What are the charges levied against Barack Hussein Obama?
What are the charges to be brought against Joe Biden?
What charges are to be brought against Harry Reid?
What are the charges to be brought against Mitch McConnell?
What are the charges of John Boehner?
What are the charges against Nancy Pelosi?
What are the charges to be levied against Eric Holder?
In theory, maintaining any form of government that represents the interest of “We The People” is impossible with the people named above in office. Not only those named but also any other elected or appointed officials that operate in the spirit of being the “Lord and Master” over the people. What are the specific crimes of these people? Does the RICO Act provide any latitude for charging these people with a criminal act? If no specific crime can be levied against them how will it be possible to prosecute them? We can’t charge them with the crime of “We don’t like you”. No such crime exists and no form of punishment has been established for it.
Please identify the crime or crimes these people have committed and I will gladly accompany the task force to make the citizens arrest for each and every one of them.
Obama should be held responsible for ordering a drone strike that killed a U.S. citizen overseas. The RICO act does provide for his culpability with conspiring in the death of an untried U.S. citizen.
If you do not know the answers to those questions, why are you here?
If you can't charge anyone with something, how can you hold a tribunal?
Are we going to charge these people with "We Don't like you"
In my opinion, That is not a legitimate response to a very pertinent question.
My opinion is, however that Barack Obama may be charged with Sedition and failure to honor and uphold his outh of office.
He has worked in consort with domestic enemies of this nation. Men and women who are members of a secret organization that has ideology in direct conflict to the Constitutional Guarantees and protections, this nation was founded on.
Who are these domestic enemies? They are the many members of the American Socialist Party, who are members of the House and Senate, or hold positions in our government.
These men and women should all be also detained, and tried for treason. Many are card carrying Communists. The entire Congressional Black Caucus are members. That is not a racist attempt to vilify. It is fact.
So High Treason is more than a legitimate charge.
Richard, I know John personally. Believe me, he knows, but he is asking that our grievances and constitutional redresses be defined. John, I think what you are looking for. If we are to arrest these people as we both hope, we must have charges ready to be filed, a court to hear the charges and a justice department ready to do what is needed. Right now, Im not sure we have that. We also MUST have our Constitutional Redress defined. I personally believe that the redress that gives us the strongest legal standing and accomplishes the most in restoring our Republic is nullification of the 14th. Im not even close to a constitutional scholar and certainly not an attorney however. That said, do the research on the 14th and study its history. Many, myself included, would argue that it was signed and passed under the gun, quite literally. Nullification of the 14th would strip the executive branch of most (90% or more) of its power, dismantling the systematic slavery designed into it. The IRS would loose its power, the Fed, the FBI, ATF, DHS, all would officially be unconstitutional. Now, you would need someone more versed in the legal jargon and BS to make that argument, but I believe that is our redress. As far as your charges..... Obama is fairly easy to come up with a long list of charges and I think that we should. The others? I dont know what charges you can make stick. I believe there is one. Maybe there are others, with more teeth, but I think the following is valid for EVERYONE in office save maybe 10. Violations of the Oath of Office.
Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration ... of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
The exact charges are for the Attorneys and Congress to decide. My point was that we know there are many violations that have been committed. That is what we are here for.. We have too much work to do and not much time to do it.. We cannot afford the time to debate the things that are not, ultimately, our responsibility.. If anyone does not know by now why we are here, we do not have time to educate them, I suggest they do some research on their own and come back when they understand what our job is..
There is more than enough evidence of Treason, Sedition, Fraud, Misrepresentation, election violations and breaches of the Constitution to bring inditments against all listed.. Our job is to force Congress and our legal system to hold them accountable for their actions. How they do it is not our concern!
When you have entrusted the care and custody of a possession of high value to another in consideration of their solemn promise to treat the arrangement as a fiduciary relationship - only to realize that their purpose from the very beginning has been to steal that possession- you owe them no explanations. You show them the door.
If the OAS is not willing to hold itself accountable to the law of the land, then its grievance is not justified due to the executive branch not holding itself accountable. If this movement is nothing other than a lynch mob the use of martial law can be appropriately expected.
John, The Constitution is the Law of the Land, and we are perfectly iy within our rights to redress our Government. In fact, it is our duty to do so.. I have nothing more to say on the subject.. You would obviously not listen anyway...
We stand not alone.
As far as the criminality of Congress, the Constitution is clear about exempting Congress from the Laws of the Land ONLY in very specific instances:
Article 1, Section 6, Clause 1: Compensation and Legal protection:
"The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place."
Congress is NOT exempt from laws and should not have the ability to exempt itself, its staff, or particular organizations. The practice of exempting itself and others invites, not only tyrannous legislation that Congress would in no way allow were it subject to it, but also allows Congress to engage in insider trading and make enormous profits, also providing a motivation for the pork that is slipped into legislation.
And as far as applying those laws to Congress, here are two that are a kicker:
Title 18, U.S.C. Section 241 "Conspiracy Against Rights"
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...
Title 18, U.S.C. Section 242 "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law":
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ...
Overall, these prohibitions do actually make Socialism, and these Marxist redistributive agendas both contrary to law, and Constitution. Our Congress has effectively set themselves up as "masters", and at least a portion of the citizenry as "slaves" in involuntary servitude of others, which is enabled by Congress exempting itself from laws it passes.