It's time to stand up to these federal interference judges. They have no constitutional authority to interfere in issues between states gov. and fed. gov. If the fed. gov. has an issue with any state, the only court that is constitutionally set up to mediate is the Supreme Court. All other fed. courts are nothing more than illegitimate thugs legislating from the bench.
Twana Blevins
____________________________________________________________________________
Penned by Anthony Martin
In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the state of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.
(Daniel Bayer/CBS News via Getty Images). The inept U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder.
The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part,
"Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.
"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:
"In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction."
In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state.
This means that neither Judge Bolton nor the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, to which the case is being appealed, have any legal standing whatsoever to rule on the issue.
Thus, U.S. Attorney-General Eric Holder filed the federal government's lawsuit against the state of Arizona in a court that has no authority to hear the case.
The attorney whose heads-up thinking concerning the Constitution provides the legal remedy for dealing with this blatant disregard for Constitutional law in the article at Canada Free Press, which can be accessed at the link above.
In a related development, another explosive discovery was made by those who actually take the Constitution seriously. The Constitution specifically allows an individual state to wage war against a neighboring country in the event of an invasion, should there be a dangerous delay or inaction on the part of the federal government. This information was cited by United Patriots of America.
From Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, we find these words: "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."
No one who is actually familiar with the crisis at the southern border can deny that Arizona is endangered by the relentless assault of lawless Mexican invaders who ignore our laws, inundate our schools and medical facilities with unpaid bills, and even endanger the very lives of citizens with criminal drug cartels that engage in kidnapping, murder, human trafficking, and other mayhem, including aiming missile and grenade launchers directly at U.S. border cities from just across the Mexican border.
This is every bit as much of an invasion as the nation of Iran sending in a fleet of warships to the Port of Charleston.
The Constitution that forms the basis of the rule of law in this country says that Arizona has legal right to protect itself in the case of inaction or delay on the part of the federal government, including waging war in its self-defense.
This, when coupled with the clear Constitutional mandate that only the Supreme Court hear cases involving the states, should be ample legal basis for attorneys representing Arizona to go after the federal government with a vengeance.
Governor Jan Brewer and the stalwart members of the Arizona legislature have ample legal reason to stand firm against the illegal bullying of an arrogant, lawless federal government.
Be sure to catch my blog at The Liberty Sphere.
Replies
I was unable to access this article on the Examiner site directly this morning. All I get is a blank page. I think it is being washed out.
It can be read on Canada Free Press. Arizona should line it's border to Mexico and stop the invasion there. I would think this would be under a "State of Emergency" which should allow the Gov. to call out the National Guard, If she needs more help (since the BHO admin will do nothing but sue her) she should call for Citizen Soldiers -- Patriots!! I'm sure there are plenty that will come from all over this Great Nation to help. The Mexicans have already fired the 1st shot long ago! We are at WAR with Mexico!! Course CA, N.M., and TX should do the same!!
This all boils down to them attempting to DO TOTALLY AWAY WITH OUR CONSTITUTION!!! I'm wondering if ANY attorneys are taught and learn what the Constitution is let alone learn what's in it!! How can ANYONE have an occupation or work in ANY job that has ANYTHING to do with the law -- from the local street cop all the way to to Supreme Court AND NOT KNOW THE CONSTITUTION ? IT'S A TRAVESTY!!! Justice can NEVER be done IF our CONSTITUTION isn't followed TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW!!! We all know this -- the Atorneys on BOTH SIDES SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THIS!!!
Juanita: Attorneys study "case law", not the Constitution. That's why we have the ridiculous concept of a "Living Constitution".
Stingray, you are more than likely right about Holder...This is nothing new.....One of the judges who headed the Nuremburg War Trials, I believe his name was Jackson, never completed Law school...From there, he was appointed to the supreme court and authored the Feres Doctrine, a doctrine that literally stripped Veterans of due process....Where are these people coming from????
AWESOME...and practical...
get all the violators of the US Constitution and bring them up on charges...from the top down, and from the botom up!!!
Can someone please , Explain to me why an attorney or lawyer can site the constitution in a municipal court but the average joe cant , and can someone please explain how some muck lawyer or attorney gets the Idea that the laws perpetrated today via the constitution has any thing to do with the Private citizen , let me give you an example ,
The uniform family law support act which was NOT I repeat not created by The Congress ,it was created by National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, and who are these people They are Lawyers, judges
reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Interstate_Family_Support_Act .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Conference_of_Commissioners_o...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Conference_of_State_Legislatures
in other words why
do these pin heads insist that the constitution is a chain on the people!! via law created in the name of the constitution. and where is the word family law stated in the constitution! can any one please tell me !
The Constitution Is Dead They Dont read it , the courts interpret it see Marbury vs Madison.
scioPatriot1776 is absolutely correct. Attorney's study "case law", not the Constitution. They are legally bound to do that rather than go back to the original Constitution for authority. That's why we are drifting further and further into a liberal-progressive abomination called the "Living Constitution". The whole game is rigged to enfeeble and ultimately eliminate our Constitution as written and understood by the Founders.
Arizona, Texas and New Mexico needs to call up their National Guard and guard their borders.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next