A "Mad as Hell" Open Letter to Bill O'Reilly for, Once More, Defiling Us, Grassroots-Conservatives
A "Mad as Hell"J Open Letter to Bill O'Reilly for, Once More, Defiling Us, Grassroots-Conservatives
o'reilly,
In the middle of slumbering, last evening, on my "zero-gravity" recliner --on which I tenderly nurse my nasty lumbago-- my wife gave a very rude awakening when tuning the TV receiver to your o'reilly Factor daily burlesque (fortunately at the end of it) having noticed that you have come up with a skit, whereby you invite your viewers to tell you what they might feel "mad as hell" at you for.
I took your invitation seriously; so, here is my explanation on why --among many other reasons-- I am "mad as hell" at you...and since you won't read it, I am sharing it with other grassroots conservatives who might help disseminate it, so that ultimately reaches you.
I am mad as hell that --in your interview on Thursday, May 22, 2014, with a woman called Tantaros, or so-- you said that we concerned grassroots-conservative Americans --whom you referred derisively and dismissively to as "those in the hard-right" and whom in the past you (and others, such as, for example, Ann Coulter and John Gibson) have insulted as "kooks"-- "...are construing that obama is subverting the country to convert it into something different.."; you not having even the less-than-average size of "cojones" to tell what that "something different" is.
I'll tell you, o'reilly, you very well know that --on October 30, 2008, at the Mel Carnahan Quadrangle on the campus of the University of Missouri at Columbia, Missouri-- obama menacingly, and publicly for all to hear, promised that in five days he was going to start fully engaging from the White House in "... fundamentally transforming the United States of America." In case you conveniently "forgot" obama delivering that threat, then kindly "refresh" your memory fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cqN4NIEtOY.
You very well know that "fundamentally" means going to the very foundations of whatever the grammatical-object receiving the action of the adverbially-qualified-gerund " fundamentally transforming" might be...in this case, the United States of America. You very well know that obama was, in that way, heralding the ominous harbinger that, from the day he get elected, he was going to go to the very foundations that America is founded upon...to do nothing else but to perform a full remake on America, to flip her over, 180 degrees, from free-enterprise democratic America to socialist autocratic America...which is where he has us almost at the brink of.
You very well know that such transformation that obama was announcing had to be, not to improve effective democracy and the free-enterprise (i.e., capitalist) system in America, but to implant, at least, Marxist socialism in America; for, with his credentials, such is the only fate he has in store for America...credentials which you very well know include is Marxist and Marxist-Leninist maternal and paternal lineage, and his upbringing, and his past and present intimate associations: e.g., Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright and all.
And, furthermore, you very well know that, from his own writing in his autobiographic book Dreams from My Father, obama explicitly and directly boasts of his preference in college for "...the Marxist professors...", a statement he has never repudiated...as he has neither ever repudiated, but rather reasserted continually, his preference for things Marxist in life (...for us, We the People, as he and his consort Marie-Antoinette "Michelle" obama, live a life of sudden-new-rich lumpen, like coming from rags to king and queen...on taxpayer money, of course.).
And, then, as you very well know, obama brags (or "dog whistles" to the hardcore-Left) in the same passage in his autobiography, being a deep-Marxist ideologue when he also wrote --in jargon of the most authentic Marxist cut-- about his preference for STRUCTURAL-feminists.
You very well knowthat only heavyweight Marxists would talk about STRUCTURAL sectors of society (and about THE SUPERSTRUCTURE, as well), given that Marx saw society constituted only of THE SUPERSTRUCTURE (i.e., laws, the bourgeoisie, government, capitalists, the military, religion, bourgeois political-parties, law enforcement, bourgeois traditions, customs and taboos, etc.) and THE STRUCTURE, the former dominating, exploiting and repressing the latter, which in turn is constituted by secondary structures (e.g., Obama's "structural feminists", which are not those in the past burning their bras in the streets, and now dropping their panties in public, but politically-leftist seriously-active feminist groups) engaged in an all-out perennial struggle against, and to shake off the yoke of, the SUPERSTRUCTURE. You very well know that to Marx and, consequently, to obama, it, all, is about class warfare.
You very well know that, in another rally, obama publicly added to his "...fundamentally transforming the United States of America..." inviting the audience (dog-whistling to the Left), telling them "...I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it"; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know what obama "lectured" to Joe the Plumber with; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know that obama vowed publicly that he was going to make the price of electricity skyrocket; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know that obama openly promised that he was going to bankrupt coal mines and coal-fired energy plants; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know that obama openly promised that he was going to put a halt on petroleum new exploration and exploitation; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know that --on September 6, 2001, during a Chicago Public Radio interview at WBEZ-FM, on a program titled Slavery and the Constitution-- obama openly decried the fact that the Constitution of the United States circumscribes government to the benefit of its masters, We the People, when he publicly moaned and grumbled that "...the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties...", hinting that if he could, he would unleash the mastiffs of government upon the people; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And you very well know that --on July 2, 2008, at a political campaign public-speech-- obama revealed his ravenous appetite for a Leninist Cheka-style repressive and persecutional apparatus when he most emphatically affirmed "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we [Leninists] have set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."...which can result only at the expense of depleting our Armed Forces; and you very well know he is delivering on it.
And, finally, you very well know that I have given you much undeserved credit by stating that "you very well know" this and that, for you very well know that, in reality, you are an asinine and crass ignoramus, particularly regarding hardcore-Left ideology and praxis, such condition making you completely disabled to assess who in essence obama is, and, consequently the real aims of his moves, of his policies. Your "assessment" of the hardcore-Left is limited to calling hardcore-Leftists with the ridiculously loutish label of "secular-progressives". You very well know that it's never too late to learn; hit the books and learn about hardcore-Left ideology and praxis...your role as ideological/political commentator demands it.
Ultimately, if you are such a lazy loafer, have your staff compiling for you a complete compendium of obama's crimina contra patriam and other malfeasance...a very easy task to complete at plenitude. Or simply, for starters, download, read and keep handy Ted Cruz's The Legal Limit: The Obama Administration's Attempts to Expand Federal Power -- Report No. 4: The Obama Administration's Abuse of Power which you can find at http://www.scribd.com/doc/222704929/Ted-Cruz-Legal-Limit-Report-4.
So, o'reilly, after reading all the facts listed above, do you still fancy a product of "hard-right" construe the long train of abuses and usurpations that obama has kept inflicting on America to destroy the nation the Founders instituted? Do you still attribute to our imagination the traitorous labors in which obama is fully engaged (be it said with emphasis that the disengagement and detachment that many idiotic commentators ascribe to obama --such as, for example, that woman Tarantos-- is completely inexistent) since the very day he committed public perjury in front of the American people when --on January 21, 2009--- john roberts took his perjurious presidential oath.
You, o'reilly, are a quintessential sham; you are merely an unscrupulous opportunist, bamboozling Americans with your antics and with your flamboyance, all decked out with your vaudevillian charisma...which is fading away, as you are prematurely and increasingly rapidly entering a state of severely sorry mental senescence...just the detritus of the good correspondent of the early 1980s you were.
That's all you are...and in the process, you hurt grassroots-conservatives at the slightest chance you get, hence, hurting the only ideological/political force pivotal to saving America from the demise that obama and the rest of DemocRATs --helped in varied degrees by the complicit RINOs, by the accommodationist establishment-REPUGNicans, and by the ideological dichotomous libertarians-- are pushing her to.
And you are merely feigning being "mad as hell" at obama's malfeasance regarding the Veterans Administration. You are as "mad as hell" as he is feigning to be, for you want to keep your Nielsen ratings high while keeping alive, high, the prospect of another puny, sycophantic live TV interview with obama..
And all of this is not the "construe" of any "kook" or "hard right" dude; it is facts.
Instead of consistently keep debasing us, grassroots-conservatives, for exposing and condemning obama, you, o'reily, should redeem yourself and join us...that, if in reality you are sincere about caring for America.
"Mad as hell" at you,
Rene Guerra
Replies
“We the People are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts – Not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” Abraham Lincoln
This is who We are. Any questions?
We the People are the masters of absolutely every public servant, elected or not, at all levels of government (i.e., local, state and federal) and at all instances of governance (i.e., legislative, judicial and executive) across the nation.
That's why the Constitution of the United States starts with WE THE PEOPLE.
Rene Guerra is an idiot.
A scared, misinformed, paranoid idiot, that makes OAS look like the kooks she is talking about.
Unfocused, undisciplined fringe, similar in flavor to the extreme in the OWS movement.
Strong , you are using strictly ad hominem...the scape avenue of those who don't have valid arguments; that is, one of the most used tools of the hardcore-Left, whose foot-soldier minnows panic at getting their Dear Leader --barack hussein obama-- exposed for what he really is (...and from his own mouth and writings), as grassroots-conservatives do, and as O'Reilly does not.
And Renee has the perfect right to get scared, and even paranoid, when ALL the Dear Leaders of the past (e.g., Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and all his successors, Mao, the Kim dynasty in N. Korea, the Castros,Idi Amin, Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, and many other Dear Leaders that flogged the human species in the last century, and some of them still in power) have committed all sorts of monstrosities on humanity.
That The Dear Leader of the Left in America will go that far depends on We the People allowing him doing it, and all of those in OAS are determined to stop him --lawfully, of course-- cold turkey.
That prospect makes the hardcore-Left androids panic and engage in, among other forms,ad hominem "arguing".
A person can debate the rational.
I cannot seriously debate someone who insists the sky is orange.
Not every idea is reasonable or worthy of consideration simply because it was shared on the internet. When Coulter says someone to the right of her is a "kook", it's a fair bet.
Your selective outrage is noted.
Hey Weak Pete. Find someone to agree with and help them do something positive.
I do not let my children whine and complain all the time because it does absolutely no good.
"No Good" are the key words here.
Get it?
Thank you for your very conscious observations Maria. I recommend you do not waste your time debating with government sponsored "Chat-Bots". They do not have a brain or a heart and lack the feeling of empathy necessary to communicate with humans. They do have infinite verbiage yet can not compose a sentence that contains a recognizable "feeling" in it.
They usually focus on how many people they can get to debate with them or participate in their "all is lost" discussions,
Pretend they don't exist and guess what? Poof, they become recognizably useless.
Thanks for being with us Maria.
We have a wonderful family here.
Bingo.
I think oreilly decided to bloviate so he could continue selling books. The three I read (from the library since I don't want to send him a nickel) were nothing short of boring. It isn't like we don't know Lincoln's and Jesus' fates and how they happened. oreilly acts like a "former" carnival barker. They all are now just in the business for money and will say whatever it takes to keep their gravy train going. Most of the patriots (far right?) are MAD AS HELL as well...,
Speaking of feeling have you EVER seen obummer speak with feeling about anything regarding this country? It seems like he ALWAYS reads from a teleprompter or gets whatever he tries to say caught in his craw. I turn the guy off when he comes on TV and he makes me damned near puke...
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next