So does everyone still want to listen to all these prosperity preachers?? Judgement is comming to this Country,Wake up. Our soldiers are in vain so long as we have a REPROBATE COMMANDER AND CHIEF. Maybe it's time to listen to these gloom and doom preachers and prophets. Now, all that is left is for interpol to flex its muscles. And futher more I have no Idea what Obama means by saying,"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America....."
This is Complete Treason, we are being stabbed in the back by our own president,and sold out by just like the African's sold out their own people to become slaves. This is also a slap in the face to our law because this action declares our law to be inaddequite.
The Sheriffs of all States( Counties) ,along with State Troopers,can stop this, Interpol is a foriegn U.N.police force and has NO Juricdiction on United States Soil,NO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ,can kick your door down without a warrant or search warrant,nor can they hym you up and kick the crap out of you or abuse you after you have been arresed( all though there are many they would like to.),Evidentually obama likes violance as he has given these power hungry communist thugs the right to over ride any authority Law Enforcement has,We shall see when they come slideing down the horn,sure could be a mad Bull at the end of that horn,called U.S.A.citizens.
P.S.,if there is any time left, get your make my day and stand your ground Laws passed or inforced,these are legal ligitimate Laws,they give you the right to use leathal force if you feel your life is in jeapordy,or the lives of your family or your property,it is your right,then let the courts decide on the out come of your actions,they will have to prove you were not in fear .
President Obama's Executive Order EO 12425 put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution, beyond the legal reach of our own top law enforcement. Why is Obama allowing foreign law enforcement to operate free of safeguards that historically protected U. S. Citizens until now? Most importantly Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure." That appears the KEY:
Since the Patriot Act passed several European Countries have entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the United States. Now consider in 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by the government to prosecute U.S. Citizens. At issue are millions of illegal wiretaps prohibited by the Fourth Amendment from being used in courts. The Fourth Amendment would appear now thrashed when you consider Obama’s recent Executive order granted INTERPOL an exemption from the Fourth Amendment. After the Patriot Act passed: Several European Countries Entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the United States. Obama’s executive order will now allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal investigations. In 2004, former Attorney General John Ashcroft asked government prosecutors to review thousands of old intelligence files including wiretaps to retrieve information prosecutors could use in “ordinary” criminal prosecutions. That was shortly after a court case lowered a barrier that blocked prosecutors from using certain illegal-wire tap evidence in Justice Dept. “Intelligence Files” to prosecute ordinary crimes: that evidence may also be used by governments to prosecute civil asset forfeitures. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or asset forfeiture. See: http://www.securityfocus.com/news/5452
Considering that court case, it might be possible for NSA to share its recent electronic-domestic-spying with countless U.S. police agencies; and foreign police, including government contracted--companies and private individuals that have security clearances to facilitate seizing Americans’ property—-to keep part of the bounty. It appears Obama’s executive order with INTERPOL knocked down the last barrier, the Fourth Amendment.
There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.” Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. In the U.S. private security companies and their operatives work so closely with law enforcement to forfeit property—providing intelligence information, they appear to merge with police.
Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws. Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share assets seized from Americans with U.S. police agencies.
Under the USA Patriot Act, witnesses can be kept hidden while being paid part of the assets they cause to be forfeited. The Patriot Act specifically mentions using Title 18USC asset forfeiture laws: those laws include a provision in Rep. Henry Hyde’s 2000 bill HR 1658—for “retroactive civil asset forfeiture” of “assets already subject to government forfeiture”, meaning "property already tainted by crime" provided “that property” was already part of or “later connected” to a criminal investigation in progress" when HR.1658 passed. That can apply to more than two hundred federal laws and violations.
To help protect Americans from police forfeiture abuse, Congress should pass legislation that raises the standard of evidence Government uses for Civil Asset Forfeiture from a mere “Preponderance of Evidence”, to “Clear and Convincing Evidence.
Replies
This is Complete Treason, we are being stabbed in the back by our own president,and sold out by just like the African's sold out their own people to become slaves. This is also a slap in the face to our law because this action declares our law to be inaddequite.
Since the Patriot Act passed several European Countries have entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the United States. Now consider in 2008 Telecoms were granted government immunity after they helped U.S. Government spy on millions of Americans’ electronic communications. U.S. Government never disclosed what happened to NSA’s millions of collected emails, faxes and phone call information that belong to U.S. Citizens? Neither Congress nor the courts—determined what NSA electronic surveillance could be used by police or introduced into court by the government to prosecute U.S. Citizens. At issue are millions of illegal wiretaps prohibited by the Fourth Amendment from being used in courts. The Fourth Amendment would appear now thrashed when you consider Obama’s recent Executive order granted INTERPOL an exemption from the Fourth Amendment. After the Patriot Act passed: Several European Countries Entered into Asset Forfeiture Sharing Agreements with the United States. Obama’s executive order will now allow U.S. police to circumvent the Fourth Amendment by working with INTERPOL in criminal investigations. In 2004, former Attorney General John Ashcroft asked government prosecutors to review thousands of old intelligence files including wiretaps to retrieve information prosecutors could use in “ordinary” criminal prosecutions. That was shortly after a court case lowered a barrier that blocked prosecutors from using certain illegal-wire tap evidence in Justice Dept. “Intelligence Files” to prosecute ordinary crimes: that evidence may also be used by governments to prosecute civil asset forfeitures. Police too easily can take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or asset forfeiture. See: http://www.securityfocus.com/news/5452
Considering that court case, it might be possible for NSA to share its recent electronic-domestic-spying with countless U.S. police agencies; and foreign police, including government contracted--companies and private individuals that have security clearances to facilitate seizing Americans’ property—-to keep part of the bounty. It appears Obama’s executive order with INTERPOL knocked down the last barrier, the Fourth Amendment.
There are over 200 U.S. laws and violations mentioned in the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 and the Patriot Act that can subject property to civil asset forfeiture.” Under federal civil forfeiture laws, a person or business need not be charged with a crime for government to forfeit their property. In the U.S. private security companies and their operatives work so closely with law enforcement to forfeit property—providing intelligence information, they appear to merge with police.
Rep. Henry Hyde’s bill HR 1658 passed, the “Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000” and effectively eliminated the “statue of limitations” for Government Civil Asset Forfeiture. The statute now runs five years from when police allege they “learned” that an asset became subject to forfeiture. With such a weak statute of limitations and the low standard of civil proof needed for government to forfeit property “A preponderance of Evidence”, it is problematic INTERPOL working with U.S. law enforcement and private contractors will want access to telecom/NSA and other government wiretaps perhaps illegal, to secure evidence to arrest Americans and or civilly forfeit their homes, inheritances and businesses under Title 18USC and other laws. Thanks to Obama, U.S. Police can now use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to share assets seized from Americans with U.S. police agencies.
Under the USA Patriot Act, witnesses can be kept hidden while being paid part of the assets they cause to be forfeited. The Patriot Act specifically mentions using Title 18USC asset forfeiture laws: those laws include a provision in Rep. Henry Hyde’s 2000 bill HR 1658—for “retroactive civil asset forfeiture” of “assets already subject to government forfeiture”, meaning "property already tainted by crime" provided “that property” was already part of or “later connected” to a criminal investigation in progress" when HR.1658 passed. That can apply to more than two hundred federal laws and violations.
To help protect Americans from police forfeiture abuse, Congress should pass legislation that raises the standard of evidence Government uses for Civil Asset Forfeiture from a mere “Preponderance of Evidence”, to “Clear and Convincing Evidence.