Here it is folks, the precedence everyone in DC says doesn't exist!
Established by Minor vs Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) which specifically defines an Article 2 Section 1 natural-born citizen as a person born in the US to parents who are citizens. The claim of having been born in Hawaii is totally irellevant, as I've been saying for over two years. His release of his perported COLB, whether legitimate or not, and we know it's a fraud, leaves no doubt that he is inelligible, and any claim by him dissavowing it will not stand up in any court of law.
Therefore, Obama – according to US Supreme Court precedent – is not eligible to be President.
This is why the democrats have been trying to amend Article 2 Section 1 at least 8 times, the latest in 2008.
Go to SCOTUS NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PRECEDENCE and read it for yourself!
This link must be blasted to every Congressman, Senator, SCOTUS justice, and DOJ. If nothing is done as a result, it will be then known that there is no longer any doubt that they are ALL in collusion to subvert the Constitution, therefore all guilty of misprision of felony.
Replies
All the laws he signed would still be valid. Impeachment does not rule everything void. Removal for not being eligible should void all.
(I think you mean traitors)
The above reference and its links are absolutely correct. The issue re the eligibility of a person seeking the office of president is settled law. However, the total abbrogation of the law by every elected representative at the Federal and State levels and members of all political parties and political stripes.....is nothing more than a criminal fraud upon the people of the USA and an offense against our Constitution and our Republic.
We the People cannot let this stand, as we are bound by our Oath of Citizenship to expose this fraud and conspiracy and to demand from those who sit in D.C. and those on the campaign trail to once and for all raise this question and address it fully in favor of the constraints cited in the Constitution and those legal rulings and opinions that side with the Founding Fathers.
The danger to this nation is that We the People, knowing what we know, that is that Obama is not and was not eligible and the Congress of the USA and the Secretary of State or Certifying Official of every State and Territory....were derelict in their Constitutional duty to deny Obama and the DNC the right to submit his name in nomination and as such, allow it to be placed on the ballots across the nation. The DNC and Nancy Pelosi and many others on both sides of the aisle, including the supreme court of the USA knew full well that Obama was not eligible and they did nothing and still refuse to do anything to remedy this Constitutional Fraud.
Right now as this information is being sent out, the Federal Elections Commission has given the go ahead for a foreign born/naturalized U.S. citizen to file paperwork to become a candidate for POTUS. This is nothing more than a continuation of the actions of the progressive-liberal, marxist-socialist mindset that has haunted this issue for some 8 plus years and it will most assuredly continue if the matter isn't addressed RIGHT NOW!!
Do your duty as a Citizen of America....do what you need to do to aid others to PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND the constitution of the USA against every enemy, both foreign and domestic. It is our responsibility to put and end to the deception and the misdirection by those whose ultimate goal is to undermine and destroy this Republic.....our nation and the future hope of the world.
Absolutely correct my Patriot!
GBU.
God help Us!
Mofak
In United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898), the Supreme Curt ruled that a person born in the United States to non-citizen parents living in the United States is a United States citizen. This was, I believe, the first case that ruled that birthplace alone was sufficient to make a person a U.S. citizen, but it did not extend natural born citizen status.
In fact, Justice Horace Gray wrote in the Supreme Court ruling that Wong Kim Ark was not intended to extend natural born citizen status. Justice Gray quoted Minor v. Happersett (1874): “At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.” [Emphasis in bold added.]
Thus, Justice Gray was saying there is clear agreement and there never has been any doubt that an individual born on U.S. soil to two citizen parents is a natural born citizen—and that was “the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar.” That was what the Founding Fathers meant when they wrote the U.S. Constitution.
Those who argue that Wong Kim Ark "proves" Obama is a natural born citizen are mistaken. Just as Mario Apuzzo has noted, "All trees are plants, but not all plants are trees," the Court ruled only that Wong Kim Ark was a U.S. citizen - not that he was a natural born citizen.
KWA is being used eroniously to say BHO is eligible
GREAT JOB, TWANA !!!
How did you find this?
However, After review of other evidence I'm pretty convinced BO was born in Kenya.
If true, we are doubly sure he is a fraud.
Thanks for putting this up Stingray. Several of us have made this available on our blogs...
And FYI... Here's mine... Guns And Whiskey
His face makes me puke.
My wife races to turn off the TV if his face or voice comes on.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next