Thank you Pam Pollard (Former VC of Oklahoma Republican Party). This is why we the people must do this work. The R party cannot. Thus we the people MUST do this work. North American Law Center is doing it but to accomplish it - WE NEED YOUR HELP! http://northamericanlawcenter.org/

Twana

______________________________________

GOP Legally Barred From Fighting Voter Fraud

I cant’ tell you how many emails I’ve received from readers frustrated with the GOP not being more vocal about obvious voter fraud in this past election. Well, as I discovered today, there is a reason behind it: The GOP is legally barred from it according to a court ruling from nearly thirty years ago.

Bob Unruh writes at WND:

A race-based consent decree negotiated by Democrats against the Republican National Committee a generation ago still has tied the RNC’s hands, and GOP officials could be cited for contempt – or worse – if they try to make sure American elections are clean.

Impossible?

No. Fact.

The case is the Democratic National Committee vs. the Republican National Committee, originally from 1982.


Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/11/

You need to be a member of PatriotsForAmerica to add comments!

Join PatriotsForAmerica

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder under Freedom of Information Act for documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder under Freedom of Information Act for documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know of that's been AFTER BOTH PARTIES is Judicial Watch and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder through the Freedom of Information Act for documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  It's going to be on WE THE PEOPLE to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is to FORCE state legislatures to PASS PHOTO ID LAWS NOW, we can't wait till an election year to do so as NC and several other states did last year--giving Holder an opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation and run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER the elections were held. The U.S. Supreme Court has ALREADY ruled PHOTO ID LAWS LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181, April 28, 2008.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens, who voted FOR the bill with 5 other Justices, said of the PHOTO ID LAW:  The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability' of the electoral process."  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS' ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."  It's up to the citizens of states who do NOT have PHOTO ID LAWS to FORCE their state legislatures to pass these laws and put them into effect if we ever intend to have FAIR, HONEST, LEGAL elections again.  The RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to STOP THEIR FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder for Freedom of Information Act documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder for Freedom of Information Act documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder for Freedom of Information Act documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder for Freedom of Information Act documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • One of the few organizations I know that's been actively after BOTH parties is JUDICIAL WATCH and Tom Fitton. They are currently SUING OWEbama and Holder for Freedom of Information Act documents that Holder is apparently blocking from a Judicial Watch investigation.  IT'S GOING TO BE ON "WE THE PEOPLE" to FORCE legal, honest elections--the FIRST STEP is force state legislatures NOW to pass PHOTO ID LAWS, we can't wait till an election year as NC and several others did last year--that gave Holder the opportunity to file lawsuits against the legislation, then run out the calendar on the lawsuits until AFTER elections were held.  The U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled PHOTO ID laws LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL--Indiana's Crawford v Marion County Election Board 553 U.S. 181.  LIBERAL JUSTICE John Paul Stevens who voted with 5 other Justices to uphold the law said of the PHOTO ID LAW: The law "is amply justified by the valid interests in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process.'"  Stevens went on to say: "WE CANNOT CONCLUDE THAT THE STATUTE IMPOSES 'EXCESSIVELY BURDENSOME REQUIREMENTS ON ANY CLASS OF VOTERS."   It's up to the citizens of states who do not have PHOTO ID laws to force their own states to put them into effect if we ever intend to have fair, honest elections again--the RATS in the DemocRAT party know the GOP can't do a thing to them in Federal Court to stop their fraudulent elections.

  • The Republican shouldn't have to challenge such obvious Demorat voter fraud.  The Federal DOJ and the DOJ’s in every State should be investigating, correcting, and arresting all these fraud voters.

    Dave

  • Well then there now,  seems to me, I heard a lot, a hell of a lot of voter fraud retoric  from Geroge W. when the vote in Florida didn't go his way.  He and the Republican Party screamed bloody murder regarding the tabs on the ballot cards.  Don't misunderstand, I am not an Obama supporter, but don't tell me the Repblicdans are forbidden from questioning the vote.  If you put out BS, soon no one will listen to you at all. 

This reply was deleted.