Handing guns to Syrian rebels may not be a bright idea
Reuters reported Wednesday that President Obama “signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government.” This latest leak of classified information was attributed to “U.S. sources familiar with the matter.” Lethal covert assistance undoubtedly will help the rebel cause, but the United States is risking letting advanced weapons fall into the hands of the country’s most deadly terrorist foes.
The Reuters report alleges covert assistance, perhaps including sophisticated man-fired anti-aircraft weapons, is being funneled to the Free Syrian Army through neighboring Turkey. The White House thus far has admitted only to providing nonlethal aid. The administration also has made it possible for U.S. private citizens and other groups to support the rebels. Last month, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a license to the nonprofit Syrian Support Group to raise money intended to purchase arms and ammunition, rather than being limited to humanitarian assistance.
Providing sophisticated weaponry to the rebels may aid their cause, but it also could assist America’s enemies. The State Department recently confirmed that al Qaeda fighters are moving into Syria from Iraq and elsewhere, and the terror group will seek to exploit the chaos, as it has done with the Arab Spring violence.
The North African franchise, al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), established a de facto regime in the northern part of Mali following a coup there in March. The country’s destabilization can be traced to fallout from the U.S.-supported fighting in Libya in 2011. The regime in Mali was overthrown by returning Taureg mercenaries who had been part of Moammar Gadhafi’s defeated army. Then AQIM filled the resulting power vacuum in the north with arms looted from Gadhafi’s forces. AQIM leader Mokhtar Belmokhtar said last fall that al Qaeda has been “one of the main beneficiaries of the revolutions in the Arab world.” Former Canadian diplomat Robert Fowler, who was held hostage by the group in 2008 and lived to tell about it, recently told NPR, “We have caused one of the most unstable regions in the world to become awash in weapons,” and “this is the first time that al Qaeda really has a country, a more or less secure base from which to operate.”
Mali serves as a cautionary tale for those seeking to help rebellions. Arms sent into the caldron of civil war may not stay in the hands of those to whom they are given or be used in a way the United States approves. Advanced weapons may be stolen or sold on the black market. Rebel groups that profess friendship today may be chanting jihad tomorrow.
The Washington Times
Replies
Amazing, Why involve America again, leaders last month;; Syria is one their own, Leon says lets support the rebels, Oh I forgot he has the Leader of the Free World behind him..!! `Gun--weapon Running reaches furture around the world.. Bring Our Troops HOME..
Evil is triumphing today, but not for much longer.
I posted a discussion earlier that relates to this, Look Who the U.S. is Supporting Now. It goes into some detail as to who we will actually be helping. All of these "Arab Spring" uprisings have resulted in the same thing, the take over by Islamic extremists.
Lets see if I can get this to work.
Look Who The U.S. is Supporting Now.
There you go.
Dang that's one homely commie. Huma is probably just off camera.
I guess we just didn't learn anything at all after our escapade in Afghanistan in the late 70's and 80's did we ????
IMPEACH THIS PRESIDENT AND BRING OUR TROOPS HOME ( THE WAR IS HERE OR WILL BE HERE SOON ).
If it is detrimental to the US, you can be sure Maobama will do it.
Probably off to visit Mom, isn't this where she grew up?
It seems to me, that it is precisely the reason. To get sophisticated weapons to al Quaeda, it is so far the best way to do it, without too much suspicions by "we the people"...
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next