WHY IS THE RIGHT HELPING OBAMA REWRITE THE DEFINITION OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN?’

[Twana Blevins]

Definitions are easy, they are found in the dictionary. Yet, millions of Americans remain stuck in a quagmire of dissenting views and alleged expert opinions over the simple term natural born citizen, one of only a few strict constitutional requirements for the highest office in our land, President and Commander-in-Chief.

According to dictionaries dating as far back as Webster’s 1828 Edition, the term natural born citizen has a very simple and specific common meaning, and according to the framers of the US Constitution, a very important distinction.

Natural – Pertaining to nature; produced or effected by nature, or by the laws of growth, formation or motion impressed on bodies or beings by divine power.
Born – To be born, is to be produced or brought into life.
Citizen – In the United States, a person, native or naturalized, who has the privilege of exercising the elective franchise, or the qualifications which enable him to vote for rulers, and to purchase and hold real estate.

Based upon the official definition of these words, we know immediately that the term natural born citizen is not based upon statute or any form of man-made law. It exists in nature, the result of natural law, by divine power, only able to be recognized or ignored by legislative process, but still inalienable via legal processes.

Many self-proclaimed experts insist that the US Constitution was written in some secret code, which can only be deciphered for the common folk, by legal scholars of the highest order. Yet on the basis of simple definitions, we know that if we are discussing any form of man-made law requiring the analysis of legal scholars, we are NOT discussing natural-born.

The term natural born citizen is of nature, not man-made law. The Constitution is written in plain and simple English, each word with a specific definition and meaning easily found in any English dictionary. Fortunately, not only legal scholars have access to dictionaries, making it possible for anyone who can read, to understand the Constitution, so long as they have a dictionary in hand.

After all, what good are unalienable rights that legal scholars are free to alienate via politically motivated interpretations?

FULL STORY with all the FACTS you'll ever need on the subject, at Patriots News!

 

http://thepatriotsnews.com/indx.php/content/81

 

Please support both Patriots News and The United States Patriots Union with a donation today!

 

 

JB Williams
Co-Founder
www.PatriotsUnion.org
www.ThePatriotsNews.com

[Mary Farr]

Why don't they just look for his father's birth certificate (the Senior Obama)?

[Durus Helm]

Don't have to... not with facts in evidence that Barry Soetoro and the Democratic National Committee have admitted that Barack Obama Jr. was a dual citizen at birth.

 

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.  --  Source: Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee, http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate

 

Dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country.  --  Source: US State Department, http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html

 

John A. Bingham excluded persons who owed allegiance to foreign sovereigns or "dual nationals" from being a "natural born citizen" in a statement before Congress on 9 Mar 1866:

"[I] find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen. . . . ”

-- John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, March 9, 1866 Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866).

[Paul Powell]

They claim it was just a hand written note,and in some countries they don't even keep track of them.

[Sandra Lee Smith]

Why?  Obama himself said his father was a citizen of Kenya under British rule at the time of Junior's birth, here on a student visa only; so out of his OWN mouth declared himself ineligible according to the requirements of the US Constitution,. about which he's allegedly such an authority.  He also said it to the fellow he was debating during his Senate run, quite clearly, when that man challenged his right to run for Senate even; and Obama said it would only matter if he was trying to run for President, which of course he wasn't.  The fact is that his LACK of proven US citizenship of ANY sort did matter during the Senate run too, and media DIDN'T follow that up the either, curiously enough; the references in AP and NPR have also conveniently disappeared now, from that debate.  But his father's BC wouldn't prove anything we don't already know to be fact.