BROOKS BROS vs BARBARIANS

http://nypost.com/2015/03/15/why-our-prep-school-diplomats-fail-against-putin-and-isis/

Why our prep-school diplomats fail against Putin and ISIS

Why do our “best and brightest” fail when faced with a man like Putin? Or with charismatic fanatics? Or Iranian negotiators? Why do they misread our enemies so consistently, from Hitler and Stalin to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Islamic State’s self-proclaimed caliph?

The answer is straightforward:

Social insularity: Our leaders know fellow insiders around the world; our enemies know everyone else.

The mandarin’s distaste for physicality: We are led through blood-smeared times by those who’ve never suffered a bloody nose.

And last but not least, bad educations in our very best schools: Our leadership has been educated in chaste political theory, while our enemies know, firsthand, the stuff of life.

Above all, there is arrogance based upon privilege. For revolving-door leaders in the U.S. and Europe, if you didn’t go to the right prep school and elite university, you couldn’t possibly be capable of comprehending, let alone changing, the world. It’s the old social “Not our kind, dahhhling…” attitude transferred to government.

That educational insularity is corrosive and potentially catastrophic: Our “best” universities prepare students to sustain the current system, instilling vague hopes of managing petty reforms.

Modal Trigger

People stand at the museum of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin as they mark the 62th anniversary of his death.Photo: EPA

But dramatic, revolutionary change in geopolitics never comes from insiders. It’s the outsiders who change the world. In the 21st century, our government suffers from the sclerosis of insider thinking that constantly reinforces itself and rejects conflicting evidence. The result is that we are being whipped by savages.

Modal Trigger

A motorcyclist rides past a large propaganda billboard featuring an image of former leader Ho Chi Minh.Photo: Getty Images

Of course, the insiders can’t accept so abhorrent a prospect as their own fallibility. So when new blood does enter — through those same “elite” institutions — it’s channeled into the same old calcium-clogged arteries. And we get generals with Ivy League Ph.D.s writing military doctrine that adheres cringingly to politically correct truisms and leaves out the very factors, such as the power of religion or ethnic hatred, that prove decisive. Or a usually astute commentator on Eastern European affairs who dismisses Vladimir Putin as a mere chinovnik, a petty bureaucrat, since Putin was only a lieutenant colonel in the KGB when the Soviet Union collapsed and didn’t go to a Swiss prep school like John Kerry.

That analyst overlooked the fact that Hitler had been a mere lance corporal. Stalin was a failed seminarian. Lenin was a destitute syphilitic. Ho Chi Minh washed dishes in the basement of a Paris Hotel. And when the French Revolution erupted, Napoleon was a junior artillery officer.

And sophisticated Germans assumed they could use Hitler and then dismiss him, while other Europeans mocked him. Stalin’s fellow Bolsheviks underestimated him, until it was too late and their fates were sealed. The French didn’t notice Ho. And Napoleon shocked even his own lethargic family. The “man on horseback” is often the man from nowhere, and the members of the club ignore the torches in the streets until the club burns down around them.

Dramatic, revolutionary change in geopolitics never comes from insiders. It’s the outsiders who change the world.

Put another way: We are led by men and women educated to believe in the irresistible authority of their own words. When they encounter others who use words solely to deflect and defraud, or, worse, when their opposite numbers ignore words completely and revel in ferocious violence, our best and brightest go into an intellectual stall and keep repeating the same empty phrases (in increasingly tortured tones):

“Violence never solves anything.” “There’s no military solution.” “War is never the answer.” “Only a negotiated solution can resolve this crisis.” “It isn’t about religion.”

Or the latest and lamest: “We need to have strategic patience,” and “Terrorists need jobs.”

Every one of those statements is, demonstrably, nonsense most — or all — of the time. But the end result of very expensive educations is a Manchurian Candidate effect that kicks in whenever the core convictions of the old regime are questioned. So we find ourselves with leaders who would rather defend platitudes than defend their country.

And negotiations become the opium of the chattering classes.

Once-great universities have turned into political indoctrination centers worthy of the high Stalinist Era or the age of Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Their aims may be more benign, but their unwillingness to consider alternative worldviews is every bit as rigid. Students in the social sciences at Harvard or Yale today are cadets being groomed to serve a soft-Socialist form of government conceived not in the streets, but in the very same classrooms. It’s a self-licking ice-cream cone. And graduates leave campus brilliantly prepared for everything except reality.

Modal Trigger

Russia’s President Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with government members at the Kremlin in Moscow, May 28, 2014.Photo: Reuters

This is not an argument against education. Rather, it is an argument for education and against indoctrination, against the fantasy that the barbarian with the knife bashing in the door poses no danger to the career government official who has published a book on “the false construct of race and its deleterious impact upon climate change.”

Putin, that “petty bureaucrat,” has won every significant confrontation with the West, conquering foreign territory and humiliating presidents. Iran’s negotiators have outmaneuvered their Western interlocutors so spectacularly that they really don’t need Obama’s deal, having gotten most of what they needed: time and partial sanctions relief. And the Islamic State has confounded not only our elite’s prejudices about how the world should work, but demolished their platitudinous nonsense that “All men want peace.”

In fact, some men delight in inflicting grotesque forms of violence on others.

We face a new age of barbarism. And we’re led by those whose notion of violence is a rugby game at Princeton, who won’t let their children play unattended but deny the murderous impulses haunting humanity. Perhaps it’s time to recognize that the lack of a prep-school background and a Brooks Brothers charge account doesn’t mean that a thug with slovenly manners can’t change the world.

Originally published on FoxNews.com

You need to be a member of PatriotsForAmerica to add comments!

Join PatriotsForAmerica

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • What this country needs especially in the Executive Bunch is people that are ready to roll up their sleeves and get their hands a little dirty. Any deal that they make will in some way or form line their pockets with money and we pay for it.

    Then we have congress that’s afraid of their own shadow. They do a lot of talking, tell us what they are doing, and working hard at it. In the meantime nothing is getting done.

    Now for the Supreme Court the highest court in the land, do they have a different Constitution then you and me?

    Rome is burning and they are all fiddling.  Well I’m ready to fight for this country, and fight back hard. It is time to get our country back. 

  • Ralph Peters can always be counted on to produce hard hitting, accurate reality..........he's one of the "outsiders" that we need in key decision points supporting a nation returning to the US Constitution.

    • Like EF Hutton:  when Ralph Peters speaks I listen up.

    • Harry Riley,

      Yup, he once again is 'spot on'.  I'm glad that he is one of the "outsiders" - he puts all the 'others' to shame for their abandonment of our nation's founding principles and Constitution.

  • Tish, 

    Kerry looks like his soul is dying.

    • Me thinks it was dead a LONG time ago!  "Unfit" fits him!

    • Tish, The man has no soul, that died back before Viet Nam.

      • Old Rooster,

        Yeah, in a matter of speaking you're right.  

This reply was deleted.

Activity

Oldrooster published an article
Declaration of Independence: A Transcription
Note: The following text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and punctuation reflects the original.

In Congress, July 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have…
2 hours ago
Oldrooster published an article
2 hours ago
Tricia Cornwall is now a member of PatriotsForAmerica
3 hours ago
Oldrooster replied to Clois Beckwith's discussion Under General Settings > Keywords
"OK, I see it. That's fine, good.
 "
6 hours ago
Oldrooster replied to Clois Beckwith's discussion Under General Settings > Keywords
"OK, But you've got me. What listing?
 "
6 hours ago
Clois Beckwith posted a discussion
I added "amendments" to the listing, Rooster
6 hours ago
wayne smyly left a comment on Survival ideas
"Thanks  Ole Rooster  very good information"
12 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
12 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
13 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
13 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
"Survival is all about being able to find food, shelter, and how to fight back.Remember Sun ZU said an Army moves on it's stomach. Which means in order to fight when you get there you have to  be able too.And a starving Army wont put up much of a fight.
 "
14 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
14 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
14 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
14 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
14 hours ago
Oldrooster left a comment on Survival ideas
15 hours ago
More…