TED CRUZ IS IN THE US SENATE ILLEGALLY?

 

By J.B. Williams
December 4, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

US Senator Ted Cruz from Texas, has been under fire in his bid for the White House due to his Canadian citizenship records which make it quite clear that he does not meet the Constitutional “natural born Citizen” requirement for the Oval Office, despite the opinion letter from his Harvard friends.

Following a total lack of vetting on Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 and 2012, many insist that no one ever enter the Oval Office again without proper vetting, including proof of meeting all Constitutional requirements for office. Obama’s massive destruction of our Constitutional Republic has placed the issue of Constitutional eligibility on the front burner for many Americans, and partisanship has nothing to do with it.

In the effort to vet every 2016 presidential candidate, Cruz, who had once stated that both he and Barack Obama were ineligible for the Oval Office, found himself under tight scrutiny from the same people who tried to stop Obama from taking the Oval Office via fraud. Ted placed himself in the crosshairs of constitutionalists who do not care about partisan politics, by seeking an office he is not eligible to seek.

In investigating Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office, his eligibility for the US Senate came into question…

The Constitutional requirements for the US Senate are as follows;

“No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

At 42 years old in 2012, Ted Cruz obviously met the age requirement of 30 years. However, he also needed to meet the requirement of at least “nine Years a Citizen of the United States.” As the Constitution states, one cannot be just an “Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”

The known source for the Founders use of the term natural born Citizen, The Law of Nations, also defines “Inhabitant” as follows;

§ 213. Inhabitants.

“The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.”

Today, the legal term for this condition in the United States is “illegal alien,” someone in our country and living under U.S. jurisdiction, without legally Certificate%20of%20Birth.gifbelonging to society. Modern social justice attitudes often refer to these people as “undocumented citizens” which of course are not citizens at all. Our I.R.S. created a new class of “citizen” for the purpose of collecting taxes from illegal aliens, “resident alien” which is an inhabitant (not a citizen) who pays taxes.

Contrary to current leftist social justice ideologies that view all “illegal aliens” in the U.S. as only “unauthorized” or “undocumented” citizens, our laws identify them as nothing more than “illegal aliens,” or “resident aliens” who pay taxes under I.R.S. codes.

Further, in any matter of law, authenticated evidence supersedes any and all politically motivated opinions, especially opinions which are either unfounded or poorly founded. Unlike Barack Hussein Obama who posted three forged U.S. Certifications of Live Birth and later a Hawaiian newspaper announcement of his birth to evidence his Oval Office eligibility, Ted Cruz issued his Canadian Birth Certificate as evidence of being “born a citizen of Canada.”

The above Canadian document is proof of Canadian Citizenship at birth for Certificate.gifSenator Ted Cruz. The next piece of authenticated evidence released by Ted Cruz is a Canadian document proving that he remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing that citizenship in May of 2014, which means, he was still a legal citizen of Canada in 2012 when he ran for, was elected and took the oath of office for the US Senate.

Again, the above authenticated evidence proves that Ted Cruz was born Canadian in 1970 and remained a legal citizen of Canada until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014. These official documents also prove that Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada in 2012, when he sought and claimed a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal US citizen.

As a result of this damning evidence, the Cruz campaign hired friends at Harvard to issue a letter which makes a legal case for how Ted Cruz (and Barack Obama) might be a natural born Citizen of the United States eligible to seek the Oval Office. However, a legal opinion letter is not equal to, nor does it supersede authentic evidence to the contrary.

It is possible for a child to be born outside of the United States, and still acquire legal U.S. citizenship at birth through a parent, according to U.S. Naturalization codes pertaining to “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories.” If the related conditions are met, a child born outside of the United States to one U.S. Citizen parent, in this case, Ted’s mother, the parents can file for and receive U.S. Citizenship for the child by filing a CRBA form with a U.S. Consulate at the time of birth.

The statutes governing this naturalization process state;

“A child born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met. The child’s parents should contact the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate to apply for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America (CRBA) to document that the child is a U.S. citizen. If the U.S. embassy or consulate determines that the child acquired U.S. citizenship at birth, a consular officer will approve the CRBA application and the Department of State will issue a CRBA, also called a Form FS-240, in the child’s name.”

According to related U.S. laws governing “Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories,” the following conditions had to be met in order for Ted Cruz to legally claim U.S. citizenship at birth via these naturalization statutes, through his mother.

The U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14th birthday.

If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:

Serving honorably in the U.S. armed forces;
Employed with the U.S. government; or
Employed with certain international organizations.

Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.

Ted’s parents were at no time serving in the U.S. Armed Forces, employed by the U.S. Government or by any of the certain international organizations, CRBA.gifduring their eight years in Canada, between 1966 and 1974. Further, Ted’s father Rafael, was at no time a legal citizen of the United States prior to naturalizing in 2005, from Canada. Rafael’s known legal citizenship status as of 1970 was Cuban, not American.

This is an EXAMPLE of a US CRBA Form

Unfortunately, there is no evidence to suggest that the parent or parents of Ted Cruz ever filed a CRBA form with the U.S. Government in or around 1970, which is why Ted Cruz released a copy of his Canadian citizenship records and not any U.S. citizenship records. At present, all FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests filed in search of any U.S. citizenship documents to confirm the true official U.S. citizenship status of Ted Cruz have been denied access. All citizenship records for Ted Cruz are sealed unless and until Ted Cruz agrees to allow any such records to be released by either U.S. or Canadian agencies.

As a result, there remains no authentic evidence to support the claims that Ted Cruz is either a “natural born” or “naturalized” citizen of the United States.

Without any form of U.S. Citizenship documentation, and proof of Canadian citizenship at birth in 1970 and holding that legal status until May 2014 when he renounced his birth citizenship to Canada, there is no way for Ted Cruz to prove that he is either “natural born” and eligible for the Oval Office, or “naturalized” prior to 2012, when he sought and accepted a seat in the U.S. Senate as a legal citizen of Canada.

It is unfortunate that a person so many have placed their political faith in has proven willing to defraud his supporters for both votes and millions in campaign donations. But it is better we know now, than after he wins the GOP nomination only to be destroyed by Democrats later, using the same facts and evidence presented here.

What will the people do with this knowledge? Are they really motivated by restoration of Constitutional compliance, or mere political expediency?

© 2015 JB Williams - All Rights Reserved

Click here to visit NewsWithViews.com home page.

email.giffacebook.giftwitter.gifsharethis.gifShare This Article

Click Here For Mass E-mailing

 


JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at: jb.uspu@gmail.com

Web site 1: www.PatriotsUnion.org

Web site 2: www.VeteranDefenders.org

E-Mail: JB.USPU@gmail.com

You need to be a member of PatriotsForAmerica to add comments!

Join PatriotsForAmerica

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • "The circumstances of Cruz’s birth have fueled a simmering debate over his eligibility to run for president. Knowingly or not, dual citizenship is an apparent if inconvenient truth for the tea party firebrand, who shows every sign he's angling for the White House. “Senator Cruz became a U.S. citizen at birth, and he never had to go through a naturalization process after birth to become a U.S. citizen,” said spokeswoman Catherine Frazier. “To our knowledge, he never had Canadian citizenship.”

    That was in 2013. Catherine Frazier was Cruz's mouthpiece at the time. I had to take a double look at her comment, "To our knowledge, he never had Canadian citizenship". Really, Ms. Frazier? You made that statement August 18, 2013, at the same time the past Chairman of Canada's Citizenship and Immigration Section said Cruz was Canadian.

    Ted Cruz to renounce Canadian citizenship 'soon', January 5, 2014: "Canada-born U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has yet to renounce his birth country's citizenship as promised — but a spokeswoman says the conservative tea party favourite plans to finish the process soon. Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for the junior senator from Texas, said Saturday that lawyers are preparing the necessary paperwork."

    Oh, my. In August 2013, Catherine Frazier said Cruz had never held Canadian citizenship. However, less than five months later Cruz's lawyers are preparing the paperwork for Cruz to renounce his Canadian citizenship. I wonder if Ms. Frazier practices the art of lying in front of a mirror? She certainly has a good role model in Ted Cruz.

    Supporters of Cruz and Rubio either don't want to hear the truth or simply don't care. Activists in states like New Hampshire and South Carolina who have attended many of their events send me email at how frustrating it is when they ask supporters why they don't seem to care their candidate is not constitutionally eligible? Responses vary from Ted Cruz is a lawyer, he knows the law and says the law is well settled to "Buzz off birther. No one cares what you have to say".

    - See more at: http://www.rense.com/general96/texrepub_dev.html#sthash.eBOQuajs.dpuf

    And so goes the tea party, that's why I left 6 years ago. I saw the infighting right from the get go. The tea party does not stand on principle, it stands on anything goes so long as we get our favorite elected. 

  • Who's job is it to check that the candidates meet the special criteria anyways?

    Can they be fired from ofg ice or service
    • In Arizona it is the responsibility of our candidates that at the time of filing, they attest that they have met the qualifications for office under A.R.S. 16-311 sub section D. and E. respectively.

      Our statewide and legislative candidates qualifications and petitions can be challenged by an elector through the superior court under A.R.S 16-351 

      This is the message I received from the Secretary of State's Office which primarily is a filing agency for our candidates. 

      So to answer your question, in my opinion, no one checks the eligibility of candidates place on the ballet.

      Do you interpret the challenge can be made by only statewide and legislative candidates? So if a Federal candidate is put on the ballot it can't be challenged?

      • There is an official statement that is sent to all the states, certifying that the candidate is eligible and each State signs off on it. In the Muslim-in-Chief's case, whoever was to sign in HI (Governor?) refused and Nancy Pelosi signed it instead. They also changed the verbiage of the document after the fact. I can't remember off the top of my head where I read that but will see if I have saved it somewhere. If I can find it, I will post it.

        EDIT: Ok, found the document:
        Yes, "precedent" has been set. I will try to find the article but I read more than once that the actual form given to the States' does NOT state that the DNC has found him to be eligible - underhanded word-smithing going on there!
        EDIT: Did a cursory search and found the following:
        http://www.theobamafile.com/_e...
        EXCERPT:
        The proper legal text used on the DNC Party "Official Certification of Nomination" document reads as follows;
        "THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."
        The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.
        However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of Obama and Biden.
        Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, that those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these "certified" candidates on the ballot.
        This is the legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket:
        "THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively."
        The reference to Obama’s constitutional eligibility is missing. It had been removed from the document sent to the states.
        The bogus version is in the Election Commission files of all fifty state Election Commission offices, and state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication.
        • So the Arizona Secretary of State 2008 received a certification from the Democrat National Committee, not an attestation from the candidate that he/she was eligible to run for the president of the United States and if anyone wanted to challenge him/her being on the ballot they would have to challenge that candidate with the Arizona Superior court. In my opinion the Arizona Secretary of State accepted the candidate being placed on the ballot without his/her certification.  How would we go about finding that DNC certification? 

  •  Seeing how I am from England, I do know more of this man, then most, he is a Member of Parliament of the United Kingdom and corrected to the United Nations. Understanding why England is so hell bent on controlling you, is for most to understand.

    8143103463?profile=original

    • OBozo is a criminal. He belongs in prison. 

      • No doubt Paul Rarey , Hidden from many is the fact Ted Cruz, also because of birth rights of the Crown, he may hold seat of Parliament in Canada.Obama First US President To Chair UN Security Council and Ted Cruz knows About but failed to inform you guys ?

         Now to connect the dots for this NAFTA to TPA and TPP:https://www.google.com/search?q=how+obama+can+be+president+and+hold...

        8143200475?profile=original

        Paul Rarey's Discussions
        Paul Rarey's Discussions | This effort is focused on sacrifice to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreig…
This reply was deleted.
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Can Donald Trump still win the Eelctoral College votes?
Right now USA-Today has Joe Biden winning 306 EC votes, and President Trump winning only 232.
That's a 38 vote swing that Trump and the Republicans need to manage somehow. Pennsulvania has 20,…
24 minutes ago
Oldrooster commented on Oldrooster's article Computer operating systems
"Here's a couple of ways to start with if you're interested in upgrading to Linux Mint.
https://linuxmint.com/
https://forums.linuxmint.com/ ,,,,,, A Linus Mint Forum
https://community.linuxmint.com/ , And a Linux Mint Community."
20 hours ago
Oldrooster published an article
Are you still paying and supporting Bill Gates?
 
What computer operating system are you using?
In today’s world of computers and operating systems there are several choices available and open to all users.
Apple IOS is the choice for anyone…
yesterday
Oldrooster replied to Clois Beckwith's discussion General Flynn
"In addition to arresting the full staff and owners of these fake-news networks Trump and the US Military need to arrest the top level heads of the FBI, DOJ, and several judges and prosecutors around the country.And that includes that judge sulllivan…"
yesterday
Clois Beckwith posted a discussion
 
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/12/ret-gen-michael-flynn-twee...
 
 






Home
About
Mobile App
Opinion
World…
yesterday
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Exclusive: 3-Star General McInerney Calls For Martial Law, Tribunals & Investigation of Treason with Host Brannon Howse and guests General McInerney, NSA Whistleblower Kirk Wiebe and National Intelligence Author Mary Fanning …
Thursday
Oldrooster posted a discussion
December 2nd, 2020. President Donald Trump has released a video on voter and election fraud.
President Trump speaks
 
Thursday
Oldrooster replied to Oldrooster's discussion Welcome to the United Nations
"So what could go wrong there?
Report: U.N. Climate Projects Swamped with Fraud, Corruption Allegations
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is facing allegations of fraud and corruption linked to the multibillion-dollar Global Environment…"
Wednesday
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Well that didn't take very long. Biden isn't even formally declared to be the President-Elect yet and he's already selling us out to the United Nations.Why wait until he's inaugrated as president, that's just a bothersom formaity. One of those…
Wednesday
john Holmgren left a comment on Survival ideas
"Thank you so much Rooster you're an awesome man...i'll watch these videos. thanks again."
Wednesday
Oldrooster published an article
Declaration of Independence: A Transcription
Note: The following text is a transcription of the Stone Engraving of the parchment Declaration of Independence (the document on display in the Rotunda at the National Archives Museum.) The spelling and…
Wednesday
Oldrooster published an article
Wednesday
Oldrooster replied to Clois Beckwith's discussion Under General Settings > Keywords
"OK, I see it. That's fine, good.
 "
Wednesday
Oldrooster replied to Clois Beckwith's discussion Under General Settings > Keywords
"OK, But you've got me. What listing?
 "
Wednesday
Clois Beckwith posted a discussion
I added "amendments" to the listing, Rooster
Wednesday
wayne smyly left a comment on Survival ideas
"Thanks  Ole Rooster  very good information"
Tuesday
More…