THIS IS FROM A TRUE PATRIOT WHO HAS SERVED HIS COUNTRY !WHAT THE HELL????????????????I have not been able to prove this but if true, we are finished!!!! If true, we need to get rid of this Liberal Communist that has been put in the White House (and all of his unconstitutional czars and good squad that is in congress) . It is way past time to just dump tea in the harbor. This should be seen as an outright act of TREASON.Obama to sell B-2SHOCKING NEWS Subject: Stealth Bomber Sale To China by PresidentObamaI can't believe this -- how did America let this "Person" get anywherenear a leadership role. God help us!6/5/2009: Security News Brief:Obama To Sell B-2 Stealth Bomber Blueprints To China ; Debt Relief TheReason:The Defense Department is reportedly furious with Obama's proposal tosell blueprints of the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber to the People'sRepublic. Gates has flatly rejected Obama's plan, but has sincebeen asked to step down if he will not facilitate the process.According to the deal, the United States would sell the plans forthe B-2, along with radar-absorbing paints and metals in exchange for$50 billion in debt relief. The B-2 cost the US government $23 billionto develop the bomber in the 1980s.According to the Administration, this proposal will help the UnitedStates resolve its debt issues. They point out their belief that theB-2 bomber is "strategically obsolete", according to a source in theWhite House Press Office. In addition, the source claims that theChinese would be unable to create their own functioning stealth bomberfleet for "at least eight years."American allies Taiwan , Japan , and South Korea are very wary of theproposal. Koo Syi, a geopolitical analyst from South Korea , points outthat this technology could be passed to China 's allies.. This was thecase when Chinese nuclear technology was transferred to Pakistan andNorth Korea . According to Koo, Obama has rendered US allies'opinions as "irrelevant."While this proposal is controversial, it is not being presented toCongress, where it could meet with stern opposition. Instead, theState Department has been informed to assist the Defense Departmentwith the transfer of materials. Source: Morning Security News Briefvia Internal Company News Wire-WashingtonIf that is not bad enough, he has just signed an agreement withRussia to reduce the United States ' nuclear missles by 1/3 and toeliminate many of the strategic means of delivering the remainingmissiles. All this, for the huge favor of Russia allowing our militaryto fly over a portion of their country to get to the middle east warzones more easily.Somebody has got to stop this mad man. Every strips another piece ofAmericas ' freedom for each trip he takes. He no longer discusses orallows anyone to know what he is doing before he takes action. He hasgotten so power hungry, he mentally denies he works for the Americancitizens.The reason he is working in a panic mode with each of his manipulativeplans, both with the huge money loans he is robbing from any futurerecovery and from our children, is for his complete control and power.A dictator has been purposely designed and is emerging before our veryeyes. The depletion of small business growth and control of all largecompanies will be the end of United States of America freedoms by theend of his 4 years term.His signed agreement with Russia took place when both North Korea andIran are amplifying all their nuclear weaponry to attack the free world.If anyone gets in the way of Obama's plans they are rapidly removed. Itis more obvious each day, that this administration is following the"Hate the U.S. " Progressive Left as taught by Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers,and their like.
Views: 0
You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!
I haven't been able to confirm this. It sounds a bit dubious to me. In searching the topic I did come across this and thought you might be interested: The Giant Awakes
I do not know either, however I would not put any trust in Snopes husband & wife team that do their research at their kitchen table and are rather fond of Obama.
For the past few years
"http://www.snopes.com/" has positioned
itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on
any comment, claim and email.
But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind "http://www.snopes.com/". Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team -that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.
David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of
"http://www.snopes.com/" claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been
proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.
A few months ago when a State Farm agent, Bud Gregg in Mandeville, hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on "http://www.snopes.com/". In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place.
I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers - and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from "http://www. snopes.com/" ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, "http://www. snopes.com/" issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things- not!
Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very
Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this
presidential election, liberals have a purposeful agenda to discredit
anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism
lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?
So, I say this now to everyone who goes to
"http://www.snopes.com/"
to get what they think to be the bottom line 'facts...'proceed with
caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more.
Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to
and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a
subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's
all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from
my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com"
I received this from a friend, and it sheds new light on a lot of things I have attempted to find the truth about on snopes, that didn't "jibe" with other findings.
Replies
For the past few years
"http://www.snopes.com/" has positioned
itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on
any comment, claim and email.
But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind "http://www.snopes.com/". Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team -that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.
David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of
"http://www.snopes.com/" claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been
proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.
A few months ago when a State Farm agent, Bud Gregg in Mandeville, hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on "http://www.snopes.com/". In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place.
I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers - and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from "http://www. snopes.com/" ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, "http://www. snopes.com/" issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things- not!
Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very
Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this
presidential election, liberals have a purposeful agenda to discredit
anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism
lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?
So, I say this now to everyone who goes to
"http://www.snopes.com/"
to get what they think to be the bottom line 'facts...'proceed with
caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more.
Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to
and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always google a
subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's
all the Mikkelson's do. After all, I can personally vouch from
my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com"
I received this from a friend, and it sheds new light on a lot of things I have attempted to find the truth about on snopes, that didn't "jibe" with other findings.
I would highly recommend you completely quit using http://www.snopes.com/ for any reason.
I have had better, more credible results using truthorfiction.com