http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110305/ap_on_re_us/us_spending_showdown

 

WASHINGTON – Senate Democrats unveiled a detailed counteroffer Friday seeking to undo tens of billions of dollars in cuts Republicans would make to education, housing and other domestic programs.

With the two parties maneuvering for advantage in their budget clash, the Democratic plan conforms to President Barack Obama's opening gambit to cut another $6.5 billion from domestic agencies. But neither it nor the $61 billion in cuts passed by House Republicans is expected to survive test votes next week in the Senate.

Both sides view the votes as necessary preludes to negotiations on narrowing the $50 billion gap between cuts the White House and Republican want. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid called the GOP reductions "mean-spirited."

Facing a federal deficit of $1.6 trillion, the White House and Congress have struggled to produce a long-overdue plan for the ongoing budget year. House Republican leaders are under pressure from tea partiers in their ranks for significant spending cuts, putting them at odds with Democrats who control the Senate.

The Democratic plan unveiled by Reid, D-Nev., completely restores money the House GOP cuts from education, health and job training programs. It provides a modest increase for homeland security rather than the 2 percent cut proposed by Republicans. And it softens cuts to housing subsidies and community development grants, while restoring about $5 billion in foreign aid, including help for allies in the war on terror like Afghanistan and Pakistan.

But it's not likely to please the Defense Department. The Pentagon has already complained that the slightly more generous House measure would leave it without enough money to meet vital military requirements.

Reid promises votes next week on both plans but said he doesn't expect either to win the 60 votes needed to pass.

"Our plan recognizes that we're not in a competition to determine who can cut the most, without regard for the consequences," Reid said. He said House Republicans' plan "is based in ideology, ours is based in reality. These are decisions about real money that solve real problems that affect real lives."

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., a participant in Thursday's talks with Vice President Joe Biden and congressional leaders, said the Democratic plan does nothing more than the status quo. It falls far short of a House-passed GOP bill slashing domestic agencies by 13 percent or more on average.

"The White House's proposal ... is to cut another $6 billion and call it a day," McConnell said.

"The status quo is indefensible and unacceptable," chimed in House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. "The American people spoke loudly and clearly last November. They want to cut spending."

The Senate plan cuts the agency budgets directly set by Congress $12 billion below 2010 levels. The Pentagon would receive a $6 billion increase, which forces deeper cuts on domestic programs treasured by Democrats. The GOP alternative is far more aggressive, imposing cuts that some old-school Republicans aren't comfortable with.

In opening talks Thursday, Biden offered Republicans a package of mostly recycled budget cuts totaling $6.5 billion in response to House legislation slashing domestic agency budgets back to levels in place before Obama took office.

The White House cuts fell well short of what resurgent Republicans are demanding but were portrayed by Democrats as an attempt to meet Republicans in the middle.

The combatants are involved in a dizzying numbers game that not all of them seem able to explain clearly. Republicans say they've cut $100 billion from Obama's budget requests for the ongoing fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.

But when Democrats use the same measuring stick to claim more than $40 billion — based on their agreement to freeze spending right away — GOP aides dismiss the moves as embracing the status quo.

Democrats, for their part, claim as their own $4 billion in savings from a GOP-drafted stopgap spending bill signed by Obama on Wednesday. And the additional cuts proposed on Thursday carve little new ground.

In fact, the administration's latest $6.5 billion spending cut proposal contains lots of easy targets, like cutting accounts lawmakers have heavily "earmarked" with back-home projects like clean water funding, eliminating $500 million in grants to state and local police departments and $425 million in Federal Emergency Management Agency money for state and local governments for homeland security and disaster preparedness.

The White House list also would cut $280 million for a new rail tunnel under the Hudson River that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has canceled, $275 million cut from a program subsidizing community service jobs for low-income senior citizens and $500 million in rescissions of unneeded money from a program providing food aid to low-income pregnant women and children under the age of 5.

Republicans, their ranks swelled by 87 freshmen, passed legislation in the House calling for $61 billion in cuts. The bill also contains prohibitions on proposed regulations aimed at several industries and against giving taxpayer money to Planned Parenthood, which provides contraception and health care to millions of women and girls.

Money for food inspections, college aid, grants to local schools and police and fire departments, clean water projects, job training and housing subsidies also would be reduced.

 

 

=========================================================================

Look at the actual numbers 1.6 Trillion deficit 61 Billion in budget cuts.

Deficit                         $1,600,000,000,000.00

Budget Cuts                    $61,000,000,000.00

 

That means that the coming yearly deficit is over 26 times greater then the supposed cuts! If any of us were to spend money like this and rack up debt at rate similar, we would be in jail.

You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!

Join The Patriots For America

Email me when people reply –

Activity

Oldrooster posted a discussion
Oct 22
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 29
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 26
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 19
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 15
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 14
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Sep 5
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Aug 31
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Aug 25
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Aug 11
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Aug 7
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Aug 2
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Jul 28
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Jul 22
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Jul 14
Oldrooster posted a discussion
Jul 4
More…