https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/156b29e7f544a553
Lost horizons.com
New Petition - SCOTUS calling for Amicus Curiae Briefs
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW 1. Can orders of a court commanding false speech—and particularly false testimonial speech— resistance to which has prompted a prosecution for alleged criminal contempt of court, be shielded from appellate Constitutional analysis and determination by application of the “collateral bar” doctrine? 2. Can a jury instruction removing from the jurors’ consideration and determination the statutory element of “lawful,” and explicitly instructing the jury that the unlawfulness or unconstitutionality of a court order is not a defense to a charge of criminal contempt, be properly shielded from appellate review by application of the “collateral bar” doctrine? |
|
|
DOREEN'S CASE IS THE MOST OVERT and unmistakable case of raw judicial corruption and systemic assault on the Constitution and the rule of law that has ever been seen. A lot of bad rulings have happened over recent years. But there have been no others in which, to take one example that you just saw in reading the petition, a federal appellate court has actually argued in a written, published ruling that a statute which reads, "Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command," doesn't actually include "lawfulness" as an element of the offense (and that someone can be punished for failing to obey an unlawful order). |
|
Views: 0
Replies