Prominent National Leader of Mexican HeritageFires Back at Mexico's President CalderonMr. Calderon, you dare insinuate racial profiling by Arizona's latestdesperate effort to implement an already existing Federal law in orderto defend itself against Mexico's invasion of our country. The irony ofthe matter is repugnant. Illegal aliens from Mexico have overwhelmedour nation in ways that constitute war against our citizenry.You are truly an enemy of the United States.It is no mystery that you , as the president of a failing country,have not only condoned this illegal trespass, but encouraged it.Your continued export of Mexican crime, unemployment, povertyand disaffected Mexicans illegally to the United States is the safetyvalve that supports political corruption in your country. The horriblesubjugation of your citizens encourages their escape even if it meansthat they must commit crimes to do so.The darkest mystery is your refusal to promulgate a sensible resolutionthat would create jobs and, ultimately, a better lifestyle for Mexicans.Your government took pride in the fact that the Mexican minimun wagewas raised to $4.00 a day. Instead, you choose to export your poor,uneducated, third world citizens to a complacent nation by the millions.Your repeated assailing of our laws, and unreasonable demands uponAmericans, are no longer acceptable. In fact, you and our very ownelected representatives have orchestrated this entire charade with theuse of illegal aliens from Mexico as a weapon to destroy this greatcountry and bless us with that promised change Barack O'Bama,so eloquently spoke of during his vigorous campaign.A committee of Americans of Hispanic heritage have closely examinedMexico's immigration laws; you are not only a hypocrite, you a tyranthidden in sheep's wool... What you so boldly have demanded of usAmericans is now in the scrutiny of public opinion and will serve asbrighter illumination to your sinister agenda.Let those American politicians, who so vigorously supported your divisiveretoric in a joint session of the American Congress, know that they haveput their political futures in doubt.Al GarzaPresidentPatriots Coalition
Views: 1
You need to be a member of The Patriots For America to add comments!
Posted by Lawrence Auster
On The Blog-View from the Right
Paul K. wrote:
Though many Americans were struck by President Calderon's insufferable gall
in criticizing Arizona's immigration law from the front lawn of the White House,
and the floor of the congress, some of his countrymen felt his behavior entirely
too conciliatory. In particular, they fault him for visiting Arlington National Cemetery,
which, to Mexicans, was a faux pas comparable to Reagan's visit to Germany's Bitburg. We are, after all, the enemy.
The following editorial was published in Mexico City's La Jornada newspaper on 5/21/10.
It is quoted from the "M3 Report," a daily roundup of news items from south of the border
published by the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers.
Sovereignty, A Looming Surrender
Yesterday, in his official visit to the United States, President Calderon placed a wreath at the
Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington, Virginia, in homage to the Mexican-American soldiers
killed in U.S. military campaigns. The president thus broke a tacit prohibition kept through all prior
presidential terms that prevents the head of the Mexican State from visiting that place.
The motive of that symbolic reservation was simply that the cemetery contains soldiers who were
in wars against us and in which Mexico lost more than half its territory.
We must not forget that for two centuries, the U.S. has been the main threat to the national security
and the most responsible for affronts to Mexican sovereignty. A visit to Arlington is the equivalent to
accepting the offenses for which they have never accepted blame or offered compensation.
The president's gesture was unnecessary.
This act was so inappropriate.
By giving homage to soldiers of Mexican origin who died in U.S. wars, the government of Mexico
gives its approval of such wars, invariably against international rights, national sovereignty and
human rights, as in Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq in recent times. All have stains of atrocity and
of plunder like the attacks by Washington against our country in the 19th and 20th centuries.
For these reasons, it is unavoidable to see the presence of Calderon at Arlington as a surrender
of sovereignty, the most recent in a clearly defined line: the Merida Initiative, which gives authority
to U.S. agencies to meddle in our internal affairs, and again, in Washington, Calderon asked the
assistance of the DEA and FBI in an internal investigation, tacitly admitting our incapacity in the
"war against organized crime."
Lawrence Auster replies:
What can one say?
The Mexicans have an unassuageable grievance against us for defeating them in 1848
and taking (with compensation) the Southwest from them. And they don't just see us as
having committed historic wrongs against them; they see us as "the main threat to the
national security." In short, they see us as an enemy power. Yet this simple, undeniable
reality of Mexican attitudes to the U.S. is NEVER noted by the U.S. media.
In all of history, did a country ever do what we have done--open our borders to immigrants
from a neighboring country to let them enter a part of our country which that other country
sees as theirs and has an undying passionate desire to regain?
It transcends anything in Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly.
George III's bull-headed idiocies which drove the American colonies into rebellion were
nothing compared to our own idiocy in allowing Mexicans to immigrate en masse into the U.S.
Replies
End of story.
Posted by Lawrence Auster
On The Blog-View from the Right
Paul K. wrote:
Though many Americans were struck by President Calderon's insufferable gall
in criticizing Arizona's immigration law from the front lawn of the White House,
and the floor of the congress, some of his countrymen felt his behavior entirely
too conciliatory. In particular, they fault him for visiting Arlington National Cemetery,
which, to Mexicans, was a faux pas comparable to Reagan's visit to Germany's Bitburg.
We are, after all, the enemy.
The following editorial was published in Mexico City's La Jornada newspaper on 5/21/10.
It is quoted from the "M3 Report," a daily roundup of news items from south of the border
published by the National Association of Former Border Patrol Officers.
Sovereignty, A Looming Surrender
Yesterday, in his official visit to the United States, President Calderon placed a wreath at the
Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Arlington, Virginia, in homage to the Mexican-American soldiers
killed in U.S. military campaigns. The president thus broke a tacit prohibition kept through all prior
presidential terms that prevents the head of the Mexican State from visiting that place.
The motive of that symbolic reservation was simply that the cemetery contains soldiers who were
in wars against us and in which Mexico lost more than half its territory.
We must not forget that for two centuries, the U.S. has been the main threat to the national security
and the most responsible for affronts to Mexican sovereignty. A visit to Arlington is the equivalent to
accepting the offenses for which they have never accepted blame or offered compensation.
The president's gesture was unnecessary.
This act was so inappropriate.
By giving homage to soldiers of Mexican origin who died in U.S. wars, the government of Mexico
gives its approval of such wars, invariably against international rights, national sovereignty and
human rights, as in Panama, Afghanistan and Iraq in recent times. All have stains of atrocity and
of plunder like the attacks by Washington against our country in the 19th and 20th centuries.
For these reasons, it is unavoidable to see the presence of Calderon at Arlington as a surrender
of sovereignty, the most recent in a clearly defined line: the Merida Initiative, which gives authority
to U.S. agencies to meddle in our internal affairs, and again, in Washington, Calderon asked the
assistance of the DEA and FBI in an internal investigation, tacitly admitting our incapacity in the
"war against organized crime."
Lawrence Auster replies:
What can one say?
The Mexicans have an unassuageable grievance against us for defeating them in 1848
and taking (with compensation) the Southwest from them. And they don't just see us as
having committed historic wrongs against them; they see us as "the main threat to the
national security." In short, they see us as an enemy power. Yet this simple, undeniable
reality of Mexican attitudes to the U.S. is NEVER noted by the U.S. media.
In all of history, did a country ever do what we have done--open our borders to immigrants
from a neighboring country to let them enter a part of our country which that other country
sees as theirs and has an undying passionate desire to regain?
It transcends anything in Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly.
George III's bull-headed idiocies which drove the American colonies into rebellion were
nothing compared to our own idiocy in allowing Mexicans to immigrate en masse into the U.S.