Keep in mind OAS mission against lawless, oath breaking politicians in positions of power"
There is new information out concerning emails and Benghazi and the White House is using their Carney (you know...the little paid liar who works at the circus?) to back pedal faster than a clown on two wheels. The newest claims are coming from individuals who worked both in and outside of Libya. One is a former Navy Rear Admiral and the other was a paid informant for both the FBI and the CIA. We know that recent emails state that it was imperative that the talking points concerning Benghazi remain focused on the bogus YouTube video claim. This was done to protect Obama in the upcoming 2012 election. But there is other information, too and it is damning to not only Obama and Hillary, but many other political clowns on both sides of the aisle, including John McCain, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell.
In the 18 months leading up to the Benghazi attack, the United States ignored a negotiated peace accord and assisted in attacking a sovereign nation and aligned with forces supporting a global jihad. The attack on Benghazi was about a failed foreign policy and a covert operation that saw the United States enable, support and arm al-Quaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.
In a November 2008 State Department report, then US Ambassador to Libya, Gene Cretz stated;
The U.S. shares key strategic goals with the Government of Libya (GOL), particularly with combating al-Qaeda and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG).
Shortly after September 11, 2001, the CIA stopped in Libya on their way to Afghanistan and insider reports state that the Libyan government was very receptive to cooperating. Muammar Qaddafi made the transition from sworn enemy to an arms length US ally. He agreed to destroy his nuclear weapons program in 2003. He provided the US with intelligence against al-Qaeda and he worked with the US to resolve the Darfur conflict. Despite his support for the war on terror, Qaddafi was potentially becoming a major economic threat to the Europeon Union and the US.
In a February 2009 cable, made public by wikileaks, Ambassador Cretz wrote about Qaddafi's goals for a unified Africa, which would share a "common army, currency and passport". Cretz was particularly concerned with the unified currency since the entire country would be dependent on a currency that was backed by Libya's oil exports. This idea could have jeopardized relations between Libya and EU member states that imported significant amounts of Libya's oil. The currency Qaddafi wanted to implement was a single dinar made from gold. Qaddafi was starting to demand gold for oil and in that demand he was threatening the fiat currencies of both Europe and the United States. There was a fear that if Qaddafi's plan started to take hold, then there would be some very powerful people who would lose a lot of money.
Even though rioters were raging in nearby Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, Libya was still stable until anti-Qaddafi activists called for a Libyan day of rage on February 17, 2011 to mark the 5 year anniversary of a Benghazi demonstration that had turned deadly. When the rebel forces started gaining strength, the State Department began to look for another country that would take Qaddafi in order to avoid more violence. Emails were sent from a senior State Department official trying to find a place for him. Also, emails were sent asking for information as to who exactly the opposition leaders were in Libya. Specifically, if before February 17, 2011, did Opposition leaders receive any funding and/or communication with extremist organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hizbollah, or AQIM (al-Qaeda in the Maghreb). And, were opposition and rebels plotting the "day of rage" with extremists?
On March 10, 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified before the House Appropriations Committee endorsing US support for the Libyan Opposition. But there were no factual reports of a humanitarian crisis in Libya. It was Al-Jazeera who was manufacturing the crisis in Libya and other news outlets jumped on their feed. Al-Jazeera even interviewed so called witnesses who were not even in Libya. The entire ordeal was fabricated. Over the next week, Clinton met with key anti-Qaddafi leaders and named US State Department Diplomat Chris Stevens as liaison to the Libyan Opposition. Obama and other top officials in Congress were calling for the arming of the rebels. Hillary was the most aggressive in this call, even though reports clearly showed that it would be terrorists who received the arms and the support.
On March 17, 2011, the United Nations passed a security resolution ordering Qaddafi to immediately cease fire while at the same time authorizing NATO forces to take all necessary military action against the Libyan government. People on the ground in Libya could not believe what was happening. Top military leaders called for a 72 hour cease fire and peace agreement under the laws of war. This was done in order to give everyone a chance to let the rising tensions die down and to give Qaddafi a chance to pull back his forces.
March 19, 2011 began the beginning of a 3 day cease fire negotiation period. The Department of Defense and Obama cancelled any discussion of a truce.
On March 23, 2011, NATO began assuming control of Libyan operations as dictated by the UN security resolution in place. On March 27, AFRICOM's General Hamm's control was transferred to Navy Admiral, James Stavridas.
On March 24, 2011, in an effort to stave off further military action against his regime, Qaddafi ordered the release of a detailed report to US intelligence officers. That report identified al-Qaeda and other extremist ties to the rebels. Obama had that report on his desk in the Oval Office within hours. Admiral Stavridis then went before a House Committee meeting and stated that although they had seen flickers of intelligence, there was no concrete evidence of terrorists within the ranks of the rebels. He quoted parts of the report that Qaddafi had released so it is certain that he had read it. This was a bald faced lie.
Even though Obama and Hillary remained non-committal to arming the rebels while in public, Reuters reported on March 30th that Obama had already signed a secret deal to do just that; arm the rebels. He authorized the CIA to get them the weapons. This operation was called Operation Zero Footprint. The US outsourced the transfer of these weapons to a foreign ally so that their involvement would not be so easily traced. Even though this was a covert operation, Obama still was required to sign off on it.
John McCain even answered a reporter about his feelings of those who were fighting for the Opposition. He called them his heroes. And let's not forget that McCain was very present in Libya. He visited there in the Spring of 2011. As a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain had access to privileged and confidential intelligence information. The information that the rebels were terrorists was cast aside. Obama was required to share this intelligence with what is known as the "Gang of Eight" which includes McCain, Feinstein, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi and Reid. They knew about Zero Footprint.
Operation Zero Footprint was concocted by the White House in order to arm the Libyan rebels while giving the appearance of having no dealings whatsoever in the transfer of said weapons. Qatar was used to handle the transfer into the hands of al-Qaeda who was posing as Opposition rebels. This is why Chris Stevens was in Benghazi. So that he could coordinate the transfer of the weapons. Stevens also has extensive experience in international arms transfers.
In October 2011, Qaddafi was captured and killed by the Opposition. This is when Hillary Clinton appeared incredibly happy when she said, "We came, we saw, he died." And then she cackled. (She doesn't laugh) This had been the plan all along because Qaddafi wanted to be paid in gold for his oil.
On July 9, 2012, Stevens filed a request with the State Department for additional security. He was denied that request. On August 16, 2012, Stevens described deteriorating conditions in Benghazi, specifically warning of 10 Islamist militia and al-Qaeda training camps.
On September 5, 2012, just one week before the attack on the consulate in Benghazi, an AFRICOM report showed that the rebels were taking advantage of the lax security in Benghazi, yet the State Department again refused to send additional security. Stevens was told to make do with the detail he had. Many people who were in Libya at the time of the attacks believe that Stevens was actually a CIA operative and that the entire Libyan ordeal became a CIA operation after the death of Qaddafi.
The murder of Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans was nothing more than a political agenda to save Obama's chance in the up-coming 2012 Presidential election. The weapons were transferred to the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda and Stevens became a liability. Qaddafi was removed from power, which saved the US the embarrassment of having to admit it has no gold. As a keeper of the worlds gold, this would not be acceptable and so Qaddafi had to go.
Make no mistake that the events that unfolded in Libya are only a tip of the iceberg, but information is coming out now and there is no where these murdering government assholes can hide. What goes on in the dark always comes to the light.
Portions of this were taken from For The Record with Laurie Dhue.
Replies are closed for this discussion.
A little sugar in yours? :)
Okay...I'm just going to jump right in here. I will give my OPINIONS only as I speak for no one but myself. I believe that being a Christian is not a religion...it is a way of life. Those who shove their "religion" down someone else's throat are not Christians in my opinion, even though they may believe in God and believe that Jesus is the son of God. Jesus gathered His first two disciples and told them to follow Him and He would make them fishers of men. The same thing applies when fishing for fish as it does for bringing someone to the word of God. You can't throw an anchor on their head and splash all about and expect to catch many fish. You also cannot make someone terrified of going to hell and expect them to love unconditionally the very one who is going to send them to hell. It is common sense.
When I was 5 years old, I begged and begged for a new pair of white sandals. I finally got them and I wore them to Sunday school. I was so happy, they were so pretty. I wore my white socks with the lace around the cuff with them. A woman came up to me who would have rivaled Tammy Faye with all of her makeup and jewelry and leaned down and told me that I would go to hell for wearing open toed shoes to church. I was terrified for years and even though through the coming years I decided to learn for myself exactly what we will go to hell for, (shoes aren't a factor) I still did not wear open toed shoes to church again until I was in my 30's. Sadly, there are many who cover themselves in the cloak of Christianity and they are further from God than some who do not even know Him.
I have many instances but I think you get the point. I decided to not listen to man and instead listen to what God was telling me. It took me several years to do this and I messed up many times along the way...I still do. None of us are perfect. But I do know that the further away from God we allow ourselves to get, the unhappier our life is. I'm just stating fact of what I have observed.And since God is love, it only makes sense that it is true.
I wrote a post a few weeks ago and in it, I talk about silver and why God holds us to the fire sometimes. I encourage you to read it Anne and you also Donald. I'm not telling you to, just asking. You don't have to if you do not wish to. But I think it is beautiful in that God is a refiner of silver and it was silver that Jesus was betrayed for. 30 pieces, which was the price of a slave at that time. When we are in the fire, God is watching us diligently and patiently. And when He can see His reflection in us, that is when He pulls us from the fire, minus a lot of the baggage that we went in with.
I am sorry that so many are turned away from God because of the words and actions of others who do not know God any better than those who hate Him. But a true Christian is one who will not ever operate that way. But we also won't tolerate being attacked. I, for one, take umbrage with being called names for no other reason than sharing my belief and abiding faith in God. And when I am told that someone has shut the door to the word of God, then God tells us to leave them alone, shake the dust off our feet and to not cast pearls before swine. It is up to each one of us individually to decide who we will love, God or Satan. That is the only reason we are here in the flesh. We have a decision to make and a vote against God is nothing more than a vote for the other guy. God's word and His love are open to whomsoever will. Those who won't have made their choice. That is not Bible thumping, it is truth. As for going to hell? That is something that is between each individual and God. There is only one unforgivable sin. Only one and it is not suicide as many believe. It is written in Romans 7:11 that:
7 What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded
(The rest were hardened. The election know they must stand against the false Christ. If the elect refuse to allow the holy Spirit to speak through them, then that is the one and only unpardonable sin. People who have not proved that they have the courage from the first earth age to stand against Satan, and then think God will allow it in the end, are not thinking clearly. In order to do God’s work, you must prove yourself to Him. For this reason, God put blinders on some. They are too busy either being undecided or are so caught up in the rapture that they can’t see the truth that is right in front of them. How then would these people fare when face to face with anti-Christ? They will be taught in the millennium. It is an act of love and not God shunning people. Because it is an unforgivable sin, God isn’t going to put an undecided person in that role.)
Because God loves, He will not put those who might break under the pressure in a role that requires their very soul if they should fail. God's elect, those 7,000, whoever they may be, are the ones who, if they refuse to allow the Holy Spirit to speak through them when they are delivered up before anti-Christ, are sentenced to an eternal death of the spirit. That is the one and ONLY unforgivable sin.
Please understand that I am not preaching. I am only trying to explain. We are all sinners. We ALL fall short of the glory of God.
Here is the post about the silver and why we are in the fire at times. Read if you wish...
I absolutely agree with you Conservative Wife.
This is the very position I base my own faith. Jesus said, He did not come to change the laws of the father, but to confirm the laws of the father.
He also directed, now go in Sin NO MORE.
What does this suggest? Nearly the same that you have described. I'd like to add to this, in theoretical, By Gods design, our bodies naturally procreate. Good Promotes Life, Evil Destroys Life. The child is precious. Procreation is GODLY. Yet, through Jesus and Jesus only will we find the way to the father.
Jesus also said in Luke 22:35 - 36
35And He said to them, "When I sent you out without money belt and bag and sandals, you did not lack anything, did you?" They said, "No, nothing." 36And He said to them, "But now, whoever has a money belt is to take it along, likewise also a bag, and whoever has no sword is to sell his coat and buy one. 37"For I tell you that this which is written must be fulfilled in Me, 'AND HE WAS NUMBERED WITH TRANSGRESSORS'; for that which refers to Me has its fulfillment."
We begin by first looking at the Biblical obligation to preserve life. The Bible clearly teaches that we must preserve life--our own lives and the lives of other people. 1 Corinthians 6:19f teaches that our bodies are not our own. Rather, our bodies belong to God. Our bodies are His property and so we are not permitted to treat or destroy them as we please:
19 Or know ye not that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit which is in you, which ye have from God? and ye are not your own; 20 for ye were bought with a price: glorify God therefore in your body. (1Co 6:19-20 ASV)
Not only are we to take care of our bodies and the life contained. We have an obligation to preserve the body and life of other people. Psalm 82:4 even cites an obligation to protect those who are in danger:
Psalm 82:4 Rescue the weak and needy; Deliver them out of the hand of the wicked.
Consider also Proverbs 24:11, which indicates we have a duty to preserve the lives of those who are harming themselves:
Proverbs 24:11 Deliver those who are drawn toward death, And hold back those stumbling to the slaughter.
Ezekiel 33 is a well-known passage:
Ezekiel 33 "... 6 'But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and a sword comes and takes a person from them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require from the watchman's hand.'
Even from the business end of my rifle, and my sword, I will rejoice in Slaying My Enemies, Gods Will be Done.
My brothers and I have a motto that Col. Riley is well aware of. "God will Judge our enemies. We'll arrange the Meeting."
Just as thousands of years ago God Compelled David, and Many Like Him, would God also not Compel one of US even today?
I say, if Not FOR MAN, what other evidence is there, Indeed GOD exists?
I do not fear death, mine or yours. I have seen too much of it not to have a full understanding of Both Life and Death. It is in that reality, I know GOD! It is in that reality GOD Lives in my Soul.
So many here Proclaim a cause and movement to Restore America, only to demand conditions for association. Yet you ask for Patriots to Stand with you?
How can you be So Hypocritical, and expect Patriots and Oath Keepers like myself to support you, or When NEEDED, DEFEND YOU.
Anne NEVER implied from what I can tell, that she was not a Christian, or that she does not believe in the Power of God.
Like you I will be very frank here, and if your feelings are hurt, unlike you, I will not apologize now, nor ever for this rebuttal.
In your own words, God Gave Us this LAND, to Nourish, Tend To, and to Prosper.
define TEND to? This LAND was not given freely, nor was it given with out Sacrifice and Blood. Nor was it given as Pulpit to oppress ONE individual, from ANY Religious Perception.
It was not given to build steeples and demand ONE Individual Must sit among your pews and comply to your Wisdom of denomination. This land is not for the Catholics, it is not for the Babtist, it is not for the Protestants, it is not for the Mormons, it is not for the Pentecostals, it is not for ANY form of definition of Christianity. Perhaps though, In God We Trust, we made our Nation of many Nations. From Many, One.
Among so many Men of so many community's, that in itself is absolute evidence God alone is also an Individual to which NO other man has the Authority to Dictate what one man's relationship will be with his creator.
You declarations of such is the very basis that this Nation was founded in Opposition from.
If your Only Grievance to this Nation is risen from a demand for a defined religious Proclamation that requires an affirmation to YOU own Beliefs, there are many other Countries in this world, that require a STATE Religion you may find more comforting than your own.
Although I do not deny, I am in fact Christian, I am also an Oath Keeper, sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America from ALL enemies, both Foreign and Domestic.
I also have Grievances, I also believe our Current Government has become corrupt and reaches beyond the limits and bounds of the Constitution, and ignores the principles of the Declaration Of Independence and the Cause of the People to form this Nation as intended.
I assure you, the original intent of our Founding Fathers was not for you to have ANY RIGHTS or AUTHORITY to Force Your own Religious Perception among any of those who may also have their own religious Perception, (Regardless of their Own Perception).
I believe adamantly, by restoring this Nation to its Cause, also preserves OUR GOD. Outside the Bible, which is subjective in its own rite, what other set of documents in this World we share are more perfect than the Documents that Found and Define this Great Nation we call The United States of America.
If it is You Cause, and the Cause of Col. Riley to oppress others with your Selective Perceptions, than as an Oath Keeper, and a "Christian", you, Riley, and those like You would also become my own enemy. You would be No Better an alternative than the Government we currently have that oppresses Individual Liberty, and the right to life and the pursuit of happiness. Your rights END where another's begins. If your favorite Color is Purple, must mine also be purple? If you demand this of me in exchange for association, I can NOT associate with your Individual or Common causes.
As with extreme Left ideologies, I will likewise commit to purging the oppressive extreme right from this Nation. Make no mistake, My own cause to restore America, does neither restrict religious perceptions, eject GOD from this Nation, but nor does my Mission demand any Individual declare their favorite Color be Red as it is mine. (The Color of the Blood of those who have and would fight beside me, and I beside them, in death if necessary, for true Liberty in this LAND).
I did not Serve in this Nations Navy so that You can Prejudge and demand my fellow Americans COMPLY to your Belief Systems. If you demand this of me as association fees for your America, be WARNED, you ALSO are an Enemy of the United States of America to which I pledge my Allegiance, to the Flag, and for which it stands. One Nation, Under GOD, Indivisible with LIBERTY, and JUSTICE for ALL!!!
I will come with the Fury of My God, I will prevail, I will defeat my enemy, So Help Me God.
I support the restoration of America, as it was founded. I suggest YOU ALSO Should Support that Restoration.
READ the Declaration of Independence, READ the Constitution of the United States of America as Amended to Include the Bill of Rights.
This is WHAT I STAND FOR, and MANY PATRIOTS LIKE ME. AND In Doing SO, I also STAND WITH GOD. But DO NOT LABEL ME. DO NOT DEFINE FOR ME, THAT WHICH I MUST BELIEVE WITH YOU LESS YOU ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MY OWN BELIEF'S and MY CALL OF DUTY TO THIS NATION TO END ALL FORMS OF TYRANNY FROM THIS LAND AND DRIVE THEM TO HELL.
I would like to make a humble request.....that we all cease and desist with the arguing of religious views. Let's get back to the business at hand which is to free America from tyranny and back to Constitutional rule. On a brighter note.....has anyone noticed a tad of discontent coming from the Media concerning this administrations actions? Maybe it's just me but I believe I'm beginning to hear some rumblings of disillusionment. Let's help out OAS by sending those e-mails to the Media hosts.....and.....to our elected officials. I try to send those folks something every other day! They probably think....oh, NO.....not her again! Remember, the squeaky wheel gets the grease!
Thank you Forrest Jane and I second your suggestion.