Judicial Watch raises significant questions in its Motion for Discovery about whether the State Department processed documents in good faith in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request. Judicial Watch is therefore entitled to limited discovery.
The creation and operation of clintonemail.com for State Department business, as well as the State Department’s approach and practice for processing FOIA requests that potentially implicated former Secretary Clinton’s and Ms. Abedin’s emails and State’s processing of the FOIA request that is the subject of this action.
Based on information learned during discovery, the deposition of Mrs. Clinton may be necessary. If Plaintiff believes Mrs. Clinton’s testimony is required, it will request permission from the Court at the appropriate time. [Emphasis in original]
1. Stephen D. Mull (Executive Secretary of the State Department from June 2009 to October 2012 and suggested that Mrs. Clinton be issued a State Department BlackBerry, which would protect her identity and would also be subject to FOIA requests);2. Lewis A. Lukens (Executive Director of the Executive Secretariat from 2008 to 2011 and emailed with Patrick Kennedy and Cheryl Mills about setting up a computer for Mrs. Clinton to check her clintonemail.com email account);3. Patrick F. Kennedy (Under Secretary for Management since 2007 and the Secretary of State’s principal advisor on management issues, including technology and information services);4. Cheryl D. Mills (Mrs. Clinton’s Chief of Staff throughout her four years as Secretary of State);5. Huma Abedin (Mrs. Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff and a senior advisor to Mrs. Clinton throughout her four years as Secretary of State and also had an email account on clintonemail.com);6. Bryan Pagliano (State Department Schedule C employee who has been reported to have serviced and maintained the server that hosted the “clintonemail.com” system during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State).
When Judge Sullivan issues a discovery order, the plaintiff shall – within ten days thereafter – file its specific proposed order detailing what additional proposed discovery, tailored to this case, it seeks to have this Court order. Defendant shall respond ten days after plaintiff’s submission.
The wheels of Justice grind exceeding slow. But grind away, they do.
Getting there. Slow. But sure.
Any one of us would be in jail years ago. She has been up to criminal activity for over 40 years. It is about time somebody made her accountable.
Better. They ( the 'average blindly led' if any self-dignity & reasoning remains in them as Americans) will be now forced to do self-examinations of conscience & American patriotism. I hope the image of Lady Liberty stands over them the whole time, until they come clean with themselves. Idealistic perhaps, but, somewhere in their psyches, 'was' , an American CITIZEN,; an uniqueness of personage among the peoples of other countries, who have no actual Liberty, no Inalienable Rights recognized as God-given; only a relative 'freedom to move about'. Perhaps they'll even find a new meaning in their heretofore, blindly 'follower' lives & actually begin to question & find real answers. I know! Really idealistic.
It will surprise me to no end if she is convicted, they have so much money and influence that they can by off all comers, I hope to GOD that some one has the guts to have justice prevail and she gets all that is coming to her.
I feel the same way David, but I have MUCH doubt anything will come of this...I don't have faith in the system as it stands today...
Watching these jerks try and take Donald Trump down is so depressing...The name bush, romney, g.beck, clinton, and so many others make me want to puke..
Do you have a link to the grand jury? I can't get any links to work and I'd like to read more about this. The most important thing is which prosecutor convened the grand jury. If he's an Obama pick, he'll probably intentionally mislead them.
I couldn't get any of the links to work. They all went to a 404.