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MY OWN BELIEF'S and MY CALL OF DUTY TO THIS NATION TO END ALL FORMS OF TYRANNY FROM THIS LAND AND DRIVE THEM TO HELL.
Anne.........in all your postings I have yet to read your solution? What is it?
You seem to be telling all of us what we already know, but doing so in a nasty tone. I've had enough.
Col. I support your Cause. I support Your Mission.
BUT IT MUST BE CONSTITUTIONAL RESTORATION OR ANY ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE NO BETTER THAN WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE.
BOG III% Commander OHIO (CSF)
Anne and "others": Find something you believe in and support it.
Tearing us up and down and wasting our time with bitching and crying is senseless.
Get on the bus or get off it.
I'll not read another of your posts and I recommend others to leave the critics alone.
We have work to do.
You are not alone, I am one who stands with you.
Most religions teach us, God is, was and always will be. That he is the same today, as he was yesterday, and tomorrow.
I challenge any one, outside Creation, and total destruction, where did GOD not use the Hands and Flesh of Men, to preserve the goodness of his morality.
thousands of Years ago, did this same GOD NOT bring us Abraham, who raised colonies of Warriors outside the walls of the City.
How about King David who committed many acts of complete genocide in the Name of all that was Holy.
Yes, you are right. God requires us to raise arms and men to battle men. I am not one that believes WE can just ask GOD to "SAVE US" and he will not require US to TAKE A STAND while he produces an Army of Angel Warriors that will Arrive from the mystical clouds like rain, and conquer our enemies.
It will require Men Like David, to preserve Good Morality.
But King David also prayed fervently to God before every battle. He would, by today's standards, be labeled as a fanatic and a Bible Thumper. If such a label must be placed upon me, then so be it. I do not care. I pray but I also know that the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. If my blood must be shed for such a purpose, then so be it. But I assure you that my shed blood will mingle with the blood of those who wish to destroy this Nation. I am not opposed to a fight. I know how to use weapons. I have served my Country. But I will always first and foremost serve God. That is my choice. But I would stand beside you Donald, and defend you and trust you to defend me as well. Just because I pray puts me in no higher position, or no lower one.
The entire issue here is that Anne seemed to be insulting to us and lumping us all into a group that she despises...Bible Thumpers. It is a derogatory term. After being so thoroughly insulted, we react as all people who are insulted to the core react. Anne just seems very lonely and very unhappy. That is pretty obvious from her posts. All we did was try to bring her to the one thing that has brought us peace in the midst of utter chaos around us, and that is God. She then rejected that quite soundly and then insulted us even further. She stated that she was offended by our "preaching", never caring that in her own "offending", she was doing the same thing with her insults. If someone does not wish to believe in God or if they struggle with said belief, that is their individual choice, but what is not acceptable is to come and attack those who do not struggle with it. That is where this entire thing has gotten out of hand. See how Satan works? Here is a group that has come together and perhaps able to formulate a plan to spread truth. Now it has become nothing more than an argument about Christianity. Now there is chaos and discord. God is not the author of confusion. That is a title for Satan alone. Not believing in him doesn't make him go away.
There are many of us who post on this site and other sites consistently.........are we then giving equal time to contacting our elected officials and/or Media? Remember, this is a request Col. Riley gave us some time ago. I have a list of FOX hosts that I bombard with "concerns" every few days! Are they responding to me...NO....not yet.....but they will. Why.....because they are beginning to see the corruption and lies as well. When they turn on the POTUS....and they will.....it won't be pretty. In the meantime, there are Godly men and women who are working on behalf of America and her people.......they have been raised up by God, for such a time as this. Remember, it's not over 'til it's over....and it's not over!
John, have you contacted her about all this? I bet she would look into it.