Michael, Is this You ?,,,,,, NO - I'm NOT being sarcastic, and I'm NOT trying to be insulting either. This man is very good. And if you listen to this entire video he has a message that will blow your socks off.
I know you are a man of GOD, and I believe this man is also. But he has a way of telling his story that is very compelling.
If you listen to this man and his message, he has a totally different way of saying that what we have been taught about GOD and our Bible is not only right and true but that we have been lied to for hundreds of years.
Our Governments are lying to us in more ways than we could ever imagine.
Don't let his avenue and direction of delivering this message throw you, you wont believe what he has to say,,,,,,until you get to the end of this video.
NO Michael, I haven't lost my mind,,,,,,,,,, YET.
Mike, I agree with you on the scriptures, and my belief and faith in GOD is just as strong as yours. No - I do not know the scriptures nearly as well as you and Lee, but that doesn't mean I don't believe.
My point in posting those videos was two-fold; Yes - the Government is lying to us and always has. I don't believe anything this stinking Government says or does.
#2) This guy claims he was part of some sort of super-secret Gov agency, ??? I agree - never heard of that one either and I doubt it exists........ BS....
#3) I think this guy is trying to be some kind of "New-Age" preacher,,,,,,,, How the hell can I say that ?? !!!
If you watch the entire video the first thing he says is that the information he is presenting is the most important thing that the human race will ever encounter, (paraphrasing here)> Well the belief in GOD and Jesus Christ IS the most important thing that isn't it ?
but "New-age" people have a lot of trouble believing in anything just because someone tells them they should. Maybe he's simply coming at the "belief" issue from a different direction, a different perspective. No place in any of these videos does he deny or discount the belief in GOD. In fact he promotes and tries to present a new way to approach that belief.
Many people do believe in UFO's, but that all depends on what they are, or what they might actually be...
He says UFO's don't exist, and never have throughout all of history. He does NOT believe in any "aliens" either. He says they don't exist.
Here's what I think he is trying to convey in his belief in GOD.
a) GOD said Go forth and multiply, Well according to this guy GOD didn't stop here, he didn't stop after populating the Earth. Instead he kept going and has been populating the entire universe. I think what this man is saying is that GOD is using us as seeds to populate many other planets throughout the universe. (Why not? Why wouldn't he?)
b) The Bible says GOD Created man in his likeness.
Again it makes sense. Today in our evolution and science we know how to create clones, DNA and reproductions.
If we know how to do it then of course GOD knows how to create more human beings, it's crazy not to believe he can.
But why not use us to continue his development and population of the universe.
This guy Dean says these so-called extraterrestrial beings look just like us,,,, and then he corrects that statement by saying - NO - They don't look like us, WE look like them,,,,,,, (again) GOD created man in his likeness..
Well these "Extraterrestrials" are not GOD, but they could be his labour force, his helpers.............
Once the human race evolves and develops to a desired level on any specific planet then they (we) are picked up and distributed onto another new planet that has been prepared for us.
I don't think this guy Dean is pushing UFO's and aliens as much as you think he is, in fact he says they don't exist. But what DOES exist is GOD and THAT is the single most important belief in all of human history.
Thanks Michael, I just thought perhaps you had taken only a quick view of that video and completely discounted it all because of this guys fictitious security claims and the mention of UFO's.
He does say in there that UFO's and aliens don't really exist.
My problem with all of this is (#1), You're right, Satan will fill any void available with lies and make non-believers think they are worshipping the one True GOD when in fact they follow only the lies.
And #2) Over the past 50-75 years there has been a dramatic decline in our teachings and church attendances in the country and around the entire world. That decline in our religious beliefs, and the belief in Christ, is leaving just such a vacuum and void that Satan is only too willing to fill with more and more lies.
That void will be very quickly filled by Satan and his lies AND the Muslims Islamic terrorism.
(The lack of belief in Christ and GOD will lead to the forced religious worship of Islam.)
I thought it might be this man's way of trying to teach those younger non-believers that there IS something out there, something much stronger and much more intelligent than anything they can ever imagine. And that HE has been hard at work spreading humanity to all other planets around the universe, not only here on this Earth.
It opens up the great potential for lies and deceit, but it also opens up an interesting concept of a new way to teach and educate these younger people who apparently do not believe in much of anything. Especially in anything that they can not see, they see no evidence or proof, (None to them anyway).
Only a fool could ever look up at the night sky and claim there is no proof of GOD or of any higher being, a creator.
They look up at the night sky and they believe in the universe, they can see it. And they believe in science because they can see that. Look at the photos from the Hubble Telescope, they can see that "Proof".
And there is where this man's "Teachings" can come in. Yes - there really IS a GOD, and YES he IS out there, and HE IS building the universe and spreading life throughout the entire universe.
Back to your original question, Does our Government lie to us???????
When have they NOT ??
Michael, Here is an article posted on Facebook by someone named Gaylon Barrow.
TAKE NOTE AMERICANS!!!
Handshake in SWISS Schools
This should make some people think. (those that are capable of independent thought)
Switzerland - What's in a handshake?
Sometimes it's the little things that are most telling. At first glance this may seem like a trivial story but what lies hidden beneath it could have serious consequences for our children and grandchildren.
****************************** ****************************** ****************************** ***
In Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the hands of their teachers at the beginning and end of the school day. It's a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher and pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom atmosphere. Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life.
And the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the handshake is that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who have lived in Switzerland for several years (and thus are familiar with its mores), in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to shake the hands of their teacher, a woman, because, they claimed, this would violate Muslim teachings that contact with the opposite sex is allowed only with family members.
At first the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of any female teacher. But an uproar followed, as Mayor Reto Wolf explained to the BBC: "the community was unhappy with the decision taken by the school. In our culture and in our way of communication a handshake is normal and sends out respect for the other person, and this has to be brought home to the children in school."
Therwil's Educational Department reversed the school's decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the school's exemption was lifted because "the public interest with respect to equality between men and women and the integration of foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion." It added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake. Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again "the sanctions called for by law will be applied," which included a possible fine of up to 5,000 dollars.
This uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at the original exemption granted to the Muslim boys, did not end after that exemption was itself overturned by the local Educational Department. The Swiss understood quite clearly that this was more than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a fight over whether the Swiss would be masters in their own house, or whether they would be forced to yield, by the granting of special treatment, to the Islamic view of the proper relations between the sexes. It is one battle – small, but to the Swiss significant – between overweening Muslim immigrants and the indigenous Swiss.
Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn, all hell broke loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic Central Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the Swiss decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticized the ruling in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the handshaking is "totalitarian" (!) because its intent is to "forbid religious people from meeting their obligations to God."
That, of course, was never the "intent" of the long-standing handshaking custom, which was a nearly-universal custom in Switzerland, and in schools had to do only with encouraging the
right classroom atmosphere of mutual respect between instructor and pupil, of which the handshake was one aspect.
The Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing claims — will be familiar to Americans versed in Constitutional adjudication. In this case "the public interest with respect to equality" of the sexes and the "integration of foreigners" (who are expected to adopt Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt them from some of those ways) were weighed against the "religious obligations to God" of Muslims, and the former interests found to outweigh the latter.
What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.
The handshake has been upheld and, what's more, a stiff fine now will be imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake hands with a female teacher. This is a heartening sign of non-surrender by the Swiss. But the challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and customs of the indigenes have no logical end and will not stop.
And the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the stronger and more frequent their challenges will be. They are attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of numbers from both migration and by outbreeding the Infidels, to fashion not a parallel society but one society — now dominated by Muslim sharia.
The Swiss handshaking dispute has received some, but not enough, press attention. Presumably, it's deemed too inconsequential a matter to bother with. But the Swiss know better. And so should we.
There's an old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: "Many a little makes a mickle." That is, the accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That's what's happening in Europe today. This was one victory for the side of sanity. There will need to be a great many more.
This needs circulation far and wide.