January 12, 2016

Anna Von Reitz wrote:

For those who have been attempting to "look me up" among the Bar Association Members in Alaska or searching for my face among the judges of the Administrative and Admiralty Courts ---you won't find me or any of the other Common Law or Federal (Postal District instead of US District) Judges in those locations, because we are part of the Land Courts and they are part of the Corporate and Maritime Courts.
There are three(3) Court Systems in America: (1) Common Law; (2) Administrative Law; (3) Maritime/Admiralty (which includes Martial Law).
Common Law is the Law of the Land, which includes the Organic Law of this Country---- The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitutions (1787) and (1789- 1791), plus the Public Law, the United States Statutes-at-Large. This is all "Land Law" affecting "Land Assets", which includes people, livestock, houses, barns, etc., etc., And this is why Amendment VII specifically requires Common Law regarding all important decisions regarding people and their property interests.
Our Common Law Courts came here with the first Colonists and have continued to function for over 400 years despite all efforts of the Bar Associations to get rid of them. That's because Bar Members can't work in Common Law Courts in America---- it is forbidden by our Constitution because Bar Members hold a title from a foreign government ("Esquire" from Britain----) and no such conflict of interest is allowed.
Therefore, no Common Law Judges, such as myself, are Bar Members. We don't appear as Bar Members and we don't appear as members of the Administrative or Maritime/Admiralty Courts as a result.
And here is a big, fat "Duh!" for all those who have been rampaging around "exposing" what they don't know, and claiming to "know for certain" that I am a "fake" and listening to Bar Association Members who have an ax to grind because they are in competition with the Common Law Courts actually required by our Constitution.
The same Bar Association Members who have been acting in treasonous disregard of the Organic Law of this country and who are about to get served their cajones on toast, with or without croutons, have been trying to avoid the facts for decades, but the persistent Truth has a way of dispelling oceans of Shinola. Read Amendment VII and realize that according to Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, there is no Federal "General Common Law" which means the ONLY form of "common law" in the Federale's kit-bag is Martial Common Law, which they have been applying improperly to us "non-resident aliens" and "non-combatant civilians" and using as a means to usurp jurisdiction owed to the landlords.
Thank you, very much. Applause and donations are due to me, but especially to John Trowbridge today.
All the Gurus who think I am kidding are about to not only get the smiles wiped from their faces, but their butts relocated to their occipital domes.

And all you Bar Members out there---- better start gathering around burn barrels in the public squares---- bring your Bar Cards.
---------------------------------  

For the Boyz in the Ba-El Hood:
This goes out to Larry Becraft who has chosen the unfortunate group name "Kill the Gurus" while he continues to present himself as such, for Dougie-You-Know-Who-You-Are-But-It-Does-Not-Matter, and Bob Hurt (is that your real name?) and all the other Alphonses out there who want to "expose" me as a "fake" and "denounce" me, blah-blah-blah.....
Hey, fellas, it's part of my mission to teach people to think for themselves.
1. If I am a "fake" and don't know what I am talking about, how is it that nobody has tried to arrest me for impersonating a Judge after three years?
2. Maybe it is the same reason I haven't paid "income taxes" for twenty years and all of you have?
Mark Twain was right--- it would be easier to defraud you than to show you how you've been defrauded.

You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!

Join The Patriots For America

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I am not just here to be contrary, so please do not take offense.
    I first came here because I was fascinated by the Terry Trussell case.
    As I delve further and further into these things, it is becoming apparent to anyone with an unbiased and open view that all of this 'sovereign citizen' talk is nonsense and does not apply to the real world.
    It seems to be deliberate, possibly even malicious, but nearly always self-serving gibberish based on deliberate, possibly even malicious, but nearly always self-serving misunderstanding of some not-even that complex legal situations.
    There is no secret bar attorney pledge, and it makes no difference if a flag has fringe on it in a courtroom, and if they refer to you IN ALL CAPS or not. It's nonsense people. I know dozens of attorneys and they laugh at me if I ask them about this. And it's not because of some 'we can't tell anyone' secret pledge - it's because it IS laughable.
    You are, of course, free to think what you like about what I say, or even me - I don't really care.
    I just don't like people being mislead in this way to start driving without a license or paying your taxes, or declaring yourself a judge or jury. Please mark my words - the Terry Trussell case will not turn out to his liking.
    It's not the real world - it's a fantasy being perpetuated upon those that don't understand.
    And eventually it will catch up with you:
    https://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InternetOrders/DocumentViewer.aspx?Index...
    She's not a judge, ad frankly I find a lot of what she says thoroughly nuts [from her letter to the Pope:

    2. We have the technology to control and seal the cascade nuclear reactions in Japan and can prevent similar disasters in the Marshal Islands and elsewhere;
    3. We have the means to quiet and forestall earthquakes on a planetary basis;

    This world she envisions is not reality.
    This is Alex Jones level stuff, and while Alex is entertaining, he's pretty much wrong about EVERYTHING and always has been. As one of my friends say: He has predicted 22 of the last 2 financial meltdowns.
    Respectfully, Peace be with you.

  • The common law grand jury is valid as confirmed by Justice Scalia.
    I think the smart thing for the government to do is to bring and end to this conflict before the locals get an education in the Justice system to see how corrupt it is. The corruption isn't fantasy it's a historical fact. As Justice Scalia has stated "It is the fourth branch of the Government". Shhhh... Don't tell anyone, they might wake up!
  • I'd like to also add that all who think that Anna is incorrect or any others of us in our statements on the corruption of our legal system since the founding of the Nation to show by "Facts" historical or prior court cases or by judicial records where hers or our statements are incorrect. For instance words or names being in Caps or not make no differance in their definitions, please confirm your believes by facts as many have shown that they do change the definitions and the "Wordsmiths" have use it to decieved the people and it has been shown here, on OAS and other sites over the years. What we need to see are facts not opinions and I have yet to see anyone refute Anna's statements or others who know the Common Law system with facts. So, the balls in your court.
  • Mathias Andreweld,,,,,,,,, I agree with Michael Regan on this much;
    The common law grand jury is valid as confirmed by Justice Scalia.   --------------------

    The corruption isn't fantasy it's a historical fact. As Justice Scalia has stated "It is the fourth branch of the Government". -----------------     Shhhh... Don't tell anyone, they might wake up!

    I believe in documented truth, proven FACTS,, those things that can NOT be denied or questioned.
    I am also very very sceptical about all that other stuff we have heard about the Constitution being re-written for a "Corporation of the USA" which only applies to Washington D.C. (the 10 square miles of the city limits, stuff).

    And also all that stuff about the gold fringe around the Flag in a court room. That stuff makes me very sceptical to say the least. 

    So why should I believe the Common Law is our first and primary rule of law, and that it is still in existence?
    I take a simple approach to the question:
    What kind of laws did the early settlers use BEFORE the American revolution? Those were what they referred to as  the "Laws of Nature", "The Laws of the universe". The laws derived from both the Magna Carta and also from writings of the Founding Fathers that pre-date the Constitution. Those are what we now refer to as Common Law. (The law of the people.)

    I think all we have to do is read the Constitution to see that the Founding Fathers believed in those "Common Laws", and in their existence.

    Secondly, - We The People ----- Ordained that Constitution,,,,,,,,, And THROUGH the Constitution we formed a new Government. That in it self says that any laws written by the government had to have come down AFTER the Government was formed and AFTER We The People created that government. (Kinda stands to reason there).

    In addition to all that Common Sense rhetoric we also know that in or around 1949 the Justice Department re-wrote and issued a "New set of "Rules" for the US Justice department. And that they systematically avoided any mention of Common Law and in fact attempted to eliminate it by means of omission. ( I wrote about this in another thread here a few days ago). They in effect wrote it OUT of the law books simply by leaving out any mention of it.
    Common Law has not been mentioned or taught in any of our law schools or books since that time. And therefore we are lead to believe that it doesn't exist.
    I think the truth of the matter really is that when We The People ordained the Constitution and thus created the Government they (we) never deleted or eliminated our own laws or any of our rights. The Justice department has done that for us. And in so doing the justice department deleted and eliminated all access to the courts by the People themselves.

    The results are that the courts and the justice system now belong exclusively to the lawyers and the judges. The people no longer have any say in what rules or laws are.

  • Old Rooster I don't want to hog all the conversation on this but I just have a few points. First of all your reply was well stated and that's because it is rooted in historical FACT. Your last paragraph proves my statement that the courts will not acknowledge the common law grand jury, they can't!! They are between a rock and a hard place that's why're is this is going to be interesting. If they acknowledge it they will be exposed as the frauds they are. If they don't they have to explain why not and they can't because they took over the legal system through fraud and deciet. They have to explain why the Common Law System is no longer valid and they can't constitutionaly do that. They have to continue in their lie and every level of the court up to the Supreme Court will have to go along with the lie. If that happens my question is what is our recourse then?
    • Don't worry about "hogging" the thread Michael, You're exactly right. The courts can NOT acknowledge the Common Law system, because if they ever do, just as you say, that will expose their lies and treachery, and secondly it will open the courts rooms to the people. THAT will result in a whole lot of politicians and elected or appointed officials going to prison.
      What is our recourse if they refuse?

      The third box for one thing.

    • Old Rooster... I agree and if the courts will not allow the people access to perform within the legal system through the Common Law Process which is our Constitutional Right then the use of the 3rd box would be appropriate. Another thing, did you find it interesting that according to that article you posted this Judge was being accompanied by two US Marshals? I'm wondering why.
      They have plenty of FBI and local law enforsement on site. I know people who have been under the protection of the U.S. Marshal Service when their life was in imminent danger. Just wondering why the Marshal Service is involved.
This reply was deleted.