In an interview, Senator Cruz own words disqualify his eligibility to serve as President.
By J.B. Williams
March 29, 2015
Following the War of Independence separating America from Great Britain and establishing a new free sovereign nation, our Founders set a course to establish a Constitutional Representative Republican form of self-governance, of, by and for the people of the newly formed United States with the passage of the U.S. Constitution.
Ever since, political powers here and abroad have sought to undermine, dismantle and destroy the United States and eliminate it as the world’s most free, prosperous and powerful nation on earth.
Two hundred years later, trapped in a growing global shift towards a One World system of global governance based on communist principles of social justice, the United States would soon find itself in a silent battle for its sovereignty and security emanating from within…
Fast forward to 2004 – when a totally obscure new Illinois State Senator was paraded on to the national stage by none other than Sen. Ted Kennedy, (who had very close ties with Vladimir Putin, then head of the Russian KGB) – strangely upstaging the intended star of the show, Democrat presidential nominee John Kerry. Four years later, the man with no verifiable past would become the first truly anti-American occupant of the Oval Office under color of fraud.
His name is Barack Hussein Obama and Barry Soetoro and Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah. He was born to a Kenyan Father and a young American mother, in Hawaii as the story goes, and grew up an Indonesian citizen for a time. He has more than twenty Social Security numbers attached to his name[s] – and six years later, all records sealed, not one American citizen can tell you for sure who or what this person really is…
But we have watched him destroy our country at light speed for six years – stirring up racial divides, seizing more and more dictatorial executive powers, taking over entire private economic sectors, importing illegal aliens and illegal Islamic “refugees” at a record pace, driving our nation to nearly $20 trillion in debt, setting records in Military KIA and WIA under suicidal ROE, losing Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Pakistan and numerous others, undermining every constitutional concept, installing Muslim Brotherhood members throughout federal offices and national security agencies, as well as in numerous Middle Eastern nations by directly interfering in their elections, and swapping old U.S. allies for old U.S. enemies and placing our oldest Middle Eastern ally on the chopping block, Israel.
If the goal is to destroy the United States, no one has ever done it better than Barack Hussein Obama.
Our Founders made it possible for us to prevent such events, by placing very narrow and specific requirements for the Oval Office in Article II of the Constitution… all the American people had to do to prevent this disaster was enforce the Constitution.
The Founders kept it very simple… to be eligible for the Oval Office, President or Vice President; one has to meet the following conditions -
1. One must be a natural born Citizen of the United States, a True Citizen
2. One must be at least 35 years of age
3. One must have held U.S. residency for at least 14 years prior
That’s all, three very simple requirements established to prevent someone like Barack Hussein Obama from ever entering the Oval Office, someone with unknown, foreign, dual or divided national loyalties. Barack Obama has demonstrated for six years now that he is loyal to global interests, not U.S. interests.
Barack Obama met condition number two and three, but he did not and cannot meet condition number one, the natural born Citizen requirement. That is the condition that should have prevented him from ever stepping foot in the people’s Oval Office six years ago. It didn’t stop him, because the people failed to enforce Article II of the U.S. Constitution, or even hold their representatives accountable for sitting silent as it happened.
Many Americans, millions, wanted the constitutional crisis addressed and resolved over the past six years, filing law suits, FOIA requests seeking information on who Barack Obama really is and where he really came from, calling for impeachment, both for the fraud that allowed him to seize the White House and the many treasonous acts he has committed while in that office.
But the political will of the masses was just not there. Million’s more would be focused only upon removing him from fraudulent power via the election booth, without realizing that he was now in control of everything, including elections and was rapidly turning the nation on its head.
Back in 2012, a new young up and coming hot shot Republican was emerging in the great once very conservative state of Texas. He was, like Obama, a Harvard trained lawyer, except he actually had more on his résumé than communist community organizing.
In a campaign interview during his freshman senate race, a GOP Texas State Committee member sat down with the young candidate to ask a few poignant vetting questions, and here are the questions and answers from that interview… (Redacted information is to protect the witness at this moment, but the witness is willing to offer sworn testimony)
Interviewer: “Hello Mr. Cruz, it's a pleasure to meet you. My name is (redacted). I am a (redacted) County GOP Precinct Chair and you have my support and vote. I have one question for you if I may?”Cruz: “Sure, go ahead.”Interviewer: “What is your understanding of how one becomes a natural born Citizen?”Cruz: “Two citizen parents and born on the soil.”Interviewer: “Not exactly, but as I don't have enough time to fully explain how one does become an natural born Citizen, based on your understanding, would you agree that Barack Obama is ineligible to be POTUS?”Cruz: “I would agree.”Interviewer: “So when we get you elected, will you expose him for the usurping fraud he is?”Cruz: “No, my main focus will be on repealing Obamacare.”Interviewer: “But Mr. Cruz, if he is exposed as the usurping fraud he is, everything he has done will become null and void. Everything!”Interviewer: “At that point, Cruz reiterated his main concern, so it was obvious the conversation was over as far as Cruz was concerned. I thanked him for his time and wished him success in the runoff.”
That senate race was highly unusual. Redistricting had caused setbacks delaying the elections and election results. Cruz was running to replace Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison who had just retired and vacated her seat. At the originally scheduled time for the primary, Republican Cruz opponent Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst was well ahead in the polls. But by the time the election took place, Cruz had had enough time to slip ahead with more name recognition, in the end defeating his opponent and going on to defeat Democrat Paul Sadler in the general election, becoming only one of three Latino’s in the U.S. Senate.
That was 2012, and in July of 2013, Sen. Ted Cruz was beginning to make a name for himself, a somewhat outspoken freshman senator, sometimes frustrating GOP establishment RINOs like Sen. Mitch McConnell with his on camera grandstanding, much to the delight of his growing fan base in the Tea Party movement.
Members of the Tea Party, once focused on Constitutional Government, were beginning to see Cruz as more than just a U.S. Senator. In their search for a “real true constitutional conservative” to help regain control of an out of control runaway federal juggernaut under Obama, he seemed a breath of fresh air for millions of Republicans and Libertarians across the country.
That’s when calls for him to seek the Oval Office in 2016 started to take shape, and that’s when Sen. Ted Cruz became very concerned about a fact that he knew, but had never disclosed to the public, including during his Senate campaign a year earlier… Ted Cruz was born a Canadian citizen at birth, and remained a legal citizen of Canada, all the way up until May14, 2014.
In short, Sen. Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada when he ran for and became a U.S. Senator, without ever having disclosed his Canadian citizenship to Texas voters, which under both Texas and U.S. Election law, is an act of fraud. Ted Cruz had committed election fraud by failing to disclose to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012.
No one can say for certain, but I think it is a very fair guess, that had Ted Cruz disclosed to Texas voters in 2012, that he had always been and remained at that time a legal citizen of Canada, his Republican opponent, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, would have won that race and become the next U.S. Senator from Texas.
Ted made a huge mistake… He messed with Texas!
Soon, it was the Tea Party wave of support that caused Sen. Ted Cruz to take an interest in running for president in 2016, forcing Cruz to now deal with a fact that was sure to become public in a presidential campaign… he was a Canadian citizen.
On August 18, 2013 the Dallas Morning News published a copy of the birth records released by Sen. Ted Cruz, his Canadian birth records. The story opened the debate over Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office and unlike Obama, who had issued a number of forged certifications of live birth to support his eligibility claim, Cruz had just proven that he was a Canadian citizen at birth by releasing his Canadian birth record.
Many immediately scrambled for damage control, alleging that maybe he was a “dual citizen” at birth via his American born mother. But there were no U.S. documents supporting that claim to be found…
Enter the Harvard lawyers… the same lawyers that had been protecting Barack Hussein Obama for six years… Cruz was advised by his legal friends to immediately renounce his Canadian citizenship, which he did, on May 14, 2014…
…and by June of 2014, friends and supporters at Fox News were beginning to clear his path to the White House by floating the idea that Ted was now a natural born Citizen of the United States, based upon renouncing his Canadian citizenship.
Of course, two critical problems remained… Renouncing his Canadian citizenship affected his Canadian citizenship, but not his citizenship records in the United States, which so far, appear not to exist even today.
As Ronald Reagan would say, here we go again, with a freshman Senator, a Harvard Lawyer, with Harvard law friends and no U.S. documentation to prove that Ted Cruz is a U.S. citizen of any type. A man with known foreign origins, and the son of a Father, Rafael Cruz Sr. who was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States until 35 years after Ted’s birth in Canada, when he renounced his Canadian citizenship and naturalized to the United States in 2005.
The problems were quite obvious… unlike Obama, who had taken great care to forge a false documented past before running for office, Ted had already proven to the world that he was not a natural born U.S. Citizen at birth, but rather a documented Canadian citizen at birth.
Not only had he committed election fraud by not disclosing to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012, now he was about to join Barack Hussein Obama in an even greater national effort to defraud all American voters by seeking the U.S. Oval Office less than a year after renouncing his Canadian citizenship.
Back on December 18, 2013, the North American Law Center was anticipating this sad moment in history when they directed a certified letter to Sen. Ted Cruz essentially begging him not to step out on this political limb, as he has many enemies ready to saw it off. Cruz never responded to that letter…
Enter the Harvard lawyers again… On March 11, 2015 – two Harvard law friends published a Harvard Law Review opinion declaring both Ted Cruz and Barack Hussein Obama “natural born Citizens” of the United States.
The key opinion in the entire legal wordsmithing document is this…
“While some constitutional issues are truly difficult, with framing-era sources either nonexistent or contradictory, here, the relevant materials clearly indicate that a “natural born Citizen” means a citizen from birth with no need to go through naturalization proceedings.”
What the Harvard experts are saying is this, gee, we just can’t find any documents to confirm the Founders intent of the term natural born Citizen, and so, we think it means this… a “citizen at birth” is a “natural born Citizen.”
Never mind that Harvard and Yale law buddies had already decided that “illegal aliens” are really just “undocumented citizens,” or that they long ago twisted naturalization laws to make “illegal aliens” born on U.S. soil “anchor babies” who are also considered to be “citizens at birth.”
The legal experts have now expanded all of our naturalization terms to mean “natural born Citizen,” using naturalization amendments, cases and statues to do it. In so doing, they are eliminating the true meaning and purpose of the Article II natural born Citizen requirement from our Constitution without having to endure the cumbersome process of actually amending the Constitutional legally.
And, what was once a long fought leftist battle to eliminate all Constitutional foundations for sovereign government by a sovereign nation and of its sovereign citizens, has now been joined by Republicans like Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, none of whom are actually eligible for the Oval Office, and all of whom know it.
Only days later, on the heels of the Harvard opinion piece, Sen. Ted Cruz stood among 12,000 Liberty University students forced to attend the event, and announced he was running for the office of President.
If you ask the average American citizen what natural born Citizen is, they do not know. Even many, who think they know, do not know. Since Barack Obama, numerous definitions based on numerous political agendas have been floated, making what was once a very common simple term too ambiguous to enforce.
The people have allowed the lawyers to amend the Constitution by simply publishing a legal opinion.
And today, we are witnessing the death of the American Presidency… from this point forward, any person born anywhere on earth to any foreign Father or Mother can be president of the United States in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution.
The only documentation Obama ever proffered was a forged COLB (Certification of Live Birth, not birth certificate) from Hawaii, which Hawaii prints off and hands out like bingo cards at a Saturday night church social… and the only documentation Ted Cruz has proffered is proof that he was born a Canadian citizen at birth and remained such until May 14, 2014… on this basis, Harvard Law experts say both can be president…
Now, what does natural born Citizen really mean and why did our Founder’s choose that term in an overt effort to prevent people like Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Vladimir Putin and bin Laden’s son from ever gaining access to the Oval Office?
The answer is found in the Founders statements identifying the source of the term, Vattel’s international treatise on Natural Law, The Law of Nations, book 1 – Chapter XIX. Every American can easily find it, read it, understand it and know it. There is nothing at all ambiguous about it… unless you let your political agenda drive your facts.
The true definition of the natural born Citizen requirement for the Oval Office as described throughout the entirety of Chapter XIX can be summed up in this section from 212…
“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
Barack Obama’s Father was never a U.S. Citizen. Ted Cruz’s Father was never a U.S. citizen either, until he naturalized 35 years after Ted’s birth. Ted remained a legal citizen of Canada until he renounced his Canadian citizenship on May 14, 2014. Without any U.S. documents, Ted is now a man without a country, according to any authentic documentation. Is Ted Cruz just an “illegal alien” holding a U.S. Senate seat and running for President?
Nothing pertaining to naturalization pertains to natural born, nothing. Naturalization is the process by which an alien (non-citizen) becomes an American citizen.
Natural born Citizenship is a Natural Law term describing a condition that either exists or does not exist at the moment of birth. There is nothing anyone can do to become a natural born Citizen, once they were not born a natural born Citizen. Lies offered by Ivy League lawyers to the contrary are offered with the explicit intent to alter the Founder’s intent, and once again, they know it… It is a Common Law practice they all learned in law school. Common Law is the legal British practice of openly subverting Constitutional Law.
So, people with no U.S. documentation, “undocumented citizens” according to Ivy League lawyers, are “natural born Citizens” and average citizens must rely upon Ivy League Law experts (or judges, political appointees) to help Americans figure out what the true meaning of “is” is… a term the average American is not intelligent enough to figure out for themselves. This is not a new tactic, Hitler did it with the help of Goebbels, Marx did it, Castro did it, Stalin and Lenin did it, even Hugo Chavez did it…
That is the worst part of this entire saga in the demise of the United States… The people put their politics ahead of their Constitution and as a result, they are about to let it all slip away, their freedom and liberty, all of it.
The mission to globalize the United States is only possible once it is no longer a requirement that only a True American, a natural born Citizen, can hold the office of Commander-in-Chief. The people appear willing to accept this now.
AUTHOR NOTE: Everything presented in this column is verifiable fact. Now we will see how many American patriots care about these facts.
© 2015 JB Williams - All Rights Reserved
Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.
JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Web site 1: www.PatriotsUnion.org
Web site 2: www.VeteranDefenders.org
I wonder what Mark Levin has to say about this article, there is no guessing who he is supporting and pushing on his radio audience and website, and his constant bashing of Trump. Mr Levin (the Great one) over and over again pounds into his audience how we are a bunch of "bot's-doofus-ignorant-low information" persons NOT to understand HIS explanation as to how Ted Cruz is a NBC. Your above article explains very clearly,,,one thing missing was one of my friends had posted proof that both Mr & Mrs Cruz were registered as voters in Canada, which bu Canadian law you cannot be unless you are a citizen. Also if you are Born American 1st you cannot have a dual nationality, in that you must make an oath yo another Country (my American Ambassador made that very clear to me-as I was born here but my father was Danish and had offered me to have a Danish passport-dual national-we most wisely went to the experts and that is what we were told) Also remember the Woolworth Heiress that married an Englishman and got an English passport, we she not only lost her citizenship she lost the ability to return to the USA for 10 years, So if Mrs, Cruz was registered to vote in Canada, how is that she was an American citizen during Ted's birth, she just may have committed a crime there herself. BUT then again did she go the American Embassy after Ted was born and register him-if she did-well those are the very papers not found,,,,just curious as to what Mr. Levin has to say-being that I was an advid listener to his program's and HAD (key word - had) the most respect for him, especially since he said he was for the Constitution and a scholar of such.
Very interesting observation Dawn..........the voting of Senator Cruz parents in Canada.............
Jerry Gabriel FACTUAL CRUZ CITIZENSHIP TIMELINE
(Everything presented in this timeline is a matter of public record. All of it is based upon publicly reported events, public statements made by Rafael Cruz, Ted Cruz, officials with the Elect Ted movement or US and Canadian officials."
1957 - After working as a teen to help Fidel Castro gain power in Cuba, and being imprisoned for his actions by the Batista regime, Cuban Rafael Cruz applies for admittance to the University of Te'as as a foreign student and enters the US on a four year student visa to attend four years of college. He is a Cuban citizen attending a US college on a foreign student visa obtained through the US Consulate in Havana.
1961-1962 - After graduating college at the University of Texas, and upon the expiration of his foreign student visa, Cruz Sr. applied for and received "political asylum" and was issued a "green card." A green card is a permit to reside and work in the United States, without becoming a "citizen" of the United States, in this case, under political asylum from Castro's Cuba. His citizenship status was that of a Cuban national living and working in the United States, under a green card work permit. According to US laws, the "green card" holder must maintain permanent resident status, and can be removed from the United States if certain conditions of this status are not met.
1964-1966 - Cruz Sr. takes a few odd jobs, marries and moves to Canada to work in the oil fields. The Cruz family resides in Canada for the next eight years. “I worked in Canada for eight years,” Rafael Cruz says. “And while I was in Canada, I became a Canadian citizen.” – (From and interview with NPR) "Peter Spiro, a legal expert on US citizenship at Temple University. Spiro says Rafael Cruz's multi-country odyssey did not follow traditional models for immigration. SPIRO - “Ted Cruz himself seems to be an advocate of those traditional immigration models. Maybe he should be a little more tolerant of the nontraditional Versions, given his own father's history.”
1970 - Ted Cruz is born in Canada, to two parents who had lived in Canada for at least four years at that time, and had applied for and received Canadian citizenship under Canadian Immigration and Naturalization Laws, as stated by Rafael Cruz. As a result, US statutes would have voided the prior "green card" status which requires among other things, permanent residency within the United States and obviously, not becoming a citizen of another country during the time frame of the US green card.
1974 - The Cruz family moves to the United States when Ted is approximately four years old. Rafael Cruz has publicly stated that he remained a citizen of Canada until he renounced his Canadian citizenship when he applied for and became a US Naturalized citizen in 2005. As a result, his wife and son were also Canadian citizens, his son being born a citizen of Canada in 1970.
2005 - Rafael Cruz applies for legal US citizenship and renounces his Canadian citizenship. No record of Ted renouncing his Canadian citizenship or applying for US citizenship exists as of 2005.
2013 - Freshman Senator Ted Cruz is a rising star in the Tea Party movement, and calls for him to run for the White House begin. In July, Ted Cruz is Questioned by the press about his interest in running for President, and the issue of his Canadian born citizenship is brought up Sen. Ted Cruz rejected questions Sunday over his eligibility to be president, saying that although he was born in Canada “the facts are clear” that he is a US citizen.
“My mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware. She is a US. citizen, so I'm a US citizen by birth,” Cruz told A&C. “I'm not going to engage in a legal debate.”
NOTE: Senator Cruz omits the part of his father's story, in particular, the part about his parents applying for and receiving Canadian citizenship prior to Ted's birth in Calgary. He also attempts to gloss past the actual definition of natural)born Citizen by implying it is a mere legal debate for others to figure out.
August 2013 - As Ted's political stock rises in the Tea Party, so do press questions about his eligibility for office. Ted decides to quiet the questions by releasing his birth certificate, which now becomes absolute proof of Ted's Canadian citizenship at birth, 1970, Calgary, Canada. The release of the Canadian birth records only serve to further fuel the controversy.
Ted seeks Legal Counsel, as the media is now pressing members of Canadian Immigration and Naturalization to clear the matter up, when instead, Canadian officials confirm the Ted Cruz was in fact born a legal citizen of Canada, the son of two parents who had also applied for and received Canadian citizenship prior to Ted's birth.
“He's a Canadian,” said Toronto lawyer Stephen Green, past chairman of the Canadian Bar Association's Citizenship and Immigration Section.
“Generally speaking, under the Citizenship Act of 1947, those born in Canada were automatically citizens at birth unless their parent was a foreign diplomat, ”said ministry spokeswoman Julie Lafortune.
Legal counsel advises Ted to "renounce his Canadian citizenship" in order to make himself eligible to run for the presidency. Of course, renouncing one's original citizenship only further proves one's original citizenship.
May 2014 - Ted Cruz legal counsel files to renounce Ted's Canadian citizenship in an effort to make him eligible to run for high office under the natural born Citizen clause Article II in the US Constitution.
AUSTIN, Texas - Canada-born US Sen. Ted Cruz has given up his citizenship from his birth country, making good on a promise from last summer. spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said “the Tea Party favorite formally gave up his citizenship May 14th. He received official confirmation of the action at his Houston home Tuesday.”
News that he had renounced his citizenship was first reported by the Dallas Morning News. The newspaper also bro$e that Cruz had dual Canadian) US citizenship when he released his birth certificate in August.
Frazier said Cruz “he is pleased to have the process finalized” and that it “makes sense he should be only an American citizen.”- of course, the Constitution does not require that one be only an American citizen, but rather a natural born Citizen.
As of February 4, 2015 - No evidence of any US Citizenship has been released to confirm anything at all about the true citizenship status of Ted Cruz.
also....This was posted by someone else and she keeps sharing... She is talking about Ted Cruz : Please note>>>HE IS A BORN LIAR, HIS MOTHER WAS NO LONGER AMERICAN AT THE TIME OF HIS BIRTH, QUESTIONS TO ASK ABOUT WHY DOES HE HAVE BANK ACCOUNTS IN CANADA AT BOTH ROYAL BANK AND CIBC. HE HAS MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS WITH CIBC, AND CD ACCOUNTS WITH ROYAL, HE FILES TAXES EVERY YEAR IN CANADA AS WELL, IF HE IS AMERICAN WITH NO INTEREST IN CANADA WHY DOES HE FILE AS A CANADIAN EMPLOYED OUTSIDE OF COUNTRY, HIS MOTHER WAS ON THE ALBERTA HEALTH PLAN, WHICH NO ONE OTHER THAN CITIZENS CAN HAVE SHE WAS COVERED FROM 1968 UNTIL 1975 SHE IS REGISTERED AS A CANADIAN CITIZEN ON TAX REGISTRATION FORMS FROM 1968 FORWARD, ALSO CANADA IMMIGRATION RECORDS SHOW HER SPONSORED AS A CITIZEN IN 1968 MARGARET STOCKTON KRUSE WAS A WITNESS AS WAS HECTOR WHITSON.... PAPERWORK BEING NOTARIZED AND ABOUT TO BE SENT TO DONALD TRUMP HEADQUARTERS SHORTLY, DID CRUZ DISCLOSE HIS ASSESTS IN CANADA
also...Breibart (like Mark Levin really supports Cruz, so whether you wish to accept their explanation as to why The Cruz family was registered to vote in Canada or as the piece explains that it was "just a mistake-and that Mrs. Cruz (Ted's Mom) never voted or registered as a Canadian needs further investigation, but here is one story-up to you to decide what is real and what is not....
If, in effect, our Constitutional Founders, we being a newly declared Nation, wanted to make it inarguable as to who could be President of the NEW NATION, would they not have written, with all their brilliance, any Citizen of the United States, or Colonies, if you will, conditionally could run for and be President of the Nation?. They did not. They did not state Citizenship in any other form than that of a Natural Born Citizen. They could have made the word Citizen, all encompassing. This would have allowed for any applying for Citizenship, or becoming in any other manner a Citizen to be eligible to be President. They likely did not mean that if Hitler came to America, took the Test of Citizenship, and was sworn in as a Citizen, that he could then, being a Citizen, become President of the Nation. I know the timeline is way off, and I used Hitler being a name all know, strictly as if he had been born and effective of that timeframe.
Since we fought a hard war, and took our Nation from the British, does anyone believe that our framers would have allowed a General from Britain to come here, become a sworn Citizen, and run for our President?. If Citizenship of any Country does not prove a loyalty to that Country, or mean anything legally, then why have Citizenships at all?. I know I am making this sound small minded, but I am doing so to merely get a point across. I am not a Constitutional Scholar, but I am of higher than average IQ, and I can understand the plain simplified language used of the timeframe of this Nation being organized, and the rationality of it. Those who sat, pondered, authored, penned, signed, and constructed our Constitution, were the most brilliant of their time, and many could not even now, by most, be matched in their intellect.
It seems it would be foolish, at very best, for them to be putting together a document which would govern this, newly formed Nation, and not be all inclusive of the Nation, and those who were altogether, The Nation. Without actual proof of their intellectual meaning of the words Natural Born Citizen, it would be most logical to believe that they were talking of a new Nation, and the laws, rules and regulations, by which it should be appropriately Governed.
One can take a saying, a book, a magazine article, or even a law, and cause it mean whatever their thoughts deem it to mean. This is exactly what is being done to our Nation’s founding documents. Those who read it, can rearrange the wording to mean what they prefer it to mean, but the meaning, the true meaning is evident and clear to the authors of it. Everything is open to one’s interpretation of it, whither or not their particular observation/interpretation is, or is not, valid to it’s true meaning.
A newly formed Nation, a document Governing the acts of the people, and Governance of that Nation, are for the code, ethics, and reality of the words by which the Nation sees in the Document. This is the reason each Country effectually has their own Constitution, code, and truths in and of the leadership of that particular Nation/Country. If those documents were in generalities, then basically all Countries/Nations, and their Citizenry, would have no need at all, to have their own laws, rules, and regulations set forth for the People, and the Country. Each would then assimilate into each other, and all would live under the same mandates.
I believe in the modern day and age, it is referred to as the N.W.O. ( New World Order, which would effectively make each and every Governing document null and void, and a new one would need to be written to encompass the totality of all Nations trying to live as one, under the same laws, rules, and regulations.
Who will write the next Constitution, one which controls the whole populace of the known world?. Who will have the rights, if any?. Who will benefit, if any?. Who will the allegiance be to?. Who will it protect?. You can bet it will be designed and penned By, For, and Of the Government, and only they will have all the rights and privileges granted within it’s wording. We the People, will no longer exist, have any rights, freedoms, and certainly no avenue to change it’s meaning.
We will then, think back to a time when we actually had a say in what happens to us. A time when we still had the right to fight for our independence. A right to still change our dire situation, and take back that which was freely ours, and freely given to the powers and persuasion of the evil which brings us ever closer to that day, when all of this will no longer be within our grasp, or at our disposal.
WHAT HAVE WE DONE?.
Exactly what have we done??? Our founders also put in a provision that we not to have Royalty in our government, and what have we done? We have allowed it,,in the form of "Esquire" meaning Lord or duke, which is Royalty. and who has Esquire, why your lawyers of course, and what are most of our representatives? They are lawyers. The founders also stated that what ever law or regulation that was to be passed must be written in a way that a "lay person" could read and understand. AND what have our lawyer representatives done-it is all in legalize. Also it was to be printed plainly and simply (short and sweet) and what do we have, we have deals that are 3000 pages alone, we have the TPA read secretly in a private room that needed clearance to be read, as well as punishable if what was read in it could be repeated publicly, and they are going after Senator Sessions because he released some of which was in that bill. So in how many ways have we gotten away from our founders...1) Natural born citizen,,2, No royalty..3) transparency..4) lay-person language 5) short sweet no a towering 6 feet tall bill such as that of the ACA, I could go on. Our Country is in serious peril, and this did not happen just with this administration, it goes back aways. The true question, what are we going to do about it? It is one of the main reasons I would support the likes of Mr. trump or Dr. Ben Carson, they are NOT lawyers. Lawyers have destroyed this nation and has taken us away from who and what we are. The litigiousness of this nation is as well making us broke (and a main reason why health care was so expensive) so instead of common sense solutions, we get more laws and regulations. The whole NBC argument can be argued any way a LAWYER (Esquire) would like to make the argument, and that is a selling of our Great Nation and of our Founders wants and writs.
Shared (copy & pasted) thank you!
Be very careful with Cruz. He is not who he claims to be. I am not voting for him.
Of course Dawn C. Lynge-Pruden is correct in what she says about our (The Citizen) role in Destroying the Greatness of the Founder work at the Hand of GOD! I have said that the rule of Law was destroyed and replaced by the "Rule of Lawyers", the Obama world is proof positive of that statement. No one in the Congress will stand by their Oath of Office. Mr bergedale deserted his place of duty and now is supposed to face a General Court Martial, while the Congress as a whole has also deserted their post (Their Oath) and they face no retribution for their crime! Personally I do not think it matters one bit who you vote for as long as the United States Citizen who is supposed to be driving is a sleep at the wheel. Wake up Citizen arm your selves and throw the liars and thieves under the Oak tree and hang them. Yes without trial because that is what they have done to you!!