WHAT IS OBAMA'S MILITARY ATTRACTION?

[Harry Riley]

What is it with Obama's sudden attention to our active military and veterans?

His action to highlight support for veterans benefits, visit to Fort Bliss, talk about Iraq, etc??? Is this a disguise to gain military support, turn around his abysmal approval rating with active duty military, in order to fulfill future goals of the Obama Administration?

I find it difficult to engage in "trust but verify" with regard to Barack Obama given his "transform" America stated intentions. How will he carry out his "transformation" of America? What exactly does "transform America" mean and has it been given due analysis? Does the Obama agenda portend grave consequences? If so, how will he/it be stopped?

Given the current attitude and visible atmosphere in America of "we the people" rejecting the socialist/fascist policies and actions of the democrats in power, it's not likely Obama will transform anything other than his political future to retirement. At least he won't transform America with the support of "we the people" after the on-coming (assumption) election massacre on November 2, 2010.

What then is the tool Obama will resort in order to complete his "transformation" process of America? If he can't do it through consent of "we the people" how will it be done?

Does the "anointed" one see the handwriting on the wall? Rejecting the US Constitution and skirting other legal accepted means of governing has disgusted and alienated American patriots. That America is coming to grips with a fraud, usurper,and anti-America elements in the White House? That America has had enough of the trashing of our beloved land and is on the verge of eruption demanding constitutional restoration...preferably through the ballot box.

Is Barack Obama so arrogant, narcissistic, and blinded with power and self adulation that he would consider drumming up a situation as a disguise for martial law, thus invoking military control in America? Is this his reason for increased attention for our military...to gain military support? (even in light of government denying our military adequate voting support)

What other option is there for "transformation success" given "we the people" want no part of a world government, communist, socialist takeover? The forces of world government greed and other evil elements will spare no devious plan to fulfill their goal of enslaving America.

Think about it...be careful in accepting artificial sound bites.

Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

[Monica]

i started to respond to this yesterday, and decided not to post my comment. now, reading thru the comments, i find that carl swensson posted what i'd intended to. [carl, you are the reason i branched out into other conservative websites, and possibly the reason i ended up here... (i remember way back in 2008, following u & your progress on the "grand jury").]

BO's pretense on being interested in the military is just a pretense. i wonder if he thinks his fleeting attention will sway those deciding LTC Lakin's fate? i would hope they would see thru it. my concern is that the defense will be unsuccessful in getting BO to produce the documents; and the court (& jury) will be so cowed by the fraudulent CINC they will destroy Lakin's career for naught... active duty, retirees, and former vets are all watching this with much interest and hope!!!

[Harry Riley]

Only the most vile, divisive, and destructive comments are removed........I'm not aware of any removal. Send me what you state as being removed. Mail to [e-mail]

This accusation happened once before. I requested information and never received any response. Now, tell me what was removed.

[Harry Riley]

Ha Ha........good one Mike.............

[Harry Riley]

Robert Sewell.......I want you to answer me or risk being banned. I'm a bit weary of being accused of deleting your posts. Is it possible you're not posting items and believing I have deleted them???

[Harry Riley]

Robert.......I have asked you several times to send me posts that have been deleted. Gave you my personal email [e-mail] and you refuse to share what has been deleted. You are the only member of PFA that is complaining of deleted posts.

No one is seeking your removal but I won't tolerate further accusations that are unfounded, accusing me or Twana of deleting your posts. Making accusations that other people view and cause disruption.

We are not deleting your posts....and there is nothing personal involved here.

Your choice....stop the accusations.

[Sandra Lee Smith]

@ Monica: Not even the court martial of LCOL Lakin will do the job unless the defense can force disclosure somehow; thus far the Army JAG office is going along with Obama's secrecy too. In June, at the initial hearing they denied him the right to the very evidence that would, I'm sure, exonerate him and prove once and for all what most of us know: that Obama is a usurper and imposture!

[Sandra Lee Smith]

I'd also like to know what got removed. I've seen passionate posts from Mr Sewell, but never anything out of line; and if it was about not being PC, I guess they need to start censoring me too, because I don't do PC; gave it up as a bad habit some while ago.

[Sandra Lee Smith]

@Robert: I don't believe Harry is deleting your posts or Twana, but consider the possibility that someone intent on disrupting the site might be behind such deletions; I know of whole sites that have been mysteriously deleted, and threads on other sites in recent weeks, all of which are conservative sites. Liberals, in particular Obama, don't want us giving or sharing information that is contrary to what he wants, which is what shows up in the liberal media; and "big brother" is watching all these sites, either indirectly via monitoring devices, or directly through their "plants". Like all bullies, they tend to zero in on the individual whom they perceive as " weaker" in some way, and may have attacked you on that basis, unaware of why your language skills were different than most who post here. But I honestly don't believe anyone wants you to leave this site. You have a lot of good things to say here , and it's obvious that you are a passionate patriot.

[Sandra Lee Smith]

@Robert; You'te most welcome.

[Twana Blevins]

I posted this for John
Twana
___________________


Harry:

Your referenced dissertation may be an accurate description of a pathological liar (a "user") that is not - in my estimation - a "leader" by any figment of imagination. Whether in my military, political, or civilian experiences (on the job or otherwise) users "tack with the wind" and will lie at every convenience with malicious intent of achieving successes along a path leading to their ideological goal. Lying is their means to an end that only enraptured followers accept, unfortunately everyone loses in this scenario. Personally, I believe "O" hates the US for very personal reasons (first being his lack of parental leadership), and that he is Muslim merely based on his actions and statements about the Christian faith our Constitution embraces. You may find this quite interesting about allowable "lies" by the Muslim faith, and it well may be exaggerated within the Wahabi sect of Saudi Arabia - it speaks volumes:

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/011-taqiyya.htm

Along the same lines is the old adage: "Never trust an Arab who is smiling!"

Our entire administration has evolved - behaviorally - from the Alinsky premise "The world as it is, is not what it should be," which evokes radicalism amongst his followers, and an ideology in an individual's mind - solely for their own pleasure and/or goal determination. "O" is such a follower, but also adapted to SDS rants (you may recall Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden) of the 1960's under Wade Rahke (later Weather Underground, ACORN, SEIU, and now the "Tides Foundation" funded by George Soros). While "O" was at Columbia University, he undoubtedly became "enraptured" (himself) with the Cloward - Piven Strategy of 1966. (Please note that the Clinton's were also disciples of SDS and Cloward - Piven.) The Cloward Piven Strategy is:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strateg...

Three congressmen have garnered my support to either admonish "O" or to hint at issues within our own government. The first is Ron Paul who is an abject patriot, but is cautious in his prediction of the "truth." Will address him last.

Second: Sen Jim DeMint, (R - SC) is a conscionable and honest conservative, but who also only hints at Congressional issues that require repair. His Senatorial speech regarding enactment of legislation (if you haven't seen this) you will likely find extremely disturbing (there are others, but this looms largest):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2B751mhY-QE&feature=player_embedded

And along the same lines are the Slaughter House Rules (Deeming Laws to Pass without reading or vote) that are employed by Pelosi and Reid, this may also be referred to as “Unanimous Consent”:

http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/16/the-slaughter-house-rules

Third: As far as impeachment proceedings, two prospects exist:

Darrell Issa, R-Rep CA has issued this report (there is a pdf file available) of Constitutional breaches:

http://www.westernjournalism.com/scathing-congress-report-slams-oba...

And, found to be enlightening, the latest Judge Roberts potential Smackdown of Obama by the Supreme Court:

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/sources-say-smackdown-of-obam...

As in your referenced blog article, I suspect you and I are in unison that "O" may exercise a manufactured crisis by which he can impose martial law. His pandering to the military will only serve to relax their opinions - enough that he could enable a large (quietly organized) security force to squelch riots perpetrated by ACORN and others. That is the last "plank" to establishing communism here. I believe the foregoing links to be substantiation for your and my beliefs, but one more step has been an eye-opener. (We - as a country may have two Constitutions: One for US Corp, and the second least viable is the original Republic Constitution.

Ron Paul alluded to the US as being owned (73%) by the UK and wealthy Europeans. A recent article he published linked to these two files, thus I find them credible:

Read as much of the "Features page," specifically "American History" at: http://teamlaw.net/

And also this link: www.usavsus.info
You can spend weeks in here reading everything - I don't have the time.

US Corp can be explained here:
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm
or here:
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/corp_us.htm

Are we in trouble? I believe so!

John