Yankeemom introduced me to Mark Alerxander's writings....I'm so thankful she did!
Thursday, January 12, 2012·
"[T]ake care that the laws be faithfully executed ... support the Constitution ... faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and ... preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." --Article II Section 1, 3, the Constitution of the United States
This is no "typical" election year, a point lost for the most part by Republican presidential candidates and obscured by the national media. This just accounts for the fact that a substantial majority of conservatives voters (both Republicans andIndependents) have yet to approve of anyone on the current slate, and consequently, tell pollsters they prefer "other."
What Beltway political advisers and pundits fail to grasp is that the 2012 federal electionswill have enormous ramifications upon the future of our Republic and upon prospects for sustaining Liberty through our current national government structure. That structure, now severely destabilized, is a mere shadow of what the Founding Fathers envisioned and enshrined in our Constitution.
Treating this election cycle as anything less than the critical historical tipping point it is thereby dishonors the enormous sacrifice of blood and treasure that generations of American Patriotshave sacrificed in support and defense of our Constitution.
Sadly, the Republican presidential contenders are still running plays out of an antiquated and self-destructive political attack playbook. They do so at great cost, both financially andto the ultimate objective of defeating Barack Hussein Obama.
The beneficiaries of this primary season's Republican rancor are, once again, the mainstream media, the plethora of pollsters and, of course, the Democrat Party. Meanwhile, Obama does not have a primary opponent (other than the economy), and thus is building an enormous political war chest for the upcoming general campaign.
While it will require many election cycles to undo the severe political injuries inflicted upon our Republic by generations of Leftists, the restorative process began in earnest with the 2010 midterm election of many "Tea Party" candidates -- those who rallied grassroots voters around restorative constitutional campaigns. We have a protracted and arduous fight to turn back the tides of Democratic Socialism -- and time is noton our side.
Though congressional elections are important, and conservatives are making significant headway in the Legislative Branch, it is election of the next Chief Executive that will most determine whether we restore Rule of Law, or our nation succumbs to the fatal cycle of democracy, further submitting to authoritarian government rule and plunging into the gaping abyss of socialism.
(Notably, the U.S. has dropped from 9th to 10th place in the just-released 2012 Index of Economic Freedom.)
Though The Patriot Post devotes substantial energy and resources to evaluate candidates, we do not endorse presidential candidates until the general election. However, given all we have learned about the current field of Republicans, there is one candidate we could endorse and fully support.
Unfortunately, that candidate exists only as a composite of the best attributes from each of the actual candidates.
This amalgamated profile is important because it encompasses the qualities that all Patriots seek in candidates for federal office. Thus, what follows is a collection of winning conservative attributes, which, in some measure each of the current GOP candidates possesses, with the exception of one.*
The best candidate for the job is devoted to Liberty as endowed by our Creator and enshrined in our Constitution. He (because the remaining candidates are male) is a man of strong faith, is devoted to his family and has served his nation in uniform with honor. He has a good record of executive leadership, both in the private sector and government. He is an effective advocate for free enterprise, limited government and tax reform. He is smart, articulate, charismatic, experienced and a great debater with a remarkable sense of history. He has an outstanding comprehension of complex domestic and foreign policy matters. He bases his positions on constructionist logic, not political expediency, and is bold in his vision for our nation. He is salt of the earth from an strong family. He has formative ties to the renaissance of American conservatism launched by Ronald Reagan.
Of course, it would also be instructive to develop a composite based upon all the negative attributes of the contenders, but the GOP circular firing squad is already doing a fine job of promoting their liabilities.
As our ideal presidential candidate is not among the current lot, we must all vote for the primary candidate who most closely embodies him. I would encourage every Patriot to ignore the meaningless Iowa caucus and more so, the New Hampshire primary, as that former conservative stronghold is now little more than a political suburb of Boston. (Oh, but that we would have all primaries on a single day, rather than defaulting to the victors of minuscule Iowa and New Hampshire primaries, neither of which are substantially representative of grassroots conservatives across the nation. But a national primary day would put the choice in the hands of the people, rather than the GOP establishment and the 24-hour news cycle talkingheads.)
All other candidate attributes notwithstanding, we should, first and foremost, demand that every candidate, and president, affirm Rule of Law in compliance with their Sacred Oathto Support and Defend our Constitution.
In the words of Justice Joseph Story, "No man can well doubt the propriety of placing a president of the United States under the most solemn obligations to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. It is a suitable pledge of his fidelity and responsibility to his country; and creates upon his conscience a deep sense of duty, by an appeal, at once in the presence of God and man, to the most sacred and solemn sanctions, which can operate upon the human mind."
Our single focus must be to defeat Obama, and frankly, I would fully endorse a turnip in order to achieve that objective.
*Jon Huntsman's best attribute is that he is a superlative example of what notto support in a Republican candidate, as affirmed by his strong performance ahead of Gingrich, Santorum and Perry in the New Hampshire primary, where centrist Independents and Democrats outnumbered Republican voters.
I have researched Ron Paul myself. I have even gone to his own site . I have researched his voting record, and I don't want him as a candidate nor as a President!! I'm not one who blindly reads one thing then jumps on the band wagon. I have followed Ron Paul for many years. To me, he talks out of both sides of his mouth. Research videos of his speeches though out the years. Ron Paul, to me, has "strange bed fellows". Take the time and energy to really research, because apparently you haven't done enough, if you would call this writing "myths". Course that's just my opinion, which no one is required to go along with, but the majority of people here, do their own research to verify facts. I've not seen "sheep" here. Just Patriots, seeking and spreading the truth.
Go to his site and listen to his videos. Go to u-tube listen to his video speeches. Google his voting record. Do your research. Very few of us here read one article and the jump on a band wagon. We do our own research -- at least I do!! I spend hours everyday (and nights of insomnia) researching candidates, things the government does illegally, things they sneak into bills that should never be allowed, Also research who writes and sponsors bills that you might not like. You might find it's not who you think. Rather than argue with other Patriots here, do your research. You ask that we give you facts and point your way to them. Be an independent thinker and find out the facts for your self. Then if you wish to present your facts -- feel free to do so. But the facts in this article are well spelled out and very easy to verify. Not arguing just saying -- All Americans are in for a bad war if Obama gets re-elected, and a third party will do just that.
Keep your friends close but your enemies closer?
If anyone has cause and ability to see Ron Paul assassinated who would that be? Better to face them while leaving a good trail.
That Soros connection is really skimpy, is that the best you can come up with?
Twana, you can bring a horse some water but you cannot make it drink, especially if it needs a "doctor".
Good luck appealing to "patriots" while alienating Ron Paul supporters. I can't believe you stooped so low to attack his supporters. Do you really think that strategy will work?
You condemn me for not being willing to change (when all I did was call that one attack "skimpy"), then you say in the next paragraph that you will NEVER... Looks like you are the one who is "no different than talking with Obama supporters."
You are so right in what you have said here. The above shows what happens when there is a third party. This comes from Wikipedia. This is what I'm afraid will happen with Ron Paul. I also fear, since he won't win in the primary,, he will run as a third party candidate, History has a way of repeating its self and if this happens we will have Obama for 4 years or indefinitely as a dictator. I PLEAD WITH ALL OF THE RON PAUL SUPPORTERS TO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN. PLEASE SUPPORT THE CANDIDATE WHO GETS THE NOMINATION. A THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE CANNOT WIN, ONLY CAUSE ANOTHER TO LOSE AND OBAMA TO RULE!
the democratic party broke-up The Democratic-Republican Party almost as soon as The Founders took in their last breath... the republican party IS the third party, therefore for the long term it cannot win... the third reich beat them to it.
What you are doing is BS and you know it. Twana doesn't need me to come to her defense but I'm going to do it anyway...
Are there some Patriots that have fallen for the Rob Paul hype? Yep. Are their numbers so huge that they would change an outcome? Very doubtful. The truth is that Ron Paul supporters come from very questionable corners of America, and unfortunately some Patriots have gotten caught-up in the hype that has been built around him.
Let me give you a "did you know" rundown...
Something that I recently learned was info that came from one of the two major newspapers in Boston. I honestly forget which one. I was watching an early morning interview with one of the Fox News talking heads and the Political Editor of the Boston Paper who's name I forget. The conversation was NOT about Ron Paul, it was more about the New Hampshire Primary in general. The politics Editor was talking about things they glean from the elections in the NE during Presidential election years. One piece of info was very interesting concerning Ron Paul.
Back in 2008 after the election was over, the Newspaper commissioned a study to see why certain voting blocks voted the way they did. Keep in mind that between the two large Boston Newspapers they cover the entire North East so their readership is huge. They are the Big Dogs in the NE. Anyway, one very surprising thing they found out was those that voted for Ron Paul in the primaries (around the country), mostly ended up voting for BARACK H. OBAMA. Let that sink-in for a second. Are these the Patriots you are talking about? I hope not.
Then let's examine where some of his other support comes from...
You are aware that Code Pink supports him, right?
You are aware that a lot of OWS protesters support him, right?
You are aware that much of his support comes from people that think that Ron Paul will legalize Pot and Cocaine, right?
You are aware that many of the "Medicinal Pot Growers" in California support Ron Paul with large amounts of $$$ run through PAC's, right?
You are aware that "White Supremacist Groups" like the KKK support him, right?
You are aware that Ron Paul is a true Libertarian and that the true Libertarian philosophy over-laps with Anarchy, right?
And you want to give Twana crap over his connection with Soros? Get over it and wake-up.
Twana There are some people you can NEVER convince of anything. Some will argue the sky is never blue, nor the grass is never green. You, like most of us read the articles, read the postings, and research on our own, to find these politicians own words that back up the facts. It's not an easy task, and it takes hours, days and weeks. I have been doing it on my own for many years. When I got my first computer in 1999 I started researching candidates, and people in office. The internet has come a long ways since then. I'm a member of several sites such as this, where I'm able to get more input and more ideas, and more leads for my research, which I didn't have in the beginning. For years, I felt I was alone in my quest for the truth. I have found though (even among some family and friends) that they have a policy of hear no evil, see no evil, think no evil, say no evil -- then what they have believed forever will remain "truth" for them. When they finally do wake up, because they are my family and friends I will be there with the truth for them where they can verify all I say and have said to them. I too believe a vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama. I believe Ron Paul WILL NOT get the Republican nomination but I believe he will run on a third party ticket then, and the votes he gets will be the votes that get Obama reelected. Ron Paul supporters WILL NOT get behind anyone else, and by the time they get Obama back in the WH it'll be too late!/. Keep up the good work.
Patricia, who is trying so hard to throw out dirt about RP?
All instance of humanity evident are evidently full of sh!t. May God help us because we obviously need it - and we are obviously still a work in progress - and so largely not fit to be judged yet. Even so, we must make some choice and therefore must judge - perhaps we can include God's part in our judgment and so avoid grave error.