The United States is a “FEDERAL CORPORATION” Whereas defined pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15)
Public Notice/Public Record
What was never taught in high school civics class: The United States is a FEDERAL FOREIGN
CORPORATION. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 3002(15); Washington, D.C. is a FOREIGN CORPORATION
separate city-state-nation, not bound by any laws or treatises that the 50 states in the Union are (just as the City of London is not part of England proper and the Vatican is also a sovereign city-state). See:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/185991988/Common-Law-Trust-District-of-Columbia-Defined-Public-Notice-
Public-Record
The people believed by most to be representing Americans in D.C. are immune from virtually all laws and treatises of the USA. These corporate CEOs known as “CONGRESSMEN” and “CONGRESSWOMEN” are representing a FOREIGN CORPORATION known as “UNITED STATES” which makes most of its profits off a war and prison machine and a FOREIGN fiat paper money system. The only reason this paper “MONEY SUBSTITUTE” has any value at all is because the USA and NATO force OPEC countries to exclusively sell oil with Federal reserve notes (U.S. CURRENCY). If they do not, they get “Iraq-ed,” “Libya-ed,” and/or “Afghanistan-ed.” The Bank of Israel, aka the “Federal” Reserve (a private FOREIGN CORPORATION), prints and administers this toilet paper worldwide, while the Washington, D.C. - based IMF and World Bank play video game economics with the rest of the world. Corporations are “people with rights.” See Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 50 (2010).
And this is why your “vote” matters about as much as your life does to these people.
Barack Obama is NOT the president of America, He is the CEO of the FOREIGN CORPORATION called "UNITED STATES INC." and "U.S. CITIZENS" are the employees of that FOREIGN CORPORATION.
Of course if you're a member of the FOREIGN CORPORATION, their rules and regulations apply to
"YOU!" Just as if you were a member of the corporation called "McDonald's", their rules and regulations would apply to "YOU" because you are an employee of that CORPORATION. But if you're not a member (employee) of the CORPORATION called "McDonald's," their rules and regulations do NOT apply to "YOU!"
So why did YOU check the box that asks are you a "U.S. Citizen???” By doing so and without reserving you're UN-A-LIEN-ABLE rights, you VOLUNTARILY waived CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTED RIGHTS and gave CONSENT to be a employee of "FOREIGN UNITED STATES INCORPORATED"..
"The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the "citizenship" to the agencies of government." City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
So when Citizens voluntarily CONSENT "Citizenship" to agencies of FOREIGN CORPORATION, you
voluntarily surrender you're "RIGHTS!!”
A US CITIZEN does not have any rights. See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/189199805/The-STATECreated-
the-Office-of-PERSON
See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/185070810/Common-Law-Trust-Legal-Fictions-Defined-Public-Notice-
Public-Record
See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/187236001/The-Real-Thirteenth-Amendment-to-the-Constitution-of-the-
United-States-%E2%80%9CTitle-of-Nobility%E2%80%9D-Amendment-Public-Notice-Public-Record
See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/190417894/IRS-A-Private-for-Profit-Foreign-Corporation-Find-Attached-
IRS-Certificate-of-Incorporation-Plus-List-Of-Private-For-Profit-Foreign-Corporations
1
Replies
WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of
a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and
conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically,
the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be
SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!
• Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme
Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not
the States or the Government. The court went on to define that
local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing
unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement
of the laws and are personally liable for their actions.
• Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 – 2000 – Supreme Court –
Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.
• Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 – 2011 – Supreme Court – Cited by
306 “ “
• Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 – 1993 – Court of Appeals, 7th – Cited by
66 “ “
What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling?
1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of
corporations by all governments representing the American Republic.
Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws
are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of
America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the
Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement
personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. (See: James
118
Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722) and (Pull
up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words
“District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive
about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.)
2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the
Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all
State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional
branches of government.
3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the
Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals,
which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate
United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and
Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of
incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United
States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all
others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of
the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of
National Security.
4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the
SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is
an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings.
Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real;
they are a fiction and only exist on paper.
5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are
private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and
ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer
know about this? You bet they do!
6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot
promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and
enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW
of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written
agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be
arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter,
did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for
violating their corporate regulations?
[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency
because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to
contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]
119
7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN?
Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they
compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their
process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you
can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about
it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal
law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against
the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally
liable for their actions. [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the
American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced
to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and
therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!
10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons
are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to
the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization
Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions.
So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some
jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison
populations!
11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your
children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers
can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different
matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.
Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American
Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its
creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and
are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American
Republic.
Blessings,
Judge Dale, retired
Link to this article: www.anticorruptionsociety.com - Judge Says US
INC is just a Corporate Franchise Network
Thanks for the link, and I signed to 'follow' the site. I've seen a few other web sites that discuss this topic, each with additional info. Not sure what to make of it all -- most of the populace appear to be numb to the message, at least for today.
This is a small excerpt from the 1940 Congressional Record:
Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and
International Strife—Part I
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
OF
HON. J. THORKELSON
OF MONTANA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Monday, August 19, 1940
Mr. THORKELSON. Mr. Speaker, in order that the
American people may have a clearer understanding of those
who over a period of years have been undermining this
Republic, in order to return it to the British Empire, I have
inserted in the RECORD a number of articles to prove this point.
These articles are entitled “Steps Toward British Union, a
World State, and International Strife.” This is part I, and in
this I include a hope expressed by Mr. Andrew Carnegie, in
his book entitled “Triumphant Democracy.” In this he
expresses himself in this manner:
Let men say what they will, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens
once shone upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to
rise, to shine upon, to greet again the reunited states—the British-American
Union.
This statement is clear, and the organizations which Mr.
Carnegie endowed have spent millions in order to bring this
about. This thing has been made possible by scholarships,
exchange professors, subsidies of churches, subsidies of educational
institutions; all of them working for the purpose of
eliminating Americanism as was taught once in our schools
and to gradually exchange this for an English version of our
history.
These organizations were organized to bring about a British
union, a union in which the United States would again become
a part of the British Empire. However, this has been upset to
some extent by the attempt of the internationalists to establish
their own government as an International or world union. And
there is, therefore, a conflict between the two, for England
wants a British union, with America as a colony, and the
international money changers (Bankers) want a Jewish controlled union,
in order to establish their own world government.
It is, therefore, best for us to stay out of both of these, in
order to save what is left of this Republic as it was given to us
in 1787, by a people who knew more about international
intrigue and the real problems that confronted the world, than
we know today. These early founders not only understood the
problems, but in drafting the Constitution they provided an
instrument for us to follow, so that we could remain secure
from foreign double-dealing and intrigue. Had we adhered to
the Constitution as it was given to us, we would have been
secure and safe today.
Therefore, it is our duty, in the interest of our people and in
the interest of this Republic of the United States, to ponder
seriously and to give fullest consideration to solving the
problem which now confronts the world. In doing so, I am
rather inclined to believe that the real American people will
decide without hesitation, to return to those fundamental
principles that were set forth in the Constitution of the United
States. Let no one tell you that this instrument is not as
valuable today as it was in 1787, for the fact is that it is much
more valuable today—so much so that complete disintegration
of this Republic cannot be avoided should we fail to return our
Government to the principles set forth therein. [underline added]
Excellent information. Like yourself, I've been trying to study these documents over the past few years, and noticed that there is more frequency in their appearance on the Internet since the second term of POTUS.
I most certainly have a lot of questions regarding the ' United States as a Corporation Theories' and 'Article V Convention' Movements. I am considering to begin a website {as a discussion group or think tank project} regarding these and other Constitutional issues.
I would like to know 'your take' on the following link/article/Youtube:
December 11, 2014
Expert: USA Will Receive BRICS Gold Only When ["the original"] Constitution Is Restored:
http://newsinsideout.com/2014/12/expert-usa-will-receive-brics-gold...
Thanks again.
The people of England and the people of the United States are always
friendly to each other; another statement which no one can criticize, but to
which I want to add that the people of all countries—the common people—
have always been and are now friendly to each other. If war depended upon
them there would be no war. The trouble lies with the rulers of the different
governments. It is they who advocate war; war of destruction, not only of
property and human life but of Christian civilization itself.
So in view of this, let us remember that no country has been
at war so much as England and no country has brought about
more misfortune and suffering than the British Government.
This should be clear as we review the early history of our own
colonies, of India, Ireland, and the 400,000,000 opium addicts
in China, all of which may be charged to the greed of the
British Government. Mr. Choate, in making his statements,
spoke for the people of the United States, when in reality he
should have hesitated even to speak for himself. His sole
concern appeared to have been our friendliness toward Great
Britain, but not their friendliness toward us; and again he
placed the United States in the position of a suppliant to the
British throne.
Mr. Choate then referred to a dispute which arose in regard
to the passage of ships through the Panama Canal, and
intimated that it was the understanding of Hon. John Hay and
Lord Landsdowne that the British should have equal rights
with us in the use of this Canal; a right which the British have
never conceded to the United States in the Suez Canal. We
have even been driven out of foreign markets by England for
many, many years, and in her wars she has brazenly furnished
us with a blacklist of firms with which we are not supposed to
trade; and we, like fools, comply with her demands.
Continuing his discussion on this topic, Mr. Choate
expressed himself as being quite willing to leave the decision
of the Panama Canal in the hands of the British and American
pilgrims, which anyone can readily understand would be a
one-sided decision; i. e., all for England and nothing for the
United States.
Mr. Choate then makes his most extraordinary statement,
upon which every Member of Congress and the people of this
Nation should ponder—particularly in view of the happenings
since 1912:
Now the people of this country are not going to allow anybody— any
Congress, any government, any President—to break the good faith which they
have pledged to the mother country.
In making this statement, Mr. Choate takes the position that
Great Britain or England is our mother country; the same
position that was taken by Cecil Rhodes over 50 years ago and
by Andrew Carnegie in 1893, when he wrote a book entitled,
“Triumphant Democracy.”
I want you to note particularly that this was in 1913, and that
1913 was the very year we changed our Government from a
republic to a semi-democracy; the year in which we destroyed
constitutional government, international security, and paved
the road for us to become a colony of the British Empire. It
was also the same year in which we, by adopting the Federal
Reserve Act, placed our Treasury under the control and
domination of the Bank of England and the international
banking groups that are now financing the British-Israel
movement in the United States. It was also the year preceding
the World War; a war in which we became involved, as
everyone knows, in 1917, but what everyone does not know is
that we were committed to this war in 1910, and were to all
intents and purposes in the war in 1914, when J. P. Morgan &
Co. began to finance the Triple Entente. (Association between Great Britain, France, and Russia, the nucleus of the Allied Powers in World War I.)
This statement is
borne out by Mr. J. P. Morgan’s own testimony before the
Senate committee investigating the munitions industry.
Mr. Choate was, therefore, right, because nothing has
stopped, not even Congress, the destruction of this Republic
and its gradual incorporation into the British Empire through
the efforts of the many subversive and pro-English groups, led
and directed, as I have said, by the British- Israel movement.