Constitutional Emergency

"Looks like more trouble for us." 
Jim
 
The Full Article Here: http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015


U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to
force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By
signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

We are being led like a lamb to the slaughter (Socialism/Dictatorship).


Views: 7305

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

When will the war begin is the only remaining question to be answered if this passes and if congress does not stop this president.

Wouldn't that be your responsibility to VET your own posts? Oh well, when you get mad and throw another tantrum, you can just start another page  to moderate and let this one go like the last 3 you took over.

ALL: I know the congress,senate and most of US State Department doesn't follow the U S Constitttion. 

Simply put ANY treaty is not equal to or above the US Constitution. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2

[The President] shall have Power, by and with Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur...
 
The Supremecy Clause says.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
"treaties are UNDER the authority of the United States".   JMHO.
 
 
. In the 1950s, a Constitutional Amendment known as the Bricker Amendment was proposed in response to such fears. This proposed amendment would have mandated that all American treaties shall not conflict with the manifest powers granted to the Federal Government. Subsequent Federal court cases such as Seery v. United States, 127 F. Supp. 601 (Court of Claims, 1955), Diggs v. Schultz, 470 F.2d 461 (1972), and Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) have, over the course of time, established in legal decisions most of the limitations that had been proposed by the Bricker Amendment
 
LASTLY.. A illegal law is not law at all.  Don't take or follow illegal orders.  Oathkeepers.org
 

ALL of congress needs to be replaced by patriots.

FEMA camps filled with millions of coffins are not necessary.

Human transporter vehicles are not the norm.

tora, tora, tora.

When I received this alert, I could not open the original article.  I have sense have been able to open it, and see it is dated Oct. 14, 2009.  But it does state:  "It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012."  Since it reports the goal is to negotiate a treaty in 2012, we have to be watchful.  The only option I have at this time is to talk with U.S. Senators.  I will have to look at other options as things develop.

When I began reading this article I said to myself, even though the democrats are not the sharpest tools in the shed they would know better than to try and confiscate all our guns by any means. Then I began to think about all of the EO's and the way they pushed through the healthcare reform law, how Obama has made the statements about the constitution being outdated and a bother, and I realized that yes they may would actually attempt something like this. All I can say is, may God have mercy on their poor souls, because I and many others will not have any on their azzes.

What would we do if that happened?  I don't think such a law would survive the scrutiny of the supreme court, but if it did, what should we do?  I for one will never surrender arms.  I will hide them, make them, carry them and encourage others to do the same.  This isn't out of some kind of stubborn, red-neck rebellion, but rather for the good of the country.  An armed public creates much more stability than is credited.  The armed public isn't killing people.  Remove the suicides from the statistics and the criminals and where is the gun problem?  Certainly it is not with the common man or woman carrying a weapon!

I feel if this is enacted, and the rule of law/Constitution is so bypassed, ignored and degraded that there is nothing left by which the citizens need abide as regards illegally inacted laws, appointed czars and international treaty (s) overwhich we have no ability to comment or veto. Leaves a lot of open gates and cut fences.

Fred, what are you going to do, if the elections are cancelled and/or Martial Law is implemented before the elections? Or if the government is successful in destroying the Financial sector before the elections?

You had better be preparing now for outright civil war, in case this happens and decide which side of the coin you are on.

 

 

Here is a bit of good news...Breitbart has a bit of paper...from the literary agents for Obamas book...1991?...Obama says he was born in Kenya! www.breitbart.com

 

Remove the Imposter Obama!

 

Our Covenant has been broken. We must renew with God and stand for him and against evil.

I take their Gun Treaty as a declaration of war against the American people. They started this, but who will end it.

Divine PROTECTION is ours, I pray.

RSS

About

Old Rooster created this Ning Network.

This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Fox News

Tech Notes

Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11



HOW TO JOIN YOUR STATE GROUP

1. Click on State Groups tab at the top of the page.
2. Find your State Flag
3. Click on Flag.
4. Look for link to join Your State Group near the top of the State Groups page.
5. Click on it.

Follow the Prompts


How to post "live" URL in posts at PFA............. Adding URLs in blog posts that are not "live" is a waste of everyone's time.....
Here's how....if anyone has better guidance send to me.....
First........type your text entry into the post block to include typing or paste the URL you want us to view........when finished with the text, highlight and copy the URL in the text.......then click the "add hyperlink" tool in the B, I, U box just above the text entry, after clicking, a window will open asking for the URL...paste the URL in the box and click "OK". You have now made the URL "live"...........it shows some code before the post is published, it goes away when you "publish post".......

Events

© 2019   Created by Old Rooster.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service